Back to index

Ep 343: We Are All Amits From Africa | The Seen and the Unseen


#
We are all omits from Africa. We must beware of revenue Brahmins. Our statues must eat ice
#
cream. Our cities must be designed by cardiovascular surgeons. Our women must migrate to rice eating
#
cultures. We must all go to the 5th temple. We must all drink panipuri water, gallons
#
and gallons of it to wash away our sins. What am I talking about? Keep listening.
#
Welcome to the scene and the unseen, our weekly podcast on economics,
#
politics and behavioral science. Please welcome your host Amit Barma.
#
Welcome to the scene and the unseen. A couple of weeks ago, I had to go to Chennai for a couple
#
of back-to-back conferences and I suddenly remembered that Krish Ashok lives there. I
#
messaged Ashok to ask if he'd record an episode with me to add to the one we've already done
#
and he agreed. I then mentioned to my friend Narin Shanoi here in Mumbai that I was going
#
to record with Ashok in Chennai and I said how nice would it be if Narin was also there.
#
I will fly down said Narin and so he did and so we have this great three-way episode. Please note
#
that I've already got epic episodes with these two gents which will be linked from the show notes.
#
For this episode, there was no agenda. Just meet up and shoot the breeze. Still,
#
there was no more breeze left. We had a blast. You will love it.
#
Hey, the music started and this sounds like a commercial but it isn't. It's a plea for me
#
to check out my latest labor of love, a YouTube show I am co-hosting with my good friend the
#
brilliant Ajay Shah. We've called it Everything is Everything. Every week, we'll speak for about an
#
hour on things we care about, from the profound to the profane, from the exalted to the everyday.
#
We range widely across subjects and we bring multiple frames with which we try to understand
#
the world. Please join us on our journey and please support us by subscribing to our YouTube
#
channel at youtube.com slash Amit Verma, A-M-I-T-V-A-R-M-A. The show is called Everything is Everything.
#
Please do check it out.
#
Ashok and Narin, welcome to The Scene in the Unseen.
#
Yeah, great to be here. Unbelievable.
#
Absolute pleasure. In a while, I have of course recorded with both of you before. With Narin,
#
we have discussed your entire life, so there is nothing left. We can't talk about your life.
#
Why are you even here? And Ashok, we've spoken a lot about not food, but food science, which is
#
your wonderful book Masala Lab was about and etc, etc. And what happened today was I've been at
#
this conference where I've been really busy and we fixed this time and I thought,
#
okay, I'll wake up at 5 a.m. and do the research. Sorry for the Hindi. I'll avoid it for the rest of this episode.
#
Yeah, it's okay. It's legal to speak Hindi once you cross the 13 degrees south.
#
So legal, but is it ethical? It is inappropriate.
#
It is inappropriate. I will simply avoid it. And yeah, so I woke up at 5 in the morning and then I
#
realized that my video show with Ajay Shah, episode 7 of that is being edited today and I have to send
#
a list of inserts, which were like about 70 inserts or something. The morning went, I haven't prepared.
#
I have no idea what to talk to you guys about. My Rome research today feels like a little bit of a waste of money.
#
But we will freewheel our way across it because we are all kind of good talkers.
#
And in fact, when I asked you guys to suggest subjects, we could talk to each other about a show.
#
Suggestion for Naren, dear listeners, was turn the mic on and he will be magic.
#
But let me let me start by asking you about an observation you made on WhatsApp, Naren,
#
which is you spoke about how city planning and city planners and cardiovascular surgeons
#
should receive the same training in Chennai. Kindly explain.
#
So I am not a frequent visitor to Chennai.
#
So this morning when I stayed at a friend's place and I took a cab and it was it showed I should have
#
reached this place by about 9.15 or 9.30. I eventually reached a 10.
#
And that was because it had the most insane traffic situation.
#
I come from Bombay, which has pretty bad traffic.
#
And there was one place where everything was absolutely jammed and there was a trickle.
#
And when our car finally made it through the trickle, it was wide open.
#
And so this reminded me of my when my dad had a stent put in.
#
I was there and you could see the, you know, this the heart surgeon was telling me how, you know,
#
this this thing, it was a little trickle and I had no reference points.
#
I didn't know. And then he puts the stent and it becomes like the Amazon River.
#
Right. So then I thought that an interesting cross disciplinary course would be town planner
#
and cardiovascular surgeon, because then you can put stents and bypasses and whatever for Chennai.
#
I would still think that I don't want a town planner to do my surgery.
#
Yeah. Although I would be OK with cardiovascular surgeons doing town planning, given the current
#
state of town planning, I don't really think, you know, they could do any worse.
#
But you'll have a lot of nice shops and whatever inside your aorta.
#
Inside your aorta. Yes, yes.
#
Yeah, I'd love to have a main road that says, you know, Anna Veena Kava or something like that.
#
But there would be like zones in your heart then that there'd be zoning, right?
#
So one zone can produce provide blood only to the liver, another only to the kidney,
#
nothing else allowed. And you're going to get jammed.
#
Actually, a good question that arises from this and a perfect question for someone like Ashok,
#
you would agree with that, Naren, is that our basic insights, you know, universalize,
#
what word would be appropriate? Universalize.
#
Universalizable. So, you know, and you are so cross-disciplinary and go to first principles
#
for everything. And in fact, my show with Ajay Everything is Everything is kind of this is one
#
of the reasons for the name that, you know, you can apply certain frameworks to kind of everything
#
as long as that's not the only framework you're applying.
#
So is this a case that a basic insight about any subject at its core will also give you a lot of
#
Gyan on other subjects?
#
Oh, absolutely. So it is, see, for me personally, just to take a personal example, for me, I think
#
the basic principles of software engineering probably for me has been the single most
#
universalizable skill. And let me maybe generalize it and say computational thinking, right?
#
The idea that any set of decisions, any workflows, any processes, you can break them down
#
into a set of smaller, easily computable parts. And some of those computation steps are best done
#
with a computer or a calculator and some best done in the brain, right?
#
And then you'll know it once you break things down.
#
So I kind of realized that the same thing applies to music, for example, right?
#
A lot of my music, often the people will ask me when I did that Sanskrit heavy metal album,
#
and basically I'm singing, I'm playing the guitar, the violin, the bass, the keyboard,
#
and doing the mixing and mastering. How did you learn to do all of that?
#
I said, no, I didn't, right?
#
If you really ask me individually, am I a master at any of those instruments?
#
Probably not. Violin probably gets closest in terms of competency.
#
But all the others, I know just enough to play that part.
#
And in some sense, the meta model there is more to do with thinking about learning to learn.
#
So meaning that you don't just jump into learning the bass guitar, right?
#
So I first would say for this song, this is the part that I need to play.
#
And then I first then find out what is the absolute bare minimum skills I need to play that part, right?
#
And the second thing I'm also thinking is that if I make the following mistakes,
#
what software tools can I use to correct them and improve them?
#
Because software is continuously improving, right?
#
And there's autotune, you can fix mistakes, you can fix timing errors and so on.
#
So I think for the most part, for me, computational thinking is constantly thinking about being strategically lazy,
#
meaning that what is it that I'm best placed to do?
#
But what are things that I can outsource to tools, to AI, to other people and so on?
#
And so in that sense, that skill has actually helped tremendously even when you think about food, right?
#
A dal, for instance, is a series of steps, right?
#
So there is a dal and there's like 20 or 30 varieties of dal.
#
They all need to be soaked for different periods of time based on their size and density
#
and nutritional content, and then they need to be cooked for different periods of time.
#
And then you need to layer flavors.
#
And you could make a Middle Eastern one, a Moroccan one, an Indian style, it doesn't really matter.
#
So in that sense, I think, for example, you could also think about generative recipe ideas.
#
Like, for example, a chutney is basically a combination of nutty ingredients, sour ingredients, hot ingredients, salty ingredients and sweet.
#
And so if you take like seven or eight of these things, you can combine them, whatever you have in your fridge, it's a chutney, right?
#
So I think computational thinking is, I really think is, at least for me, it's been a deeply fundamental skill that you can apply to anything, right?
#
So the music making process, therefore, devolves to me sometimes recording literally a two second loop,
#
which is about as much as I can sustain on an instrument I'm new to,
#
but then use looping, using software modification to extend it into something that sounds like it's like three or four minutes.
#
And that's what goes behind in the song.
#
So it's also like in that sense, I think computational thinking is really also about learning to learn in this new world.
#
And I really now think that with GPT and all of these AI assistants, this skill, I think, is now democratized, right?
#
It's now going to be available to everyone, right?
#
Everybody can now pick up any skill they want.
#
You can understand anything from first principles, right?
#
I mean, for example, I would use GPT to regularly understand the basic biophysics and the bio sort of chemistry
#
of what happens once food goes in, right?
#
And you can really dig as deep as you want and go down to as first principles as you want with an assistant.
#
Of course, you have to cross verify if it's like making stuff up.
#
But 90% of the time, it's actually pretty useful and it's a fantastic thinking tool.
#
So I really think computational X, right?
#
I really think everyone in the future can be a computational historian, a computational whatever.
#
What that means is that now all the tools of computation and analytics are now democratized
#
and you don't have to become a statistician to be good at it.
#
I love this answer at multiple levels.
#
Like at one level, I remember I did an episode with a guest back in the day.
#
And he said that, oh, you know, and this is a standard leftist worry about any new technology,
#
that it will create new inequalities.
#
And I'm like, are you kidding me?
#
What it will do is it will actually make the playing field much more even because now everyone has access to these great tools.
#
Anybody can use these incredible tools.
#
I want to sort of double click on a couple of things there.
#
And one is that it's also become fashionable recently to make fun of code.
#
And of course, some companies, you know, talk about it in ways of, you know, teaching children to code.
#
If your son can't code, he's finished, you know, which is which is wrong and which puts too much pressure on parents.
#
But I do think that coding is a fundamental skill purely because it aids you in that kind of logical, rational, computational thinking,
#
which is why I'm planning to kind of teach myself programming also, not because I want to program anything.
#
But it's just it sharpens your thinking about the world.
#
And what I'd like you to do, either of you to do, is, you know, you spoke about a meta model.
#
I want you to make it concrete to help me understand that, for example, like A, by meta model, do you mean just learning to learn?
#
And I'm guessing not. There are other ways, other things that are involved.
#
I want you to make it concrete by taking an example of something that you learned from the first principles of one field, which you managed to apply to something else.
#
Yeah, so for example, I think your first point about people worrying about technology creating inequalities for the entirety of mankind's history,
#
every new disruptive technology has always created temporary inequalities.
#
That's just the nature of technological disruption.
#
The printing press did. I mean, it puts scribes out of work.
#
The clearly the the steam engine and things put a ton of manual labor out of work.
#
The conveyor belt essentially essentially converted what was artisanal skill into a composable skill,
#
where an individual worker with no training could just come and turn a knob.
#
But at the end of the entire conveyor belt, you actually get a car.
#
Amazing thing is that the funny thing is on a side tangent that people think, you know, Henry Ford pioneered it.
#
No, Venetians pioneered this idea of conveyor belt manufacturing in like the when they were the reason they dominated the seas
#
when there were so many other places in the Mediterranean was because they figured out this idea that a ship is best built,
#
not in a single place where I have tons of guys, guys building the hull, guys building the painting, all of them clashing with each other.
#
No, if I do it because a ship can float and move, if I do it in a way by which it starts here, the basic stuff is built.
#
It moves to the next stage and a bunch of other guys come and they do their stuff.
#
And they but the only difference is that they didn't have the mechanization to to essentially maybe, you know, start the industrial revolution.
#
But the whole idea of conveyor belt actually goes back to the Venetians.
#
So in that sense, I think every technology has always done that.
#
I mean, I'm sure in your podcast, you've spoken about, I think, all the artists in the 20th century complaining to the US Congress that the radio was destroying live music.
#
And it did not. I mean, yes, it did destroy some live musicians jobs.
#
But in a generation, people figured out other ways to do it.
#
And I have a photo of myself.
#
My mother used to work for Kendra Bank. And this is a photo from 1984.
#
It's a very ironic photo, given that I know where I work and what I do.
#
It's a photo of me standing in front of a protest poster that says ban computers.
#
Computers will destroy jobs in banks.
#
This is in 1984. And this was a real thing. People were genuinely worried.
#
Now, nobody was worried that you should be banning computers.
#
Right. So it's just the natural progression.
#
But clearly, it is evident that AI in this current generation of technology has a nonlinear effect on individual productivity.
#
It will democratize access to knowledge.
#
It will democratize access to tools.
#
Like, for example, I mean, to produce a high quality podcast, you needed a sound engineer.
#
You needed people who could do all these things.
#
And now software will do it for you. Right.
#
And there are AI tools that automatically edit.
#
Like, for example, I use a tool that automatically breaks, takes all my takes, chooses the best ones,
#
fixes all the gaps and generates the reel that I want to post on Instagram.
#
My editor, Gaurav, is in his mind saying, shut up, shut up, shut up, shut up.
#
You cannot replace him.
#
It's, look, honestly speaking, the general idea is that we live in times where you have to wake up every day with a continuous creative dissatisfaction with a status quo.
#
You have to wake up assuming that your skills may not be relevant.
#
I know it's hard. I mean, there are, it is going to be hard for a lot of people.
#
But that goes to a deeper issue about universal basic income and welfare and others, which is, you know, entirely separate.
#
But you can't stop the progress of technology.
#
And in the sense that the good it will do on the longer run is almost always going to outweigh the short term harms, if you will.
#
Right. So to the point about, see, computational first principles thinking, let me, let me give you one interesting example of how I applied it in the context of actually making a a Dal recipe generator.
#
Right. I'll take this one example.
#
And maybe another example is actually how I make my Instagram reels itself and how my workflow has actually changed.
#
Right. So the meta model, let me start with the reel first. It's more interesting.
#
So the meta model for me for a reel is is essentially comes from years of being inspired and learning from people like my grandmother, who was a fantastic storyteller.
#
And I've thought long and hard about what is it that makes people watch some reels and some YouTube content more than others.
#
Right. And what so it really goes back to a skill that human beings have had for the longest amount of time, which is storytelling.
#
Right. And good storytelling and you and you do a course on the art of clear writing and good storytelling.
#
I would actually think is a is a skill on top of that.
#
Right. It's a slightly more creative skill, slightly harder to quantify.
#
But again, for me, the moment people say it cannot be quantified, I'm always skeptical about that.
#
Right. So I can still say that, look, this is 230 words.
#
It's not a 60,000 page book.
#
I can still come up with a formula.
#
And the formula for that is that it needs to start with a provocation.
#
Right. A provocation that basically means that the person is intrigued enough to want to listen to it.
#
And the person is only committing 90 seconds.
#
But in today's world, getting the person to commit to 90 seconds is hard.
#
So your provocation has to be pretty strong.
#
Right. It has to be something non-intuitive.
#
The person wants to wait, then find out whether he agrees or disagrees person.
#
Both of them want to find out what you're about to say.
#
Right. And then the idea is that you also storytelling, you cannot look down on your audience, but your audience has to be with you.
#
You're taking them on a journey.
#
Right. So especially with science communication, more science communication is speaking down to people that you should have paid attention when you were in school.
#
This is basic science. How can you be so superstitious?
#
That basically fails to understand that people are superstitious for good reasons.
#
And if you can't appreciate that, then you're not a communicator.
#
Right. So this is again part of the problem.
#
There's a difference between, say, Neil deGrasse Tyson, who does not speak down to people.
#
And there are other science communicators who just sound like they're lecturers, who sort of, you know, a strict lecturer, teacher, who's like, you don't even know this.
#
Right. So that tone is important.
#
Right. And then so if you're explaining the science, you then have to come up with day to day metaphors and things that people can observe.
#
You can't give lab examples.
#
Right. So if I say something like, by the way, you don't have to wash your rice and rinse all of that starch.
#
You're not. People believe that they are actually losing calories when they actually do that.
#
And then I just give a simple example that if you literally soak all of that rice, the amount of rice that is getting dissolved in that, the starch that is getting dissolved in that water in a hundred gram is less than point five grams.
#
So think about how many calories you're actually saving.
#
So that way you have to give practical examples in a way that they can actually identify.
#
And then eventually you also need a closing punch.
#
Right. So that sort of makes it memorable.
#
And this is where you have to think hard about the closing punch is what people will proximately remember.
#
And that's what will make them share it to others.
#
So it has to be something punchy.
#
Right. So in that sense, while it's it sort of seems so it's possible to create a meta model for this.
#
So, for example, a sambar, people think take a sambar very seriously, but a sambar is a dal.
#
Right. So in South India, they will say pulisheri and more kuzhambu.
#
It's all basically kadhi as a template.
#
Like if I take a pan India sort of term, it's a yogurt gravy.
#
Right. Like with this is a legume gravy.
#
Right. And so in that sense, if I then break it down to the fact that there is a fat plus spices, then I have your main ingredient, then I have other kinds of powdered spices, and then I have a tadka.
#
That describes basically 90 percent of most categories of dishes.
#
And then so in that sense, that then allows you to be far more creative.
#
Right. So you don't like look at a recipe and then say, let me go and buy all every single ingredient.
#
Right. I'm just going to use what I have in my house that fits that template.
#
And going to the next level, like, for example, people in the West who do not have access to curry leaves, which is a very central ingredient.
#
Again, very hard to replace.
#
But if you understand what flavor molecules curry leaf has, you know that you can find 80 percent of them by a combination of lime zest and basil, Italian basil together.
#
Not quite curry leaf, but you will get similar notes.
#
Right. So in that sense, I think, you know, the application of many of these things essentially comes down to really focusing on what you want to get done and then figuring out what are all the basic Lego bricks.
#
The problem is that either people assume that they want to build everything at atomic level or they are the Lego bricks are too big, so they can't do very many sophisticated things.
#
The entire key seems to be almost figuring out what's the right size Lego brick that makes my life easier and which Lego bricks can I borrow from others.
#
And surprisingly enough, you can borrow Lego bricks from software.
#
Even when you're cooking, you can borrow Lego bricks from software when you're doing music.
#
And so for me, at least, that's how this whole thing is sort of worked out.
#
It's just fascinating, this system thinking.
#
The one thing that I really liked, you mentioned a little earlier, it liberates you from having a grand strategical overview, which people would have to have before someone wanted to build a ship.
#
But here you have all the building blocks.
#
So it's a very bottom up approach rather than a top down.
#
Software innately is also, like have you been in software for 23 years now, it is very much a, let's build something first and then let's continuously improve it.
#
I understand, I mean, to be respectful to architects and doctors.
#
There used to be a poster in an office, I think Cadbury office, which says, ready, fire, aim.
#
So it's pretty much what we're doing here.
#
To be fair, the iterative freedom to fail approach of software, again, doesn't work in, say, when somebody is building a dam or a doctor and so on.
#
Yes, I can appreciate that there are different ways of thinking about that, which is why I almost always like, I don't want to get into those areas where the stakes are that high.
#
And that where you genuinely do need institutional training and practice and years of honing before you put a scalpel to someone's body.
#
On the other hand, there are millions of things that you can truly be interdisciplinary across areas where the stakes are a lot lower.
#
I think that is also a useful way to think about it.
#
And as you said, a great way, in fact, you can count on your fingertips, like Raucho Marx said, I'm an amateur brain surgeon.
#
You can't be an amateur brain surgeon.
#
But many other things you can.
#
Yeah, you can.
#
And increasingly, I think the sheer number of things, because of all the AI assistance and knowledge that you now have access to, the number of things you can now be is like, order of magnitude more.
#
I have a couple of observations and then a question.
#
And the observation is, you know, what you said about storytelling is great about the meta model, and there'll be screenplay books, which will give a three act structure.
#
So in this conference I was at, I was actually at a couple of two conferences in a row.
#
And in one of them, Roshan Abbas and Prem Panikkal were there, excellent duo to have around to talk about storytelling.
#
So Prem did a workshop on storytelling, Roshan did a workshop on storytelling on day one, then Prem did.
#
And Roshan was kind of giving the same kind of structure that you did, that there's a hook and you have to get people on.
#
And there's an excellent economist in the room called Aditi Dimri, who's working on women's health.
#
And he asked everyone to write one line that would hook people onto the project.
#
And her line was so memorable.
#
Her line was that there is a 50% chance that I will get breast cancer.
#
And powerful line.
#
And then, you know, and then to, you know, to give a sense of the concrete over the abstract.
#
One woman gave this abstract line that as a woman entrepreneur, people often tell me that I can't succeed.
#
And Prem and I felt that's too abstract, let's make it concrete.
#
And Prem's line about himself was when I was eight years old, my father told me that one day I would be begging at the traffic signal outside the house,
#
which is a mind blowing example of concrete over abstract and also kind of heartbreaking.
#
Now, my sort of question, and this is something that I've, you know, my writing students asked me about AI, that we are creative people, you know,
#
on the one, and they often hold these simultaneous positions that are contradictory.
#
One is AI can never be creative like us, and the other is AI is going to take away our jobs, right?
#
And both of them obviously can't be true.
#
And I do believe that one day AI will write, you know, monkeys will produce Shakespeare.
#
It will. I do believe that.
#
To me, that is not a worry for a couple of reasons.
#
Reason number one is that, look, even if it does that, your thin desire of getting validation is under threat because AI will be churning out great books.
#
How do you compete with that?
#
Right. But your thick desire, I want to tell a story, I want to write.
#
No one can take that away from you.
#
That is point one. But point two is more important than what you alluded to is that AI can help you become a better storyteller.
#
It will give you these structures within which you can express your creativity.
#
Like often when people talk about, you know, writing a novel, people talk about two kinds of approaches.
#
There is the architect who is designing everything in advance, 40 rooms, each room has this many square feet, everything is immaculate, right?
#
And people who are doing like plot driven crime novels will have a post-it for every chapter, bullet points for each dot.
#
And then there are gardeners and gardeners don't know what the fuck they're doing.
#
They're just pottering around and hoping something happens.
#
And the great novelist, Dr. O, once said that, you know, it is OK to drive just by the light of the headlights.
#
You can make the whole journey that way.
#
So, you know, Delhi fog in winter, all you can see is your headlights.
#
And I am thinking that what AI can do, what technology can, forget AI, what even computational thinking can do is do the default architecture within which you can garden,
#
do your gardening with great creativity and kind of still, you know, get it right.
#
Is that how you?
#
Exactly. I think you nailed it.
#
I always see this as computational creativity is about architecting multiple small gardens and every single one of those gardens, some of them you're going to outsource that you're going to ask somebody else to take care of it.
#
Could be AI, could be something that you outsource, something that you use open source.
#
You built on somebody else, right?
#
I think, you know, people, creative people sometimes very casually forget that nothing happens on a blank slate, right?
#
The inspiration for every song is somewhere.
#
It's a novel. It's a life situation.
#
It's a similar structure from somewhere.
#
So people are forever inspired.
#
It's just that they often don't recognise, implicitly recognise the fact that they were inspired in the same way that I gave Chad GPT a really smart prompt and then it gave me something.
#
And I took that, I edited a bit.
#
Some more creative people think that that seems like cheating, but no, not really.
#
All it did is is make that entire process that you are anyway doing more creative, more productive.
#
Exactly. Earlier you had to spend time, you had to go to visit places.
#
Somebody like a ward house had to literally visit Lake District to get inspired by the flowers.
#
Who knows, a poem can strap on an oculus and visit that place virtually and get the same inspiration.
#
Or for that matter, maybe ask Chad GPT to give descriptive or botanical information about flowers that he can then turn into a poem.
#
The point is that there's now a million ways in which you can use AI into the workflow of creativity.
#
And that's not really cheating.
#
It's just that being more productive than in the world where you have to be extraordinarily privileged to have access to all of the things that can inspire you.
#
And then you never actually credit those inspirations.
#
So that's really what's happening.
#
So here's this thing, where did the transition into art happen?
#
So now there's this age old argument about craft and art.
#
And a lot of artists have this withering contempt for craftsmen.
#
So he's just a craftsman.
#
But like this is so evident in cooking.
#
I, when I started cooking, much inspiration from you, I was a stumbling beginner.
#
And then eventually once you mastered the craft of it, once you got the skill, you become audacious enough to apply your templates, modify your templates every once in a while.
#
Often by accident, you come up with something which is amazing.
#
You've never eaten something like that.
#
We were, you know, fiddling around the other day and we came up, we did some pork thing and it was out of this world.
#
Yeah.
#
I have a story about this, but finish.
#
Yeah.
#
So my thing is, do you think that AI will, you know, really lead to a mushrooming of art rather than sort of dumbing it down as people?
#
Yeah, absolutely.
#
I, it will also expand our definition of what art is, right?
#
And in a weird way, I think there is also this, and I think definitely you did discuss this in your episode with TM Krishna, right?
#
All too often, the distinction between art and craft may purely be down to class and completely subjective need for richer people or the richer, powerful people in society to wall off and create things that are exclusive to them, right?
#
I mean, you can see, you can actually see this in, in across history.
#
Right now, sourdough bread is like considered the posh hipster thing for you to eat.
#
That was actually what the peasants ate back in the middle ages.
#
Yes.
#
Because only the rich could afford the flawless factory made white bread.
#
And today white bread is considered the poorest of the poor, you know, non nutritious, poisonous sort of stuff, right?
#
And that people have a problem with.
#
So in that sense, almost always, even if you look at luxury goods now, right?
#
Even if you look at the travel industry, this is very curious.
#
So as wealth grows, people then start flocking to the places that you would consider to be premium tourist destinations.
#
And the first thing that happens is that the millionaires and the billionaires stop considering those tourist destinations anymore.
#
Right now we've reached a point where billionaires basically now buy their own islands and go chill out there.
#
They're not, they're not coming to the Monaco's or the, the usual, the Switzerland and all that.
#
The Switzerland is now largely just people with Shah Rukh Khan and Yash Chopra nostalgia, right?
#
They're basically going to Switzerland.
#
The millionaires are not going there, right?
#
So in that, likewise, I think, you know, as TM Krishna speaks about classical music itself, what is classical music?
#
Classical music is a bunch of rich people saying this is classical.
#
That's what it is.
#
There is nothing more to it, right?
#
There is nothing about a folk art form or a popular pop art form or Illayaraja's music or Rehman's music that does not make it classical.
#
There is no intrinsic value judgment.
#
I would actually argue that there are Illayaraja compositions that have a hundred times more sophistication than the most advanced
#
Carnatic compositions purely from a music theoretical standpoint.
#
But what makes it classical is because a bunch of rich people say, yeah, this is classical.
#
And I get to build a posh auditorium and I get to keep the plebs out.
#
Yeah.
#
That's when it is.
#
The moment it then it's weird because what's happening now is that my generation was the first generation of people who learnt music, who were
#
comfortable with Carnatic artists singing in films.
#
So my parents' generation, the biggest scandal of their time was Yesudas going away from the Carnatic world and starting to sing in Hindi and Malayalam films.
#
It was considered to be a betrayal of songs.
#
Yeah, demeaning the status.
#
But then my generation is like Unnikrishnan and you name everyone.
#
Everybody's doing both.
#
And now those people are on TV judging people singing film songs, right?
#
And then telling them this raga is wrong and that raga.
#
So it's now it's just that I think at any generation, you're almost always going to see that art, for instance, almost always has a
#
certain subjective class judgment.
#
We say it's art because we say it is, right?
#
I mean, we saw a very curious demonstration of it during the during the entire crypto bubble, if you will.
#
The board ape and all those sorts of NFTs and so on.
#
Why is that so valuable?
#
It's because a bunch of Internet people thought it was valuable.
#
It's the same phenomenon at hand when somebody says that John Cage is four minutes, 33 seconds, which is basically four minutes and 33 seconds of
#
silence as one of the great musical pieces.
#
The point of that entire four minutes, 33 seconds was essentially that the orchestra would come sit and not play.
#
What the audience experiences is any other fidgeting sounds, people coughing, audience coughing.
#
That's the symphony. That was his definition of the symphony.
#
Now, again, is this art, right?
#
So our Sheldon Pollock basically looks like people took a bunch of buckets of paint and then splashed it on a large canvas worth millions of dollars.
#
So in some sense, I think, you know, I've always felt that craft is the more important thing because there is no art without craft.
#
Picasso had to learn to really do photorealistic stuff before he started doing the Guernica and the other things, the abstract stuff.
#
And likewise, so I think, you know, but most people then undervalue and disrespect crafts and we use the term craftsman.
#
You know, I think we were briefly speaking about how the distinction between a mechanic and an engineer is basically a mechanic is the craftsman.
#
And the engineer is the artist.
#
The problem now is that there are places in India where in an ideal world, an engineer would have been a mechanic at some point of time and then became an engineer with years of experience and the meta knowledge of understanding how these systems work.
#
So he's able to visualize what the system will do without actually touching it.
#
That's what an engineer was, right?
#
But not anymore. Now we have basically people who've never touched or, you know, crude a nut or a bolt in their lives.
#
But they're engineers earning like 10 times more, but the craftsman is not.
#
And it's very, very curious because I'm, I think, Professor Andrew McAfee from MIT, he once asked a question about how, which of these jobs do you think is more easily automatable by AI?
#
And he asked this 10 years back, an investment banker in Wall Street or a plumber.
#
We know the answer now.
#
The investment banker, what he does is basically data analytics, which machine learning algorithms are really, really good at.
#
Like much better than you.
#
Most trades are now actually done by algorithms, you know, that shouting on the stock floor exchange is an image that we all have in mind, rarely happens, right?
#
But it was awesome. I have a good story about that.
#
Yeah, so this point is that what he says is that maybe now because of the rise of this kinds of AI, we may hopefully, again, depends on a lot of other factors, get to the point where we are genuinely able to appreciate the genuine complexity of certain things.
#
Like, for example, why is a nurse paid less than a doctor?
#
Why is a kindergarten teacher paid less than a university professor?
#
It is impossible to automate what, what they do because they are, have tremendous human complexity where every scenario is unique and you have to react uniquely.
#
And those are classic examples of, sorry, boss, can't build a better model.
#
Every house plumbing works differently.
#
Yes.
#
The plumber deals, when he walks into a house, you're not going to see a plumbing robot anytime soon because, well, every house will have a different species of dog, different species of cat and kids and other environments, other changes, different food, blocking the pipes and so on.
#
That you literally have to rely on the classic human sense of, can I make sense of the world with minimal knowledge?
#
People keep asking me, what is this whole, is this going to replace this artificial general intelligence?
#
Boss, it takes $10 billion and the entire contents of the internet to train that GPT chatbot, right?
#
A human being basically gets a tiny, infinitesimal fraction of that training.
#
We seem to be good at simply just taking that, making some, taking some risks, learning from that and moving on.
#
And so that seems to be, that is where jobs like plumber, nurses, kindergarten teachers are all jobs that involve every day is different.
#
There is an investment now that's like literally, software guys are literally doing the same thing every day.
#
So I have a story and a question.
#
The story is about what young Narain was talking about cooking.
#
Okay.
#
Which is that one day, and this was, I was in my, I reversed my type two diabetes by, you know, going on keto plus one meal a day.
#
And that one meal a day I'd cook between six and eight.
#
And during that process of experimenting three course meals, I came up with an entirely new dish, which I will now christen stranger in prawns.
#
It involves basically you marinate, you know, jumbo prawns in olive oil, gochugaru, which is a Korean spice and stranger and son's gin, that specific gin.
#
Let me tell you, don't have blind taste.
#
I couldn't tell you otherwise, but that specific gin.
#
And then eventually you cook it in bird's eye chili, olive oil and butter.
#
And it is incredible.
#
So it blew my mind when I first made it because I thought two things.
#
One, I thought this is the best prawn I've ever had.
#
And two, I thought fucking hell I made it.
#
Right?
#
Complete accident.
#
But then my good friend Narayan Shanoi came over, right?
#
So I made it for him.
#
And he said fucking, he was blown by the same two things that fucking hell best prawn I've ever had and fucking hell Amit made it.
#
And then he said, I will make this for Sheila, who as everyone knows, the most loved wife in India.
#
So, so the next day he calls me, he says, I made your prawns gochugaru for Sheila.
#
She loved it.
#
I said, okay, okay, really?
#
You made the same thing.
#
He said, well, I went to the store, they didn't have gochugaru, so I use gochujang.
#
Now gochujang is like completely fucking different from gochugaru.
#
Completely.
#
It's on the other end.
#
Right?
#
It's a sweet kind of pasty kind of thing.
#
I don't like it very much.
#
So I said, okay, so you made prawns gochujang.
#
He said, well, actually there wasn't prawns, so I used chicken.
#
So, you know, everything kind of completely turned around.
#
So that is our good friend.
#
And then the next time I met Sheila, she's like, Amit, thank you for teaching him that.
#
And I didn't have the heart to say that I had nothing to do with teaching him whatever the fuck he made.
#
Yes.
#
Right.
#
But my point about art and craft is actually one I keep coming back to.
#
And while Krishna, of course, is, that's an extremely important insight.
#
Yeah.
#
I'll add something to that where, or I'll rather make a different point I keep making about art and craft.
#
It's that we call something art only when we, only when the process of making it is not explicit.
#
Right?
#
So if craft is something that you can replicate and teach someone to do, yes, this is craft.
#
But if it seems mystical, you call it art.
#
But actually it is craft only, except that you don't understand how the brain is doing what it is doing.
#
But it is only craft and nothing else.
#
Now, you know, turning to LLMs, like my whole argument is the three of us sitting here have been trained on LLMs,
#
which are much smaller than what GPT is trained on.
#
And our ability to process is far less than GPT, right?
#
So these are like completely obviously going to do everything better than us.
#
And we make the mistake of thinking that, oh, we are creative.
#
They can't be because we don't realize that there's, you know, creativity is just something that we haven't understood,
#
but it doesn't mean that it can't be crocked.
#
And I want to ask you there for a question about music.
#
Yes.
#
That music is always the example I use that it's going to be super easy for AI to do the best music ever.
#
Yeah, simply because it is ultimately a matter of computational thinking.
#
Certain combinations of notes hit certain neurons in the brain and make you feel a certain way,
#
whether it's melancholic or excited or horny or what can music make you feel horny?
#
I guess very much, very much.
#
Yes, very much.
#
OK, I will ask you for concrete examples of what makes you feel horny.
#
But so what do you kind of then think of that?
#
Because I think all the great art can easily come from AI because we are being showing extreme hubris
#
when we behave as if there is something special about us.
#
On the contrary, what we are doing is pretty routine for AI.
#
But we are so fucking stupid, we don't understand it.
#
And we call it creativity and art when it's just craft and computational thinking.
#
True. So I think, for example, so before we jump into music,
#
let's maybe briefly talk about, say, Mid Journey, Stable Diffusion and so on.
#
Right there, it's fun.
#
Like if you basically take the net sum of all visual images that you have on the internet
#
and then have this algorithm spending millions of dollars on GPU costs,
#
really doing matrix multiplication at every pixel level.
#
You're going to end up with something that can generate some stunning art.
#
That is just that's just going to be natural.
#
Right. Yes, of course, notwithstanding the finger problem and all that.
#
That, again, is a training data problem.
#
Right. So the reason why these AI regularly distort fingers
#
is because the problem is that finger is at different angles in all the photos we have.
#
So the AI finds it hard to generalize the fact that if basically we had 10 million images
#
of just people holding their hands like this, then it would actually do better.
#
But even then, the problem is it has a hard time imagining
#
what would this look like because our hands are insanely flexible in that sense.
#
Right. So so there is we kind of understand those limitations.
#
Music is actually, in my experience, it's always been a very weird art in the first place.
#
So we know that when you watch a movie, right, when you watch a movie,
#
there are different parts of your brain being engaged.
#
So you're listening to the voice.
#
There's the visual cortex because you're seeing the colors, the images.
#
So all of these things.
#
And then you are interpreting that in that sense. Right.
#
So that's when you play a video game or a movie, you know, that's that's what it is.
#
And in a video game, there's one more layer because you are literally in it
#
far more than you are in a movie. Right. It's one more thing.
#
And likewise, I think the spoken word is, again, different.
#
It's because, you know, humans have been speaking for the longest amount of time.
#
It's a very uniquely human skill.
#
And that's a part of the brain specially evolved for that.
#
Music is weird because one, there is music that has no words
#
and it still seems to work.
#
A Mozart symphony or a Beethoven's symphony and so on.
#
There is instrumental music. So it's a weird thing.
#
So there is no specific part of the brain that clearly says,
#
yeah, I'm going to understand these specific ratios of strings
#
that then Pythagoras spoke about, saying that if you divide a string by two,
#
you get the octave and then you divide it by.
#
And there is no evolutionary reason for it also.
#
Exactly. It's just it's an absolute freak of geometry
#
and probably your geometry for the most part. Right.
#
So it's saying that the way those sound frequencies resonate
#
and the way they resonate inside your your chamber and your cochlea,
#
there seems to be some connection to, oh, this is that note.
#
And the weird thing is that every society has independently
#
come up with the same 12 notes,
#
because these are all the same based on the same physics,
#
the same sort of ratio of where you pluck a string.
#
Right. So the same thing. Right.
#
And everybody every time there would be a hole in a bamboo tree
#
and wind would go through and they would hear what the flute,
#
the origin of the flute.
#
And then you would recognize that, huh, you know what,
#
I can create different resonance frequencies
#
by adding holes at specific distances.
#
And it's just a classic thing.
#
Every society independently has invented the flute and string instruments
#
and the same and the same set of notes, right,
#
because of the ratios involved.
#
So therefore, compared to, say, films and others,
#
music is a has been a remarkably fertile piece of creative output
#
from a very small set of rules.
#
So there are very, very limited set of phrases
#
that you can actually make that work.
#
There are limited set of harmonies that actually work.
#
Right. A tonal jazz apart, right.
#
John Cage apart, John Cage apart.
#
That's why when people say criticize pop music
#
is that the same four chords can describe literally 70 percent of songs.
#
That's it. If you try another chord structure, that song,
#
unfortunately, will not go viral.
#
So I think the particular thing with music, the way I see it, is that
#
like the Max Max, what's the Swedish guy,
#
the guy who cracked the algorithm of virality of music, right,
#
who basically produced all of the top hits like in the last decade.
#
I've spoken about him, linked him from the show notes,
#
but I'm an old man. I've forgotten the name.
#
Yeah, Max Martin. That sounds like it.
#
So he's they've nailed down essentially what sort of sonic pattern,
#
the choral styles, the right down to the frequencies, nailed down that formula.
#
Right. Now, what is going to be able to do pretty shortly
#
is to basically do large scale parallelized A-B testing.
#
And it can generate thousand variations of a pop song
#
and then A-B tested and see which one actually works
#
and then learn from that and then make more of that.
#
So in the short term, what will happen is that
#
musicians will start to use these tools as a way of generating content faster.
#
They can get artists, musicians used to famously like do drugs,
#
go to some random places one year, two years.
#
Pink Floyd would take like five years to come out of an album.
#
That's not going to work. Right.
#
So people are going to be able to turn out stuff over a weekend.
#
And then by AI itself, you're going to more people
#
are going to be generating more music.
#
So in that sense, in a weird way, it reminds me of how photography
#
largely kind of disappeared as like some fancy art.
#
The moment the smartphone camera became decent enough.
#
Right. You know, there was a point of time.
#
We all remember pre iPhone era, internet era, the guys slugging the slugging
#
the SLR, right.
#
And sitting around in weird angles and taking photos was a special person.
#
There's a Japanese saying from the 1980s.
#
If you want to make a man a pauper, gift him a camera.
#
It was just all the film and all that.
#
Yeah, film and then lenses.
#
And it's like an interesting right.
#
And then all of a sudden now you can make you can make movies
#
on on your iPhone or Android phone. Right.
#
So in that sense, I think music is particularly vulnerable
#
to this because it is genuinely an art form built on an edifice
#
of a very tiny set of rules.
#
So all the rest of the thing that we consider art in music
#
has to do with the personality of the artist and sometimes the words
#
and the context and the the context of blues coming from slavery.
#
It's all of that.
#
The underlying music of blues.
#
Every song is the same.
#
Musically speaking, they're all the same.
#
Right. So then it becomes about the words.
#
It becomes about the poetry and so on.
#
And even there, when it comes to words, more people can now
#
write decent poetry if they know how to use these tools.
#
So the whole point is that, as you rightly said,
#
a musician plus AI will make a better musician.
#
A poet plus AI will make a better poet, a far, far better poet.
#
And it will also obviously increase the number of mediocre poets
#
and the mediocre musicians, obviously.
#
There's just going to be more content out there.
#
And that's good. I mean, you know, it is it is now, for example,
#
it is the industry has made it so hard.
#
Like, for example, if I wanted to teach science
#
and I just randomly wanted, felt like using a piece of music somewhere.
#
Now, I can't write without paying royalty, expensive royalty to someone.
#
I can't. There are many artists who I cannot make a cover version
#
because they simply denied the right to make a cover version and so on.
#
So it's just that those kinds of things will largely disappear. Yeah.
#
And yeah, so also fewer and fewer people
#
now need to know the entirety of a body of, you know, craft.
#
In order to produce art, that eye pencil thing that you mentioned, really.
#
Nobody knows soon.
#
No one will really know how to make music, but everyone will be making.
#
Everyone will be making music.
#
And in a weird way, I think people, every generation,
#
they get worried about what basic skills people are losing. Right.
#
My parents generation was clock stables.
#
You don't know how to do logarithms.
#
Boss, we have scientific calculator.
#
We don't. I don't need to use that.
#
And it was a it was a tool designed for a time
#
when we did not have scientific calculators.
#
So you wanted to multiply.
#
I'm the last generation that used a lot of tables.
#
Yeah. So you wanted to do this large arithmetic calculations.
#
It's a shortcut. It's an engineering shortcut, which you don't need,
#
which you can just completely give up the moment you have calculators.
#
Same thing with maps and navigation and and all of that. Right.
#
Who's people needed to have the skill east, west?
#
How is the city laid out? How do I read this map?
#
I used to have a city map of Delhi when I was living there. Right.
#
And you have to know which quadrant to look at, turn to that page
#
and then find out where it is, which road.
#
So it needed a special skill, like people knowing how to operate a VCR
#
back in the day. Right.
#
And now nobody just cares.
#
You just plug in your address and nobody would argue
#
that navigation is a skill you need to have. Right.
#
The onus now is on making sure that maps doesn't, you know, take you
#
make you fall off a cliff and so on.
#
Right. So that's basically the you're putting the onus like
#
how cloud computing takes the onus of dealing with computer
#
hardware and servers from every software guy and says, no, no, it's
#
the problem of only three companies, which is Microsoft, Amazon and Google.
#
And that's it. All the rest of you, you focus on the software.
#
Let them focus on that problem.
#
One of my friends with the great observation that the generation
#
that is, you know, born 10 years ago will never know what it is to get lost.
#
Speaking to the maps again, another useless skill none of us have.
#
Right. We and we are actually the last generation that remembered phone numbers.
#
Today, I only remember two phone numbers, which is like by inertia from the past.
#
But unless you're some kind of crazy geek, you will simply not know.
#
And, you know, a great thing that this also points out.
#
Is how we are slaves to our brains.
#
We speak of free will and all of that, but we are slaves to our brains.
#
In the sense, certain notes will make us feel a certain way.
#
And there is really nothing we can do.
#
And there's no value judgment to that.
#
And this also resonates with, you know, you made a video on dairy milk,
#
how they change the shape of the little chocolate from a square thing
#
to a rounder thing. And everyone thought they've added sugar
#
when they hadn't only because round things taste sweeter.
#
And you had made a point about, you know, Booboo and Kiki.
#
Can you explain Booboo?
#
Booboo and Kiki actually sort of like this famous.
#
So as we are understanding the brain better and better, right.
#
The one thing that's becoming painfully obvious
#
is that our brain is riddled with cognitive fallacies,
#
shall we say, predisposition to fall for these fallacies.
#
Right. And particularly optical illusions are some of the craziest things.
#
You know it and you still fall for it.
#
And you will still fall for it. Right.
#
And again, as I said, you know, the most mind blowing fact about that
#
is that the latency between your retina receiving a photon
#
and it sending the message, that latency is too slow
#
for you to process the world in real time.
#
And so the brain is actually, therefore, uses a model
#
to try and create an image of what it's likely to be.
#
It's like a neural network, right.
#
So it's based on past information.
#
Can I predict what the next blind spot will drive?
#
So literally everything you see is basically your mind projecting
#
what you're seeing and not the real, not actual reality.
#
So we regularly get into blind spots because of that.
#
So the fascinating thing here is that in the last 20, 30 years,
#
particularly in this area of food, there is this new interdisciplinary
#
field called gastrophysics.
#
There's idea of how the combination of brain visual, these things,
#
the presentation of the food and how your brain reacts to certain things
#
and in terms of flavors, aroma, textures and all of that.
#
Most famous user of gastrophysics is Heston Blumenthal, right.
#
And in fact, the person who came up with the paper
#
about the whole round shapes and straight shapes is Charles Spence,
#
who was the advisor of Heston Blumenthal.
#
He used to be the science consultant for creating those Heston Blumenthal
#
experiences, like he'll come and give you like oysters.
#
And there will be the small thing that will generate a bunch of molecules
#
that are redolent of the seacoast of some place.
#
Right. So he's creating that sort of experience, right.
#
And there'll be sounds also.
#
There'll be sounds and gentle sounds of waves and water and all of that.
#
High quality speakers.
#
So they're creating these synesthetic experiences
#
because we've recognized that flavor is actually a very multidimensional,
#
very hard to model sense.
#
It's not a single sense.
#
That is a combination of taste and aroma and sight.
#
And even even the sound. Right.
#
So, like, for example, you will like it as a mechanical engineer, right.
#
When you eat a panipuri, right.
#
The the crunch of a crispy panipuri
#
is bulk of that sound is actually in the non audible range.
#
So it's well above 20,000 hertz, the high frequency ones. Right.
#
And so we can't actually hear it.
#
We hear the ones below that.
#
And the difference between a soggy potato chip
#
and a crisp potato chip or a crisp panipuri is chemically not much,
#
except that that there is slightly less water.
#
And so you get that crunch.
#
And your brain processes crunch as a sign of freshness,
#
because historically, evolutionarily, a crunchy fruit is likely to be healthy.
#
Mushy fruit is likely to be rotten and kill you. Right.
#
And so even people who are hard of hearing, who cannot hear,
#
can sense crispness because the higher frequencies travel through the bone.
#
So you can literally feel the crunch of a panipuri,
#
regardless of whether you can hear or not.
#
Betavan famously used to listen to his music through his teeth.
#
Through his teeth.
#
And you can sort of hear those vibrations and so on. Right.
#
So in that sense, I think there are another example is the boo boo kiki thing. Right.
#
So like we also look at certain sounds
#
and we associate them with certain shapes in our head. Right.
#
A bar sounds generally sounds rounder than a car sound, which sounds sharper. Right.
#
Hard to hard to sorry.
#
It is impossible to sort of really explain why, but it's just the way it is.
#
Very similarly, Charles Spence found out that for the same amount of sugar,
#
a rounder shape tastes sweeter than an angular jagged shape,
#
because angular jagged shapes tend to evoke sourness more than than than sweetness.
#
And so when Cadbury changed, basically their dairy milk was slightly rounded,
#
despite not changing the the entire recipe.
#
People were like outraising that you guys made it too sweet.
#
You guys are adding needlessly more amount of sugar.
#
And they had to come and clarify that, no, that was not true.
#
And then this paper came out explaining that, well, this is why our brains
#
tend to process it this way.
#
And it's very hard to explain why, but that's just the way it is.
#
So Booboo versus Kiki would
#
you would imagine Booboo to be a nice roly poly person.
#
Right. So people, the moment you hear a name with a bar sound,
#
you automatically think this is a yeah, this is a rounder person.
#
This is very sad.
#
And it's also about how nomenclature could be destiny,
#
because I would normally never reveal this.
#
But one of my childhood nicknames, which my mother gave me, was Booboon.
#
So Booboo comes in there and look at my weight now.
#
I'm losing.
#
Yeah, she named me like Kiki or something.
#
It could have worked.
#
And, you know, what do you said about food?
#
Also, there's that thing about tomato juice.
#
The tomato juice tastes much better in flights,
#
which is why it is consumed so much than on the ground,
#
because your taste buds experience them differently
#
because of the different air pressure.
#
Yeah. Or whatever the case might be.
#
Low moisture and the lower air pressure in a flight
#
actually makes your taste buds about 30, 40 percent less sensitive.
#
And so what happens is that the dryness basically makes them a lot less sensitive.
#
And so normally cooked food will taste bland in an airplane.
#
So normally now chefs have adjusted to that,
#
to add more salt, more sugar, more sour so that the food tastes good.
#
So normally when you like, like, oh, I like this airlines,
#
the good chance that they're probably adding like an unhealthy amount of salt
#
to make it taste palatable.
#
So tomato juice is unique because it is a weird kind of sour,
#
especially more specifically, the Bloody Mary mix, which is salty.
#
So the most widely consumed cocktail in a plane is Bloody Mary.
#
That's a weird thing, right?
#
Again, because it's tomato juice and the add on effect
#
of the hard alcohol also mutes taste buds even more.
#
So that drink particularly needs even more salt.
#
And so what happens is that almost all of the tomato juice consumed
#
is consumed in flight because that sourness is comes down
#
to just the point where you're able to tolerate it.
#
And here's the other interesting thing.
#
So sometimes when things have two different flavors,
#
they'll be a dominant flavor and a less dominant flavor.
#
Our brains cannot usually sometimes cannot parallel process.
#
So they'll only pick up the dominant one and ignore and.
#
So classic childhood example, all of you would have gone through.
#
You've eaten Amla, right?
#
And then you drink water.
#
It tastes sweet. Why does it taste sweet?
#
Interesting thing is that Amla sourness comes from citric acid
#
and all the acids it has.
#
So acids are sour, right?
#
That is a dominant taste.
#
But citric acid specifically also has another trick up its sleeve.
#
It fits into the sweet taste receptors.
#
So it tricks your brain into thinking it is sweet.
#
Also, what happens when you drink water
#
is that you're increasing the pH.
#
So now your brain is like, I'm not saying so.
#
It's not really focusing on the sourness.
#
It's like not the sweetness now comes through.
#
What happens with tomato is that tomato has two predominant sour.
#
Second is, again, everybody's favorite demon, glutamate.
#
Yeah. Of MSG fame, right?
#
Tomato has a ton of free glutamates,
#
but not enough to dominate the sour taste.
#
So once you can't taste sour, umami comes through.
#
So people find tomato drinks to be very savory.
#
It's like almost drinking like sort of like a meat gravy.
#
So but the same thing when they drink on the ground,
#
it will just taste quite terrible.
#
And just to sort of double click on the sound thing also,
#
like one of the webinars in my writing course is about sound.
#
And the interesting thing is that hard sounds and soft sounds
#
play out in a certain way in the real world.
#
For example, words that end with vowels are soft sounds, right?
#
So Aditi, Mohini, Narendra, Modi, you cannot those two.
#
But generally, you will notice that girls' names in South Asia
#
will often end with a vowel, right?
#
Because it's a soft sound and softness is associated
#
for right or wrong, whatever.
#
That's a different argument with femininity.
#
And boys' names will often end with harder sounds like Amit, Ashok,
#
you know, Narendar and so on and so forth,
#
which is one interesting observation.
#
And in this great book called The Poetry Handbook by Mary Oliver,
#
she gives an example of how it plays out in the real world.
#
Now, imagine you are watching a movie, right?
#
You go to a cinema theater, you're about the movies about to start.
#
It starts. But two people are all behind you are talking, talking, talking.
#
Right. How do you handle this?
#
Your first gambit could be to turn around and say, hush.
#
Now, this is such a soft sound.
#
Hush. That is too gentle.
#
If you say this to a stranger, it'll seem like you're hitting on them.
#
Right. Is what you say to a little baby is being by your knee.
#
And you say, you know, uncle is cooking a stranger and prawns.
#
Hush. Now, what I would typically do is I'll turn around and I'll say, please be quiet.
#
Now, the quiet ends in a hard sound, the ter, it's emphatic.
#
But please be a soft sounds.
#
So it's getting a message across, but in a polite way.
#
So please be quiet. It's fine.
#
Unless you're in a cinema theater in Noida or Gurugram,
#
you're not going to get stabbed for this.
#
Apologies for my stereotypes.
#
I think Amit's stereotypes are acceptable in Chennai.
#
So I'll go with it.
#
And typically, if they don't listen, I'll have to turn around
#
and say something like, shut up.
#
And it's just hard sounds, the ter and the per.
#
Shut up. Right.
#
And writers know this.
#
See computational thinking that writers know soft sounds and hard sounds.
#
So when Shakespeare wants to make an impact, he will say,
#
now is the winter of our discontent. Yes.
#
You know, this is why Bob Dylan will say the answer,
#
my friend is blowing in the wind, not blowing in the breeze,
#
which doesn't have that same impact.
#
You know, you want to end with something emphatic, hard sound.
#
You want something flowy and gentle, softer sounds.
#
And even if writers are not always planning this
#
because of internalizes, it becomes intuition.
#
The computational thinking is working in the background.
#
And foolish people who don't know anything will call it art.
#
Exactly. And you know, the whole sound thing also reminds me of how,
#
like, for example, particularly Sanskrit is phenomenally flexible
#
when it comes to the interplay of sound. Right.
#
And because you can say the same thing in many ways,
#
it allows you to compose poetry that that there are some remarkable
#
examples of how you can follow some of the most crazy sound rules.
#
Like, for example, I need an alternate hard and sound. Right.
#
And I need I also need every fourth syllable.
#
I need a erotic sound. You can you can do those kinds of things. Right.
#
You know, the most common example that I did, you just say erotic sound.
#
What do you call it? Erotic. Right.
#
R. Fine. But you got that horny question is pending.
#
You got to tell me what makes you horny.
#
So so so so so for example, you know, Adi Shankara is the the whole
#
Aigiri Nandini. Right.
#
So if you so Aigiri Nandini, Nandita Me, Dini Vishwa, we know Dini.
#
So so the the the cadence of that, right, is just remarkable.
#
And if you look at the whole thing, you'll find that the exact the way
#
where the stress comes will keep varying based on what he wants to do.
#
And so there are some remarkable examples of this kind of stuff
#
that sometimes even harder in English to replicate,
#
because this is designed primarily around this sort of thing.
#
And because the word order doesn't matter. Right.
#
Because it's all tensors are inbuilt into the words and so
#
so you can actually play around with it.
#
So it's quite a lot of remarkable stuff.
#
Tell me about your experience with Sanskrit metal.
#
You know, how did it was it a great form in a great language
#
for the rhythms of metal?
#
No. So the way it worked was that
#
it was in a sense that I was I always enjoyed learning.
#
I did learn Sanskrit in school and obviously sort of lost touch with it
#
as I was getting out and out of college and so on.
#
It felt to me that one way of keeping in touch with the language,
#
many people try.
#
The problem is that sometimes the only way to keep in touch
#
with that language is to go down the religious path, right?
#
I mean, you read the Vedas and read, you know, all that sort of stuff
#
that I was not interested in.
#
It didn't appeal to me.
#
And so I was like, you know, is there well out there, you know,
#
to use a particularly negative word, secular ways of appreciating
#
the language, if you will,
#
because it's such a strong liturgical language that sometimes there is
#
there is like little pop culture in that language.
#
Of course, you could you could like read Kalidasa and all that.
#
But it also required you to be reasonably good at it
#
before you could do that. Right.
#
And so it struck me that for me.
#
So one of the things I often do is I use a personal
#
what I call it's a nice aside the the creation consumption ratio.
#
So for me, if I'm spending half an hour watching something,
#
I need to spend half an hour creating something. Right.
#
So it's how I keep that balance
#
so that I'm not endlessly doom scrolling and just consuming content
#
and watching more YouTube and watching Netflix,
#
but not actually creating anything. Right.
#
Listening to music, but not making music.
#
So so in that sense, for me, I almost always naturally,
#
rather than consuming stuff to learn,
#
I always prefer making stuff to learn.
#
And in this case, it's like, OK, fine.
#
Let me let me take a simple song, a heavy metal song that I enjoy.
#
And in this case, it turned out to be Rammstein's Do Hast. Right.
#
Again, the lyrics are quite straightforward.
#
And thankfully, I'd learned German before it wasn't too hard.
#
And essentially, the lyrics themselves are a parody of the wedding vows.
#
So do hast, do hast mich, do hast mich gefracht.
#
You have asked me and I have said no. Right.
#
And will you take me to be your whatever? Nine. Right.
#
Will you till death do us part nine?
#
So it's basically a parody of the wedding vows.
#
That's what the song is. Right.
#
And so it seemed like very straightforward.
#
And high school Sanskrit was enough to get that translated.
#
I had to use the help of Internet dictionaries and so on.
#
But I eventually got it translated, got it reviewed by a friend of mine
#
who was much better at Sanskrit and so on.
#
And then I just said, fine, now let me make a slightly Carnatic,
#
heavy metal adaptation.
#
But it shouldn't sound very Carnatic, like the cheesy Internet stuff.
#
It still should sound like that Rammstein song.
#
But it will have instead of the keyboard solo,
#
I played a violin solo, like, for example. Right.
#
And then so that's how the whole thing began.
#
And the interesting funny story with that song was
#
once that sort of mildly went viral,
#
a wedding planner in Bhopal contacted me
#
and he said, sir, I really loved this song.
#
I would like to play it at the I want permission
#
for our DJ to play the song at the weddings he's doing in Bhopal.
#
Right. And I was like, sure.
#
I mean, you know, you know, like we can figure out what your, you know, IP,
#
you know, rates are, etc.
#
And then he's like, no, no, no, I will give you free promotion.
#
Right. You don't I don't have to pay you.
#
I'll give you free promotion because, you know, you will get a lot of people
#
will hear it, etc, etc. He wanted to use that logic.
#
So so in generally, then I said, it's fine.
#
But do you also realize that this is a song that is literally
#
basically making fun of the wedding vows, the wedding vows,
#
and it's faithfully translated into Sanskrit.
#
And you want to play that at a wedding.
#
His answer was nobody understands Sanskrit.
#
They would just like the sound of it.
#
So anyway, that was that interesting aside.
#
So that people just like hearing Sanskrit and they think it's holy.
#
Can we play a bit of that song now?
#
You'll get exposure. We can play it.
#
Absolutely. Absolutely.
#
All my music is there on SoundCloud anyway.
#
It's there on iTunes as well.
#
I'll give you absolute rights have been cleared for you to play.
#
Marvelous. So guys, listen to this.
#
Yes. OK, fine. So this is how it began.
#
And then with that song, then obviously I got a little bit more bold
#
than I permanently said, look, I probably need to find a collaborator
#
who's a little bit better.
#
And then we would jointly sit and translate more and more harder songs.
#
Still, we reached Pink Floyd's High Hopes.
#
I was like, oh, no, the imagery and all of that.
#
There's any literal translation will just seem silly.
#
Yeah. Right.
#
Again, not that people understand Sanskrit,
#
but at least, you know, for personal satisfaction. Right.
#
So for that alone, I had to reach out to a professor of Sanskrit
#
who actually, strangely enough, has a pet project.
#
She gladly did it for free.
#
And she said, this is lovely. I wanted to do this.
#
And she then would ask me and say, what did he mean by this
#
random vague reference to some Oxford meadow somewhere in some Pink Floyd song?
#
What did he actually mean?
#
And then I had to go through blogs that explained Pink Floyd imagery
#
and said, no, this is actually a drug reference.
#
And this is OK.
#
So then I will convert it appropriately to some Sanskrit
#
Soma, some drug reference.
#
And a lot of these things had to be adapted.
#
And it was just a great fun exercise. Right.
#
I mean, I just enjoyed that entire process.
#
I didn't really care about how well it would do.
#
It was a great fun. And in the sense, I
#
by the time I finished that album, I recognized that I had
#
effectively learned more Sanskrit than I had during my entire school life.
#
Because school life was basically memorizing a bunch of things to crack an exam.
#
And Sanskrit is famously very logical.
#
And you've got to gamify it.
#
If you're good at memorizing stuff, I think, you know, there's nothing to it.
#
There's no creativity. You're not actually writing essays.
#
You know, that's it. I wish somehow I feel that in retrospect,
#
I wish I'd actually maybe study Tamil or Hindi as a as a as a second language,
#
because in those languages, you at least you have to think you have to write.
#
You have to describe. You have to make your own stuff.
#
No such thing. In Sanskrit, you're just basically parroting what is already done.
#
You're doing some very basic translations.
#
You're not really doing anything advanced at all.
#
So we'll play the Ramstein song now and we'll play the Pink Floyd cover
#
at the end of the episode and have the time codes in my show notes.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me, but I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me or hear any cameo.
#
Your drain is at the bottom of the screen.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
#
or hear any cameo.
#
I'm not sure if you can hear any cameo.
#
Say what ever you want.
#
Vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam.
#
Vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam.
#
Vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam.
#
Vam, vam, vam, vam, vam, vam.
#
Vam, vam, vam, vam, vam.
#
Vam, vam, vam, vam.
#
Vam, vam, vam, vam, vam.
#
And as good mates go, she went.
#
She went.
#
I think which AI will be the last to crack is humor.
#
A certain kind of humor.
#
A certain category of humor.
#
Yeah, and a great point about adjectives and verbs.
#
How do you know I say that in my writing course?
#
Have you ever done my writing course?
#
I have heard every single one of your podcast episodes and what you don't realize is that the net sum of all the advice in your course,
#
you have given it away for free if people have listened to your podcast.
#
I'm flattered.
#
So here's a way to save money, guys.
#
No, but that's advice I'd really give to everyone because people misunderstand sure don't tell.
#
People think sure don't tell means you have to describe something, which means adjectives.
#
And that's completely wrong.
#
Sure don't tell means you show a character doing something.
#
And with that, you indicate a state of mind or you indicate something about him.
#
Like as for this corpulent lady, I love this phrase.
#
I forget who it's from, but that person said, nouns name the world, verbs activate them.
#
And these are the two key things.
#
So whenever you want to bring life into something that you're writing, go for the concrete and use verbs.
#
Absolutely.
#
Even that Anglo-Saxon example you gave, even in food, right?
#
It's interesting how the word cow, sheep, goat, all of these are Anglo-Saxon words, simple Anglo-Saxon words.
#
Beef, mutton, pork, these are all French words.
#
Fascinating.
#
So because after the Norman conquest, people don't realize that the English upper class was French speaking.
#
It took them 200 years to eventually decide to deign to speak the local language.
#
And so the terms they used ended up being, they were never really anywhere close to the animal at all.
#
That was poor farmers and peasants doing that.
#
They experienced the cow only as beef.
#
They experienced the goat only as mutton.
#
So those are all of the French origin words in the new CD.
#
So basically, Hinduism got it right by favoring the Anglo-Saxon.
#
We like cows, but we don't like beef.
#
Yes, we're for the...
#
Naren, I want to ask you about, you know, we mentioned the upper class only seeing the beef and the whatever.
#
The upper class over here would be exactly the opposite way around.
#
No beef, cow is all fine and good.
#
And you made an observation earlier before we began this recording, which I want to double click on,
#
where you said that humanity has contempt for what others eat.
#
And you pointed out, you know, just elaborate more on it.
#
Yeah, so I just, you know, I've seen, like I've felt the contempt of vegetarian people for when I eat something like pork or beef.
#
They're, you know, then they're okay with chicken and they're somewhat okay with goat.
#
But if I'm eating a pig or a cow, they, you know, they have a great contempt for me and it seems to wash away whatever else I might have said.
#
So then I saw, you know, we have all of us Indians have this little seat of contempt for Chinese people because they eat lizards and snakes and cockroaches.
#
So it's so natural.
#
I mean, it's there, it's very deep.
#
And it's interesting because one of the most provocative things I usually say in my food related presentations is that food doesn't unite Indians.
#
Food actually divides Indians.
#
Brilliant.
#
But we're just not willing to think about it.
#
Sure.
#
Just saying we all like butter chicken, we all like, you know, paneer butter masala is one thing, right?
#
That's not really, that's just restaurant food.
#
It represents a tiny fraction of what we eat on a daily basis.
#
And, you know, even if you, and I'm sure you've had, you know, Tony Joseph and others in your podcast as well.
#
We Indians are basically a large number of basically largely inbred genetic groups, right?
#
Because we marry within our caste, right?
#
And for the last 2000 years.
#
So even now, even medical professionals now regularly struggle because every one of these groups has unique problems.
#
They all react uniquely to medicines.
#
They react uniquely to foods.
#
We have different allergies.
#
And so I remember, I think a friend of mine, we went to the hospital in somewhere in Coimbatore.
#
And he was slightly taken aback when the doctor asked, are you this caste?
#
He was like, why is caste relevant?
#
He says, no, this is not a social thing.
#
It's a medical thing.
#
We know that if you're Chettiar, this is how diabetes works for you.
#
Right.
#
And so, so this essentially means that what we've ended up doing is that we've sort of created these small, small, small tiny tribes.
#
And it is at least my hypothesis that a big part of keeping tribal loyalty and that caste loyalty would place a big role.
#
Because one of the hardest things for people to do is to eat food that is different from what they grew up eating.
#
Because that's how the part of the brain that deals with flavor is the same part of the brain that makes memories and nostalgia.
#
Because we have visual cortex, smell and all that.
#
But flavor is all combinational.
#
So it is basically the part of the brain that deals with it is the nostalgia part.
#
And so when we say I enjoy my mother's sambar, the sourness, the dal choice, the amount of heat, the salt is a very tiny part of that.
#
The aromas are a part of that.
#
But the physical presence of your mother, your kitchen, that surrounding, that is a part of that flavor memory.
#
So that's why you can't really, it's very hard to enjoy food that you did not grow up eating.
#
Exactly.
#
And the common example I give is that there is one molecule called trimethylamine,
#
which essentially is produced by bacteria on the skin of fishes.
#
The moment the fish dies, that bacteria multiplies and the fish starts.
#
So the quintessential smell of fish is basically trimethylamine.
#
Fishy smell essentially.
#
If you're from a seafood eating family, it's the warm and comforting smell of your mother's kitchen.
#
If you're not, it's the nasty smell of a fish market.
#
Exact same molecule having these two diametrically opposite effects.
#
So what this means is that the moment you bring people up and say this is what is good, this is what you will eat.
#
And on top of that, Indians are famously will not allow you to eat in other people's houses.
#
Yes.
#
Even as a child, even when you might be okay to experiment, that's when they will make sure you can go to your friend's house, no eating.
#
Non-veg friend, no eating there.
#
Muslim friend, no eating there.
#
Christian friend, no eating there.
#
And likewise, both ways.
#
So the problem here is that we've ended up creating people with insanely strong flavor memories
#
that they believe are actually universal, but actually only practically only applies to them and what they grew up eating.
#
Which is why people on social media end up fighting over
#
sambar is not supposed to have fennel is a fight.
#
It just so turns out that tamburams don't use fennel as a spice.
#
That's all. If you did not grow up eating it, you're going to find that odd.
#
And so it's not just to do with fish or non-veg.
#
People are literally divided at the level of, I will eat stuff with onion.
#
I will not eat stuff with garlic.
#
Things underground, I will not eat.
#
This particular community will not eat brinjal.
#
This particular community will not eat a specific vegetable on certain days.
#
So the more food rules you have, the easier it is for you to maintain castor oil.
#
I never thought of it like that, but this is so profound.
#
We've ended up creating people who are some of the most intolerant to any other kind of food.
#
Indians are far more likely to go to the US and then seek out Indian restaurants.
#
And not only that, it has to be vegetarian or it has to be Jane, it has to be whatever.
#
There is maybe 15% of the population that generally is considered,
#
if you look at the Gaussian distribution, of people who are novelty seekers in food.
#
They are a minority.
#
The vast majority of people seek comfort.
#
Comfort only comes from eating what you've always eaten.
#
Which means that, forget if the Toor Dal becomes some other Dal, Moong Dal, it's not acceptable.
#
So if the sambar contains Moong Dal instead of Toor Dal, it's a deal breaker.
#
If no curry leaves were used, it's a deal breaker.
#
In a sense, I think food actually crazily divides us.
#
For example, I would sometimes tell some of my relatives that,
#
look, just think about all your friends and think about why they are your friends all the way.
#
You're now 60 years old, you still have some friends.
#
Why are all of them vegetarian and why are all of them of that same community?
#
Did you not have people from other communities and other religions when you were in school?
#
Why did you not end up, in a sense that I would actually argue,
#
have you ever eaten at that person's place?
#
Have you ever, you know, have you actually dined, communed with someone and eaten their food?
#
If you can't do that, then how is it that you build these kinds of relationships?
#
So food actually really divides people and we don't recognize it.
#
The incredible nuance here is that, you know, it's like it is not, one would imagine,
#
at a very basic level that a particular chemical will hit everybody's brain the same way.
#
But what you're saying is that there is a combination of tricks involved here.
#
As neuroscientists say, neurons that fire together, wire together.
#
That shapes the way how you respond to food.
#
And looking at an example of this, and I'm going to sort of turn to caste in a moment,
#
and looking at the example of this, I did an episode with Chandrabhan Prasadji on caste.
#
And a number of great TILs, but one of them was that when he goes back to his village
#
and he sees an elder in the family with diabetes, he celebrates.
#
Because for them, it indicates that there is a certain kind of prosperity
#
that has come together with diabetes and that prosperity is worth celebrating
#
and the diabetes is fine, whatever, we're all going to die anyway.
#
And just to sort of explain to listeners who might not be aware of that endogamy insight,
#
you know, in the Tony Joseph episode, in his book, he quotes David Reich,
#
who also does similar genetic studies, as saying that if you're looking for a large population,
#
the Han Chinese is a large population, but in India, you get thousands of small populations.
#
And this is because around 2000 years ago, and the date is important,
#
because before that, all our migrants from everywhere else were basically having a party.
#
Everybody, full-on party. 2000 years ago, you've got severe caste endogamy.
#
And the ramifications of this, of course, are there on food and what Ashok described so well.
#
It is also there on gender, because what happens when you have caste endogamy
#
is that you have to control women's sexuality.
#
And then that leads to a certain way of thinking and a certain controlling of norms
#
and a drive towards, you know, female seclusion.
#
It leads to what the economist Alice Evans calls the honor income trade-off.
#
So today, when you look at women's participation in the workforce,
#
one of the reasons for that is that when a family reaches a level that both people don't have to work,
#
the woman will stop working for the sake of honor,
#
because the family can now afford what they quote-unquote call honor.
#
And it's all dating back to that particular Hindu-belt ideology of caste winning
#
over circa 2000 years ago and it continuing down this way.
#
And both of you have spoken about the differences in food.
#
Naren, I remember you talking once to me about how different castes will have different things.
#
So this is our hypothesis. And we put that down as a project.
#
We never got anywhere with it.
#
And the project was to go to a village and try and sample the food of different castes within that village.
#
And it will be really interesting.
#
Is your hypothesis from your experiences that they're very different?
#
Yeah, I have really not. I've eaten. So I've eaten a meal at a cobbler's house.
#
One of my friends, this cobbler is to work.
#
I mean, he's from that cobbler caste, he used to work in his office and he was getting married.
#
So we went there and they had, you know, kept.
#
So just the two of us, me and my friend, we drew all the way up to Ratnagiri, some small village.
#
And it's a little hamlet of just cobbler people.
#
Really basic thing, wedding is happening.
#
And there is food and they bring different plates for us.
#
And there are things like paneer, paneer chili and things like that.
#
Clearly they brought it from some far away place.
#
They wouldn't eat that. It's just for the two of us.
#
And my friend is a very strict vegetarian.
#
The rest of these people are eating meat.
#
So I went, I said, can I eat?
#
There was chicken, there was beef and I remember chicken and beef.
#
And the flavor profile was really different.
#
I've eaten chicken curry in Maharashtra, in that part of Maharashtra.
#
Flavor profile was really different.
#
And unfortunately, I don't remember it. I didn't register it much.
#
But it's something I would like to go and do it again.
#
Even if you had tried to replicate it,
#
you would have made something completely opposite from previous experience.
#
This reminds me of this beautiful story.
#
It really moves me every time I hear it and the first time I heard it.
#
Mukulika Banerjee in her episode speaks about how for her book on Pathan,
#
brilliant book called The Pathan Unarmed.
#
This was like a PhD thesis turned into a book, took 10 years to write.
#
But she spent a few months in Northwest Frontier province,
#
trying to track down survivors of the Khudai Khidmatgarh.
#
Now there was this great non-violent movement Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan.
#
And they were basically shut down after a partition because they opposed partition.
#
So they didn't exist and she was looking for surviving members.
#
And her local guide was taking her from village to village in that province,
#
trying to find old men who would remember.
#
And typically if there was an old man who was a Khudai Khidmatgarh,
#
he would say maybe in that particular village so many miles away,
#
northeast of here there is one guy, Yusuf.
#
But you know I last saw him 40 years ago and they were going like that.
#
And what Mukulika noticed was that in all of these places beef was cheap,
#
so beef was plentiful and chicken was very expensive.
#
And every house would have one chicken for a special guest.
#
And whenever she came they would give her that one chicken
#
because A doesn't eat beef and B, a special guest, you know,
#
Mehman Nawazi and all of that.
#
And Mukulika felt bad about it that she is, you know,
#
the most expensive thing she is eating.
#
So she began eating beef just for that reason.
#
And when she came back to India she told her mother about this,
#
who was a staunch Hindu.
#
And her mother thought for a while and said,
#
son you have done right, this is humanity.
#
And this moves me so much because to me this is, we are also this.
#
And today we don't say enough of this but we are also this.
#
See all food is, the very definition of food is one form of life,
#
killing and eating another form of life.
#
Yes.
#
That's literally the, there are, it's really weird, right?
#
So I think there is this interesting talk where someone said
#
that there are only two things that can nourish us
#
that do not involve the death of an organism.
#
Only two things.
#
Can you guys name the two things?
#
Milk.
#
Milk and honey.
#
So in fact the biblical land of milk and honey and so on.
#
So in a weird way it's like sort of like the only two things
#
that do not involve the death of another animal.
#
On a completely lighter note,
#
the two things that vegans will not allow you to eat.
#
So on that, yeah.
#
So again, I love vegans but you know,
#
I know they give me a lot of grief on Instagram
#
but otherwise I do love them.
#
But yeah, so it's interesting how food in general,
#
all rules about food are effectively actually mostly just cultural.
#
They're not actually based on science.
#
They're just purely, they are cultural and they get into taboos
#
because the taboos help you define your identity, right?
#
And so the moment you say that you eat something else,
#
you've lost that identity, right?
#
And within India I think because of the fact that it's largely again a poor place,
#
you will find that the cooking habits as you go down the economic ladder
#
are not cultural choices but are purely economical choices.
#
So you will often find, and interesting I've seen a ton of YouTube videos
#
because the good thing about YouTube is that there's now content
#
from every part of India, every social class as well, right?
#
So you can sort of see what a specific rural community in Andhra Pradesh is cooking
#
and how that, there's a hundred year old lady who had a channel,
#
I think recently passed away and so on.
#
She cooks these things in the village.
#
I think I've seen that, yeah.
#
And she would just pick up leaves and she would cook.
#
You'd be surprised to find out that, you know, fancy spices
#
because your cardamom and badi elaichi and that stuff is expensive.
#
Pepper, all those things are expensive.
#
So they use other alternatives.
#
So they use, and also they use the poorer cuts of meat.
#
They consume organs that we would not consume.
#
And because they're consuming the poorer, harder, bonier organ meat,
#
they're able to get a lot more flavor of those meaty.
#
So when people sort of, when people love Japanese food and things,
#
so much umami and all of that, it's because you haven't eaten that food.
#
That's very similar. It has a very similar flavor profile
#
because you're actually getting a lot of that flavor from the marrow
#
and from all of that, which are like super flavorful fatty acids.
#
And no spices, not mass by spices because those spices are expensive.
#
So people think that India is just about spices.
#
No, the lower down you go, they're not using expensive spices at all.
#
Maximum they would use chili powder and turmeric, just sort of like universal.
#
But you won't find cardamom, elaichi, cinnamon and all those.
#
Yes, of course, where it's cheap in Kerala, where it grows,
#
of course they're going to use it.
#
But not somewhere where nutmeg is not available.
#
Somewhere in Bihar, somewhere in UP, probably not.
#
Not going to happen, yes.
#
Here's a question, provocative question.
#
Recently a friend of mine was having this vegetarian argument with me
#
and I said, listen, if I eat goat meat, I've killed one goat.
#
If you're having any vegetable, you've killed literally perhaps
#
millions of animals in the whole ecosystem of farming.
#
I'm not even going into that argument that plants have feelings.
#
But, you know, your thoughts?
#
No, so this has always been a, as someone, again,
#
just as someone who's been on Instagram doing food content for a year and a half,
#
this is a front and center thing, right?
#
No matter what you do, you post something on egg,
#
there's going to be someone saying, no, caged hens, cruelty.
#
If you post something on chicken, it's going to be the same thing.
#
It's going to be beef, it's going to be the same thing.
#
Usually if it's beef, the argument will often be that it's bad for the planet and so on.
#
So I've thought long and hard about it.
#
So on the one hand, let's first address the medical and the health science about it.
#
The honest reality is that you can be healthy on any kind of diet.
#
How much you eat and the overall balance matters.
#
Inuits actually just eat seal blubber and whale and no vegetables and they're fine, right?
#
And there are people who eat a completely vegan diet and are fine.
#
People who are on a keto diet and are fine.
#
People who are low fat and are fine.
#
So first and foremost is that you can be healthy on any kind of diet.
#
That's number one.
#
And not everyone responds the same way to food.
#
There are some people who are allergic to soy, who may not be able to consume soy.
#
There are people who are allergic to dairy, who may not be able to consume paneer as protein and so on.
#
So everyone, and there are variations, everyone reacts to the same stuff differently.
#
There are people who process saturated fats better than others.
#
There are others who, the slightest amount of saturated fat, their heart is like blocked, right?
#
And again, so there are variations, genetic variations and lifestyle and so many epigenetics and all of that.
#
When you come to the question about, before morality, we'll get to, we'll first address sustainability
#
because that's a more, more objective thing you can, morals are like very subjective, right?
#
When it comes to sustainability, the biggest fallacy often find is that vegetarians and vegans in India
#
will use data from the US to question Indians' choice of eating when it comes to sustainability.
#
So the data they will use is 25% of greenhouse gases is from the American beef industry.
#
Indians are not eating American beef for starters, okay?
#
And we don't have giant cattle farms in India.
#
What we have is a giant dairy industry, which therefore, which we have one third of the world's cattle.
#
We become the, we export all the cattle that are not able to produce milk, namely the males, as beef.
#
That's what we do, right?
#
We are one of the first or the second largest exporter of beef in the world, right?
#
So the second thing is the fact that Indian per capita consumption of meat is like 10 times smaller
#
than the average Western European or American consumption of meat.
#
Yes, of course, logical, the moment you eat something that's higher up the food chain, more carbon, right?
#
I mean, it's a product, it's a sum of everything.
#
That's fair enough, right?
#
And in India, people do not consume meat like it's the center of the dish, right?
#
I mean, you're a fish curry person.
#
How many fishes are in a fish curry?
#
You'd be hard pressed to go on two or three, right?
#
A chicken curry is a way to make two small pieces of chicken go a long way, right?
#
Everybody's not sitting and eating the leg piece day out like the famous guy, right?
#
The leg piece guy, yeah.
#
The leg piece guy, right?
#
So that's not what's happening.
#
So, and then the other thing I did is that you look at Niti Ayo's own data about where India's greenhouse gases come from.
#
74% comes from fossil fuels and transportation, energy, electricity, production.
#
That is 74%.
#
14% comes from agriculture.
#
That's it.
#
Amidst that 14%, what do you think is the largest contributor of greenhouse gases?
#
It's dairy cattle.
#
It's basically cows farting, right?
#
And here's the weird part.
#
Since you can only get milk from the postpartum females,
#
which therefore means you have a ton of that population that's just sitting around, unproductive, farting away, right?
#
And contributing to greenhouse gas.
#
Weirdly, a climate scientist once told me, up to a limit, if Indians actually start consuming beef,
#
your carbon footprint would go down because you're going to consume them younger.
#
I know this is a controversial thing to say, but yes, up to a point.
#
Of course, if demand for beef goes up and you then have more cattle, of course, it's going to be a problem.
#
But even the current scenario, if you just simply get out of the way of people who traditionally eat beef,
#
your carbon footprint will go down, right?
#
So that is number one.
#
The second thing is that's half.
#
Where do you think the other half comes from?
#
30% of that, of the food part, is rice.
#
People look at, when you look at a paddy field, what do you see?
#
It's beautiful, it's green, it's food, it's generating oxygen is what you think, right?
#
No, paddy fields are net carbon negative.
#
Because there's a bacteria in the soil that bloody puts out a ton of carbon during that entire process.
#
So as a climate scientist once said, that you look at a factory and smoking, you think that's bad for the planet.
#
You look at a paddy field, you don't think the same thing.
#
But he says, you put a bunch of paddy fields of a certain acres, that's as bad as a factory.
#
So people don't realize this, right?
#
And then animal husbandry and meat consumption as a fraction of India's greenhouse gases, not even a rounding error.
#
You see, this is Niti Ayu's data, right?
#
So I keep telling people that you're going after Indians who are just now starting to afford enough to be able to eat more protein.
#
And we are famously protein nourished and our diet is like heavy on carbs.
#
And like you guys are shaving people about using data from the West about sustainability.
#
We will get to the moral argument separately, right?
#
But this is, I've always found it quite silly that we are not even, we don't even consume as much meat per capita as China does.
#
They consume three times more animal protein.
#
Of course, nobody is doubting that as we get wealthier, this will become a problem.
#
Boss, you know, cut before the horse, right?
#
So the last element is obviously the moral argument is obviously very hard to convince people one way or another because it's very subjective.
#
At the end of the day, as I said, if I take an absolutist view that all form of life is one form of life killing another, right?
#
His point about saying that you're right.
#
Actually, a rice field is as much a crime of nature if you argue in that sense that you have to kill every other species, kill every rat, kill every other plant and everything to basically grow that rice,
#
which is the most unnatural thing you can imagine in nature.
#
And on the other hand, you have a problem with a farmer raising a bunch of goats and chickens around the house.
#
The reason humans basically domesticated animals is because we don't realize that when we did agriculture, human beings eventually figured out that we eat a tiny fraction of what we produce.
#
The rice plant is huge. You eat the grain.
#
Just the grain.
#
All the rest is waste.
#
Human beings figured out that I can tame a bunch of animals that will turn that agricultural waste and turn it into free protein for me.
#
That is how animal husbandry was born.
#
Of course, now we have caged chickens and large giant farms is a problem of industrial scale.
#
But that's how animal husbandry was born.
#
You can't go around and tell someone that you've got to become a vegetarian.
#
When they've been doing this for tens of thousands of years, the idea of turning agricultural waste into basically protein for free and effectively the cost of protein for the poorest villager is free.
#
Exactly.
#
For a small family.
#
It's just byproducts.
#
They reproduce.
#
They eat waste.
#
You don't feed them.
#
The goats go eat whatever they eat, agricultural waste.
#
And it's free protein.
#
They reproduce and you get milk.
#
I mean, that is self-sufficient in that sense.
#
Of course, city people are obviously buying from supermarkets.
#
And that's a problem.
#
Yes, we know that.
#
But that's the fundamental moral problem is always that people have to be very choosy.
#
It's saying that I will ignore the human suffering.
#
There is no large scale rice plantation without human suffering.
#
Rice plantations are not exactly automated like corn plantations in the US.
#
It's backbreaking work.
#
It requires brutal human labor.
#
Highly, it used to be planted twice.
#
It's brutal.
#
Right?
#
Yeah.
#
So I want to make two points.
#
And one is, you know, in my typical humble way, which I am proud of having cultivated over the years, I have to say that my keto diet is contributing to the environment because one, I'm not eating rice and two, I'm eating beef.
#
So in all these ways that you describe, it's, you know, I'm...
#
And you're eating Indian beef.
#
I'm helping this.
#
I also want to posit the great cow paradox.
#
Right?
#
But before that, I will turn to tigers in China.
#
Our mutual friend, Barun Mitra, who has been on the show, had once written this great piece for New York Times saying that if you want to save tigers in China, which was a campaign, then save the tiger.
#
Last tiger is dying out.
#
You should actually allow tiger farming that if you breed tigers and you allow their open sale in the market, you create incentives by which people will actually start tiger farming and tigers will be plentiful.
#
And if people start eating their meat, even more plentiful because the market grows.
#
And the way to save the tiger is actually to allow their sale instead of the other way around, instead of black marketing it.
#
And when you think of what it does to India and the consequences, the cow paradox comes up.
#
And the cow paradox is that our cow belt has slowly turning into Buffalo Nation because your incentives for having cows is dropping quickly because milk becomes your only way of earning revenue from the cows.
#
And because that is simply not enough, essentially cow belt is becoming Buffalo Nation.
#
So while we want to do away with beef on the other hand, there is this rhetoric of protect the cow, cow is our mother.
#
But if you take it to its logical conclusion that no one can eat beef, there will be no cows left.
#
Yeah, of course.
#
So the whole, not to mention the interesting sort of mythological biases towards the buffalo being the vehicle of Lord Yama, right?
#
And therefore acceptable to eat, right?
#
Cow, no, no, cow is healthy.
#
Cow is fair skinned, right?
#
So buffalo is dark skinned.
#
And all of these are accidents of geography.
#
The north and the west are the dairy belt because you have large flat open pastures where you can have cows grazed.
#
The south and the east don't.
#
And so these are seafood and you have the wetlands where you can grow rice.
#
And these are therefore the rice and seafood places.
#
And that's basically the paneer and milk part of India.
#
These are accidents.
#
And it's interesting how I think, I believe 70% of South Indians and East Indians are lactose intolerant as adults.
#
It's the reverse.
#
North and West Indians are 70% lactose tolerant.
#
And people forget that lactose tolerance as an adult is the exception, not the rule.
#
East Asians are famously completely lactose intolerant after being weaned from their consumption of dairy milk is very small.
#
So the only form they eat it in is in situations where there's no lactose, high fat ice creams and things like that.
#
So these are all just complete accidents of geography rather than anything else.
#
So all this talk of food is making me damn hungry and it is almost lunchtime.
#
But before we go, because when you said dairy belt, I remember that as a kid, I would get really, my pronunciations are bad, half Bengali and all that.
#
I would get very confused between pronouncing dairy and diary.
#
And therefore comes my next question for both of you.
#
But first with a lot of, you know, emphatic violence almost towards Mr. Shanoi.
#
And people on Twitter also have been asking this that Mr. Shanoi, where is the memoir?
#
And I will turn to you after this because there are similar questions to be asked.
#
But our friend Mr. Ashok has written a book and is writing more and is extremely productive.
#
You on the other hand, you know, Ashok, there's a group on Facebook started I think in 2011 or 2010 by Chuck Gopal.
#
We want Narendra Shanoi to write a book.
#
Everybody, the nation wants to know where is the book?
#
What is happening, sir?
#
So actually I've, so Amit, you know, he spends his time between Bombay and a farm in Karjat.
#
And he's been after me to come and spend a week or two weeks in Karjat and sit and write the farm.
#
It's a farm in the middle of a forest.
#
So daily, you know, what Japanese call forest bathing is happening.
#
There are lakes there so that he won't have to do any farming.
#
He will just enjoy himself in the middle of nature, continue.
#
So there is, so we are putting up a new factory.
#
So I've been sort of, what are those things?
#
They put on horses, bridles, straps, saddles, saddles.
#
And then I've been forced into sort of making that factory, creating that factory.
#
But it should get done in like less than a month.
#
Yes. So I have a completely contrary view to this.
#
I believe the best way to get Narayan to write a book is not to make him sit alone in a farmhouse and all of that.
#
His genius comes in making Vodossian Pratchett style observations in day to day mundane situations.
#
So all we need is for him and his wife to keep traveling and keep having those experiences.
#
And just for maybe someone to just keep recording his anecdotes as and when they happen, instead of waiting for him to put it on Twitter.
#
And then just combine that and have someone go straight to a book.
#
So let me tell you something. He's part of my clear writing WhatsApp group.
#
Every day he relates one or two stories.
#
He has gone through all WhatsApp groups he has been part of historically and collated all of those stories and gotten it ready.
#
Also, what I did last November is there is a thing called NaNoWriMo where people write a novel in November.
#
So I announced as a way of getting writing habits going that on November 1 at 6 a.m.
#
I will start a Zoom call, which will go on for the rest of November.
#
And people join whenever they feel like video audio can be off.
#
But just seeing that there are other people there who are writing can really help.
#
And our good friend here, Mr. Shenoy, actually wrote how many thousand words did you write?
#
About 20,000.
#
Oh, not bad. That's like a longish short story.
#
But we need to get more of that.
#
Novela at least.
#
No, but what Ashok said.
#
So I also I on that on that writing group, especially, you know, there is conversation.
#
And then I remember something that I put it in.
#
And oftentimes even I didn't know I had that experience.
#
So it's awesome. It's very cathartic.
#
I mean, I say like so my wife, there was a there was a point of time when I was actively blogging.
#
She enjoyed your comments on my blog far more than she enjoyed my writing.
#
So she would just wait to see why hasn't why hasn't Shenoy commented on this?
#
Actually got me thinking. So my question for both of you is let us we of course want Narendra Shenoy to write a book.
#
And now I'm realizing what you said is true.
#
If you were alone in a room all day, you would have no contextual passing comments to remember stories out of.
#
Those are happening because you're having interactions.
#
How can we optimize?
#
So the number of interactions is perfect to get a good number of stories out, but not overwhelming and tiring.
#
I think he needs a he needs it like the equivalent of a tweet generator,
#
except that someone who can nudge him as and when these things are happening to capture it in audio and then let the AI do the rest.
#
So AI will not write any of what he is writing, but it will stimulate him with realistic conversation and he will remember stories.
#
Maybe maybe maybe he just needs to chat with AI, which is just maybe just prompting him, right?
#
Hey, you know, remember that time when you were in Dadar station and then that's enough, right?
#
And then he'll come up with some I'm sure he can now come up with an insane story that happened in Dadar station, which will be worth publishing.
#
You have a great Goregaon or Borivali which station is that?
#
All stations are replaceable with each other.
#
So this this happened.
#
So I had an uncle who was sadly passed away early, but he's the most awesome person in my family by hands down.
#
Completely, you know, lacking in any moral sort of fiber and entire being.
#
That's your definition of awesome.
#
I just love that guy.
#
Complete Maida of humanity.
#
So one time his mother who they used to live in Vadala, her brother used to live in Mulun.
#
So Mulun is the one the best way of getting from Vadala to Mulun is you walk to Dadar station and you catch a train to Mulun.
#
And my grand aunt, unfortunately, could speak only Konkri and Kannada.
#
She didn't know any other language.
#
So she knew how to get to Dadar station.
#
She could walk there.
#
But and she knew how to get from Mulun station to her brother's house.
#
But she didn't know.
#
She couldn't read the indicators and she didn't know which train was going in which direction.
#
So she asked her son.
#
So he says, no problem.
#
You ask anyone.
#
Yeh train Mulun kyun jata hai?
#
So this lady goes there at Dadar station and she's freaking out everyone by asking a very existential question.
#
Yeh train Mulun kyun jata hai?
#
People are like, yeh jata hai toh jata hai.
#
And she couldn't understand that.
#
She was in tears.
#
Even the trains engineer or the driver wouldn't be able to tell you.
#
Why?
#
Very existential question.
#
You could change someone's life with a question like this.
#
But I have a question for you too.
#
Hum kyun lunch khaate hai?
#
Time for a break.
#
Anyway, time for a break.
#
Have you always wanted to be a writer but never quite gotten down to it?
#
Well, I'd love to help you.
#
Since April 2020, I've enjoyed teaching 27 cohorts of my online course, The Art of Clear Writing.
#
And an online community has now sprung up of all my past students.
#
We have workshops, a newsletter to showcase the work of students and vibrant community interaction.
#
In the course itself, through four webinars spread over four weekends, I share all I know about the craft and practice of clear writing.
#
There are many exercises, much interaction and a lovely and lively community at the end of it.
#
The course costs rupees 10,000 plus GST or about a hundred and fifty dollars.
#
If you're interested, head on over to register at indiaankar.com slash clear writing.
#
That's indiaankar.com slash clear writing.
#
Being a good writer doesn't require God given talent, just a willingness to work hard and a clear idea of what you need to do to refine your skills.
#
I can help you.
#
Welcome back to The Scene and The On Scene.
#
Welcome to The Scene and The On Scene.
#
I'm chatting with Krish Ashok and Naren Shanoi.
#
And I have been informed by Ashok during our walk towards biryani, which we had during lunch, that number of illuminations that I want to focus on.
#
But the first of them, we are all Amits from Africa.
#
Kindly explain. And you, by the way, are a North Indian. Your surname is Sharma.
#
Right. That is Mr. Krish Ashok who keeps so coined the pejorative term Amit, which I have suffered from and self-deprecatingly referred to myself often.
#
But kindly explain. We are all Amits from Africa.
#
So one, you do realize that the origin of the Amit phrase actually kind of goes back to the 90s, late 90s era, Rediff.
#
Where the general assumption was that, by the way, a good friend of mine, Harish, who's my musical collaborator, he, in one of my blog comments,
#
essentially made this reference that, you know, these random Amit underscore one, two, threes who leave those comments on Rediff.
#
And that is how, since then, we started referring to a certain typical stereotype of this angry internet North Indian as an Amit underscore one, two, three.
#
It just got shortened to Amit. Right. And by the time, you know, Twitter came, it just became Amit. Right.
#
Yeah. On the, on the, on the whole aspect of me being an Amit.
#
Well, so apparently 10 generations ago is when my father's ancestors moved from Maharashtra to, to, to what is now Thirunalveli, right.
#
You know, not too far away from Kanyakumari.
#
And so, yeah. So technically you could say that I'm a 10 generations ago we were Amits.
#
And, and the larger sense that as Tony Joseph says that, well, you know, two waves of migration that we populated the Indian subcontinent.
#
One is obviously the land route and, you know, by the direct route.
#
So became the first sort of ancestral South Indian population.
#
And then obviously the one, the migration that happened like maybe 2000, 3000 years before common era and so on. Right.
#
So, yeah, effectively. Yeah. So we're all Amits from Africa in that sense.
#
At this point, since we're talking origins and all, I will turn to our good friend Mr. Shanoi.
#
But before that, I will tell a story that in college, in Ferguson College, Pune, there used to be a friend of mine whose father was Maharashtrian and whose mother was German.
#
So we used to call him, Dixit was his surname and we used to call him KGB, Konkan as a German Brahmin.
#
But you are a different kind of a matter of great shame.
#
But tell us more about. So, yeah, I belong to a community called Gaud Saraswat.
#
And there is a Brahmin tacked on after that, which itself is a bit of a controversy because Gaud Saras Brahmins infamously eat fish.
#
And why is that infamous? Because that apparently disqualifies you from Brahminhood.
#
I see. But Bengali Brahmins do like Kashmiri pundits eat mutton.
#
So it's down south here. So my wife's folks, they migrated to Mysore because her grandfather got a job in the palace.
#
So he was a Shanoi, but his children wouldn't get admission into the local schools because everyone knew that Shanois were fish eating Brahmins.
#
So they had to slightly change their name to Rao.
#
I see. And by the time they were done with rowing, the independence and everything had come.
#
So the next generation again became Shanoi.
#
You know, there's another interesting sort of Mysore slash Udupi story about the origin of the Udupi restaurants, right?
#
In general, apparently, basically one is that India historically never really had a restaurant culture because you wouldn't eat food cooked by another caste.
#
There was no concept of communal dining of any kind.
#
Well, there were obviously wayside places like Marwadis would often set up these places that served only Jain food and so on.
#
But otherwise, there was no proper restaurant culture like you find in, say, China.
#
And so the whole idea, there is also this other cultural idea that you must not charge money for food.
#
There's also that deeper ingrained idea.
#
And the idea was that the temple would essentially feed people who are hungry and for free.
#
And so famously, the Udupi temple was famous for its amazing meal that even till today remains free and all of that.
#
But the interesting thing is that they went through a period when the whole raja and the king patronage of these temples went down as those kings lost power and money.
#
And the British weren't interested in patronizing temples, obviously.
#
And so many of these cooks and others in the Udupi temple and so on, they had to look for other jobs.
#
It was also that time when Brahmins in Madras had very neatly pivoted to working for the British.
#
Became clerks and lawyers and early doctors.
#
They had learned English and they sort of pivoted into this.
#
And they had also formed a clique that made sure that they only bought in other tamarams.
#
And so the Mysore and the Udupi Brahmins were left out.
#
So, in fact, the pejorative term that they would use to describe tamarams from Chennai was revenue Brahmins.
#
Because they were all working for the, that was the term they used, revenue Brahmins.
#
They were all in the revenue department.
#
And so they had no choice.
#
So some of the people associated with the temple and cooking and so on, started to get into starting restaurants, the food business.
#
And because at that point of time, the only acceptable restaurant where everyone would eat is a restaurant where the cooks were Brahmin.
#
And so that was their selling point.
#
And in the early days, the Udupi restaurants had a separate dining set up for Brahmins and the rest.
#
And obviously post-independence that became unacceptable.
#
And then, so it went away.
#
And you, in fact, even till the 1960s, restaurants would signal the fact that their chef was a Brahmin by literally tagging the word Brahmin to their name.
#
So you'd have some Gomati Vilas Brahmin's Cafe.
#
It essentially hinted that, yeah, the chef is a Brahmin.
#
So, you know, you're welcome to come and so on.
#
So, yeah, so it's quite interesting that they pivoted to that.
#
And another interesting story that I've read in Krishnendure's sort of academic works is that the Udupi folks,
#
as they started these Darshini restaurants and all of that in Bangalore, many of these places,
#
one of the pivotal moments that made the whole thing take off was apparently the plague of 1898.
#
Yeah, there was a huge plague in Bombay.
#
And then one of the things that people would do during the plague is to send their wives and kids to their hometowns, right?
#
Because they didn't want to, right?
#
And so basically leaving behind a bunch of men with no cooking skills in the city.
#
And suddenly, therefore, you had these Darshini restaurants that became a place where you could go eat.
#
And yeah, so just go stand and eat.
#
My grandfather started a restaurant in Bombay and he benefited from this phenomenon during the World War.
#
So when the World War started, there were rumors that the Japanese were going to come and occupy Bombay.
#
So all, everybody, all the migrants sent their wives and children.
#
My grandfather chose that time to start a little restaurant.
#
He was like doing odd jobs here and there, somehow cobbled capital together.
#
He did very well and he pulled an entire community,
#
including my uncle who famously told his mother to find a train,
#
ask people why trains want to go to Mulun.
#
Our question for Ashok though, that fine, got it, Chennai is cool.
#
You've got Brahman cafes.
#
Is anything but cool from a temperature standpoint?
#
Yeah, anything but cool.
#
You've got Brahman cafes, revenue, cars, you had plagues and all that.
#
Do you have sex mandals?
#
Because our friend here, you got to tell that story, man.
#
What is that?
#
So this is why GSBs are superior to riffraff like you, right?
#
Here's the reason.
#
He's not even in the rankings, right?
#
And here's the reason.
#
So in Bombay, in Sion, there used to be this wedding hall still there
#
called Guru Ganesh something, okay?
#
And there's some problem within the community.
#
I don't know exactly what, but there were two rival mandals.
#
So the mandal that ran this was called GSB Seva Mandal.
#
So it was very important.
#
So GSB Seva Mandal was written in very large letters on the side of the building.
#
And it had GSB Seva.
#
The problem is when you write Seva vertically, the V and the A form an X.
#
So from a distance, it looks like GSB sex mandal.
#
So for a beautiful decade or so, I was in the classiest community in the country.
#
Waiting to grow up so you would be allowed into the mandal and perhaps even the mandal commission.
#
A colleague of mine again from Chennai, the first time he went to the US, this was Texas.
#
He was driving his car and a woman sort of, I think her brake failed or something, he rammed into his car.
#
And so they waited for the police to come so that they could do the insurance, do the needful and so on.
#
And the police asked to describe what basically happened.
#
And he said that, you know, she banged my Dickie.
#
And she was like, excuse me.
#
And then since then, you know, I think, you know, all these IT companies had to put out a manual to tell people that there are terms that Americans use differently.
#
And you do not.
#
So it was quite hilarious.
#
Every time we would tell some of our customers who are insurance customers that this is what we call it.
#
But the other word for Dickie is trunk, which can also be misinterpreted into something.
#
Yeah, exactly.
#
Don't have cars with backs, I guess.
#
I'm finding the imagined consternation of the policeman.
#
Excuse me?
#
What is the complaint?
#
I mean, I think the most hilarious of these episodes is a colleague of mine who carried very religious guy, also very large guy.
#
So six, four or something.
#
Corpulent, as you would say.
#
Just larger, not just generally big bone.
#
I mean, you know, like the obliques.
#
I'm not fat.
#
I'm big bone.
#
And he obviously also and very ardent, but of Shiva.
#
So as you might imagine, a lot of the ash, you know, Vibhuti, as they call it all over right on his forehead and his arms.
#
I have a T-shirt line.
#
Is that a religious symbol you're carrying or are you happy to see?
#
So the funny thing is that this so this guy obviously being large.
#
So as you can imagine the surface area that he had to cover and therefore the amount of Vibhuti that he needed to carry to the US where you don't get it back in the day.
#
So he carried essentially 12, 250 gram packets of this ash, sacred ash.
#
Essentially, effectively, imagine the scene in JFK airport when the customs guy opens his bag and he sees 12 whitish powdered bags with a large Hispanic looking guy.
#
I mean, how does he know the difference, right?
#
Curly hair looks like Hispanic.
#
So what is this powder?
#
And he says, he doesn't know what he says.
#
He says, this is spiritual powder.
#
He says, yeah, you bet.
#
Because he doesn't know how to say it.
#
And then he makes it worse by saying this is cow dung ash.
#
And then, you know, and that that doesn't that's a dairy product.
#
So ultimately they don't let him carry it because it's a dairy product.
#
So they throw it.
#
Yeah, poor guy.
#
Very sad.
#
Let's bust some more, not Chennai myths, but something Amit would be surprised by learning about Chennai.
#
And one of them you pointed out earlier is that Chennai has a highest per capita protein consumption.
#
Yes.
#
So, you know, kindly tell us more about that.
#
So in general, if you actually look at the map of India by, I know there's this fantastic, you should call them.
#
I don't know if you've already spoken to them.
#
Ashris Patel, who runs that India and Pixels Infographics.
#
Fantastic.
#
So one of the one of the charts that you put out is this map of India by say poultry production and consumption.
#
And like literally Tamil Nadu is like red and every other place is like, you know, some shade of like mild pink.
#
So in general, I think a common misconception is that people in the north think that people in South India are vegetarian.
#
So the south and the east are actually the most non-veg.
#
In fact, I'm increasing.
#
I'm not even a fan of the term non-veg.
#
Why should the eating preferences of the majority be described in terms of what the minority does not eat?
#
So, by the way, there is a wedding I attended in Trivandrum.
#
So they finally cracked this problem.
#
They had two counters.
#
They had vegetarian and they had regular.
#
So I'm not going to use.
#
So for them, it's like food and then there's vegetarian food.
#
Right.
#
So I think that should be the way we speak it.
#
So 98% of typically anywhere from 95 to 98% of the Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Andhra, Orissa, West Bengal, this region, right.
#
The coastal rice eating region is predominantly meat eating.
#
But I think because the first generation of people you might have ended up meeting in North India would have been disproportionately vegetarian back in the day.
#
There is this sort of misconception about what these people eat.
#
And the other thing is that poultry particularly is huge here.
#
The amount of egg consumption per capita is huge because you have poultry, you're also going to have eggs.
#
And again, it is my completely anecdotal observation that Chennai has more KFCs than McDonald's.
#
So one of the few cities where there are more KFCs than McDonald's.
#
And not only there are actually like hundreds of KFC clones.
#
Like, you know, even when you walk down, you would have seen two places that are for fried chicken.
#
We saw one or two of them.
#
So it's either biryani or fried chicken. That is like the default.
#
Let me reassure our listeners that we did not eat chicken.
#
We had, we went to a biryani place, a Tamil Muslim biryani.
#
Yes, Tamil Muslim biryani.
#
Pointed out and it was absolutely excellent.
#
And Punjabis people would be surprised to hear are so vegetarian.
#
Yes, significantly far more vegetarian.
#
You know, this is neurons that fire together, wire together.
#
Because every time I think of paneer, which, and we discussed it earlier, I'm thinking of Sidin Vadakut.
#
And it's not even like, you know, I had paneer for years before.
#
You know, whenever you see colour, think of us.
#
It's like whenever you see paneer, think of us.
#
Yeah, I'm wondering.
#
I mean, I won't be surprised if Sidin is also lactose intolerant actually.
#
So given that a lot of people in Tamil Nadu, Kerala and others are actually lactose intolerant as adults.
#
Yeah, he's not even hairless.
#
So we can freely speculate about it since he's not here.
#
Another unusual food fact, what you mentioned again during lunch while we were consuming biryani.
#
Yes.
#
Is the Zomato map.
#
Yes.
#
So tell me about that.
#
Yeah, so it's quite interesting how there are a bunch of these maps.
#
One is what is the most commonly ordered food dish category on Zomato, right?
#
In every state, right?
#
You'll find that the south and east is all biryani.
#
The north and the west is pizza, right?
#
And in that, Maharashtra is sort of halfway.
#
So he's actually done a sort of this thing to find out where the index is because people, of course, order both here.
#
And is it heavily in favor of biryani is south and east.
#
Maharashtra is sort of in the middle and the north is disproportionately in favor of pizza, right?
#
And the interesting thing is that then you also overlay with a couple of other things like weird indicators like infant mortality,
#
women's rights and female health related indices and all that.
#
And you'll find that there is generally this correlation between the rice eating states and the same map.
#
So in a strange sense, the Zomato map is also predictive of things like infant mortality and other things.
#
And what I especially love is the Zomato map, the food map is indicative of women participation in the workforce.
#
Because as you pointed out during lunch, more women work in South India because in North India, they are busy making fucking rotis.
#
Yes, so this has been a historical observation that in general, when it comes to South Asia,
#
rice eating cultures ended up liberating women ahead of wheat eating cultures.
#
Wheat in general, especially if you're making bread, it's different because I think people largely don't bake bread at home.
#
They buy it from a bakery. So that's actually super productive.
#
But on the other hand, if you're sitting and making chapatis at home, that's a very linear, non-parallelizable process.
#
And you can make rice for the entire family for morning and evening in one shot.
#
Like making a biryani in the morning can feed you the entire day.
#
And so therefore, I think this is a general historical correlation that these states, rice consuming states, generally did better on many of these indices.
#
Stunning. And also you had a story about Upma.
#
Oh, yes. So the rice story actually reminds me that in 1941 or 1942, when the peak of the World War II and Britain was severely stretched.
#
I mean, the US hadn't really fully committed quite yet. They were like completely...
#
And the last thing they wanted was the jewel in the crown, which is India, to be up and rebelling and rioting and so on, which was also happening.
#
And famously, again, the Gandhi and others said they did not want India to participate, our soldiers to participate in World War II, as they did in World War I.
#
I mean, we lost a lot of soldiers in World War I.
#
And so, interestingly, what they would do is that in the north, when it came to wheat, it was always possible to procure wheat from many other places, the Europe and Russia and many other places where you could procure wheat.
#
Rice, again, was hard. Rice is something that grew only in some very hot and wet parts of the world.
#
And so whenever there would be a shortage of rice in the south, Britain would essentially get the rice from Burma, which was also a British territory.
#
And rhymes with both Sharma and Burma.
#
Amit Burma, yes.
#
So the funny thing is that when the Japanese occupied Burma, that essentially put a stop to the ability of the British to bring rice to South India.
#
And there was a bad monsoon, there was a bad harvest, and Chennai was on the verge of things like riots, right?
#
And so many parts of Malabar and here, and so the Britain had to come up with ideas.
#
So the first idea they came up with was we need to convince South Indians to eat wheat.
#
But the only problem was that nobody wants to sit and roll chapatis all day because by then, you know, women are already going to school.
#
They were working and so on.
#
So nobody wanted to sit and waste two hours in the kitchen making food.
#
So in general, the average amount of time South Indians spend in the kitchen is relatively much smaller because rice is very, very productive that way.
#
And so they didn't want to do this.
#
So then the additional then was, OK, let's be creative.
#
Let's give them a form of wheat that cooks like rice.
#
And that is how they really aggressively started to promote semolina in the South as that.
#
It wasn't like India didn't know semolina.
#
I mean, it was there and it was used in the North.
#
But it was never a day to day thing.
#
And then they really aggressively promoted it.
#
The ration shop stopped giving rice and started giving semolina.
#
They ran advertisements in the newspaper telling women of Chennai, we will teach you how to cook wheat.
#
It is 10 times more nutritious than rice.
#
They lied about these things.
#
And then they said, you come to Spencer.
#
Spencer was this sort of old shopping complex, which now has become a mall and all that.
#
They say that we have a demonstration of how to cook these dishes.
#
And they got these chefs and all these places to concoct new dishes to teach people how to make this.
#
And so one is obviously in Bangalore, some of these restaurateurs, because they were not given rice, had to innovate.
#
And the guy who went on to found MTR innovated and made popular the Rava Idli.
#
So Idli requires rice. So now he made the Idli with Rava.
#
So that's the Rava Idli.
#
And likewise here, instead of the Pongal, which is usually had for breakfast, requires rice.
#
Now you have it with Upma, which is basically a Pongal analog, except that it's made with wheat.
#
And so it's interesting, even those advertisements used to say, there are actually these, you can check on my Instagram page,
#
that there is a, the British government banned weddings from happening because you can't, there's shortage of rice.
#
You can't feed people.
#
So the person who was the then chief minister of Madras during the British time,
#
whose grandson, by the way, was the finance minister of Tamil Nadu,
#
Payanivel Tyagarajan.
#
His grandfather P.T. Rajan was the chief minister of Madras during that time.
#
He had to take out an ad saying that, sorry, I am not able to feed all of you because of the rice shortage.
#
Please do not give any gifts. Please just send your best wishes to the couple here to take out an ad in the Hindu,
#
because there was a shortage of rice and so on.
#
So it's quite a fascinating time and people sort of think that many of these dishes are ancient and traditional.
#
No, the upma is like literally traces its life back to World War II actually.
#
That was absolutely incredible. I had absolutely no idea.
#
Yeah.
#
It reminds me of, you know, recently I found out that it was the Norwegians who introduced salmon to Japan in the 1980s.
#
So we think of salmon sushi and a lot of the sashimi, you'll order the salmon.
#
And we think, oh, it's one traditional thing.
#
But 1980s, even ramen, which we think of as so quintessentially,
#
Japanese was a relatively modern invention.
#
So we think of and it makes me wonder what is culture, right?
#
Because so many, when we think of culture, we think again in terms of, you know, purity and sort of modern day conveyor belt culture and all that.
#
But a lot of what we think is how this is pure Indian culture is actually not.
#
Stitch clothing did not exist in India till, you know, a relatively short time ago.
#
Our prime minister's elegant churidar kurtas are of Islamic origin, essentially.
#
This is a recent find of a tunic in Norway.
#
I forget what it's called. It's something.
#
And the thing is this, the tundra is melting.
#
So somewhere in the far reaches of Norway, someone finds what looks like a discarded t-shirt.
#
He pulls it out and realizes it's really old.
#
Hands it over to the museum.
#
And they find that it's the oldest garment in existence.
#
Wow.
#
Yeah. And that's because it was preserved.
#
And then they worked out how much labor would have gone into it.
#
And they estimated some 38,000 man hours or some crazy number.
#
So, yeah, that's why clothing is really not, you know, not common.
#
For example, I think there was this survey or interview of old Swedish grandmothers and so on
#
about their views on women's liberation and what truly...
#
Normally, you know, people would credit it to things like, say, the pill.
#
The contraceptive pill played a big role in women's lib.
#
Many of these Swedish grandmothers said, no, it's a washing machine.
#
How's old tech?
#
In that part of the world, washing just took three days and things wouldn't dry.
#
And it's, you know, it's a cold and wet place and it's a nightmare.
#
Thick clothing.
#
Yeah, it's quite, you know, the other thing you mentioned about what is culture.
#
The pad thai, for example.
#
It's not a thai dish.
#
It's an American...
#
It was invented by a thai chef in America.
#
Chop suey as well.
#
It's again invented in America, right?
#
And now you can get pad thai in Thailand, right?
#
And I remember seeing this video where a thai chef is schooling Gordon Ramsey on what a proper pad thai is.
#
And it kind of seems cool, right?
#
I mean, always an Asian guy schooling a white guy.
#
It's always fun to watch.
#
But the fact is the pad thai is not a thai dish.
#
It really, in that sense, it was actually invented by...
#
It was invented in America, right?
#
And so it is quite...
#
There are so many such examples.
#
My favorite example is the Panchatantra.
#
The Panchatantra...
#
You ask anybody who wrote the Panchatantra?
#
Vishnu Sharma.
#
Vishnu Sharma wrote the Panchatantra.
#
All of us didn't quite read the Sanskrit.
#
We all learned the Amarsitra Katha version.
#
Or one of those Chandramama simplified versions of that, right?
#
Everybody would assume that, yeah.
#
So we translated from the Sanskrit to the English.
#
How many people realize that Sanskrit was translated from the Persian?
#
Was it?
#
Yes.
#
Because we never wrote things down.
#
We don't actually have the original.
#
Fortunately, at some point of time in the past, it was translated to Persian.
#
And then it was re-translated back into Hindi and Sanskrit and so on.
#
So the Panchatantra that we have now
#
is a Sanskrit translation of a Persian translation of the original Sanskrit.
#
And I have an example of a similar loop
#
because now I will cite a musical example of this
#
which I got from you, which is of course a violin
#
when you were told off for playing Iliya Raja.
#
Tell me about that.
#
So when I was learning to play the violin when I was like seven years old,
#
not my choice really.
#
One of the things I wrote in my blog back in the day is that
#
as instruments go, there's a metric called mean time to sonic palatability,
#
which is the amount of time you need to play an instrument
#
before you like the sound of what you're playing.
#
You just made it sound really cool.
#
M-T-T-S-P.
#
I had written a post about it.
#
And then I kind of compared the M-T-T-S-P of piano, which is five minutes.
#
You kind of roughly know what to play.
#
It's going to sound pretty decent.
#
A guitar is like less than 10-20 minutes if it's in tune.
#
A flute is like 10-20 minutes if you don't know how to make the sound.
#
Violin is like seven years.
#
You're basically sounding like some form of industrial chainsaw equipment till that point.
#
There may be geniuses who pick it up in a year,
#
but average people like me, it took me like seven years
#
before I liked the sound of what I was playing.
#
So it's a frustrating thing for a child to keep doing something that's completely nasty sounding.
#
So the moment I kind of had a sense of, oh, you know what?
#
I can actually mimic other sounds.
#
So immediately you want to mimic the songs of the time.
#
At that point of time, there were these insanely popular,
#
it was the Ilayaraja's golden decade, the 80s.
#
So I would start playing his songs.
#
And then once I demonstrated it to my teacher
#
and immediately said that I will throw you out of the class
#
if you play any Ilayaraja music on the violin.
#
You cannot sully the purity and the sanctity of this instrument by playing film music on it.
#
At that point of time, and I didn't know, the older me now knows
#
that the violin itself is less than like 150 years old.
#
It was introduced by the British.
#
And it was some of the first people who ended up learning
#
Western classical violin under British teachers
#
who ended up adapting it to the Carnatic classical format.
#
Right? So, you know, it's quite funny how people have a weird sense of
#
what is Indian, what is not Indian, right?
#
I have to tell you this, my favorite violin thing
#
because you talked about not being...
#
First of all, Gandhi ji kindly shared, you inflicted a very horrible burden on me.
#
It's an old joke. I was very shocked to know that Amit hadn't heard about it.
#
But I was just observing during lunch
#
that while Krishnashok is a great, good violinist,
#
I don't know if he is a great violinist, good violinist,
#
unlike Mahatma Gandhi who was a non-violinist.
#
Of course, yes, your story.
#
Yeah, so Woodhouse is one of those, you know,
#
Bertie Wooster attends a concert, a village concert.
#
And he's narrating the sort of proceedings to Jeeves.
#
And there was one of the items is a violin solo by Poppy Kegley-Bassington.
#
And he says, as violins, it was as most violins...
#
What was it? Oh, sorry.
#
It was loud in spots, less loud in other spots.
#
And like most violin solos seem to last much longer than it actually did.
#
Yes, the line between being decent sounding
#
and just atrocious sounding, very, very, very, very thin in a violin, yeah.
#
I have a question for both of you and for you, Ashok,
#
in the context of music and in the context of food for both of you.
#
Wait a minute, there's another violin joke I have to get off.
#
Kindly, kindly.
#
So there's this violin maestro who's playing in America.
#
And one pushy Jewish lady comes with her son
#
and she says, you have to teach my maestro, you have to teach my son.
#
And this guy has been, you know, inundated with such respects,
#
requests all over the country.
#
So he's like trying to get rid of her.
#
He says, no, no, my son is really a great violinist.
#
You have to listen, you have to teach him.
#
And she has, she's carrying one of those cassette players
#
and she has a cassette.
#
She pops the cassette into it and plays it.
#
And the maestro is shocked.
#
He says, such technique, such delicate fingering,
#
such bowing, it's, how can I teach this?
#
This is like Yitzhak Perlman.
#
How can I teach this boy?
#
So the mother says, actually, that is Yitzhak Perlman.
#
My son plays exactly like that.
#
This is like your fucking prawn gochugaru that you made.
#
Nicely done.
#
I know where you're getting that from.
#
Yeah.
#
So my question is this, that, you know,
#
you learned the violin for a long time.
#
And like you said, it's a hard slog.
#
Sounds horrible.
#
Last longer than it actually does.
#
And eventually you reach a stage where it is so natural
#
and intuitive to you that you're playing every other instrument.
#
You're doing funky things.
#
You're doing Sanskrit heavy metal, et cetera, et cetera.
#
Your kind of stuff you've done in music is mind blowing.
#
What is it, you know, how do you get to that stage
#
where through constant repetition,
#
you've internalized everything so much
#
that you're then able to reach that creative space
#
where you can do whatever the hell you want.
#
And it's the same with food.
#
In fact, the same question to both of you.
#
The same question to both of you about food.
#
That when do you reach that space
#
that Amit gives you a recipe for prawn gochugaru?
#
You'll find chicken and gochujang.
#
And you still make something kick ass.
#
Exactly.
#
You know, Vishila likes.
#
So, you know, and I'm thinking about
#
whether there's a generalizable lesson in this
#
about the period of time it takes.
#
I'll go first.
#
Yeah.
#
So I'll go first.
#
So in my case, like a huge part of the transformation
#
is thanks to Ashok,
#
who, even before he wrote the book,
#
was busily engaged in demystifying.
#
At that time, he was just in the process of discovery
#
and he used to share that things.
#
And he did two things.
#
First, so I come from a pretty patriarchal family.
#
My mother even now is very, you know, unhappy
#
that I have to work in the kitchen.
#
For me, it's like fun.
#
I'm just playing, you know.
#
Why do you say you have to work in the kitchen?
#
She, you know, she's saying that why does my, you know,
#
it's the Raja beta syndrome.
#
Raja beta, yeah.
#
As a good friend, Mahima.
#
Sheela's absolutely happy to,
#
she keeps putting butter must go,
#
you're such a good cook, please cook something.
#
I'll go ahead and cook.
#
So one was, I lost my, the fear of cooking.
#
And so you suddenly, you know, sort of get a framework
#
of how things work.
#
And the second thing is, at some level,
#
after some time, after you get a hang of,
#
you know, you start off with eggs and things like that.
#
And then you get a little more hands-on
#
with other slightly more difficult things.
#
It's, you realize how satisfying
#
the occasional successes are.
#
So I get this feeling that food appeals to us,
#
culturally, artistically, or aesthetically,
#
whatever, at a much deeper level than many other things.
#
Absolutely.
#
Because I think food is, first and foremost,
#
it's very multi-sensory.
#
And beyond just being multi-sensory,
#
there's a very strong, like the human element
#
of you're making food for someone.
#
There is this sort of deeper connection that you have,
#
and then you're feeding someone,
#
that act of feeding someone and all of that, right?
#
I love what Warren Grover said in his episode with me,
#
where he said it's like rangoli,
#
that the festival comes, you make the rangoli,
#
it's art, art, you put major effort into it,
#
and then the next day it's gone,
#
and people are stamping all over it.
#
And every act of cooking is really nothing
#
but an act of love.
#
It's not even art.
#
Because it's there, and it's gone,
#
and there is a purity in that that I really love.
#
That impermanence.
#
It is not scalable.
#
A million people aren't going to see it.
#
You might get the, if you're a man,
#
you'll get the applause of your elders.
#
Raja betta neka aaj khaana banaya.
#
But in general, it's, and it's a similar act of love.
#
I mean, I wonder what you think about this, right?
#
I just think that in the act of letter writing,
#
as we used to back in the day,
#
1980s, 90s, we would write long letters,
#
inland postcards, whatever.
#
There is something in that that we have lost forever
#
because the act of sitting down
#
and writing a letter to someone,
#
regardless of what you write,
#
it sends a message that I care about you.
#
So I'm sitting down and spending that time
#
writing something by hand,
#
which is remarkable and not just I care about,
#
and obviously the writing of a long letter also.
#
And the least performative thing,
#
because you have an audience of exactly one person.
#
Exactly one. And of course,
#
it's a different matter that it also,
#
it's a separate issue that it also helps
#
you become a different person.
#
Because every time you write,
#
it's an examination of the self and of the world.
#
And that makes you better.
#
And today all our messages are transactional
#
and crisp.
#
And you can't edit and you can't delete.
#
It's one shot.
#
If you make a mistake, you make a mistake.
#
Nobody wants to erase stuff.
#
Do you find cooking meditative?
#
Very much. So actually I would
#
actually go on to say to your deeper question
#
about, the deeper question
#
about how do you think
#
about freely being creative and mixing
#
things, right? I think you said something
#
that I think is very close to
#
how I feel about that, which is the whole idea
#
of impermanence, which is that
#
yes, it is true
#
that many things like food
#
by nature is impermanent. You make it.
#
You can't just forever just keep looking at it, because it
#
is, it is a perishable thing.
#
It is becoming colder. It is,
#
it will spoil with time.
#
You do need to consume it, right? I mean, and then it's
#
demolished. Once it goes inside,
#
no matter how beautifully it's plated, it's all the same
#
goo once it's inside.
#
And like that, I think
#
in general,
#
any creative act,
#
I feel that if
#
you are vested in the process
#
of that immediate goal of creating
#
that and nothing more,
#
you have a far greater chance
#
of being able to experiment and be,
#
because the moment you
#
have the illusion that
#
you are vested in its permanence,
#
I care about what people think.
#
I care about how much reaction
#
will it get on social media? How much, how many,
#
how much sales will this do, et cetera,
#
right? At that point,
#
it's very hard actually to be creative,
#
because you are now thinking
#
of those consequences. You're not really
#
truly, you are not well
#
and truly being experimental. You're not,
#
you're then afraid of failure, right?
#
In that sense, I think, so for me, for example,
#
some of the music
#
stuff that I've done,
#
I went in it with absolutely zero
#
expectation that anyone would listen to it,
#
right? It's, you know, why would somebody
#
want to listen to a Sanskrit translation
#
of Johnny Cash version
#
of a Nine Inch Nails
#
song, like for example, right?
#
It was just a,
#
the act of creating it and the act of
#
doing all of that gave so much joy,
#
et cetera. For me, I have reaped the
#
benefits of what I've created.
#
After that, anything else is a bonus.
#
So in that sense, I think
#
it is sometimes, I understand
#
it's very hard, like for example, if you're a movie
#
maker, I know it's very hard. I mean, you've
#
sunk in hundreds of crores.
#
You obviously want it. It's also the nature of
#
the art. It's the nature of the art, I understand that.
#
But I think from a purely, if you're cooking,
#
especially in the context of, especially
#
if you're thinking about hobbies in general,
#
right? That you cannot be
#
vested in the outcomes of your hobbies.
#
That it has to be purely just the creative process.
#
If you don't enjoy
#
the process of doing that hobby, that's not a hobby.
#
Then it's a chore, right? If you're
#
only vested in the outcome, then it essentially
#
means then you have to do things like feed the algorithm,
#
I have to make post every day,
#
I have to make this, I have to dance to a
#
trending reel. So then that's just
#
a chore. You're not actually enjoying the creative process.
#
This reminds me of something the
#
Marathi literator and humorist
#
Puladesh Pandey said. He was speaking
#
at some function. It was
#
I think the
#
musician Srinivas Kalei.
#
And they're talking on
#
whatever. And he
#
says one thing, which sort
#
of just resonated with me and
#
it's very similar to what you're saying.
#
He says about Srinivas Kalei that
#
he, Srinivas Kalei
#
loved the art more
#
than he loved himself. So, which is why
#
he did what. So, you know,
#
he's really not invested in the outcome
#
of it. He's just, like, he
#
did it because he felt like knowing it.
#
And I think there is also this sense of
#
like in many cases
#
not being in the moment.
#
If you're thinking about the
#
outcomes, then you're not actually in the moment at all.
#
And sometimes a lot of art just simply
#
doesn't work if you're not in
#
the moment at all. It shows through.
#
And I feel like it sort of
#
it also reminds me of Dave Chappelle.
#
And he regularly
#
he does shows where he's
#
very, very strict about no phones.
#
Saying that, see
#
if I know you guys are recording it
#
you're going to put it on
#
Instagram or YouTube.
#
I'm not going to say some of the jokes
#
because I use this
#
as ways of really just
#
being free with my craft because I
#
know this is a private space.
#
And that you're not going to
#
judge me for a poorly crafted
#
joke or a politically incorrect
#
joke because I'm just playing around with my
#
art to see what I might then
#
say in a Netflix special. I can understand
#
he has to think differently when he does the
#
Netflix special, right? But this is
#
my, this is my, this is you
#
in my space where I'm actually like
#
practicing my craft. And so
#
no phones. So don't make
#
an impermanent thing permanent.
#
It is a very common theme that you often
#
sort of actually find. I can tie this back to
#
that argument we were having a little earlier
#
about artificial intelligence
#
and its impact on art.
#
When you have this frame of reference
#
it really makes no difference. You're just
#
looking at the art and a better
#
sort of outcome. That's it.
#
And what you said Narayan earlier reminds me of this great
#
story by Prem Panikkar which I have told on the show
#
so people must have heard it. Ashok
#
certainly has because he claims to have heard every episode.
#
But it's a beautiful story.
#
It's about a poet who was
#
interviewed in the 1950s and asked
#
about his writing process. A writer, poet, whatever.
#
And he said okay so I
#
go into my house and then I go
#
into a room and I'm the only person there and I lock myself
#
in and I sit down at the typewriter.
#
So the interviewer asks so that is when you start
#
writing. And he says no because I'm not alone.
#
With me there are all the
#
people who have expectations of me.
#
All the people I want to impress. All the people I
#
care about. All my enemies. I wait for
#
them to leave the room. So then the interviewer asks
#
that is when you start to write. And he says
#
no because one person is still there.
#
I am there. I wait for that person to leave
#
the room and then the story tells itself.
#
So it to me is such a beautiful parable about
#
what writing is like. And I also tell my
#
writing students that whenever
#
you do something there is
#
a trade off between getting it done
#
and getting it right. And the mentality
#
we as creators should have is get
#
it done. You know because getting
#
it right when you, getting it
#
right is actually a function of getting it done
#
again and again and again because only iteration
#
makes you good. And whenever we
#
begin something we suck at it. Like your first seven
#
years with the violin. So you
#
know if you're going to go for validation in that phase
#
you will not get it and you will give up.
#
You will give up.
#
Only if you do it
#
for the love of it which is to me a necessary
#
condition not sufficient but necessary
#
only then can you achieve excellence.
#
I think in a weird sense I think probably we
#
might sound like uncle
#
G's who are sort of glorifying the
#
first generation of the social media and internet
#
if you will. We are all uncle G's in Teenagar.
#
Uncle G's in Teenagar if you will.
#
That somehow not
#
having real time
#
analytics, dopamine
#
hitting you on a daily basis.
#
I really think produced
#
a certain free kind of art
#
in the blogging era that
#
the Instagram and YouTube era
#
somehow does not allow. Because
#
you're staring at analytics, you're staring
#
at likes. The platform is like
#
really constantly nudging you.
#
This is doing better than previous. This is that.
#
So forever escaping feedback
#
seems to be impossible actually. No but I
#
would say it does allow that because look at
#
Miss Excel. You've heard of Miss Excel.
#
Just for the sake of
#
the listeners, just for the sake of the three
#
listeners who are listening to this episode and haven't heard
#
this story from me before. For those
#
three people, hello there.
#
Miss Excel is this awesome person
#
who had three passions.
#
Microsoft Excel which she used to
#
teach also, EDM and
#
dancing. And she started putting out these
#
Instagram videos where she was dancing
#
to EDM while
#
also teaching Excel through captions at the same
#
time and became a superstar. Any gatekeeper
#
of the past would have said fuck off, what
#
nonsense is this. But the reason
#
it worked is all three of these
#
were authentic to her.
#
And I'm guessing that at no point before starting
#
did she think will this be popular because the obvious
#
answer is are you crazy. But you do
#
what you do. Like Ajay Shah and I for our new
#
show Everything is Everything, we have decided
#
we will not see the analytics. We will do
#
it for two years. We won't see the analytics.
#
We'll do it for him and me. We'll talk the way we
#
talk. Of course Ajay is a complete geek
#
and he's getting all kinds of insights from the data
#
but it's not affecting the content.
#
I have a deeper question for you
#
now and it takes off from what you said about
#
food. That one of the things
#
I've realized with great guilt is
#
that very often whoever is cooking for
#
us we take it for granted. And too
#
often is it the case that in too many
#
Indian households the woman is cooking the
#
food, the man is eating it while looking
#
into his phone or whatever and not
#
for a moment saying thank you or not for a moment
#
even considering the food and
#
that gratitude for all the good things in our life
#
is so important and that is
#
therefore something that
#
we should be intentional about
#
of recognizing what everyone
#
is saying. And the question I want to ask
#
you guys about is what are
#
you intentional about in your lives?
#
Like in my case one of the things I have come
#
to be intentional about is friendship where I would
#
take people for granted, not stay in touch
#
not reply to emails and all of that.
#
And recently I have realized
#
that people are all there is.
#
Nothing else matters. The things you have
#
your achievements, nothing matters.
#
It's the people, that's all that matters.
#
So I try to be more intentional about this.
#
And I try to be more intentional about
#
being mindful while I'm eating of the food
#
though my mind just keeps drifting
#
off the monkey brain so this is harder.
#
So you know in your
#
journeys through life and I'm guessing parenthood
#
must also have changed
#
you in certain ways so consider this
#
a question about how that changed you as well.
#
What are the things that you have
#
learned to be intentional about today that you
#
weren't before?
#
I think there's one specific
#
immediate thing that comes to mind about food
#
and then I'll tell you another deeper story
#
and then connect back to this. One is that
#
when I started cooking
#
I think I came at it
#
with a typical masculine attitude of
#
here I am, a rare Indian man
#
in the kitchen, you know, doing things
#
that other Indian men do not. So
#
behold my great cuisine
#
you shall enjoy and eat whatever
#
I choose to make. Today I
#
have done YouTube research
#
on a Mexican dish and all of you shall enjoy
#
whatever Mexican dish I
#
cook up. I think over
#
the last decade or so it kind of
#
struck me that one of the things that are the people
#
we've always taken for granted, our mothers and
#
grandmothers and so on
#
is the fact that for them
#
cooking was not this sort of show that they
#
had to every day that they made something and people
#
said amazing, right? For them
#
they had to balance it amidst things like career
#
and other things
#
and not only that
#
they also had to cater to
#
the fact that children don't eat spicy
#
food, this older gentleman
#
has a heart disease so he needs less salt
#
this person does not like
#
bengan so I have to make something else for him
#
so those micro
#
preferences, so the act of cooking
#
was an optimization problem
#
that they had to solve across all of these variables
#
and here I was like generally saying
#
I want to make this completely feta cheese
#
something Mexican thing and I'm expecting
#
everybody will enjoy it without recognizing
#
that they may not like the flavor
#
my wife does not like very spicy food
#
and Mexican food is like super spicy
#
and somebody else in the house has diabetes
#
so they may not eat something that is very
#
sweet. So in effect now I've
#
deliberately started to think
#
carefully about if I can make
#
a meal, can I make sure that
#
there is something in it that everyone
#
can enjoy. So
#
my son can enjoy the roasted potato
#
the chicken, my wife can enjoy the less spicy
#
dish and somebody who likes spicy food can enjoy
#
something else rather than think of it as
#
this performance where you should eat my
#
I watched that famous recent
#
movie, the menu I think
#
so that
#
is one. The second wider thing
#
that I wanted to share is this
#
beautiful insight that somebody told me many
#
years ago, almost 20-25 years ago and this person
#
is a very widely read somebody who
#
used to read Sanskrit and Tamil
#
and one of the things as I keep telling people
#
that Tamil is one of those languages where you can
#
read something from 3000 years ago
#
and if you know the language it will still make
#
sense. No other language
#
has that, Sanskrit apart but
#
Sanskrit is not a spoken language today
#
it's not a living language. So you can
#
watch Tamil films now but then read
#
a 2500 year old poem and
#
it will still make sense.
#
So one of the things he told me about is
#
is this sort of like a side
#
story in this Tamil epic
#
called the Selappathigaram which is one of the
#
very old, it's supposed to be 2500 years old at least
#
fascinatingly enough
#
written by a Jain
#
prince by the name of Ilango Adigal
#
people forget that Jainism was
#
very dominant in the south
#
and so the
#
story initially is sort of set in Madurai
#
and it's about a woman whose husband is wrong
#
and she burns the city of Madurai down in revenge
#
and so on. So that's like the overarching story but
#
there are obviously multiple side stories
#
and one of those side stories
#
is about the city of Madurai itself
#
and the fact that obviously you know the Meenakshi
#
Amman temple is sort of like the centerpiece
#
but there are many temples right
#
and so he speaks of this idea that there are
#
five temples in Madurai
#
and then people would go
#
to each of these
#
temples for different reasons
#
so there was one temple that people would
#
go when they had a physical ailment
#
I'm in pain, I need help
#
so that's the temple you go to
#
that's the temple you pray to when you have a physical ailment
#
there was another temple
#
where you went when you had
#
basic problem with money
#
finance, you know I'm
#
broke, I need money, that's the
#
temple you went to to pray for money
#
the third temple was the one that you
#
prayed to for
#
family kind of issues
#
my wife, my son is not listening to me
#
I'm having these issues, inter family
#
civic issues, my business
#
partner is cheating me kind of stuff is
#
the third category of this thing
#
the fourth temple is the one that you went to when you had
#
depression, anxiety and
#
mental health issues
#
so it was the fourth temple
#
and he says that guess what the fifth temple was for
#
he says that the fifth temple
#
was for people
#
who felt, had none of these other
#
problems but who felt the pain
#
of others
#
so in a weird sense what he said is that
#
and he said that that temple would be
#
filled with artists and creative people
#
and people who are poets and people who are
#
musicians and so on because in general
#
good art comes from you
#
feeling the pain of others
#
not feeling your own pain
#
so when a blues musician is writing
#
so I think a lot of good art
#
comes from you empathizing with others pain
#
not just channeling your pain
#
people think blues musician is channeling his pain, no
#
he's channeling the pain of all of his
#
black forefathers who went through
#
what they did and so I think
#
in that sense it was such a deep insight
#
in terms of, one in a wider sense
#
it gave me a better
#
understanding of why people are
#
religious
#
life is hard, life is unpredictable
#
so you can't really look down on people for being
#
religious, right, of course you can look down
#
on religious establishments that exploit
#
this, that's fine, but you
#
simply cannot take away from the fact that people have
#
these kinds of problems and that's how we are
#
we are this sort of complex species
#
that are not living in small tribes
#
in Africa but really in large
#
complexities, worried about whether AI is
#
going to take our jobs next week
#
so yeah, people will believe in astrology
#
people will believe in all of these quack
#
remedies and all these other kinds of things
#
so in a sense I think that what that really taught me
#
is that
#
the skill of being able to
#
experience or understand somebody else's
#
pain is very central to
#
you being
#
a truly creative person from the point of view
#
of solving problems
#
right, I mean, right down to even in software
#
if you're designing a system
#
unless you feel the
#
pain of the user, you will design
#
websites like the government of India does
#
clearly nobody designing these websites
#
is experiencing the pain of the actual
#
end user, right, so they end up designing these
#
things in the way they are and so that's why
#
in a weird sense that has played
#
into the way I think about music, the way
#
I think about food, more importantly the way
#
I think about even software and all the stuff that I do
#
Mind blowing and I'm thinking the fifth temple could be called
#
the mirror neuron temple because mirror neurons
#
of course being how we kind of imagine
#
the pain of others and my friend Ajay Shah
#
is this fantastic theory about
#
religion that he shared with us a couple of days ago
#
and I want him to say it on everything is everything
#
because I think we'll go madly viral and
#
possibly get lynched
#
you know Naren has been complaining all through lunch
#
that Amit is certainly going to get lynched one day
#
Patani left se ya right se but he's going to get lynched
#
my worry actually is that I'm going to
#
get lynched along with them
#
because I'm standing next to them
#
there is actually this fallacy where
#
on another note there is this fallacy where
#
you believe others are paying attention to them all the time
#
yeah
#
there is a main character syndrome
#
the worst thing that can happen to Amit is that
#
no one will want to lynch him
#
nobody listens to his poor jokes and lynch him
#
that's the best thing so every time I say all of you must have heard it before
#
like the three people listening to this are saying
#
humne toh nahi suna, pala baar sun rahe, abhi kabhi nahi sunenge
#
but Ajay's theory is
#
that no one
#
in the world is religious
#
or believes in religion that they pretend
#
to believe in religion but religion
#
and his theory is not even god of the gaps
#
his theory is that
#
in society you need something
#
that makes you social that can help you
#
go out and meet people
#
hang with people etc etc
#
and these are really
#
religion is
#
enable social instruments people are going to
#
church on a Sunday and they are meeting the whole community
#
why do we go to temples because the boys
#
want to check out the girls and vice versa and that is
#
the whole theory he had a great line about
#
I think his exact quote and I'm not
#
supposed to say this in public but I'll say it sorry Ajay
#
his great line was
#
Tinder is a dagger to the heart
#
of Hindutva
#
and the whole thing being that as time has
#
gone by we have found other ways
#
of socializing other ways of meeting
#
the opposite sex other ways of finding
#
community other ways of finding purpose
#
and we never actually
#
believed all along anyway and to the
#
extent that religion can play a part in
#
all of these vacuums it is
#
useful I do partially agree
#
in the sense that an older relative
#
of mine someone who is in the family
#
WhatsApp and that we almost
#
always I end up debunking
#
nutrition food related myths that
#
people end up sharing often times
#
by sharing one of my videos and saying please watch
#
this and you know I just was
#
speaking to her and
#
sort of I just wanted
#
to ask saying that you know
#
you're a school you've been a school
#
teacher you clearly you understand science so
#
why is it that you continue to believe in
#
some of these you know superstitions
#
and myths and she
#
what she basically said is that no you don't
#
understand right it is for
#
me the belief in all of these other things
#
has nothing to do with whether I believe it or not
#
it has to do with the fact
#
that it's a shared belief
#
that people around me my community my family
#
they all believe and it's something that
#
holds us together right that belief
#
etc this religious particular religious belief
#
and yes so on
#
the one hand I can say yeah
#
I'm going to be rational I'm going to be atheist
#
I'm going to be all of this I can understand all of the
#
science etc if I do
#
all of that that doesn't mean
#
my children and the younger people in my family
#
will now suddenly be friends with me
#
he says that
#
I have this community I don't want to lose that
#
so clearly I think for the
#
older generation who
#
for whom Tinder is not an option
#
right basically religion is just
#
the way you hold on to those ties
#
and they're afraid of losing that
#
they're like yeah I'm willing to
#
say that this particular
#
ayurvedic or this
#
religious belief is helpful etc
#
if I believe that it's wrong
#
I'm immediately persona
#
non grata from that group
#
but I don't have another group
#
to go to because you guys
#
are not exactly close
#
knit like the way that my generation
#
and the irony is that you could be in
#
this terrible equilibrium in a game theory
#
problem when nobody in a group
#
believes but everybody pretends to believe
#
because they think everybody else does
#
I'm pretty sure that
#
some of the people there particularly the men
#
genuinely believe but there are
#
enough people who are flexible about this and
#
largely believe it because it's
#
just part of their identity and they feel that
#
if they don't publicly express
#
their belief that they will not
#
be part of that community
#
so I think you've touched upon this in many
#
other things even in other podcasts where
#
a lot of the incel communities
#
and so on it's not like
#
many of those men hate women
#
is that they found a community now
#
their fear of ostracism from that incel community
#
is a far bigger problem
#
so it's not like they genuinely hate women
#
but they have to performatively do it
#
for what is worth it sounds exactly like vokes on twitter
#
as well
#
every form of extreme belief is exactly the same
#
it's all cult forming and it's the same thing
#
it's really just the same thing
#
we've just now broken into multiple
#
layers of digital
#
groups and digital gods and so on
#
yeah so that tribalism is
#
very deep
#
I think we are wired to it
#
I think also we are the only species that
#
coordinates at this scale
#
correct
#
at numbers
#
the largest chimpanzee tribe is
#
very very small
#
not even 100 some 60 individuals
#
so even humans I think there is something called
#
Dunbar number
#
140, 150 or something
#
but we've gone past that right
#
because you know
#
I've been on Microsoft teams meetings
#
with more than 150 people
#
I used to think
#
that social media with the perverse incentives
#
towards tribalization
#
and polarization and all
#
amplify our worst instincts
#
but I have since modified my view
#
to think that it also empowers the worst
#
among us
#
the most unpleasant people who in the real world
#
would not have that many friends can go out there
#
can castigate other people
#
join online mobs etc etc
#
and they are part of a community, they are part of a group
#
fantastic for virtue signaling
#
which is also what I was thinking that had that
#
fifth temple existed today
#
it would be social media where everyone is showing
#
how much they care for anyone else
#
while really not giving the smallest damn
#
but I want to turn to you Narayan Shanoi
#
because I do give a damn
#
I do give a damn because I asked you a question
#
both of you a question and only Narayan answered
#
so I will now turn to you and ask what are you intentional about
#
yeah, so I
#
over the course, so I went through all of it
#
right, so first for the
#
longest part, longest period in my life
#
nobody cared a hoot about me
#
then for a brief while
#
on social media, on blogging
#
on twitter or something, I found out there
#
good number of people who would
#
you know listen to me and
#
sort of laugh at things that
#
I would say which like
#
literally no one has ever laughed at before
#
so getting diverse people
#
finding my own tribe, I did that
#
and then
#
you know as the whole social media
#
thing exploded
#
all these things started crawling out of the
#
woodwork and you find people
#
with the most bizarre and
#
you know sort of
#
despicable thoughts
#
also getting followings of their own
#
and then
#
I come down to a full circle
#
as you did
#
and I find people
#
to be like individual
#
people to connect with being the most
#
like the most satisfying
#
and
#
it's satisfying on a level
#
I didn't realize, I've been to it
#
I had friends before, I've had conversations
#
now it's the flavor
#
is different, of course the one
#
person that I connect best with now
#
after all these years is my wife
#
because she is
#
the awesomest in the world
#
tell me a bit about that because that's also
#
an interesting journey where
#
when you first fall in love and the relationship is taking
#
off you're like you're just full of that person
#
you can't get enough of that person
#
but at the same time what you're in love with
#
is really an imagined version
#
of that person in your own head
#
and later on everything kind of gets
#
normalized as a danger of drift and
#
inertia and all of those things
#
and you seem to either have bypassed that second
#
stage or gone past it
#
and arrived at a new awakening
#
where you see this person as a person
#
again except not the idealized version
#
but the real person you love just as much
#
is that a fair way?
#
I often think of do we actually
#
know what is real so we can't
#
we really can't, it's all
#
everything is playing out in your head
#
and you're imagining versions of people
#
and that is a version that you
#
love, what changes
#
is that you
#
your love for that person becomes
#
far more unconditional than it
#
was before
#
it's incredible
#
when you start off
#
like when we got
#
married and everything was physical
#
and you hold hands and look at the stars
#
and do whatever other things that
#
young people do
#
I've forgotten a lot of it
#
but later
#
it's just being close
#
to a person just sort of
#
so it is very very difficult
#
there's a danger
#
that when I finally write that book
#
a lot of it is going to
#
sort of turn out as
#
absolute sentimental garbage
#
but who cares right
#
so we shall write that book
#
You know it's interesting how I think
#
the functioning
#
happy couples are not
#
people who
#
discovered and appreciate each other's
#
strengths but actually people who
#
are deeply aware
#
and tolerate the worst
#
of the other person that you've actually
#
fundamentally made a compromise of
#
yeah I can live with this
#
I mean it's in a sense all the way from
#
body odour to literally everything
#
else
#
living with another human being
#
it's fundamental about saying that
#
you've reached a point where you're like
#
this is less important
#
the fact that this person choose to stick around
#
and compromise their careers
#
all that other things
#
then you put their strengths
#
in the context of their tolerance of your
#
is what makes the whole thing special
#
what is the worst of you
#
the worst of me I think is
#
I mean over time I would like to
#
think I've changed but largely being
#
sometimes lost in my own
#
head and forever
#
and when I get a creative spark I can just be completely
#
unavailable
#
like lock myself in a room
#
not be available and just assume things will happen
#
clothes will get washed, food will get
#
cooked and all of that right
#
over time I think once the
#
sun arrived I think you do have to
#
change otherwise it's just brutally unfair
#
how did you change?
#
definitely
#
deliberately spending more time
#
and also recognising that sometimes
#
giving that
#
one or two hours of
#
free time just to do whatever you want
#
sun is not your problem
#
despite the fact that you know that mothers will
#
they are forever thinking of that
#
they're like worried about
#
what crazy stunt is the father going to do
#
with the child that is going to actively harm them
#
but you still want to keep doing that till you
#
reach that point where they're like I'm going for a
#
two hour shopping the sun is your responsibility
#
and if you can get to that point I think that's
#
great I think it's amazing
#
how men in India simply
#
don't recognise that giving your
#
spouses like a 15 minute breather
#
from just childcare
#
is such a huge thing
#
right I think those are things
#
that have tried to be a lot more but yeah I mean
#
it's almost as if every year
#
you kind of realise that you think you're doing
#
like amazing but I think the bar is
#
like you know I still think
#
even in the most equal couples
#
women still end up doing much more
#
it's just somehow just the nature of
#
I guess how we're built but it just seems to be the case
#
I was just at a conference and I hope it's
#
okay to say this I haven't asked her but she won't
#
mind where Mahima Vashish
#
who writes women in India was there and you know she's
#
got a kid she's got a lovely feminist
#
husband Salil who's just an absolutely
#
lovely guy
#
you know and she was like look my
#
husband is in the top 1%
#
of supportive this thing
#
that you can possibly imagine
#
but motherhood is so
#
fucking demanding
#
no matter how much the father helps out
#
it is so fucking demanding and she said
#
my being at this conference without my kid
#
this is like a fucking vacation
#
you know the rest of you are working
#
you're networking you're doing this
#
I am just so free my mind is
#
you know it's
#
and we don't
#
I have sort of another
#
sort of question then to ask
#
and we can come back to this and that question
#
is that I am increasingly thinking that
#
men and women just fundamentally
#
want different things
#
now how much is nature how much is culture
#
and nurture and all that we can
#
you know is a separate question but men and women
#
want fundamentally different things
#
and among the many different equilibria
#
that could exist
#
that allows them to coexist
#
manage time together
#
the worst or
#
deeply unsatisfying one seems to be marriage
#
because especially in India
#
it leaves both people unhappy
#
trapped in their roles
#
and often unable to understand
#
each other in any respect whatsoever
#
so what are your thoughts on this
#
generally the Indian system is to condition
#
girls to assume
#
that your life is going to be
#
bad and tough you better put up with it
#
there is no alternative
#
this is the way
#
the best we can do is to
#
make sure that find a guy who won't beat
#
you up
#
pretty much the low bar
#
it's like the bar you are setting
#
and I find that
#
so I am also thinking hard about your question
#
about whether men and women want different things
#
sometimes I think even if they may
#
want similar things it's pretty evident
#
that the way to get
#
there I think
#
differs very differently
#
it's sort of like how
#
even right down to
#
the situation where sometimes my wife will tell me
#
describe something that's happening
#
some problem that she is having at work
#
or something like that and I am immediately
#
in software engineering solution
#
mode architecture okay this is the problem
#
let me solve this oh you do one thing
#
so that hashtag you do one thing
#
is a very typical engineering mindset
#
no that's not what she is looking for
#
she is basically getting it off her chest
#
she is not looking for a solution from you because
#
one your solution is probably not a solution
#
at all you think it's a solution
#
because you haven't heard the full thing
#
she may not even be expressing all the multiple
#
variables that are going on inside her head around
#
that problem she just wants you to listen
#
and help her process right and sometimes
#
I think you know we go about
#
at trying to solve problems
#
in fundamentally different ways as well
#
to get to the same goal sometimes
#
even career growth or
#
whatever it is or a vacation
#
the definition of what is a good vacation
#
you'd be surprised men and women think very fundamentally
#
differently right I mean
#
I will sometimes plan a okay
#
I want to maximize five days
#
in Japan morning we will walk to this
#
place and then afternoon we will eat in this
#
place and then we will take a train and go
#
there I want they'll be like okay
#
do you think we have a ten year old son
#
he will get tired by the afternoon
#
how far is that is that kid friendly
#
so the number of questions they are obviously asking
#
themselves in when they solve a problem
#
is much much higher
#
I mean I regularly find
#
that like even in my software this
#
thing design teams
#
which have good diversity
#
end up asking question
#
greater set of questions
#
from the perspective of the end user
#
and eventually end up building better software
#
so this isn't about
#
this nonsensical idea of meritocracy and all
#
that nonsense at all
#
actually speaking diverse teams just
#
generally do better
#
he cited a study
#
which shows that the biggest
#
predictive factor for good decision making in teams
#
is not intelligence or education
#
or any of those things it's just a diversity
#
of the team
#
you're coming at the same problem from the more
#
different angles are better I think Paul Graham
#
sort of speaks about this
#
allied problem was called the brilliant
#
jerk problem where he basically says
#
that I think people think that having the smartest
#
people in your team is what you need to do
#
to do great work he says that no
#
beyond a point having brilliant jerks
#
actually prevents your ability to actually do
#
great things so in that sense
#
you cannot be optimizing only for
#
what your narrow definition of intelligence
#
have either of you been a brilliant jerk?
#
I'm almost all through my life
#
yeah pretty much all through my life
#
yeah I thought I was the only one
#
jerk for sure brilliant I think is
#
probably a self assigned
#
this is the other thing right and this is general
#
observation I'm sure all three
#
of us are like that we've always been
#
quick on the update and that
#
you know that gives you the
#
earns you the sobriquet of brilliant
#
but you'll realize
#
later there are a lot of people
#
who are not so quick
#
but who are no less thorough and deep
#
and the system doesn't
#
really so you know often times
#
you will find quiet people
#
who take a while
#
to come out with what
#
they really think but who have some
#
really good insights and the system
#
I'm now sort of
#
sensing that I've been
#
really rude and dismissive about
#
a lot of people going through
#
just because they are not quick
#
not just that to go back to religion
#
and come back to this I think it was
#
Christopher Hitchens one of the
#
four horsemen basically who pointed out
#
that most believers are actually
#
atheists of all other religions
#
because there are so many religions if there are 500
#
religions you believe in one of them
#
you are an atheist in the other 499
#
similarly I think all 3 of us and every
#
brilliant jerk ever is incredibly
#
stupid in most things we might
#
be fortunate that we know one thing well
#
and even if that is like a meta model
#
even if it's a computational thinking and
#
we think oh I'll grok any new thing
#
the point is you are still a moron in most things
#
and therefore you have to
#
have some kind of humility when you're
#
dealing with people who may not be so good
#
in your thing because those people
#
will kick your ass in some things
#
and it also goes back to the
#
point about many people
#
are actually fantastic at
#
systems 2 your Kahneman's
#
systems 2 thinking which is
#
take your time I don't want to immediately react
#
it may come out of things like
#
shyness, inability with
#
communication in English or whatever language
#
it could be all of that but
#
they turn that weakness into a
#
strength that allows them to think slightly more
#
long term take your time and actually come out with a more
#
sensible thing as opposed to
#
the quick brilliant hot take
#
I think which society tends to
#
see the other point about
#
which is inevitably going to be system 1
#
definitionally is going to be system 1
#
and we Indians have also glorified engineers
#
and MBAs and medicine
#
and given that
#
every metric you know it rewards you
#
can you sort of sum up 2 numbers
#
or whatever find out the root
#
whatever it is and you have all of your little
#
algorithms going you are proficient
#
at that is really not a metric of
#
your overall intelligence
#
yeah it is actually it reminds me
#
of this fascinating anecdote I heard
#
strangely enough on Trevor Noah's
#
video recently
#
by the way he is one of the
#
guys who speaks spectacularly
#
sharply about AI, stand up comedian
#
all of that super sharp he is more
#
insightful about AI than many actual techies
#
and he gives this example of how
#
Microsoft designed
#
this AI model
#
to do one good thing
#
they fed it millions
#
of pictures and it had one job
#
to do distinguish between
#
whether a photograph of a face is male
#
or female that was its only job
#
and it performed
#
stellarly well on Caucasian faces
#
on a wide range of faces
#
it even performed
#
well on Asian faces and things like that
#
but performed very very poorly
#
on black African American African
#
faces and they didn't
#
know why they had mostly
#
done everything right they had a diverse team
#
they had black developers
#
they had testing data
#
biases they ensured that all
#
photos that they had were enough of both
#
they said we've done everything
#
right why are we not able to crack this
#
eventually they had to send the
#
they sent it to their Kenya research center
#
and the researchers there
#
eventually cracked the problem
#
apparently
#
all these neural networks
#
what people don't realize is that
#
you don't know how it's doing what it's doing
#
you don't quite know what feature it's extracting
#
in order to make that binary
#
prediction you're asking for because it's just too impossible
#
to debug and they never
#
bother to really dig deep into that right
#
the Kenyan folks apparently
#
found out that oh by the way
#
you've asked it to distinguish between male
#
and female faces the neural net
#
based on the training data you've given it
#
has arrived at one feature that distinguishes
#
male and female faces which is not
#
no shape I know it's presence
#
of makeup
#
so it was literally marking anything with
#
makeup as female and anything without
#
makeup as male and
#
that was good enough for every
#
other situation but historically
#
black people the cosmetics companies don't often
#
make cosmetics that are suitable to their
#
wider range of brown colors so they often don't
#
wear cosmetics and so it was failing
#
so it was marking all of them
#
as male
#
so then they had to retrain
#
and make sure that this is not the variable
#
that it is eventually so the point is that sometimes
#
we all need to have this sort of
#
epistemic humility that
#
not only do you not
#
know many other things you don't even
#
know why or how you don't know
#
I've got to say I'm just
#
feeling so proud of the collective
#
humility the three of us are showing
#
it's a very man thing right
#
I'm more humble than both of you
#
hands down
#
oh my god who has the biggest
#
humility in our size matters
#
let's now talk about
#
one of the pet subjects of Ashok
#
but something that I'm sure even Narayan you have a lot to
#
contribute on which is misinformation
#
around food and we will begin
#
by talking about Ashok's
#
controversial contention which will no doubt
#
make this episode viral that Nithyananda
#
is better than Sadguru
#
kindly give full
#
context and explain
#
so this is one of the
#
one of my daily things that I end up
#
having to do is to
#
hundreds of people send me messages
#
posting a link to a viral
#
video saying is this true
#
and most of those videos are
#
very random things like for example
#
you must not drink water
#
standing up like apparently
#
this is a thing right
#
and that if you cook
#
dal in a pressure cooker you will get cancer
#
right or that if you use a microwave
#
you will get cancer because none of it
#
is true obviously right so I have to end up
#
so I usually point them to the videos etc etc
#
and I obviously looked and saw that a very
#
regular purveyor
#
of food and diet related
#
misinformation is our
#
Sadguru
#
and allied handles there's an
#
entire ecosystem of
#
Instagram handles that spread this stuff
#
and he sounds very confident
#
he uses scientific terms and so on
#
and it clearly appeals to a lot of people
#
and the people are truly worried right
#
there's one video where he's like there's one vegetable that you're
#
eating everyday that's a poison and you should stop
#
eating it one apparently that we enjoyed
#
in great amounts today a bengal
#
so apparently eggplant has a poison
#
you must not eat it
#
one day it's okay but over
#
if you eat it over a lifetime it will make you dumb
#
apparently that's the crux of the video
#
he must have eaten a lot of it
#
do you respect I mean I was like you know
#
the Mediterranean people eat a
#
lot of bengal and they produce a fair number of
#
noble laureates last I checked
#
and they live 20 years longer than us so it didn't seem
#
like a common sense thing and I ask people to think for themselves
#
rather than one of my common
#
things is to also I've realized
#
that when it comes to communicating science
#
it is actually better to
#
try and make the person think using
#
scientific ideas that they may be
#
familiar with as opposed to me saying boss
#
then otherwise I'm doing the same
#
argument by authority that the other people
#
are doing right so I told him that did you
#
think about the fact that everybody's been eating this and
#
you know they don't seem to be falling sick and so on
#
so this is a comma so I keep
#
getting this and regularly I have to keep debunking and once
#
in a while deal with very angry fans of
#
his who will often just
#
say that you don't understand
#
his wise beyond words and
#
you are looking at it tactically
#
the funny thing is that
#
many of these people actually don't agree with what he says
#
with regard to non-veg food
#
but they find everything
#
else he says to be knowledgeable
#
but they are asking me to
#
you cannot be nitpicking he's a yogi
#
you must not nitpick these small small
#
things so they genuinely say he's
#
wrong but I'm not supposed to nitpick
#
so the point is that one day
#
somebody sent me this video of
#
Nithyananda where somebody in the audience
#
was asking him what is the
#
best diet to be spiritually
#
wise etc and he said
#
the best diet is to eat as little food
#
as possible and
#
I was like oh man
#
this is the first god man who's
#
actually said anything remotely correct about food
#
about diet and so
#
I just remarked saying that well
#
it's a weird world when he makes more sense than
#
the guy who's loved by all of the IT
#
and MBA crowd
#
it's a weird world where he makes sense I would
#
expect both of them to be equally nonsensical
#
to be fair he's probably nonsensical
#
in many other areas but it just seemed like
#
an odd comparison
#
the first time I encountered
#
Sadhguru was at the TED India conference
#
in Mysore in 2009
#
where Sadhguru gave a
#
TED talk and at one point he said
#
something to the effect of I broke my arm
#
and then I just mentally focused on it
#
and my arm became okay
#
and at this point the thought that went through my head
#
was you charlatan give me a chance to
#
break your arm right now and demonstrate it
#
for us but anyway I mean
#
I think so to be fair see I've also
#
as I said I think in full
#
you know epistemic
#
humility right I
#
don't particularly care about the individual
#
the Sadhguru himself right I mean I really
#
want to if there are ideas of his
#
that I find scientifically inaccurate
#
in the context of food where I have some expertise
#
I would like to correct it right but at the same
#
time I keep telling
#
people that I have no problems
#
with you finding
#
some spiritual sucker
#
in something that he says right because there's
#
people say lots of things right people broadly
#
say they will say things
#
to be mindful
#
so in the sense that I
#
can't judge what people find useful
#
and take and
#
improve their lives I'm willing to accept
#
that yes of course when you come
#
you then want to defend him and then come and fight
#
me it's a different problem but I suspect
#
the vast majority of people they
#
flock to Godman largely again
#
because the world is complicated life is complicated
#
and you don't always get
#
answers that easily
#
tragedies happen and in
#
the past obviously you had a more institutional
#
religious system the temple and the
#
ecosystem and the family there's more tightly
#
bound so there was that sort of place
#
that you could go to for support but
#
increasingly those ties don't exist and these people
#
kind of fill in the gaps if you will
#
I kind of agree about the point of epistemic
#
humility obviously I've actually used that
#
phrase horror to my shock and horror in
#
the past because I read a word jargon
#
but it is such a precise
#
phrase but I will also
#
add here that yeah fine
#
that you debunk what he says
#
wrong and you don't mess with the rest of it
#
and people who want to believe can believe
#
but at the same time the point is that there are
#
some people with vast followings
#
who cause great harm and people
#
get suckered into following them
#
so I also feel it is important
#
for people like me with whatever limited reach
#
I have to continuously say
#
this man is a charlatan he talks bullshit
#
he is dangerous beware of him
#
which I do I haven't got lynched yet Naren but that is
#
because no one listens to podcasts
#
I think you need
#
a bit of both in the sense that
#
like for example
#
if I want a large number of people
#
who are generally deeply spiritual
#
for whatever reasons etc etc
#
and if I want them to
#
if I believe that
#
there is greater good in the world if all of those
#
people use the pressure cooker
#
because it will literally save LPG
#
usage by a massive
#
amount if people stop believing in the misinformation
#
about pressure cookers
#
I can go after that narrow goal
#
and to that effect which means
#
that I am not going to sit and waste time
#
trying to berate you for your
#
faith in Satguru
#
so in that sense I think this is always going to be a very
#
for me I think science communication
#
what I have learnt in the last 4 or 5 years and I used to
#
be exactly like you in the sense that
#
if it is bullshit
#
call out the bullshit was essentially the thought
#
process but then you sort of realise that
#
I think there is a certain
#
preaching to the choir when you do that
#
so the people who react
#
positively to you calling a godman
#
a bullshit are people who believe he is
#
bullshit anyway the number of people
#
who are going to change their minds in a social
#
media world near zero
#
very very hard
#
here is the thing you are never going to
#
change the mind of anyone who actually
#
believes but the point is
#
that paradigms change one funeral
#
at a time change is generational
#
so there might be people who never heard of the guy
#
and for them it might make a difference
#
for all 14 of them
#
yes the fact that
#
there are counter views
#
meaning that there is just not wholesale worship
#
hopefully the youtube algorithm
#
like oh you saw this
#
here is a counter view
#
in an ideal world yes
#
Shakespeare said this actually
#
so he said to paint
#
the violet
#
to gild gold
#
to perfume the lily
#
and to call
#
Sadguru a charlatan is a pointless
#
and wasteful exercise
#
brilliant I think you
#
cited it wrong it was George Bernard Shaw
#
who said this
#
thank you Shakespeare I will take your word for it
#
I have a question for you
#
if there is a chicken which is studying
#
for an exam and is under
#
enormous stress what would
#
you call it
#
pressure cooker
#
pressure cooker
#
cooker is Punjabi for chicken folks
#
kindly
#
that is actually
#
also Konkani for
#
chicken
#
is it ok
#
this joke is about 2800 km
#
away
#
an interesting
#
myth that you busted shows that
#
Bangalore is less likely to get this joke
#
than Chennai because Bangalore is south of Chennai
#
yes
#
whole latitude point
#
like two weird geography things for some
#
reason which I learnt much later
#
one is Amsterdam is north of London
#
ok
#
now go to the map and you will realise
#
England is
#
actually north
#
Amsterdam is north of London
#
Chennai is north of Bangalore
#
Chennai is north of Bangalore
#
Chennai is more Amit than Bangalore
#
brilliant
#
I will ask you to bust some more
#
quick misinformation
#
one panipuri water will it give you diarrhea
#
or not
#
I think it goes back to
#
what Anthony Bourdain
#
once told Anderson Cooper
#
no matter what place you go to
#
you are far safer eating street food
#
than a buffet
#
in a five star hotel
#
because the breakfast buffet is probably
#
leftover food recycled for you
#
on the other hand
#
street food is almost always freshly prepared
#
now I think also again
#
if you just apply high school science
#
in general microbes, bacteria and so on
#
require certain conditions
#
to live
#
first is obviously I think there are aerobics
#
so let's keep that aside, this is going to be anaerobic
#
but there are anaerobic bacteria in any case
#
so that's aside
#
the second thing is that they don't do well
#
in salty solutions
#
because salt actually by osmosis
#
removes the water from a cell
#
so the bacteria will die
#
so they do not do well above a certain salt concentration
#
the second thing is that on top of that
#
they do not do well in acidic solutions
#
and what's there in panipuri water
#
and tamarind, all of which are strongly acidic
#
the pH of panipuri water is like
#
3 or 4, it's like super acidic
#
if anything actually
#
sloshing around the panipuri water
#
is going to damage your enamel
#
so if you want to drink panipuri
#
use a straw like you do with lemonade
#
so there is that, so the pH
#
alone is going to kill all the bacteria
#
then
#
just to be safe, there are a few more layers
#
of protection we add
#
we add spices like chilli powder
#
and cumin powder
#
all of which are strongly antibacterial
#
see spices are basically plant
#
defense chemicals
#
they produce those chemicals
#
to prevent microbes from attacking them
#
and insects from attacking them
#
because they are good at killing those things
#
they tend to be volatile and aromatic
#
so we like the smell
#
so all spices above a certain concentration
#
are toxic for us also
#
famous example is nutmeg
#
5 grams of nutmeg is poisonous
#
it will actually kill you
#
and little bit less actually makes you high
#
there is a molecule in nutmeg called myristocin
#
which turns into
#
basically in your brain turns into ecstasy
#
MDMA
#
so it's a precursor molecule for MDMA
#
so basically the reason why
#
mothers in India give a little bit of nutmeg in milk
#
to put kids to sleep
#
is because it makes them mildly high
#
Naren and I are going to go after this
#
to procure some nutmeg
#
the line between high and sick is very small
#
public service announcement
#
please do not try this at home
#
kindly recommend good nutmeg dealer
#
in Chennai
#
garam masala is there
#
biryani masala famously
#
has nutmeg
#
so the point is that
#
the spices themselves
#
are very strongly antibacterial
#
chili is strongly antibacterial
#
that is another layer of defense
#
and if that wasn't enough
#
we use mint
#
famously
#
human beings are the only animals
#
that can tolerate mint
#
every other animal cannot tolerate
#
the smell and this thing
#
the reason in fact we grow mint
#
and the borders of many of these fields
#
to prevent pests from coming in
#
they cannot stand the smell of mint
#
no animal can stand the smell of mint
#
so therefore
#
we have like 4 layers of defense
#
far far safer
#
than any random
#
5 star buffet
#
5 star buffet
#
don't talk to me about 5 star buffet
#
6-7 days in a 5 star I am kind of dying
#
the other thing that irritates me
#
is I will look at a menu often of a Chinese restaurant
#
and there will be that ridiculous obnoxious line
#
no MLG added
#
and I am fucking sick of it
#
because in the 1980s
#
there was this canard spread that MLG is bad for you
#
it is not
#
MLG is incredible
#
everyone listening to this
#
has tons of MLG every fucking day
#
kindly elaborate Ashok
#
add your voice
#
so let's start with a very basic
#
monosodium glutamate
#
so leave aside the sodium
#
you get it in salt, sodium chloride
#
glutamate is basically the
#
glutamic acid
#
which is an amino acid
#
so all life on the planet
#
is made from the same 20 amino acids
#
the entire structure of every living form
#
from bacteria to human beings
#
20 amino acids which is remarkable when you think about it
#
because these 20 amino acids
#
can combine to form the most spectacular
#
larger protein structures
#
from muscles to blood tissue
#
to brain cells to heart cells to everything
#
and one of that 20 is glutamic acid
#
if you generally assume
#
you are a 70 kg person
#
you have 2 kgs of that glutamic acid in your body
#
for starters
#
therefore a quarter teaspoon of that glutamic acid
#
not going to kill you
#
second thing is that why do we have a taste bud for it
#
we have a taste bud for it
#
because it is now believed
#
that it is a mechanism for indicating
#
to your brain that what you are eating is high protein
#
see we have an indicator for
#
carbs which is sweetness
#
we have an indicator for sourness
#
this is how you get vitamin C and many other things
#
so you have sourness
#
how you indicate
#
salt, again because body needs certain amount of sodium
#
so that's salt
#
and then bitterness is to prevent you from eating poisons
#
and most of the bitter taste buds
#
are at the back of your tongue
#
that's why we use expressions like bitter after taste
#
bitter is the last taste you will experience
#
and needs to prevent you before
#
swallowing is what it is
#
and then umami is basically
#
to detect glutamates
#
so anything that is high protein
#
means it has a lot of glutamates
#
fun fact, why do you think it is called gluten
#
wheat, wheat protein
#
is mostly glutamic acid
#
now obviously people
#
will then point out that no no no that is glutamic acid
#
in a protein structure
#
this is free amino acid and that is
#
harmful, so which is where we then talk about
#
tomatoes, parmesan cheese
#
and a ton of other things like
#
any fermented food, literally any
#
fermented food from idli to yogurt
#
anytime you introduce a bacteria to ferment
#
something it's going to break down those proteins
#
and glutamic acid will be formed
#
so that's what makes fermented food savory
#
like kombucha or for that matter
#
kimchi or any of those things, gochujang
#
for that matter, again lots of MSG
#
and soy sauce
#
lots of MSG, again fermented
#
so the point is that there is actually
#
no difference between the MSG
#
that is literally in your tomato
#
and the parmesan cheese
#
and the powder that you add, the powder is just simply
#
the pure 100% essence of that
#
and you don't need much
#
so there is a
#
tiny tiny tiny number of people who are
#
allergic to MSG
#
far far more people are allergic to
#
gluten and peanuts and dairy
#
and soy and eggs and all that, this is really
#
a non-issue, many people tend to
#
self-diagnose things like allergies, they usually are not
#
and many people won't even know
#
when you are eating a tomato juice
#
in an airplane and you are loving it
#
you are literally loving the MSG
#
yeah and I love that t-shirt line
#
of yours, parmesan is white person's MSG
#
yeah white people MSG
#
and Naren
#
another question for you, let me see if you get this one
#
you came close to the last one
#
an overweight man has a lot of tomato
#
MSG, let's say he has a lot of
#
MSG and he hits on a pretty
#
woman at a bar and she turns him
#
down saying what?
#
no MSG
#
no no, what is MSG called in India?
#
Ajinomoto
#
Ajinomoto
#
overweight person I said, anyway let it pass
#
these are clearly
#
literally in Japanese means essence of taste
#
and it is the essence of taste
#
Uncle Roger Videos, earlier you spoke about
#
Uncle Roger Videos is
#
very much the man
#
raw milk or processed milk
#
oh man, I mean it's weird
#
how we are trying to turn the clock back
#
to literally the dark ages
#
like most people
#
before the last 50 or 60 years
#
died from infectious diseases, food poisoning
#
and things
#
against which we had done
#
a huge amount of work to come up
#
with vaccines and antibiotics and food
#
processing techniques to keep food safe
#
and people now have a problem
#
with like preservatives and all of that, would you rather
#
eat rotten food? I don't quite understand, you need
#
a very tiny amount of preservative
#
like people are worried about preservatives in bread
#
the bread without the
#
preservative will start molding
#
and by the way people think only when you
#
see that green patch is when I should
#
stop eating it, when you see that green patch it means
#
days ago the spores are already inside
#
that's already giving you
#
pathogenic, so therefore
#
people have a distorted sense of this
#
raw milk is one of the most dangerous
#
things you can consume
#
and people will say no, no, no, my grandfather
#
consumed and he was healthy
#
classic anecdotal bias
#
and the grandfathers probably did
#
not only that
#
the first and foremost hard mathematical thing
#
for people to grasp their head is that
#
all old people you see around you right now
#
are all lucky
#
survivors
#
selection bias already happened
#
because they were all part of
#
families where there were 8 kids, 3 died
#
from smallpox, 1 died from measles
#
people used to have 8-9 kids
#
because many used to die
#
the very fact that they survived means there is already a selection bias
#
the fittest they were already preselected
#
then on top of that they survived
#
all the other
#
malnutrition and everything else so
#
in the sense that any clinical test will
#
tell you that boss this is not a good population
#
for you to test your hypothesis at all
#
because they are already going to be naturally healthy
#
because all the unhealthy ones are already dead
#
see the beauty of the modern world
#
is its ability to give
#
the person with the most mediocre
#
health a fantastic chance
#
at a life
#
that is what people don't forget
#
the very fact that
#
you spoke about the Chandrabhan Prasad
#
the fact that people have diabetes now
#
unfortunately as there are lifestyle food
#
related issues yes
#
but boss you did not have
#
diabetes and cancer in the past because
#
these are diseases of age and wealth
#
people died before they were 40
#
when are you going to get cardiovascular or diabetes
#
at all
#
so the fact that so many people are now living up to their 70s
#
you are now going to see all of that
#
and not only that we now have diagnostic methods
#
for that do you know how many people died
#
of cancer in the past you have no idea because you never diagnosed it
#
people just died of old age
#
how do you know whether there was a tumor
#
how do you know whether it was a prostate cancer or a uterine cancer
#
nobody diagnosed that
#
but some people are confident in saying
#
that it was better in the past
#
there is obviously there are
#
there is evidence that says that
#
vegetables 100 years ago
#
had 30% more micronutrients
#
soil
#
there are deep issues and so on
#
when you eat a balanced meal
#
you don't need every single ingredient to have
#
every nutrient
#
you are going to look at where all you get everything
#
on top of that you have
#
supplements in any case
#
Indians for the longest time believe that
#
you get vitamin D again famously you get vitamin D from milk
#
believe that oh
#
we have so much sunshine
#
we will get vitamin D from sun etc
#
you don't realize
#
that the way humans evolved
#
the browner the skin the less vitamin D you produce
#
but the browner the skin
#
the better you are protected against UVB
#
so the white person
#
far far more susceptible
#
to skin cancer
#
but also generates lot more vitamin D from the sun
#
that's the mutation that
#
allowed Europeans and why Europeans
#
became white is basically this
#
because the browner people probably
#
died out from lack of vitamin D
#
even right now
#
Indians who go to Nordics they have to take vitamin D
#
tablets and so on
#
so the point about milk is that before
#
this milk naturally has a ton
#
of bacteria
#
by the way even human mother's milk has a lot of
#
bacteria but those are the beneficial bacteria
#
that then get into our gut and form the
#
start of your gut microbiome
#
so it's designed for the human this thing
#
that bacteria is designed for baby cows
#
not good for you at all
#
many of them can kill you
#
and cause food poisoning
#
I have been told I look like a baby cow now I know why
#
very sad
#
so and the fact that we invented a method
#
that simply uses a high temperature in a short
#
amount of time and that's all you need to kill
#
the bacteria in milk
#
and does not do anything
#
and so the common problem is
#
people will say it
#
destroys nutrients and my
#
advice to everyone is always just ask
#
the next question what nutrients
#
does it destroy proteins does it destroy
#
carbs does it destroy which
#
vitamins right and you pointed out somebody
#
perhaps Sadguru was saying that iron
#
it destroys iron no no there's a bunch
#
of belief in about raw milk
#
that pasteurization destroys iron
#
in
#
raw milk I am like no iron
#
has there is no iron in milk
#
right and more basically even if you
#
don't need that fancy bit of information
#
if you remember your school chemistry lab
#
iron is famously dark colored
#
everything about iron is dark colored
#
you cannot have something that's absolutely
#
white and have iron
#
if it has the slightest amount of iron
#
it's going to be orange or red
#
why is your blood red
#
anything that has iron is going to be red orange brown
#
there is just no other
#
color that you can have iron salts in
#
and so therefore anything that's white in color
#
atta maida whatever it is
#
it's not going to have zero iron
#
it has to be darker colored
#
and anyone who has milk running through his veins
#
is basically dead because severe iron deficiency
#
so what are we talking about
#
and if you are taking me seriously severe irony
#
deficiency so kindly control
#
there is one more
#
big misconception
#
that nitrogenous
#
fertilizers are destroying
#
the world so
#
apparently
#
or not apparently indeed
#
nitrogenous fertilizers what enables
#
8 billion people to survive on
#
the earth
#
since you mentioned that
#
nice sort of segway to fritz harbor
#
harbor bosh process
#
the one is that
#
there is no way we would have had 8 billion people
#
without
#
our industrial ability
#
to take atmospheric nitrogen and turn it
#
into ammonia
#
because just relying on dal and legumes
#
is not enough that's very slow not enough
#
crop rotation can only feed so much etc etc
#
I don't think we would have had this
#
most people would have starved actually
#
so it's been the longest problem
#
and then fritz harbor and bosh
#
basically solved this
#
it's a fascinating fact that chemist actually
#
I heard it in a lecture
#
half of the
#
nitrogen atoms in your body
#
in all our bodies
#
came from the fertilizers used to
#
grow the crops that we eat
#
and eat the animals that eat those crops
#
half of the atoms in your body
#
came from that fertilizer you wouldn't exist
#
without that
#
so that is how dependent we become
#
it's not like 10% half
#
so it literally
#
means that the agricultural productivity
#
didn't just like mildly increase
#
it just exponentially increased
#
that's how the 20th century we had
#
this explosion of a population
#
and then obviously the green
#
revolution then figured out hybrid varieties
#
that was able to do many of these things but
#
nitrogen fertilizers what the fuck
#
we are not only what we eat
#
we are what fertilizers what we eat
#
and by the way I have a question
#
for Mr. Shanoi he is failing on my questions
#
today for both of you
#
but Mr. Shanoi will appreciate it more
#
harbors partner in this endeavor
#
went to calcutta and was asked to sit
#
and his response was
#
how do you know
#
what was he asked
#
bosh brilliant
#
sorry continue
#
harbour story itself is actually super poignant
#
yeah it has to be told
#
it's a segue but it has to be told
#
Jewish scientist makes
#
critical discoveries the harbour
#
bosh process nitrogen fixation
#
single handedly responsible for saving
#
more lives than any other person on the planet
#
and yet his research
#
is what results in the production
#
of the gas and the other
#
things that was used to kill
#
Jewish people during World War II
#
so much so his wife committed
#
suicide very tragic life
#
and he himself was thrown out of Germany
#
he lost his position because he was a Jewish
#
it's quite a tragic life
#
wife was a lady named
#
Claire Immerwar
#
and there is a prize
#
instituted in
#
that was won by my
#
friend's daughter
#
she teaches
#
in England
#
what is the prize for
#
it's for women who have done
#
the most for science
#
Claire Immerwar was someone who did
#
a lot of work and then
#
she was driven to suicide because
#
of her husband
#
her husband was a worthless bomb
#
I don't know the details but
#
I think in the sense that his
#
the impact that his work had
#
was something that was depleted
#
I think the gas and that poison gas
#
poison gas
#
so he literally
#
is responsible for hundreds of thousands
#
of people dying in World War I
#
the trench thing
#
and then the Zyklon B
#
that was then
#
made to kill all the Jewish people
#
in concentration camps
#
and irony of irony is he ended up
#
being the cause of
#
saving billions of people
#
he killed millions and saved billions
#
it's quite mind blowing
#
and I'm just thinking
#
Rajma khao, gas banjayagi
#
toxic poison gas
#
so you know
#
what are the other
#
what are the most
#
irritating misconceptions about food
#
so
#
the most the big picture one
#
is fundamentally this idea that
#
there are heroes and villains
#
right that there are
#
amazing things like turmeric and poisons
#
like maida
#
sugar is a villain though Claire
#
sugar yes it is but at the end of the day
#
in the larger context of it everything that you
#
any carb you eat is getting turned into sugar actually
#
by the way even your fat and
#
everything else is also getting turned to sugar if your body needs it
#
right ultimately glucose is the currency
#
energy currency of the body but the point is
#
I think people have a
#
completely distorted sense that
#
that they are
#
moved to do silly things like drink turmeric water
#
turmeric milk three times a day
#
which our friend Abby Phillips the liver doctor has shown
#
actually it's a myth turmeric
#
does nothing for you it doesn't do anything
#
the amount of curcumin and turmeric is
#
like you like it is like some one
#
milligram in some fifty grams of
#
turmeric or something who is eating fifty grams of
#
turmeric boss I mean it is just insane
#
it is almost homeopathic so useless
#
and also and not only that
#
the the common
#
so one of the common exercises I
#
use with children when they teach them about just to make
#
things fun is to say that imagine you are lost in a
#
forest that you are abandoned
#
and that you have to survive what would you
#
what would you eat is
#
an interesting sort of thought experiment
#
and it's it's incredible how
#
kids are immediately moved to say I'm going to pick
#
berries I'm going to eat the fruits
#
etc etc right and I tell them
#
no every single thing in a forest
#
that you eat from a plant will kill you
#
right a tiny number
#
of plant species have been domesticated
#
by human beings to reduce
#
the poisons reduce the alkaloids
#
reduce all the other anti-nutrients
#
to make things that are convenient for you
#
everything else in the wild will kill you
#
so on
#
the other hand we are animals
#
you can literally kill and eat any
#
animal any fresh kill is
#
absolutely safe you can eat insects
#
you can eat any small animal you can eat
#
hunt and eat any animal but you cannot
#
touch any plant in a in any forest
#
so in that sense I think
#
a very common sense about people swigging
#
all of these these remedies
#
is that as Dr. Abhi points out they're all liver toxic
#
your liver is your first
#
and last point of defense
#
it has to remove all of those toxins and when it can't
#
it's going to get completely over well right
#
so I think this idea that there is a hero
#
and a villain actually forces people to
#
not focus on the entire meal meaning that
#
I know it's controversial
#
but you can have a maida parotta
#
but you can have it with a veg curry
#
and a side salad and that's not
#
a bad meal like this idea
#
that somehow you must not you must eliminate
#
maida from your diet is actually ridiculous
#
because that results in people doing things like
#
no I won't eat this biscuit because it's made
#
from maida so we'll eat a millet biscuit
#
millet tastes like cardboard
#
so what do manufacturers do
#
add a ton of fat
#
and that millet biscuit is way more unhealthy
#
than your marry biscuit that you originally
#
and millet is basically carbs so
#
I'll make three points
#
one point is
#
and this I get from my good friend Susan Thomas
#
married to Ajay Shah
#
and as wise and insightful as him
#
and Susan once told me that you think fruits are healthy
#
fruits today have
#
30 eggs if I remember correctly
#
30 eggs as much sugar as I used to once upon a time
#
first insight
#
the other thing is that
#
now and a lot of the battles
#
around food as you
#
pointed out tend
#
to almost be ideological
#
and extremist and dogmatic
#
and what I recommend for everyone
#
is that today you can actually figure out
#
for yourself what food does to your body
#
like the reason I reversed
#
my type 2 diabetes took my HbA1c
#
from 7.7 to 5.7
#
was I figured out my optimal diet
#
by using a CGM a continuous glucose
#
monitor which by the way Ajay had advised
#
me to do and when you do
#
that it's like I had a slice of toast
#
284 I had eggs and bacon flat line
#
I was arguing with a friend of mine
#
about how oats are unhealthy
#
and she was like are you crazy I have oats for breakfast
#
it's healthy I said use
#
a CGM she had oats
#
once it went to 290
#
next day she had again just eggs
#
and it stayed flat and never had oats
#
so therefore
#
what I would say is that
#
use a CGM see how your body
#
reacts to things forget about the ideology
#
the third important thing I would say
#
is that yes what
#
you said you can have maida parotta
#
you can have vegetables you can have all of that
#
the order matters one of the things I
#
realized with a CGM is
#
that the order matters because say you have
#
the carbs first you will immediately
#
get that glucose spike because
#
your stomach immediately gets to work digesting
#
but if you have either
#
fiber or protein first
#
and then you have carbs
#
your stomach is already busy on the other
#
stuff and the glucose spike is slower
#
and much less so the order
#
matters and this
#
what is the most remarkable thing is that
#
somehow the Europeans
#
and you verified this yourself yes yes I verified it
#
on me and it's well known by now
#
I tested it with the CGM and
#
the most incredible
#
thing to me is that somehow
#
without a CGM without any of this
#
the Europeans arrived at
#
just the right meal structure where you have
#
salad first you have your protein
#
second whatever the meat is and then you have
#
your dessert last so I am not
#
saying that you avoid any food I mean I
#
jokingly say sugar is poison but
#
what I would say is you want to have something sweet
#
you want to have a dessert don't have it
#
by isolation in the middle of the day
#
have it at the end of a meal where you've had
#
those other things and your body just
#
treats it entirely differently
#
it's a little bit like what we were earlier
#
it's very contained to you yeah it is very much yeah
#
and what he was earlier saying that you would imagine
#
that a chemical will have the same reaction
#
on every brain but it is contextual
#
it depends on what memories you associate
#
food with and similarly here
#
you know you would imagine that sugar
#
will provoke the
#
same response but no it's context
#
what are you having before it or after exactly which
#
brings me to my second
#
important myth right
#
people vastly
#
overestimate the impact
#
of choice of food and vastly
#
underestimate the amount of food you eat
#
so to your point when I did the CGM
#
the general prevailing
#
myth was just switch from rice to quinoa
#
and quinoa to millet and that and all of that
#
makes little or no difference
#
in your because they're still grains they're still
#
carbohydrates quinoa and millet are also f*****g unhealthy
#
so in that sense so the point here
#
but here's what make a difference
#
I used to have a cup of rice when I made it half
#
a cup of rice the spike is much smaller
#
so people really need to understand this
#
that the amount of food you eat is a far far
#
more important factor than
#
what you eat what you eat is important
#
yes in the balance meaning that
#
it has to be a good balance it can't be like 100% carbs
#
it can't be like very low on protein
#
yes all that is fine but the amount of food
#
you eat makes a huge difference and
#
the thing is that to quote
#
Nithyananda
#
eat less food
#
so in that sense this is a very
#
common myth and the third thing is
#
people waste an inordinate
#
amount of time
#
assuming that your cooking technique and
#
appliances and these things make a
#
difference they're statistically
#
they make little or no difference
#
basically first one is how much you eat
#
second is what all you eat
#
and it's not even in that
#
list of things then there are other things like
#
whether you're having alcohol whether processed
#
meats are associated with certain
#
risks and add one to this list of how
#
much you eat and this thing is when
#
you eat yes right and I
#
I think by now the science is pretty clear
#
intermittent fasting is actually
#
great I would urge everyone to
#
avoid breakfast to you know fast
#
for 18 hours a day and eat in a 6 hour window
#
the only thing I will say there
#
is that what a nutritionist told me is that
#
again there are deep individual
#
variations in how people
#
respond to the duration that
#
they can fast and in their
#
glucose insulin responses and so on
#
so like for example
#
18 hour fast may not work for a lot of women
#
and so on so in the sense
#
that almost always before you just
#
jump to trying a fast do it gradually
#
see what works for you speak
#
to an actual specialist or doctor or this thing
#
make sure your vitals you do get
#
yourself tested regularly right suppose for example
#
like you could go on a low sugar diet
#
and that's absolutely great for you but if it
#
internally means that you're going on a high fat diet
#
you might also want to take a look at your triglycerides
#
parallel so you don't want to get completely
#
out of whack right so in general
#
I think the as much as possible
#
think in terms of entire meals
#
don't think in terms of
#
one magical ingredient one meal
#
one this thing and it's such a
#
tempting thing to do right you want that
#
magic bullet solution I remember
#
when my one point when my dad was alive
#
I sent him this documentary on keto
#
and it was praising coconut oil a lot
#
so he said you know I'm going to get some coconut oil
#
I'm going to have it everyday and I was like no
#
no you can't just do that
#
I can have coconut oil if I'm already
#
on a keto diet and one meal a day and it's like
#
a super food for me it's additional
#
and I'm also having vitamins on the side
#
and making sure I'm getting one but
#
randomly if you add coconut oil to a normal
#
diet you're just adding saturated fat
#
and again it's and the science
#
on that is like very still very hazy and
#
is still emerging so remember that one the science
#
is complicated and two every individual is unique
#
yeah that is the confounding variable
#
that's the confounding variable and by the way
#
you don't just eat one thing so many
#
of the studies are nearly impossible you can't
#
force feed a person one thing to test something
#
right you can only do that on rats and
#
that really doesn't does not really indicate how
#
a human might behave so the problem with this
#
is that don't fall for fat diets and
#
don't like don't overthink
#
this at the same time just focus on reducing
#
what you eat but you
#
know it's good to fast but do it in a way
#
that it works for you right if it's causing you tremendous
#
amount of bloating and discomfort always
#
talk to experts don't believe random
#
people on social media yeah that I think is the
#
common this thing right and I
#
once posted a prioritization
#
of risks food and
#
diet related risks by
#
analyzing all of the priorities
#
of every major food safety
#
and health agencies of FDA
#
and European all of the big like
#
some 20 countries right and I
#
then counted all of them and found that
#
like alcohol
#
diet meaning the amount of food
#
you eat and what you eat etc are
#
the level one risks tobacco
#
etc are like the top tier risk
#
red risks right then you have like
#
processed meats and a few
#
other things then you have
#
additives microplastics
#
as they're not as
#
bothered apparently but apparently but people
#
seem to be very bothered by that but most
#
experts are not bothered and
#
literally everything else Instagram
#
and YouTube is scaring you about not even
#
on their radar at all nobody is
#
worried about microwave nobody's worried about
#
aluminium in pressure cooker
#
nobody's worried about any of those things at all
#
right I mean aluminium is the most abundant
#
metal on the planet
#
there's a canard about it causing
#
Alzheimer's yeah no again
#
the weird thing the Alzheimer's website literally says
#
there is no connection between
#
dietary consumption of aluminium and Alzheimer's
#
they have found aluminium
#
in the plaques that doesn't mean that
#
it essentially because the problem is
#
that the amount of aluminium you get from
#
your vessels a tiny
#
fraction of what you get from drinking
#
water and medicines and
#
your food aluminium is everywhere your
#
vegetables are absorbing from the soil
#
right so if your vegetables are growing in a soil
#
that has a lot of super abundant
#
it's always there and your kidney takes care of it
#
there are people with renal failure
#
etc for whom it's a danger they have to
#
be wary of it you can't just randomly
#
concord so I think the fundamental third myth
#
is that all the things
#
influencers want to scare you about
#
experts are not worried about so
#
you need to think about that
#
it's also
#
I have a tangential
#
thought is I wonder what
#
it is that makes people
#
put these you know
#
factoids out yeah what
#
what possibly because everybody I think wants to
#
seem like an expert right and this
#
makes it easy I mean there was one
#
influencer who was doing a havan at
#
home YouTube influencer and then he
#
said everyone in Bhopal who did this
#
did not die during the gas tragedy
#
that happened out there which is complete nonsense
#
and when this fantastic reporter
#
I won't name her but she listens to
#
the show this fantastic reporter reported
#
on this and said what the fuck is this why do advertisers
#
fund this guy because this was hardly
#
the least of the ridiculous things he said
#
the guy sued her sent a mob
#
after her sued her in multiple
#
I mean it's just a complete mess which is why I'm not
#
taking any names but it's
#
a messed up environment and what
#
really makes me mad about a lot of influencers
#
is forget the food I mean you're saying
#
any kind of foxy rubbish because it'll go viral
#
it'll become popular but
#
I am also pissed off about
#
the brands that they endorse
#
whether or not they acknowledge
#
it because I think that you've got to be responsible
#
because you know once upon a time I used to think
#
celebrity endorsements not a big deal who cares
#
it's a lazy strategy but reading Luke
#
Burgess wanting having him on my show talking
#
to him looking around thinking about this stuff
#
I have realized that mimetic desire
#
is ubiquitous in the sense that
#
so many of us want what we want because
#
other people want it especially when role models
#
want it and unfortunately
#
people like Krish Shok
#
and Naren Shanoi are role models to small
#
little tiny groups of geeky people
#
these influencers
#
influence in a huge way what people
#
want so I think your basic minimum
#
responsibility should be that
#
if you think you're an influencer in any way
#
you've got to have a
#
you've got to understand what you are
#
peddling so many of these influencers are like
#
selling random crypto things and all that
#
I've turned down an Ayurvedic advertiser
#
because I'm like no Ayurveda for me
#
I think
#
if I think about
#
as someone
#
almost since 2007 my first
#
one of my roles in TCS was
#
to sit and research social media from the
#
early days so sort of like
#
over time I have this insight into how these
#
algorithms are designed and how they are actually
#
implemented and therefore
#
in turn what kind of behaviors
#
they incentivize you've spoken
#
a lot about how they incentivize polarization
#
and so on but on this particular
#
food misinformation piece
#
misinformation in general
#
it's a classic Brandolini's
#
law in the sense that
#
it takes far far more effort to do
#
fact checking than to generate bullshit
#
the second thing is
#
that these algorithms
#
are essentially designed to maximize
#
engagement now engagement
#
is really literally defined as
#
the amount of time people
#
spend on the app that's
#
the variable that they are optimizing for
#
so the way it ends up
#
so one way of thinking about it is the way these
#
machine learning algorithms will work is that
#
right let's find people who create engaging content
#
right the more time they spend that's engagement
#
over time
#
they've also figured out
#
that rather than just show
#
content to people who agree with it
#
let's show content to people who disagree
#
with it because the engagement is hundred times more
#
because they will sit and comment and fight
#
and hate and you are
#
getting engagement that's engagement
#
and what are you doing you are selling all of that
#
engagement and packaging it as advertising
#
rates that keep going up so if your engagement
#
goes down so hate and
#
polarization and negativity is literally
#
the only way to increase engagement
#
I mean it's basically just a modern
#
day data science way of saying
#
dog bites man is not news
#
man bites dog is
#
except that now you can now basically say
#
microwave causes cancer
#
is information that
#
will get hundred and fifty thousand likes and millions of views
#
dog bites beer biceps
#
could be news
#
that could be that could be
#
but my point is that I think the
#
sense of how and now what you've done is
#
you've created an ecosystem where
#
a bunch of young people
#
whose entire careers
#
is to be an influencer their entire
#
livelihood is this it's not like
#
people like me who have a day job and I'm just doing
#
this as a hobby on the side for them
#
it is their ability to get an audience and then
#
command a better rate from a product that they
#
want to peddle and so you've created
#
that ecosystem millions of people are dependent
#
on it and you've created an ecosystem where
#
the only thing that goes viral is
#
negative only thing that goes viral is
#
misinformation because it gets more engagement
#
I keep telling people
#
again that don't feed the trolls
#
meaning that don't
#
engage with misinformation
#
in that direct sense that by giving the algorithm
#
a signal that you're engaging with it
#
put screenshots comment on it do
#
those kinds of things the
#
code tweet the
#
repost on whatever the reshare
#
the remix on Instagram these are
#
all things that are completely counterproductive
#
having said that I would say that the even
#
the screenshot is incredibly toxic
#
incredibly toxic
#
it has different issues but yeah
#
why is it toxic?
#
it's incredibly toxic because you're shitting on them
#
shitting on someone behind their back
#
and true it's that whole negativity
#
which we've spoken about by and large
#
it's so easy because what happens every time
#
you shit on someone you're saying I'm wiser
#
than you I'm more virtuous than you
#
and both of those are incredibly toxic and easy
#
to do it's easy to go out there
#
screenshot someone and do mockery
#
it's much harder to have a reasoned argument
#
and what I would say is that you can have
#
a reasoned argument without engaging directly
#
so if somebody is for example
#
saying that raw milk is good
#
you know you don't have to either
#
screenshot them or code tweet them you can
#
just talk about why that particular belief
#
is rubbish and make a reasoned argument
#
and that is part of the debate
#
so in fact the way for example I've recently
#
people keep sending me this
#
these reels of food farmer
#
and ask you know is he scaring me
#
is it okay to eat
#
food farmer is the sort of guy who
#
is the guy who went after Bonvita
#
wrote that whole Bonvita thing and then later
#
went after every brand and so on right
#
and I appreciate his drive
#
to get people focused on labels and
#
corporate malfeasance and people
#
misleading you with labels I think that's great
#
but it is also true that he regularly just
#
wildly exaggerates the dangers
#
and it's very misleading
#
when like all bread in India is a scam
#
and so on right so basically the way
#
I decided people were asking me you need to put a
#
reaction video I said no I don't like doing that
#
right I'm instead
#
going to make a video about
#
why it's okay to eat a small amount of bread if you're
#
eating it with cheese and with vegetables and with
#
other things and do it moderately and
#
maybe learn to bake and I'll do it
#
in my own way and not really
#
directly so I think the part of the
#
problem is that in social media is not
#
designed for
#
ideas to engage with each other
#
it's actually designed for people to fight with
#
each other for individuals to fight with each other
#
and that's the entire user experience
#
design of that so if they
#
in a sense they want you
#
to completely they
#
incentivize only you reacting to people
#
to reply
#
let me ask you guys a question as people
#
who've been you know thinking about this for a long time
#
in your case been in the business for a long time
#
directly responsible for everything
#
wrong that your company which we shall not
#
name has done right directly responsible
#
we are going to talk later about
#
passports or actually we're not
#
but here's the deal
#
what has gone wrong is that
#
it's not that social media companies are evil
#
but in the obvious pursuit of
#
maximizing engagement it so happens
#
that they have amplified
#
certain hard wirings of ours
#
which just happened to take us in this toxic
#
direction for example
#
tribalism you know the Facebook
#
like and the Twitter retweet you
#
know end up pushing tribalism and
#
polarization because they are rewarding
#
that quest for validation and the easiest way
#
to get validation is blah blah blah we know all of
#
that my question is
#
that what are
#
and I'm sure even the social media companies don't
#
like this they want the engagement
#
but they also understand the
#
impact of what is going on but
#
at the same time the incentives are what they are
#
so in your opinions what are the possible
#
ways of you know
#
getting what they want but
#
at the same time amplifying the better
#
angels of our nature as it were
#
fascinating question so
#
there are fairly obvious
#
ways of doing that
#
I mean eliminating the like button and
#
eliminating no no but without harming the bottom
#
line because you eliminate the like button and the retweet
#
your engagement goes down
#
it's almost impossible to do because
#
that's entirely what engagement is
#
what drives
#
there's a structural thing in the sense that reddit
#
is far less toxic than Twitter
#
reddit is basically
#
millions of individually deeply
#
toxic sub communities rather than
#
so in the sense that
#
it varies right I'm sure there are
#
there are actually very very
#
focused productive highly well
#
moderated communities but
#
the incel communities the
#
trump communities and all of that stuff also
#
sort of end up starting out from there
#
right I mean in that sense
#
in a deeper sense actually
#
I don't know man I just think
#
less engagement is the only solution
#
in just that I think these
#
companies need to find other ways
#
of making money in general it's almost as
#
if large engagement is toxic
#
for humanity here's a related
#
question and I'll come back to this because I know
#
you'll have other answers as well
#
that then if you're talking about
#
ways of making money if
#
you look at the creator economy what's really happened
#
is we've gotten a move
#
away where the mainstream has ceased to matter
#
and the way creators reach their audiences
#
has changed so in the 1990s I
#
sell a piece to Times of India for
#
800 rupees or whatever it is
#
they aggregate these pieces
#
they aggregate eyeballs they sell the eyeballs
#
to advertisers the creator gets a tiny chunk
#
of it how that changed gradually
#
was a creators got the means of production
#
began reaching audiences directly and selling
#
advertising directly through google adsense and
#
whatever and today advertising
#
has become irrelevant in the
#
sense that you can get money directly from the
#
consumers who are happy to pay and you
#
don't need to scale anymore you get your 100
#
1000 true fans whatever it is right all
#
of those so therefore the model
#
is changing where that whole model of aggregating
#
eyeballs and getting
#
money from advertisers is irrelevant
#
in us in certain domains
#
is there ever a possibility
#
that the revenue
#
options for large tech companies
#
change
#
in the sense that they are getting their money
#
directly from the consumer
#
and the consumer therefore doesn't
#
have to be the product
#
and there are other ways of making money
#
or would network effects
#
mitigate against that because network effects
#
involve the largest
#
number of users and the largest number of
#
consumers and that's
#
more likely in a free model that's an
#
intuition but a lot of my intuitions
#
in the past about whether people will pay directly
#
or whatever are wrong and I am doing
#
this today because they are wrong so
#
what do you guys think?
#
It's a weird scenario so on the one hand
#
so today you could
#
be a tech influencer on YouTube
#
and
#
once you've reached say
#
1 million subscribers at that point
#
you're almost an autopilot
#
you've created an engine new
#
product comes you unbox it you review
#
it and it's just moving on and
#
so there's categories of content where
#
you relentlessly have to keep doing new things
#
because nobody is going to check your review of a phone
#
from one year ago
#
and there's also content that has a long shelf
#
life any political content
#
tech review content is like very transient
#
and
#
I think that is really where the
#
bulk of the problem lies because
#
you've created a stressful
#
setup where the guy
#
has to feed the algorithm today
#
and there is just no
#
sort of incentive
#
purely as someone who's
#
been creating content on the platform
#
over a long period of time I'm really thinking
#
whether I think the
#
it's almost as if it's weird so there's a guy
#
who can get a million views on a phone review
#
thing and get paid a hundred thousand
#
dollars for that I'm really questioning
#
whether the value of that
#
thing that content is hundred thousand dollars
#
right yes today Google or
#
YouTube may be paying that guy hundred thousand dollars
#
maybe I'm really asking an existential
#
question is that worth hundred thousand dollars?
#
there are guys who are doing far far more impactful
#
work for a tiny fraction
#
the definition of
#
I mean prices are always determined
#
by supply and demand as it should be so
#
worth is a metaphysical question as a
#
sacred matter I know that is true
#
I absolutely agree with you
#
in the context of the world where these are physical
#
goods being exchanged
#
this advertising attention and eyeballs
#
is very abstract
#
is not the same thing as
#
the value of the price
#
controls fail on a practical
#
good because you should let the market decide
#
what it wants and all that I'm not entirely certain
#
how you can define what people want
#
in the context of an advertisement
#
but then the people who are putting their money
#
who are advertisers the people
#
who are putting their money they have
#
skin in the game they are the best place to decide
#
what they want and don't want and what they are willing to pay for it
#
correct so the point here is that
#
you have a monopoly here
#
pretty much a monopoly of
#
one or two companies
#
that internally opaquely get to
#
determine the ad rates
#
it's not like the companies really have much of a choice here
#
you don't have if you don't want to advertise on
#
YouTube you really don't have a choice to go
#
elsewhere to be honest right so it's not a perfect market
#
either so in that sense I think there might
#
be perhaps and there are probably people
#
smarter than me in this to sit and
#
design this
#
design the incentive system slightly
#
differently so that one
#
you are maybe prioritizing
#
certain categories of
#
it's for example a few tactical things
#
health and medical
#
misinformation can
#
easily with the right kind of AI
#
and human you know
#
moderation and so on you can make a big
#
dent on that my question I have a question
#
there though that who is to determine
#
what is health misinformation for example
#
for 50 years people believe sugar
#
was fine and fat was evil the
#
US health department's guidelines
#
of 1977 directly led
#
to the obesity epidemic of America
#
and it was important for there to be
#
free-daring voices like Gary
#
and all to fight against
#
the orthodox orthodox because now
#
we know that what the sugar lobby did
#
was far worse than what the tobacco lobby
#
did far far worse so there is
#
there are two things here there is
#
there is content on YouTube
#
and Instagram that says
#
that you can reduce the power in your eyes if you stare
#
straight at the sun there is
#
and that has millions of views right
#
I can very directly establish that
#
people watching that measurably
#
are going to harm themselves if they follow it
#
so there is one the other
#
extreme is the more nuanced
#
sense of Joe Rogan platforming
#
and anti-vax person
#
is a far far more tricky thing
#
and I am not aboard
#
deplatforming or demonetizing that
#
kind of content because the end of the day
#
silencing voices is never a great idea
#
but at the same time
#
there needs to be a way in which I can say
#
that there are direct consequences
#
because you can equally argue
#
that people watching this podcast if 10%
#
of them don't vaccinate their children
#
that by the way has other effects as well
#
so it's a very very to be honest
#
I've really not it's hard to wrap your mind
#
around this this is the problem is that
#
we have nothing in the past that we can learn from
#
this is a completely new
#
no never at any point of time in the past
#
did one man command this much of
#
an audience and millions of people hundreds of millions
#
of people content going viral like
#
one random individual sitting in
#
Delhi like for example Mike Cadbury
#
has had like seven and a half
#
million views I would never have thought
#
that any point of time that I
#
would have that kind of an audience right and
#
so this is there is nothing in the past to actually learn
#
from so to be honest it's a I would
#
generally err on the
#
side of not controlling
#
and moderating speech in general I don't
#
want these companies to determine that
#
whether the problem is
#
that if I say it's going to be a third party neutral
#
pool of doctors people will argue
#
why does the allopathy doctor
#
get to determine whether what I say in
#
Ayurveda is right or not so it is
#
not easy at all so I
#
have two things to say and one is that as far
#
as monopolies are concerned in a narrow sense
#
they are monopolies you know
#
Facebook is a monopoly at what it does Twitter
#
is a monopoly at what it does but in a larger
#
sense in a sense of how people spend their time
#
they're not monopolies because to be
#
on Twitter I'm not on Facebook for that long
#
I'm not reading my book for that long
#
everything is competing with everything else
#
so in that larger sense there is still competition
#
and it's not quite a monopoly
#
secondly even if for a moment I say
#
that is a semantic point and let's say that they are
#
monopolies and people will spend their time on social
#
media I would still say and I'm sure
#
you both agree with me that
#
the reflexive reaction many people have
#
that the state should regulate this
#
is completely wrong because that is
#
the road to serfdom
#
I'll give you a very interesting counterpoint
#
that somebody told me once
#
and that I honestly don't have an answer to that
#
right so today yes
#
notionally Twitter and Facebook
#
and Instagram are competing with each other and competing
#
with Doordarshan or whoever it is for your attention
#
right and they all have
#
the window into your life through your smartphone
#
they can notify you they can
#
hack into your dopamine reward system
#
they can fine tune
#
messages and nudges
#
that can hack your brain wiring
#
and get through to you right they have
#
that your brain can't compete with their big
#
data algorithm that is able to do that
#
in a sense like
#
it's like methamphetamine
#
it's like crystal meth competing with heroin
#
and some other
#
drug or nicotine or something like that
#
right how should a society
#
deal with this versus that
#
it is pretty evident that
#
the current research basically says that the effect
#
they have on your brain is not too dissimilar
#
when you actually eat sugar the effect of
#
being addicted to it is very similar the effect
#
of getting a like on Instagram is not
#
dissimilar from the high you get when you
#
take some of these drugs but we do regulate and we do
#
control drugs and now it's a separate issue whether
#
it should be a free market that determines that
#
but would you then allow it to be sold to children
#
we do so in the sense that it's a
#
weird system where I don't
#
want necessarily an incompetent
#
government to be the one at it
#
but how
#
do you get to a point where
#
we're broadly okay with banning
#
those dangerous drugs but we're not
#
but social media has
#
roughly the same effect so I would
#
say this that firstly there are things
#
like sugar which have worse impact than
#
those dangerous drugs and it's
#
still out there and some of those dangerous
#
and some of those drugs should not be out there
#
and some of those drugs should not be banned
#
right
#
exactly but the thing with
#
social media is that broadly my feeling
#
is that and I've made all these points
#
about the dopamine rush of the Facebook
#
like or the Twitter retweet before
#
but they are a massive net benefit
#
I strongly believe that in the way that they
#
connect the world and the way that they globalise us
#
in the way that they help people form communities
#
of choice rather than communities
#
of circumstance which were
#
introverted geeks like me is a massive big deal
#
because I won't have any friends or a career
#
or a life without the internet
#
so I think that and
#
that's a utilitarian point and I don't even
#
believe in utilitarianism because you cannot
#
measure any of these things the greater
#
question is a question of individual choice
#
I keep saying sugar is poison do I believe
#
it should be banned of course fucking not
#
people have to make their own choices
#
and epistemic humility is important
#
I don't know
#
therefore because I don't know enough
#
I can't decide for others
#
so my sense is that
#
we are faced with what is currently a huge
#
social problem
#
in my reading of history
#
social problems are never solved
#
and always made worse by state coercion
#
but social problems can only
#
be solved internally from the bottoms
#
up by society and I
#
accept that in these times
#
where dopamine
#
manipulation can be weaponized at
#
scale with AI especially
#
my answer feels
#
inadequate because I have seen this in the gambling
#
industry I have written about gambling addiction
#
I was a professional every society controls
#
gambling to some degree from the 80s
#
to the 90s in the 80s and 90s
#
is a book by Natasha Dow show all about
#
machine gambling which shows that you sit down
#
at a slot machine you know 30
#
years before social media they
#
have weaponized the way
#
the brain uses dopamine
#
the way the lights and the music plays
#
and you are paralyzed you just cannot get
#
up never happened to me I have just seen this
#
retail stores use a plan
#
to make sure you buy something
#
the way you go up an elevator and the next
#
up thing is in besides you you got to go
#
around so you pass the shops
#
the lighting in the store is more pleasant
#
than the harsh lighting outside so you naturally
#
want to go inside the way what is placed
#
at eye level of the kids
#
and so I think this is
#
the problem is that I think
#
we live in a very different world and I
#
somehow have this feeling that
#
many of the other lessons that we
#
may have learnt about economics about
#
human behaviour I somehow feel
#
that they may end up being inadequate
#
in informing us
#
yes there are
#
maybe things that we know for sure
#
are bad like state control etc
#
there are things that we know we don't want to do yes
#
but I am not quite certain we know what to do
#
I agree with you my sense is that
#
in terms of overarching principles
#
I am quite clear
#
I don't like coercions and
#
I don't want the state to be
#
autocratic and I value individual
#
freedom and I am clear about these
#
broad principles but having said that
#
below these broad principles how
#
the panoply of actions and policies
#
and incentives play out is something
#
that A is very hard for
#
us to grok in this time maybe with
#
retrospect it will be clear 50 years later
#
and B boss in the next 10 years
#
AI is going to change everything so fundamentally
#
that we don't have a clue
#
and actually lot of people are worried about
#
the fact that AI
#
is completely unpredictable as to its
#
terminacles yes
#
what I am saying is that see like even the coercion
#
piece right let's think about this for a moment
#
let's say you are an individual who you
#
believe has individual liberty of
#
choice of deciding where you want to spend your
#
time or do you want to use twitter
#
do you want to use your facebook you want to use
#
I would actually argue I don't think you have a
#
choice twitter yes
#
you can choose not to use twitter it's like really a
#
lightweight in this context
#
there is no way you are escaping facebook
#
because they own whatsapp facebook
#
you can choose to skip facebook but you are
#
on whatsapp if you are on whatsapp you are on facebook
#
they have all your data you
#
really don't have a you can as much as possible
#
say I am not going to be part of a group but
#
somebody is going to add you anyway you can choose not
#
to use whatsapp but a ton of businesses in
#
India today their only customer service channel is whatsapp
#
you have no choice they don't like say no no
#
I will use iMessage or I will use some signal
#
and telegram not going to happen
#
you have no so in this sense I really
#
also think many of much of our
#
digital architecture today
#
it is sold under the garb
#
of being a libertarian
#
and a lot of choice user choice
#
freedom your consent is all
#
bullshit you really don't have a choice in many
#
of these things in many cases
#
there are apps that will functionally not
#
work unless you turn on push notifications
#
there are so many design choices they make
#
many many companies
#
learning material tutorial material
#
you can say I don't want to go to youtube there is only
#
place you can go to watch videos where else are you going to find
#
it right and so
#
in that sense this is not really a
#
it's almost an implicit
#
question so the problem
#
is that I don't have a I don't know how as a
#
society we should deal with that my watch
#
give me a message I will read it out relax
#
reminder your stress level is unusually
#
high relax with a breathing activity
#
question mark so I don't think my
#
stress level is high why is it saying that
#
my heartbeat is actually 102
#
some tech bro on silicon valley decided that
#
when these two variables increase this
#
threshold please send notification
#
please send notification or maybe they are listening in
#
which is entirely possible
#
no no no I agree like I was
#
having an argument the other day with friends
#
of mine and I was saying hey you know I might be libertarian
#
and all but the fact is there is no free will
#
we have to behave as if there is and fight
#
for it but actually there isn't
#
there isn't and here also I think that
#
it's a question of your
#
choice being explicitly taken away
#
from you and you at least want to have
#
the illusion of choice but these are
#
I would actually see if you can
#
get this guest on your show Tristan Harris
#
center for humane technology
#
ex google guy who designed the infinite
#
scroll and he like you know since then
#
he's been repenting
#
and focused on tech ethics and so on but his
#
but his thought processes and
#
the guess he invites on his
#
your undivided attention podcast
#
are fantastic and I think you should
#
really purely I think
#
and his ideas about
#
how to regulate technology
#
very very fascinating you should listen to it
#
I will and I'll check out his podcast
#
and so should all my listeners if the recommendation
#
is coming from you next question to both
#
of you you know which is
#
that in
#
the way that you know
#
my perhaps my favorite quote of all
#
time is by Annie Dillard where she says
#
how we live our days is how we live
#
our lives right and I want to ask
#
about that because it strikes me that the
#
way I live my days in
#
1995 is drastically different
#
from how I live my day today
#
and it has nothing to do with my age
#
it has everything to do with technology and
#
the way that we've allowed ourselves to be trapped
#
whereas in that day there was a certain
#
terror if you had to communicate with someone
#
I'd have to sit and write a long letter and we
#
already discussed that earlier you had a lot
#
of free time I once asked a writer
#
Sara Rai the brilliant Hindi writer
#
when she grew up in the 60s and 70s
#
that she would you know she was giving
#
me such detailed descriptions of everything
#
the flower bed in the garden and all that I said like
#
how do you remember all of this
#
and she said we have nothing else to do Amit
#
poora den ye bad ke hum dekhte the aur achhe se dekhte the
#
nothing else to do today
#
is scrolling scrolling scrolling swiping
#
swiping swiping you mentioned the infinite scroll
#
we are in an infinite scroll
#
where our attention span is broken up into
#
little narrow bites and
#
I actually cavilled against the
#
canard that everyone has a short
#
attention span no people listen to my podcast
#
people crave depth all of us do that
#
but a large part of our days
#
is spent in these
#
short chunks consuming content that was
#
you know produced in the last three days
#
instead of the infinite glorious wealth of
#
knowledge we have available to us
#
not doing deep work but going from shallow
#
engagement to shallow engagement so
#
A what are your thoughts on this
#
what do you guys personally
#
do to mitigate this
#
do you feel that it has changed you in any
#
way and so on and so forth
#
so my hack for this is to learn
#
new things and
#
Sheera Sheela is
#
very derisive about this
#
did you just call her Sheera is it right
#
she is very sweet
#
Sheela is you know very dismissive
#
and derisive she keeps
#
actually I hope she doesn't listen in on this
#
so she feels
#
that you know it's
#
a foolish exercise to try and
#
learn new things
#
at my age and it is difficult
#
it's difficult I remember a time when
#
I used to be very quick I would just
#
you know pick up something and I would plot
#
and plot and plot and
#
but I find
#
two benefits one is I am
#
kind of liberated from having
#
to consume a lot of content
#
which I was doing
#
so yeah so you
#
don't need to do that and the
#
second thing is you
#
try and learn ten different things but
#
the one or two things that
#
you do learn they open
#
a new dimension to you so it's
#
personally very satisfying and
#
after a point in time you really
#
find yourself out
#
of the out of the rat race
#
I don't bother like
#
my most of my WhatsApp feed I just
#
don't it's just
#
informational if somebody is trying to reach out
#
to me very rarely it is mostly
#
you know just come forwarded
#
or composed messages
#
yeah so I one thing
#
I have to say here I'm
#
I used to be fond of mathematics
#
and engineering and I used to understand
#
very little of it because a lot
#
of it at least the way we were taught
#
in engineering very technique based
#
so you have a formula you plug stuff into the
#
formula and something comes out and that's the answer
#
and then you apply it to whatever you're up
#
the curious thing
#
is that nobody really
#
understands why those things work
#
and neither did I and
#
off late you have
#
these beautiful
#
visualisation on YouTube
#
which bring these things alive
#
I'm thinking blue one brown
#
it's incredible
#
incredible one of the best YouTube
#
channels of all time just satisfying
#
deeply satisfying even his voice
#
even if you're not paying
#
attention to the insane amount
#
of detail it's just yeah
#
so strongly recommend that to
#
every listener who's even
#
tangentially interested
#
in figuring out what
#
the hell they studied in their school
#
what new thing have you learnt in the last 10 years
#
and what was the process of kind of learning
#
so a lot of mathematics I figured out what
#
Laplace transforms are, Fourier transforms are
#
what integrals are or partial differential equations
#
are those kind of things
#
which were a big integral part of
#
my education except that I didn't
#
understand why any of those things worked
#
there's a thing many
#
Indians have the attitude that learning
#
has to be goal directed
#
I'll learn something because I want to do something
#
I'll learn the guitar because I want to play the guitar
#
and be in a band etc etc
#
and what you are sort of talking about
#
is learning just for the love of learning
#
something interesting
#
the same thing about impermanence
#
you're not having any goal in mind you're not cracking an exam
#
not worried about the rank you're not worried about
#
getting a promotion
#
just learning for learning sake it's just
#
the creating for creating sake sort of thing
#
what is the texture of your day
#
so it has taken me and someone
#
who's been very close to technology and
#
all of its negative effects and positive effects
#
if you will right
#
I've forever been I think if anything
#
I now spend a lot of time being deliberate
#
about when I don't use technology
#
so
#
my phone notifications are
#
always off
#
I check
#
messages once in 2-3 hours or something
#
the phone does not get to
#
interrupt me
#
the phone is always on silent much to my wife's annoyance
#
again to the earlier point about
#
how sometimes the boss the restaurant guy
#
is trying to reach you and not picking up
#
so yeah I know there are those issues
#
that we have but those issues are there but in general
#
I don't want to let my
#
smartphone interrupt me
#
in the sense that I want to use it as a method of
#
communication or sharing or creation
#
but it doesn't get to interrupt me whenever it wants to
#
and in a way I think you know
#
in a way of creating the environment of the past
#
where if I was
#
in a house did not have a telephone
#
there's actually no other way to reach me
#
and yeah I have lived
#
at least we got a telephone only when I was like
#
13 or 14 years old
#
so that entire childhood was spent without
#
any way for people to interrupt
#
unless by literally coming home to you
#
so in that sense that's one
#
the second thing is I also
#
spend a fair amount
#
of time trying to
#
use pen and paper to write
#
ideas and things to sort of consciously
#
not use digital methods
#
and I think part of my search
#
has always been for a device
#
that is at the intersection of convenience
#
I'm still a strategically lazy engineer right
#
so which means that yeah I won't use pen and paper and then scan
#
and do OCR wrong
#
obviously you know the Kindle scribe that I use allows me
#
to just write in my handwriting and it automatically
#
so I find that
#
some of my writing and ideas are often
#
better it might vary by
#
people right but definitely for me writing
#
on a pen and paper almost always
#
sort of works better
#
and so on the other this thing is that
#
I have stopped consuming news
#
I don't consume any kind of breaking news
#
right it's like almost
#
I don't think there is a need for me to know
#
anything in real time the realization
#
that I don't necessarily need to know I need
#
to know all breaking news
#
is just completely broken in the sense of
#
like it's no context my favorite breaking
#
day after tomorrow is Saturday
#
yeah
#
one of my favorite examples is
#
so
#
six months back there was a viral bunch of videos
#
by a few like
#
nutrition influencers
#
that palak paneer is bad to eat
#
because somebody somewhere apparently read
#
a paper that actually the
#
something in the spinach
#
interferes with the absorption of calcium
#
from milk so you must not
#
combine dairy and
#
this thing right
#
and the goal for that person
#
creating that was the
#
to try and connect it to the ancient ayurvedic
#
idea that you must not mix many of these things with milk
#
so they said see now science
#
has proven that and therefore now palak paneer
#
is bad was the final conclusion
#
and it really went viral
#
and so what ended up happening is
#
that if you now go today to google
#
and search for is palak paneer
#
healthy you will get two pages of
#
palak paneer is bad for you and it's a
#
weird scenario because this is just
#
Instagram and this kind of content
#
which all mainstream newspapers
#
have blindly
#
not fact checked
#
oh this influencer said this
#
twitter is reacting, instagram is
#
reacting, here it is
#
this is basically cheap content
#
there is piggy backing on that
#
virality so people will click on this
#
and google has happily considered these
#
sources to be trusted news sources
#
so now effectively if anyone
#
going and searching for palak paneer will only get
#
this completely nonsensical thing
#
because google has indexed all of that
#
palak paneer is bad for you, it is not
#
nothing is wrong with it, iron is also there
#
the point is that
#
the problem is that people are over thinking
#
this interfering with
#
absorption your body will figure it out
#
as I keep telling people that your small intestine
#
is smarter than all these influences
#
you let it figure out, it has
#
millions of years of evolution to
#
figure out how to keep you alive and how to
#
extract what it wants
#
times when it breaks down are when in completely
#
freaky scenarios like overdosing on
#
alcohol and eating lots of sugar
#
but for most part when you are just eating
#
a regular meal your body is fantastically
#
good at figuring out so don't worry about it
#
small intestine versus toddy triceps
#
small intestine always wins
#
toddy triceps
#
so the point is that I think
#
I don't consume news because it is completely
#
pointless
#
the other thing generally is
#
that I also don't check
#
email till noon
#
because I spend the morning
#
since I am fasting
#
I generally find myself very creative in the morning
#
when I am generally hungry
#
fasted, super sharp
#
I want to use that more productively
#
and I find that email is
#
one of the worst ways
#
in the context of work it is completely
#
a waste of time and there is a fantastic
#
term this behavior scientist
#
coined, I forgot his name
#
he said there was a point of time
#
in the past when people just did work
#
work essentially meant the thing that you need to do
#
to make whatever that you needed to make
#
that's work, he says that we've moved
#
from only mostly doing work and then
#
taking a break to now
#
60% of your day is working for work
#
this is email
#
teams meetings
#
searching for stuff, raising tickets
#
dealing with IVRs
#
reading documents, all this is all the
#
excel sheets, that's not work
#
it's working for work
#
so this goes back to
#
the Toyota founder
#
you love it as a mechanical engineer
#
so he apparently once assembled
#
all of the executives in Toyota
#
and he said
#
he wrote a
#
board and said value adding
#
non-value adding
#
and he asked all of his direct reports to say
#
in all the activities that your units and
#
departments do, please come and write
#
whether it's value adding or non-value adding to Toyota
#
obviously everybody added their stuff in
#
non-value adding
#
then he literally just flipped the whole thing
#
and said no, whatever you guys have written
#
all these are non-value adding
#
because to make a car
#
only three things have to be done
#
you have to cut steel, bend steel and join steel
#
these are the three things that result in
#
making a car, everything else is
#
non-value adding
#
so he said that's the level of thinking
#
so the point is that everything that we think is work
#
is all not work
#
browsing, watching, this, all of that stuff
#
that we are convincing ourselves is work
#
let me say, there was a time
#
where I think Andy Warhol used the phrase
#
famous for being famous
#
and to me when people today
#
say that I want to be an influencer
#
it seems exactly like that, like what the fuck
#
I can imagine I want to be a writer and I'll influence
#
people etc etc but I want to be an
#
influencer is what, however
#
Naren, I must tell you, our friend Ashok
#
sitting here, he's an influencer
#
he has half a million followers on Instagram
#
he has, despite
#
you know berating the algorithm
#
he has mastered the algorithm and all of that
#
yes I berate the algorithm but I know how to
#
I have two questions for you, the second question
#
which I want you to get to later is
#
what is your strategy towards Instagram and how did you
#
get to half million and etc etc
#
your philosophy towards, yes I should sell a course on that
#
how to get to half million
#
that could be a great revenue stream
#
but the first one, in the context
#
of what you were just saying is that
#
let us imagine that your work is to be an Instagram
#
influencer, imagine that for a moment
#
what is actual work and what is
#
working towards work and we should
#
therefore be avoided. Unfortunately
#
the way the platform
#
dynamics and the revenue mechanics are
#
designed, it is all
#
designed for working for work
#
it is all designed for you to
#
be, spend as little
#
time actually being as original
#
as you possibly can and more time
#
figuring out what's going to go viral
#
what are people angry about, what
#
what kind of polarization
#
angle can I exploit, is what these
#
platforms are essentially doing, what kind of
#
misinformation can I create that will go viral
#
today, what can I react to, what is
#
the laziest amount of, least amount of effort
#
that I can do to get the most amount of views
#
is essentially how, so
#
I would actually say that
#
if you really, you know
#
sort of goes back to one of my favorite
#
interviews on your is Ali Abdal, right
#
the sense that
#
you hone your craft and don't forget
#
to stop checking likes, audience and all of that
#
think about whether
#
what you create
#
five years from now
#
somebody completely new who's never heard of you
#
who's joining Instagram for the first time
#
who's joining YouTube for the first time
#
just comes across your page
#
think, put yourself in that person's
#
shoes and find out whether what you say is
#
going to be relevant and you'll find
#
that's actually not Ali Abdal, that's an advice I gave
#
Shruti when she started her
#
podcast where I said I don't
#
think of what people will discover on episode one
#
think of what they will have to
#
binge on at episode 100
#
and that whether what you're actually saying is
#
transient
#
and very temporary or is it
#
really knowledge that can be useful
#
years from now is generally a more
#
fulfilling way to think about it, but again at the end of the day
#
I don't want to judge people who just want to
#
make a living and a quick buck, I mean everybody has their own
#
financial goals and so on
#
if you want to be an influencer
#
the marketing is work
#
for someone like me where I just want to
#
do my content, the research is work
#
and this conversation is work though it feels like a lot
#
of fun, I can't call it work
#
but all the marketing shit I should be doing
#
chapter banao, iska ek minute ka reels banao
#
yeh banao, wo banao
#
I would actually ignore all of that nonsense
#
because the problem is that you're just feeding the algorithm
#
and that it will chew you and throw you
#
out the moment the trends change
#
people
#
worry that they have to listen to
#
everything the platform tells you, you have to do
#
I think that's complete bullshit, you have to be
#
original, the platform
#
so interesting thing, once you reach
#
a certain number of subscribers, Meta will
#
assign an advisor to you
#
and it's funny they'll keep telling you
#
you need to post more regularly, why don't you post twice daily
#
that's what they tell you
#
you simply cannot fall for that
#
it's completely unsustainable, you have no
#
business sitting and trying to create content every day at all
#
do it once or twice
#
it's weird, there are
#
some people who do animation
#
it takes months to do that, they cannot
#
possibly do it daily
#
it's weird, because of the YouTube algorithm
#
all animators have disappeared off YouTube
#
they're like, boss, the algorithm
#
only rewards people who post
#
weekly and weekly twice
#
it takes me a month to make this animation
#
so in a sense that I think
#
you cannot be listening to social
#
in general I think don't listen to this
#
working for work jnana at all
#
people who sell you hacks about how to get followers
#
how to go viral
#
all of that stuff is nonsense, stuff goes viral
#
out of sheer luck
#
just being in the right place at the right time
#
there are some things you can do
#
to maximize your chance, but what actually goes viral
#
there's no way I could have predicted
#
that something that I recorded in a Sydney hotel room
#
as an afterthought
#
about that Cadbury video
#
is the one that will get 7 million views
#
and then obviously
#
but eventually when I did make the video
#
about why the Calcutta biryani
#
having potato is actually a culinary good choice
#
I knew in the back of my mind
#
that this is a 250 million audience
#
of West Bengal plus Bangladesh
#
that's going to cheer for this
#
so that you know
#
if you manage to do it the right way
#
it did do very well
#
because it also ended up polarizing
#
and all the Hyderabadis are now fighting
#
with all the Bengalis in the comments
#
and Instagram went like
#
we love this show engagement
#
so it's weird
#
I would really say that
#
you really can't predict this stuff
#
I would really say
#
and it's terrible for your mental health
#
if you're just sitting and feeding
#
if you have a constant push
#
and none of this stuff will be
#
none of this stuff will be relevant two years from now
#
when I used to teach my podcasting
#
course in the very first one that I did
#
I do it once or twice a year
#
someone asked me where is the hole in the market
#
I said no, that's not how you think about it
#
everybody is chasing the hole in the market
#
everybody is catering to algorithms
#
what makes you unique
#
is what makes
#
every one of the 8 billion people on this planet
#
unique and that's you
#
only you are you
#
so if you're authentic to yourself
#
it will work and from this comes that related imposter syndrome
#
thing that what is so special about me
#
I'm not an expert and etc
#
and there my answer always is that
#
it is not about being an expert
#
we are in the age of intimate media
#
if you are on any kind of journey
#
intellectual journey, life journey, emotional journey
#
many other people are on the same journey
#
you relate the moment you are yourself
#
and that relating is everything
#
the best compliment I got for the show
#
I keep saying this again and again because it's so fantastic
#
is for my episode with Abhinandan Sekri
#
someone wrote in and said
#
I felt so much that I was sitting in a room
#
talking to two friends on a sofa
#
that at one point I interrupted you
#
and that is what I fucking want
#
it's an intimate medium
#
be yourself, you don't need nothing
#
you don't need to do voice training
#
you don't need to be a personality, you don't need to be an expert
#
and by the way for you know
#
all those who are wondering
#
is Naren Shanoi really here or is he interrupting remotely
#
we are all together in team Naren Shanoi
#
at Jabz Studio
#
which brings me to my next question
#
why are bass guitarists the best?
#
oh man yes
#
so I think they are the most
#
underappreciated musicians
#
in general
#
the critical element of
#
literally any band is the bass
#
guitarist but although they will usually be the least
#
known people
#
some of the greatest bands even if you take something like a Deep Purple
#
and so on, the bass guitarist is the guy
#
who wrote the songs
#
and the reason for that is that
#
the vocalist is the diva
#
the front and center is the human voice
#
we have a bias towards the human voice
#
we like hearing people's voices
#
and in the rock music
#
they are also the most spectacular
#
visually the most spectacular
#
and then the next is the lead guitarist
#
the rock is all about that guitar
#
so the basic idea of
#
the lead singer is that he
#
is telling you the words
#
and then the guitarist
#
is basically setting the melodic
#
the structure of that song
#
and the drummer
#
is doing the percussion
#
the bass guitarist
#
is basically bridging the percussion
#
and the melody and this is
#
something unique that I regularly
#
explained try to struggle to explain
#
this to sometimes people who
#
say things like Hindustani and Carnatic
#
classical music are the greatest forms of music in the world
#
and all the other stuff is trash
#
for starters
#
there is no harmony
#
in Indian classical music
#
it does amazing things with melody
#
and harmony is its own universe
#
you can appreciate that independently
#
you don't have to trash that in order to say this is a great
#
form of music
#
and the beauty of harmony especially
#
the reason I am just so obsessed with people like say
#
Elayaraja is that
#
he is able to take Indian classical
#
folk melodies
#
but then tie them to
#
western style percussion
#
with a harmonic structure that is
#
realizable only through bass guitar
#
so if you really ask the hardcore Elayaraja
#
fans what they love about Elayaraja's music
#
it will be the bass guitar
#
the true fans of Elayaraja's music are not
#
the ones who like SPB's voice
#
that's like the most shallow appreciation
#
then it's like I like the interludes
#
that's again a deep yeah because he is very creative
#
with his interludes but the hardcore fans
#
are the ones he says is bass lines
#
because a bass line
#
is both percussive
#
melodic and harmonic
#
so a bass guitar is well and truly
#
has to really
#
it's harmonic because
#
the bass guitar has to play a note
#
at a lower octave that is
#
in harmony with what the guitar is displaying
#
he cannot just play any random thing
#
right but he has to play it
#
with a cadence and a syncopation
#
that combines it along with
#
the drum but he can't play just play
#
along with the drum because then you won't hear it
#
because the drum is loud so he has to play in between
#
so he has to fill in between so that makes
#
the percussion a very simple percussion
#
think about Ringo Starr's
#
ultra basic drums
#
but Paul McCartney's
#
bass lines in between is what
#
makes that experience you take Paul McCartney's
#
bass out of Beatles and Ringo Starr
#
Ringo Starr will sound like a high school drummer
#
but if you listen to Ringo Starr's
#
drumming along with Paul McCartney's bass
#
then you kind of realize oh
#
this is what the Beatles were about because they were like
#
insanely creative so a bass guitarist
#
has to do a lot of things so in that
#
sense a guitarist is just
#
a showman right and a lead singer is again a
#
showman a drummer again a different kind of showman
#
but in a rock band the bass
#
guitarist is literally the guy who really
#
brings it all together if you don't have a good bass guitar
#
right I mean you look at Led Zeppelin
#
you look at all of these guys they'll all have
#
underrated amazing bass guitarists
#
John Paul Jones for the win and I'm just
#
sinking in this room right now you know
#
Ashok you're like the lead singer
#
you're like the drummer Narayan
#
I'm the bass guitarist
#
the bass guitarist is
#
out there recording our podcast
#
the bass guitarist is actually Arvind Murli
#
known as one job a brilliant
#
musician composer of the famous
#
CSK Visil Podu
#
composer of that as well I mean multifaceted
#
there is talent in the south who would I thunk
#
there is talent in India
#
that's only because Amits have come all the way
#
in the 1980s my mother
#
was a classical musician used to
#
run something called the Chandigarh choir
#
and she used to boast at that time that it's the only
#
choir in the country that does harmonies
#
and I was like what are you talking about and they did
#
Indian music and all of that
#
and today I kind of get a sense of that
#
there's only one surviving video of the choir
#
performing which she also sings I'll put that on YouTube
#
and our bassist
#
Gaurav Chintamani who is
#
not our bassist my editor Gaurav Chintamani
#
is a bassist of Advaita
#
who's been on the show and he's a big fan of Ashok
#
but for his food but I think
#
he will now appreciate him even more
#
for the glorification of the bass guitarist
#
I wouldn't call it glorification
#
for the rightful importance given to
#
the bass guitar
#
Narayan I want to ask you
#
that tell me about
#
your relationship
#
with music because at one level
#
you are a listener you have
#
even been caught searching for nude pics of
#
Malik Arjun Mansur which takes it to another level
#
have you heard that story?
#
yes I have
#
but at the same time
#
we are on a whatsapp group where we talk about
#
music you are deeply knowledgeable you are always
#
introducing us to just some
#
most mind blowing mind bending things educating
#
us on them and you sing you once
#
you were driving to Nasik and you sang a raga
#
for us while driving which was quite
#
beautiful tell me about your relationship
#
with music and what it means to you
#
yeah so I grew up listening to Hindustani classical music
#
and so a lot of my
#
the formative years I grew
#
so I was born in 1965 and I grew up
#
effectively between
#
75 and 80
#
the only source of entertainment was
#
the radio and there was a lot of
#
there were these little
#
music programs
#
which would explain raga
#
they would start off with a bollywood movie
#
a bollywood song and then they would
#
sort of pattern out the raga
#
and then they would introduce styles and things like that
#
at that age you are like a sponge
#
you are absorbing everything and then
#
you start
#
sort of listening I was lucky enough to have
#
intelligent parents who bought me a record
#
player and I started
#
listening to
#
a lot of music and
#
it caught my
#
imagination
#
to such an extent that I was
#
partly there after I went for engineering
#
and there
#
for the first time I encountered
#
rock music which frankly
#
sounded just like cacophony for me it was
#
I was too much
#
into the
#
and I was
#
the world was not very friendly
#
towards people who listened to
#
it was for some reason
#
considered very infradic so
#
is it true that you used to bully Sathya Nadella
#
who was your junior in college?
#
Sathya Nadella and this is the truth
#
I told him go work for Microsoft
#
you will do very well and he did and she
#
nicely done
#
for the longest
#
time it didn't affect me I used to
#
sort of I used to tag along people used
#
to go all my friends
#
were into rock music required
#
copious amounts of weed in
#
order to experience rock
#
so that was the first
#
what's this music if you need to have
#
industrial quantities of weed just to
#
understand what it's all about that kind of thing
#
it's only recently my son
#
is really into a lot of
#
western music jazz and all and he was
#
one day I saw I keep going off into
#
this ranch so I have
#
I have ranch against Deep Purple
#
Eagles, Eagles is my favorite
#
thing apart from Hotel California
#
they have no other song that kind of thing
#
it's all very rooted in ignorance right
#
so basically my little universe I'll go off
#
on Deep Purple there's smoke on the water
#
what else did they have kind of thing
#
and one day I said something
#
against Pink Floyd and that
#
boy made his life mission
#
to set the sort of
#
record straight so he caught me by the
#
scruff of my neck made me
#
listen to really large
#
quantities of Pink Floyd and then I
#
I think I started
#
it's incredible I mean whatever little
#
I've listened to I still don't get the doors
#
I think it's just the most rubbish
#
overrated band but
#
that leads to fights
#
at home if I say that but
#
yeah it's
#
just now I'm
#
sort of getting what it's all about
#
I think in general it's sort of like the metaphor is
#
beautiful classical
#
Indian classical music
#
is basically this
#
single sinusoidal line
#
going through time is how you experience
#
you experience it one note at a time
#
and in general I think
#
harmonic music is basically
#
where there's like it's like a sheet
#
it's more like if you just say
#
time this is more like space time if you will
#
and you're experiencing
#
many things at the same time
#
it's just one extra dimension
#
it's another extra dimension and
#
because it's
#
many dimensions
#
the melody cannot be
#
overtly complicated
#
because then you cannot achieve the coordination
#
with all of the others right it's a weird thing
#
so it's like how I think the
#
somehow there's a deeper metaphor here of how
#
like how in India
#
we value
#
individuals over institutions
#
we trust individuals no institutions
#
we only trust individuals right
#
neighbor there's godman there's no
#
institution we trust and
#
that sort of
#
shows in the metaphor of music as well
#
our Indian classical music as someone who
#
grew up as a violinist mean that I had to play
#
second fiddle to the
#
diva who's like the lead singer
#
lead singer gets all the attention
#
violin is just supposed to sort of just accompany
#
and play the same thing I can't like play harmony
#
and do my own stuff and all that right
#
whereas
#
in a western classical orchestra
#
you can be the greatest violinist or not
#
but if you do not play the notes
#
that have been written down
#
then the whole thing sounds off
#
so collaboration and you
#
giving up so that collectively it sounds
#
the same thing is implicit in the design
#
and it's almost as a metaphor for generally
#
I think there they trust institutions
#
and collaboration a lot more than
#
the greatness of individuals
#
that's a very different way of looking at it
#
so it's always
#
as someone who grew up learning
#
Carnatic classical I mean it's
#
again especially being a violinist
#
that you almost always have to deal with
#
the random tantrums and the
#
limitations of the
#
now you kind of play every instrument
#
though you did clarify that
#
you are much more competent at the violin
#
than any of them
#
do you still think of yourself primarily as a violinist
#
yes so primarily as a
#
string instrument person
#
so I am now in the sense that your mental model
#
of how you think about the violin and cello
#
are very similar except it's physically
#
a different dimension so the muscle memory is
#
different but structurally it's still
#
a similar thing right
#
a guitar forces you to think slightly
#
differently because at this point you're actually
#
playing multiple notes at the same time
#
and a piano you're playing six notes at the same time
#
and a guitar maybe three at the same time
#
but of course you can play six depending on how you place your fingers
#
so a piano and a guitar
#
force you to
#
it's a completely different
#
muscle that you have to build and it's a
#
muscle that you almost have to
#
unlearn some of the original assumptions
#
that you learnt only by learning classical
#
you have to unlearn them
#
and then think of it fundamentally this way
#
because that is how
#
like for example when you think
#
in terms of guitar and piano
#
you naturally immediately think
#
of not just
#
do whatever melody you want no no no
#
your melody has to be subservient to the rest
#
of the things so a raga
#
you can just improvise do whatever you want and that
#
improvisation is because it's linear
#
it's one shot and it's one person you can
#
absolutely appreciate that you can
#
just go crazy with it right you can't do that
#
so what makes jazz particularly
#
amazing is that somehow
#
they've created this art form
#
that allows insane improvisational
#
skills for each instrument
#
despite having the harmonic
#
structure which is therefore insane
#
for me that is the most
#
advanced musical art form not western
#
classical music not Indian classical music
#
not pop music jazz
#
good jazz is just something else
#
it's almost the same thing that my son says
#
he dragged me this time to
#
something called Mahindra blues festival
#
and it was just
#
a subset of jazz the blues
#
but it was amazing nevertheless
#
I have a question for you
#
man is playing a string instrument
#
this admiring woman who likes the instrument he's
#
playing goes up to him and says what instrument are you playing
#
he smiles and he tells her she
#
slaps him why what did he say
#
sitar
#
cello
#
cello
#
nice
#
cello
#
so I would then wonder
#
if different kinds of artists
#
get drawn to different kinds of forms
#
because the forms automatically force you in
#
different directions like Indian classical
#
would you know privilege the individual
#
you know person who takes flights of fancy
#
other forms will have really rigid structures
#
western classical you're reading off a sheet
#
jazz you can really improvise
#
equally
#
rock is about very tight
#
collaboration
#
jazz is like you need such
#
an advanced level of
#
inspiratory skill that
#
collaboration is just taken for granted
#
because of the way the song the standard is structured
#
then you're just free to improvise
#
at that point you need a very advanced level
#
skill to become a jazz player in the
#
first place what are you most drawn to
#
I find myself it's very hard
#
I listen to every single genre
#
and I consciously force
#
myself to listen to genres
#
that in the past I might have
#
found nah not for me
#
I've started to learn to
#
appreciate hip hop a lot more
#
because the way a
#
Kendrick Lamar is able
#
to choose and pick words
#
in the way he's able
#
to tell that story and the metaphors and
#
the other layers of meaning while it being
#
percussive and poetic is
#
just insane it's just a complete separate skill
#
and so when people say silly
#
things like you know that guy is just doing some
#
they're just playing a sample and he's
#
just rapping speaking on top of it why is
#
that an art I said boss
#
that background music is the least important
#
part of the hip hop they use samples
#
of course it takes tremendous creativity
#
to construct a sample from 20 songs
#
into something that is like catchy
#
and all of that that's not the important part of that
#
it's how you construct the verse
#
right I think there's a fascinating YouTube video
#
where I think Eminem
#
basically says that one of the silly
#
things people say is that there is no word that rhymes
#
with orange and then he rattles off
#
a rap this thing where he
#
finds like 20 ways to rhyme with orange you say that
#
you just have to be creative with how you pronounce
#
and you can create rhymes in between words who says you
#
can't and I'll tell you what you know
#
I you know when I speak about sound and language
#
I am always
#
struck by how good
#
singer songwriters are because they
#
are really combining two different kinds of music
#
and one is the music in the words
#
because words have a music of their own and the
#
other is whatever
#
music music there is so to say
#
and they do it so damn well
#
you know the answer my friend is blowing in the wind
#
one all the words are simple
#
words that we use in everyday language
#
it is not the response comrade is wafting in the breeze
#
no it's simple and musical the
#
answer my friend is blowing in the wind ending with a
#
mute sound all the
#
inflections and everything is just in the right
#
place the soft sounds and the hard sounds
#
and for rap you know
#
rap gives you so much as
#
a musical form gives
#
you so much flexibility and scope to
#
do so much like there is a video
#
by this guy called Akala where he
#
is talking about
#
the power of rap and at one
#
point he takes Shakespeare's sonnet 18
#
and turns that into rap
#
and it works and for my students
#
it is the shall I compare the
#
shall I compare the to a summer's day and
#
for my students in one webinar I
#
play them an actor I think Harriet Walter
#
performing it I play them
#
Dave Gilmer of Pink Floyd singing it
#
and then I point them to Akala as well
#
and it shows you and it's iambic
#
pentameter it mimics rhythms and
#
patterns of everyday speech and
#
it tells you the beautiful musicality
#
in language itself exactly
#
exactly and I think you know I remember
#
I think the first time I
#
heard tamil hip hop
#
it wasn't actually from India it was actually
#
malaysian tamil wow right and
#
there is a very very strong hip
#
hop culture and community there
#
and interestingly hip hop
#
at the intersection of ilayaraja
#
why because these are people
#
for whom they are still frozen in the ilayaraja
#
generation of music they haven't really moved on to
#
raiman and other things yet and so it is like
#
oh some insane they use they use
#
samples from his music and it's just stunning
#
quite stunning to listen to yeah
#
fabulous so
#
some sort of final questions
#
as we are kind of
#
getting on so Narin
#
for me and my listeners
#
recommend books films music that
#
you really love and it means a lot to you but before
#
I had a question what was the last time
#
a piece of heart made you cry
#
ah book film music whatever
#
anything anything any of these so there
#
is this ahir bhai rao by
#
gangubai hangal
#
it'll make me cry every time
#
I'll share
#
the link in the show note
#
I've shared it on our group as well
#
there are some so yeah
#
I mean music is one of those things which
#
appeals for different
#
reasons like just like food right
#
it's not it's not just the music
#
it's also the memories associated
#
with it what memories do you have associated with
#
not so much memories as the entire
#
story of gangubai struggle so
#
long long story or the short
#
story short question is this she came
#
from a you know
#
kalawant family which is
#
like code for you know
#
courtesan and
#
she was it was a respectable family
#
she I think her mother from
#
that community father wasn't he was
#
a farmer and she
#
mother was actually
#
trained in karnataka classical
#
music but she wanted her daughter
#
it was probably
#
also gangubai probably liked it more
#
and it was commercially
#
viable she wanted her to learn
#
hindustani classical music so this
#
girl learns it and
#
she gets a good guru sawai gandharva
#
I think or abdulkarim khan
#
sawai gandharva she she
#
gets good guru she learns
#
well she's a hardworking singer
#
then she falls in love with this
#
man upper caste man who
#
marries her
#
and they have a daughter and
#
unfortunately because she's from
#
a lower caste that man's
#
family disowns him but he is
#
you know he doesn't mind he's
#
sort of living with this with gangubai
#
uncle he dies
#
and then all of a sudden this
#
young lady with a daughter
#
has nowhere to go nothing to do but she
#
does have her art so she
#
starts you know she gets invitations
#
to concerts to sings and somehow
#
makes ends meet
#
then she has a
#
tonsillitis
#
really bad case of tonsillitis so they
#
say that you need to have a tonsillectomy
#
and that operation
#
is botched somehow
#
and when she
#
recovers she finds that her voice
#
has become very manly
#
it was gruff and manly
#
so even that is gone so the literally
#
the only thing she has
#
is her voice and even that is gone
#
and she
#
by dint of hard work
#
practices so much
#
cultures that voice
#
continues to be manly
#
but she becomes a really good
#
singer she's so moving when
#
she sings that she becomes
#
famous once again
#
and that is
#
the background of gangubai
#
uncle
#
it's you know just
#
bravery just
#
indefatigable just
#
fighter spirit fantastic
#
I'm reminded of the story of
#
Hemavati Sen which I've you know
#
related a number of times on the show and that
#
moves me greatly I learnt it from Kavita Rao's
#
book Lady Doctors and she
#
was born I think in Barisal or some
#
village in what is today East Bengal
#
Bangladesh and
#
in the 1850s
#
when she was 10 years old she was married
#
off to a man who was over 40
#
during the day she would play with his little children
#
because they were the same age at night
#
she would forget what happened but she would wake up naked
#
and bleeding so it's kinda obvious
#
when she is 12 her
#
husband dies her parents
#
die her in laws die
#
she's left with absolutely nothing the nobody
#
in the village wants anything to do with her she has no
#
money she has nothing she's 12 you'd
#
think her life is over but she somehow
#
makes her way to Benaras and becomes a fully
#
qualified doctor in the 19th
#
century in India which is
#
like absolutely fucking remarkable it's unimaginable
#
and then through her
#
life she writes a diary
#
and when she dies eventually and she dies
#
as a prominent person she's head of
#
guilds and all of that she's transformed
#
the ecosystem and lives of other women
#
and when she dies her diaries
#
are locked in her trunk for 80 years
#
and they're opened sometime near the end
#
of the 20th century and published as her memoirs
#
which are you know the thing
#
and I'm just thinking that
#
you know the three of us we've lived like fucking
#
easy lives we've never had to
#
do anything our character has never been tested
#
and I feel that at least
#
in my case if my character was tested in
#
that way there is no way
#
there is absolutely no way
#
I mean I don't even know what question I'm
#
getting at but your story about Gangubai
#
like if I was in Gangubai's
#
place I would just sink into a spiral
#
of self pity
#
self pity and just end it all right
#
the fifth temple is like
#
basically
#
humanity's ability to
#
to kind of appreciate
#
the pain of
#
experiences like this right
#
will ultimately make it a better
#
place right I'm reminded of
#
the one that strangely enough it
#
is not the when I originally read about
#
the life story of this particular blues
#
musician right I think I think
#
it's blind Willie Johnson I think
#
1920s or 30s
#
again at a time when black musicians
#
I mean couldn't even like record in the mainstream
#
studios and traveling
#
musicians and so on
#
they wouldn't be even played in the regular radios
#
the other white musicians would copy their
#
music and play the same thing and sort of make
#
money and so on
#
this so I there was
#
a there's a song called dark
#
was the night right it's just
#
it's just incredible you can listen to it on YouTube
#
it's like scratchy like 1920s 30s
#
right and it's just one guy
#
playing a slight blue acoustic blues guitar
#
and just singing that's it just one
#
voice and him playing the guitar
#
blind Willie Johnson right
#
and
#
and you hear it and
#
after a couple of times you sort of
#
you start to see how beautifully it is
#
done that you see that pain and so on right
#
then when you read his life story
#
is that he was
#
beaten by his father
#
and he threw some light in his
#
face and that's what made him blind so his own father
#
blinded him right and then he died
#
penniless and all that right and he made
#
this bit of music
#
even then what ultimately
#
really moved me was not even that
#
it is in Aaron
#
Sorkin's West Wing
#
they are basically discussing
#
how to how to convince
#
the public and the senators and everyone else the public
#
to to to fund NASA
#
more right and this
#
is around the time when the Voyager
#
was leaving the solar system right
#
at that point of time and
#
like billions of miles away right
#
and one of the things the Voyager was carrying
#
was music from
#
every part of the world
#
I forget which Hindustani classical piece
#
yes correct so it had
#
representative music and one of the
#
one of the songs was Dark Was the Night by
#
Blind Willie Johnson right
#
and Aaron Sorkin's storytelling
#
right where he says that
#
that this is this life story
#
this boy was beaten he became blind
#
he became this insanely brilliant
#
musician and so on and he died
#
penniless right from tuberculosis or some
#
such thing homeless right
#
and so on and today
#
his music just left the solar system
#
that's how you sell that
#
so it's like oh every time you listen to that dialogue you're like oh
#
man that's when it hits you that oh man right
#
you've created something that's timeless
#
right it's now in out there in space
#
it's like cross the solar system
#
billions of years from now maybe it
#
reaches somewhere it's it's it's a golden
#
record so it's not going to really go anywhere
#
and it's the
#
that audio technology
#
is well and truly the only universal medium
#
because it's purely mechanical
#
completely analog it's completely analog
#
so anybody smart enough any engineer
#
can figure out how to figure out
#
and reverse engineer and play that
#
music on it so I think it's quite remarkable
#
but do they have IITs in outer space
#
no but you know this
#
is and I'm just thinking the thing
#
about both of these works and I'm sure
#
they're going to move me as well now that I know
#
the stories the thing about both of them is
#
context and this is something
#
AI can't do right
#
ultimately we are like you know
#
you were chatting earlier about
#
AI that artists plus
#
machine will create better art than artists
#
alone use to etc etc there was
#
a myth about 20 years ago
#
22 years ago when
#
computers in chess were just becoming
#
dominant that player plus
#
computer is better than computer on its
#
own or player on its own and we
#
actually know that that is that was absolute
#
nonsense that the computers were
#
kind of far better
#
but what happened was two things happened one
#
is that computers becoming
#
better than humans did not destroy chess
#
it took it in the opposite direction
#
because in fact it made players more
#
individualistic because earlier
#
people would follow the computational
#
logic taught to them by the
#
Soviet chess school that you know these
#
are the heuristics you use and computers
#
gave concrete exceptions to
#
those generalizable principles
#
and allowed players to go in different
#
directions and that was the first
#
wave stockfish etc and when alpha zero
#
came about it showed you that
#
those heuristics were also wrong and it fine tuned
#
them and it helped you do things like
#
play down the flanks you know the A and the
#
H files which even Magnus Carlsen
#
learned from alpha zero without knowing
#
why without exactly
#
being able to say why and
#
today you know the strongest computers
#
are so far ahead of the strongest humans I mean
#
it seems silly to even say it
#
but we still tune into what chess
#
and there is a chess boom going on
#
so I think what is what
#
nothing can take away
#
is that human drama and that drama comes
#
from our frailties and our flaws
#
and in the case of so many
#
of these people their character
#
yeah exactly right I mean I think we
#
we've always we've always under
#
valued context and that actually
#
probably the central thing to art is
#
that it's the story it's the struggle
#
it's the artist it's all that you can't
#
take them away from but then there's another danger
#
that that context can be
#
manufactured that influencers
#
can build back stories around themselves
#
I was going to invite a prominent lawyer
#
on the show who's you know she's
#
been a part of big cases till I
#
found out she's she has a PR firm
#
and I straight away said fuck it no
#
you know not not gonna do that
#
but so you don't even
#
know what context is correct or the person really
#
exists so what are we going to do yeah
#
no but in a sense I don't
#
it almost seems like it's a deeply
#
human dilemma to
#
that end that
#
some of the most beautiful
#
things about art and all of that
#
is probably built from the same raw
#
material that makes the worst
#
the manipulative all the rest
#
of that I think it's sort of I think the good
#
comes with the bad to be honest so it's I don't
#
know it's very hard a lot of the art which
#
you mentioned earlier one when your story of
#
the five temples is the human
#
ability to empathize
#
and that's what somehow so
#
Gangubai Hangal zero connect with either
#
of you but the story touches because
#
it touches on a very human level
#
you don't even need to know Hindustani
#
classical music or nothing or
#
blind Billy Johnson
#
Billy Johnson yeah so
#
is that human experience
#
is something that
#
will probably be the last bastion to fall
#
to yeah although I mean to be
#
to be absolutely bluntly honest
#
I won't put it past
#
a chat bot
#
to randomly arrive at
#
something that ends up moving you yeah
#
very hard to predict right
#
it might just move you it may not
#
move someone else but it might move you
#
and I think where people should
#
not underestimate AI is that
#
it has all the resources to
#
do this to every individual
#
I mean you can it can run any number
#
of simulations possible to find out what's
#
your weak point and that I think is where
#
we need to be I don't know wary
#
but I honestly don't know what we can do
#
about it but yeah yeah definitely not
#
because it's seen in the unseen definitely
#
not state control yeah
#
yeah and one thing that always moves me
#
even though I don't know a back story is Lucinda
#
Williams you know I heard her album
#
Car Wheels on a Gravel Road in the late 90s
#
Blown Away looked at her earlier stuff and she
#
wrote a song once called Sweet Old World
#
because one of her friends I think killed herself
#
and it was like you know this
#
and it's a song that would move me regardless
#
of context so that is also exactly
#
possible that sometimes just words and
#
I can totally see AI
#
that is such a good definition of art
#
when it can move you
#
without you knowing context
#
it has distilled things
#
into itself that
#
are beyond the pale of
#
you know emotion, word, expression
#
I'll tell you a very
#
great example of that
#
many years back somebody in
#
the family had sort of
#
some pregnancy complications and lost
#
a baby right but had to carry it to term
#
but then the baby was had
#
to be born and then died soon after
#
they had to bury it's a painful
#
exercise right and
#
it was around the time and that person
#
strangely enough
#
found solace in a song
#
by Ace of Base Call All That She Wants
#
Is Another Baby
#
Context of that song had really
#
nothing to do with actually pregnancy or anything
#
but in some sense that's
#
when you literally interpret it
#
All That She Wants Is Another Baby is exactly what you want
#
so sometimes it's very hard to
#
you know these kinds of things happen
#
and you're like oh
#
makes sense in a weird way but yeah
#
that's how it is, we're all weird like that
#
again back to different chemicals hitting different brains
#
in different ways over a song
#
and what a cheesy song
#
and you just gave it a dimension
#
exactly, anyone who hears a song
#
it's like one of those cheesy
#
EDM techno type of songs
#
nothing serious etc
#
but then of course
#
I think there's an innate human ability
#
to somehow find profoundest
#
of meanings
#
what else has moved you guys like fuck it, this time we're not going to recommend
#
things that we like or we enjoy
#
I just want to know what moved you guys
#
what else has moved you
#
the last time I
#
like it just
#
I just wept
#
we leave the factory
#
and we are just crossing
#
it's a crowded thing
#
homeless types
#
living there under the bridge
#
and
#
there is water
#
and very evidently
#
this is what my brain is processing
#
that water comes for a
#
very short time
#
after a very long
#
while so excitedly
#
a mother is heading towards
#
her to fill up whatever she can
#
she has like one or two
#
utensils and
#
she has several little children
#
and one kid
#
maybe six, five or six
#
goes, he has
#
three little
#
things, matkas, okay
#
or two things which is filled up with water
#
he's carrying it in his hand
#
and there's a third one
#
and he doesn't know how to carry it so he puts it in his mouth
#
and he crosses
#
the road
#
that shite I tell you, it just cracked me up
#
it just broke me up
#
it was
#
I was like, I didn't know how to parse it
#
the whole
#
some of it
#
just an image
#
and then moves right, the signal
#
opens, we are gone
#
I'm not going to see that kid again probably
#
you know on a
#
slightly lighter note
#
I was just doing some
#
Lego
#
architecture with my son
#
it was New York City
#
and then so it involved
#
the One World Trade Center
#
and so on
#
and then he basically just said
#
where is the Statue of Liberty that seems to be
#
missing in this thing
#
and then he
#
interestingly enough he just said
#
Statue of Liberty, you know that green statue
#
she's holding an ice cream in her hand
#
and
#
once he said that
#
I've now never been able to go back to
#
thinking of that thing as anything other than ice cream
#
now I trust you
#
anyone listening to this and you guys
#
next time you see the Statue of Liberty
#
you're going to picture Lady Liberty holding ice cream
#
you cannot unsee the ice cream
#
you cannot unsee the ice cream now
#
I mean in that sense
#
it's also a moment where you realize that
#
kids then essentially are able to be
#
well and truly creative without any filters
#
but there would have been another
#
situation where maybe somebody would have said
#
no that's wrong, that's actually a flame, that's a torch
#
and I was like
#
correct, I think the ice cream is absolutely
#
perfect
#
and it wouldn't have been a correction
#
it's not an improvement, I think ice cream
#
is better than the torch
#
and you know what
#
just as that Kashi Nath Singh phrase goes
#
I would say
#
that
#
I've fought a lot for Flame of Liberty
#
ice cream is fine
#
but keto ice cream
#
sugar is poison
#
guys you know I would have wanted to
#
go on for longer, one Naren and I have a flight to catch
#
two, Ashok has told us
#
you know the remarkable bit of news
#
that he keeps coming to Bombay and we will do
#
a part two to this three way episode at some point
#
in time, so I don't feel so
#
guilty about letting my listeners down with an
#
episode that is merely five hours long
#
forgive me for the miniature
#
Ashok, Naren, thanks so much
#
lovely, absolute pleasure
#
it was such a joy
#
Thanks for watching
#
Thank you
#
Thank you
#
Tavat Pravudatvam Asmana Karshate
#
Shanei Shanei Jar Jar Jeevitam Pratiputale
#
Tatrinam Haritataram
#
Tatteja Prakashataram
#
Mitraihi Avratah
#
Rathrika Adgutah
#
Atitam Pashyamah Tatapigantum Na Shatnumah
#
Ahoshai Shavam Atisundaram Chavishuddham
#
Agre Vrajama Parantu Pashchad Swapanto Vrajama
#
Cheto Na Pashchad Ghamane Prerayati
#
Nisham Khyamananam Yadiyatema
#
Nishchayena Shikharam Prapsyamaha
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh
#
Rishikesh