Back to index

Ep 14: Rent Control | The Seen and the Unseen


#
Welcome to the IVM Podcast Network.
#
I had a bad dream the other night.
#
I dreamed that I was sitting on an old wooden armchair in an apartment that I lived in on
#
Marine Drive.
#
It was a massive apartment.
#
My room was as big as a tennis court and this flat seemed endless with bedrooms and dressing
#
rooms and halls and hallways and bathrooms and closets and kitchens and entertainment
#
rooms, sports rooms, a couple of bars, perhaps even a torture chamber.
#
This was an apartment you would have to measure not in hundreds of square feet, but in thousands
#
of square feet, perhaps even in acres.
#
And as I sat on my old wooden armchair, the same armchair on which Jawaharlal Nehru had
#
once spanked Indira, I heard a loud noise.
#
It was a kind of sound a house would make if a house could fart.
#
I looked to my right and there was a huge crack on the wall.
#
I heard the sound again and some cement dust fell on me.
#
The ceiling was cracking now.
#
I looked out through the window on my right and the building there collapsed.
#
All around me, the cracks in the walls just grew.
#
I looked through the inside door of the house and I found that half of Bedroom 44 had collapsed.
#
My old poster bed on which Motilal Nehru's mother had given birth to Motilal was half
#
in the room and half suspended in space.
#
Clearly the house was collapsing.
#
One of the cracks in the wall nearest to me widened and became a hole.
#
A sparrow thrust its head through that hole.
#
It made chirpy noises at me.
#
And then it said in a human voice, aren't you going to leave the house?
#
It's falling down.
#
And I just turned to that stupid sparrow and I said, how can I leave?
#
This is a rent control flat.
#
I pay only 20 rupees a month to live here.
#
I can never leave this flat.
#
And the sparrow said, damn this rent control, damn this rent control.
#
Welcome to the seen and the unseen.
#
Our weekly podcast on economics, politics and behavioral science.
#
Please welcome your host Amit Bhatma.
#
Welcome to the seen and the unseen.
#
My guest today is the American economist, Alex Tabarrok, who's here in Mumbai as a resident
#
senior fellow at the IDFC Institute.
#
He was a guest on the seen and the unseen a few weeks ago where he spoke to me about
#
FSI.
#
Today, he joins me to talk about rent control.
#
Welcome to the show, Alex.
#
Great to be here.
#
Thank you.
#
So you've by now spent like three months in Mumbai.
#
This is also known as the city of rent control.
#
Yeah, that makes it fascinating for an economist to visit and see.
#
So tell me the history of rent control in the USA.
#
How did it pan out over there?
#
So rent control has been particularly big in the United States, in New York.
#
And they put into place rent control during World War II.
#
And the thing about rent control is that it's great when you first start it because you
#
can't run away with an apartment building.
#
So the owners of the apartment building, it's already built.
#
The government says, oh, you can't charge, you know, a high rent.
#
What can they do?
#
Nothing.
#
That's the short run, however.
#
In the long run, when you have rent control, there's no incentive for developers to build
#
apartments.
#
There's also no incentive for developers to maintain apartments.
#
So what happened in New York is that over time, huge areas of New York actually really
#
started to crumble away, almost as if they had been bombed.
#
This was the time where you had movies like Escape from New York or Fort Apache, the Bronx,
#
where New York literally looked like a hellhole that you wanted to escape from.
#
And really, the reason was is that rent controls created kind of a devastating situation in
#
which entire blocks started to crumble away.
#
Now what happened in New York is that over time, the rent controls were loosened considerably
#
so that new buildings did not have any rent controls, so that when somebody left their
#
apartment building, you could raise the rent and things like that.
#
So although New York still has some rent controls, particularly on the old stock, what has happened
#
in the United States and in New York in particular is that rent controls have faded away over
#
time and that has provided new incentives to build apartments.
#
So the intentions behind rent control are obviously, they sound great, that poor people
#
can't afford raising rents and therefore you keep rent stable for them and all of that.
#
The unseen effects, like you mentioned, is that then the owners have no incentives to
#
look after the property, to develop the property further.
#
Isn't this, in a sense, a form of theft, you're destroying a lot of capital suddenly, it's
#
almost like debt capital, not literally that, but...
#
Yeah, exactly.
#
And the situation in Mumbai has been even worse than in New York because Mumbai put
#
price controls, rent controls in, in something like 1949 and they have never raised them.
#
They're still the same level, despite inflation, despite changes in economic circumstances,
#
their rent controls haven't changed.
#
So what this means is that if you're in a rent controlled apartment in Mumbai, you never
#
want to give your apartment up.
#
I mean, even if the apartment is falling apart, it doesn't matter because the rents are so
#
ridiculously low that you don't want to give your apartment up ever.
#
And this means that it's really difficult to build new apartments, to take a crumbling
#
apartment and build something taller and bigger and better with more apartments and better
#
infrastructure.
#
It's really hard to do.
#
And you'll see this if you're driving down Marine Drive, for example, the Queen's Necklace
#
and you have all these old buildings lining it up, which, you know, haven't been renovated
#
for decades almost.
#
And I know people who live in some of those old buildings in these sprawling flats and
#
they're paying like 150 rupees a month for rent, which is so absurd.
#
And there are tens and thousands of, you know, apartments like that all across Mumbai, which
#
are essentially, they're debt capital, they're just lying there.
#
The owners can't do anything with it, the buildings can't be broken down and redeveloped
#
and so on.
#
Now, tell me this, I want to understand how the political economy of this works.
#
Who are the Baptists and the bootleggers in this?
#
Okay.
#
Yeah, so let me just add to that and then we'll come to the Baptists and the bootleggers.
#
What is incredible in Mumbai is that the buildings become so dilapidated that they literally
#
fall apart every single year.
#
You know, as you have monsoon season come in and then these buildings are destroyed.
#
So it literally sometimes it's killing people.
#
Every few months there's a scandal and it's always sort of considered like a moral failing
#
of the owner for not looking after the building.
#
When you look at the poor guy's incentives, why on earth should he spend his hard-earned
#
money when he doesn't in all practical terms own it anymore?
#
Exactly.
#
The owners don't own the land anymore.
#
That's exactly correct.
#
Now on the Baptists and the bootleggers, you know, it's really hard to understand and I
#
think this is another situation where we've just gotten into a negative equilibrium where
#
hardly anybody is actually benefiting.
#
Yeah, you have some Baptists.
#
So I think we're in a situation where we've gone into a negative equilibrium where hardly
#
anybody is benefiting from the equilibrium, but it's still very difficult to change.
#
So on the Baptist sort of side, the politicians make it very easy to say that, well, we're
#
for keeping rent controls and there are people who are currently in their apartments who
#
are benefiting from that.
#
The problem is that there are many, many more people who would benefit from more construction,
#
who would benefit from better infrastructure, who would benefit from taking a two-story
#
apartment building, which has a handful of apartments, pulling it down because it's about
#
to fall down anyway, and building a 10-story or a 20-story where more people could live.
#
The problem is that the new beneficiaries aren't voters.
#
The new beneficiaries, they're not living in Mumbai now.
#
They'd like to live here.
#
There's plenty of people who would like to come in, but they're not current voters and
#
they, I think, often don't see these issues.
#
This is an unseen issue.
#
It seems very simple to say, if we allow the greedy developers, the greedy owners to raise
#
prices, people, poor people are going to be kicked out of their apartment buildings.
#
And of course, there's some truth to that.
#
The unseen part of it is that the only way you're going to house millions of people in
#
India is by building more, and the only way you're going to build more is to create incentives
#
to build more, for private developers to build more.
#
The only way of building more housing is to create incentives for private developers to
#
build more housing.
#
Now, here's the interesting thing.
#
So I look at the voters of Mumbai.
#
Obviously, the people who own rent-controlled flats, whose property have been taken away
#
from them, are very few in number.
#
A slightly larger number, a much larger number, are the people who actually live in those
#
rent-controlled flats and would vote in favor of rent control.
#
But an even larger number, which is everybody else, is people who don't live in rent-controlled
#
flats or own them, but who would benefit enormously if rent control wasn't there.
#
But they don't understand this.
#
So how do you get these ideas across to people so they understand that, you know, rent control
#
is bad, FSI, as we discussed in the previous episode, is bad?
#
What's the problem with these ideas filtering through?
#
I mean, as an economist, you often, you know, you teach economics, you speak to young students
#
who are just coming fresh out of nowhere.
#
Why are these ideas so hard to get across?
#
Well, you know, Adam Smith talked about the invisible hand, the logic of the market.
#
Well, the reason it's invisible, that means it's hard to see.
#
And so that's the problem that we face as economists, to try and get people to see the
#
invisible hand.
#
And that's just very, very difficult to do.
#
We almost need sort of constitutional rules to lock some of these things in place.
#
Because it's very difficult to get people to see some of these things some of the time,
#
even when it's in their interest to see these things.
#
And I think something else which makes it difficult for people to see is that they do
#
see the corruption in the system.
#
And it is a corrupt system the way it is now.
#
There's no question that developers will sometimes do, or owners will sometimes do, disreputable
#
things to get people out of the apartments.
#
Builders will pay bribes for various things.
#
And that turns people off.
#
So people see the corruption and they say, well, we need something to stop this.
#
We need some government to impose some moral rules against these corrupt developers.
#
What they don't see is that the corruption is generated by the law.
#
The law is what is creating the corruption.
#
If we could get rid of some of these laws to make it easier to build, easier to own
#
property, to rent an apartment, if we could get rid of some of these laws, the corruption
#
would go away.
#
The corruption is not a feature of capitalism.
#
The corruption is a feature of a controlled system in which all of the logic says, you
#
know, we want to build because we've got so many people who need apartments, so many people
#
who need houses.
#
This is a big demand for houses, and yet the supply is constrained.
#
So the logic is pushing people to build, and the government says no, so of course you're
#
going to have bribes, and in fact the bribes are the only thing which makes the system
#
work at all.
#
If it weren't for the bribes, there'd be even fewer houses, there'd be even less development.
#
So the corruption in this case actually, in the end, serves some kind of good purpose.
#
At least it allows some building, but it looks bad.
#
It looks immoral.
#
It looks distasteful, and people don't like to see that.
#
And people don't get that government is at the heart of the corruption.
#
If not for government discretion and bad rules, there would be no corruption to begin with.
#
You know, living in Mumbai, I often tend to be pessimistic because in all my years of
#
living in India, what you tend to see is that government just grows and grows and grows.
#
You can talk of reforming it, but it's just very hard to reform it in any way, and to
#
break down bad rules like this because you seem to be stuck in a vicious circle.
#
Do you, coming from where you are, have a more positive view of things?
#
Like for example, will Mumbai forever be rent controlled the way it is now?
#
Can these laws change?
#
Can incentives change?
#
The one thing which gives me hope is that the gains from trade here are so large that
#
they're pushing in favor of development and building and so forth.
#
So clearly, India is becoming a urban society, and what that means is that hundreds of millions
#
of people are moving from the rural areas to the cities.
#
So India must build new cities.
#
That has to happen, and it's in that building of the new cities that I think there's a
#
chance to change a lot of these rules.
#
The old cities may be stuck in this negative equilibrium, but entirely new cities are going
#
to have to be built.
#
New cities with millions of people.
#
So I think that there's a chance here to have some demonstration projects, to have in, Paul
#
Romer talks about charter cities.
#
But all we need, I think, is a few demonstration projects to illustrate what could happen with
#
better rules, and I think that would change people's point of view quite a bit.
#
And when I look at the political economy around rent control in particular, to bring the subject
#
back there, I often see that, sure, the interest groups in favor of rent control remaining
#
are the tenants who stay in the house or award bank and so on, but they should logically
#
also be powerful interest groups who want rent control removed.
#
For example, builders, who are an extremely powerful lobby in Mumbai, if not the most
#
powerful lobby, would benefit if rent control was removed because then they would have so
#
much new construction to do.
#
Given that, where's the resistance?
#
Where are we stuck?
#
Yeah, it's hard to understand.
#
I think the point you raised earlier is correct.
#
There is just a huge social ballast is that the views of the people in general are pro
#
rent control, and that makes it very difficult, even given the incentives of the builders.
#
But because the builders look corrupt, then even though they have all the right incentives,
#
the power of the people actually is too strong here.
#
However, I think if we had some new cities, that we would not get these rules in place.
#
I think there's enough understanding, and that's one of the amazing things about India,
#
is I think actually, though maybe you'll disagree with me here, I think actually the intellectual
#
class understands these issues quite well.
#
In speaking with people, economists in India, and even people in government at the top levels,
#
I think they actually understand these issues quite well, but they also feel frozen in place.
#
They also feel that they can't do much about them.
#
However, if we had some new cities, maybe then that there would be an opportunity to
#
do something new.
#
Well, India's future is in the cities, and I hope we'll see you more often, both in
#
Mumbai and in our new cities.
#
Thank you so much for coming on the show.
#
Thanks a lot.
#
To check out Alex's writings, do hop over to MarginalRevolution.com.
#
Marginal Revolution is a brilliant blog that Alex co-writes with Tyler Carvin, and while
#
I often say that the age of blogs is over, Marginal Revolution is an exception.
#
Anyway, I'm out of here for now, but do come back next week so I can tell you about another
#
bad dream I had.
#
Next week on The Scene and the Unseen, Amit Verma will be talking to Pawan Srinath about
#
the ban on dubbing in the Kannada film industry.
#
For more, go to sceneunseen.in.
#
If you enjoyed listening to The Scene and the Unseen, check out another show by IVM
#
podcast, Simplified, which is hosted by my good friends Naren, Chuck, and Shriketh.
#
You can download it at Audioboom or iTunes.
#
Excuse me, bhaiya.
#
Excuse me.
#
Boli, madame.
#
Menu mein kya hai?
#
Menu mein Scene Unseen hai, Podcast hai, Encore se, Cyrus se, Married in India, Rediscovery
#
Project, Empowering Series, Sexwax hai, IVM Like se, Simplified hai, Keeping it Queer
#
hai, Tings and Destination se, My Neighbor Zuckerberg hai, Aur The Fine Garage hai, aapko
#
kya chahiye hai?
#
Ek baar repeat kazeinge kya?
#
Repeat repeat nahi karta hai, aap jaao ivmpodcast.com pe aur suno yeh sab, yaafi download
#
kron ka app, sab aapki ungliyon pe.