#
What is the difference between seeing something and seeing something and writing it down?
#
I believe there are multiple levels of difference.
#
Seeing something with the intent of writing it down changes the quality of the seeing.
#
You notice more detail in the immediate moment and you are more alive to narratives that
#
extend to the past and the future.
#
I also believe that the act of writing changes us.
#
We learn more about the world and we learn more about ourselves and we grow as people.
#
That's why I advise all my writing students to write a journal.
#
But intention isn't enough.
#
You also have to have the will to keep at it and perhaps the natural curiosity that
#
drives seeing and writing.
#
Once you are curious, once you learn to see, once you start to write, it becomes a virtuous
#
If you haven't already taken up that habit, this is a good time to start.
#
Welcome to The Seen and the Unseen, our weekly podcast on economics, politics and behavioural
#
Please welcome your host, Amit Verma.
#
Welcome to The Seen and the Unseen.
#
My guest today is Seema Goswami.
#
She's a veteran of Indian journalism.
#
She's been a reporter, an editor, a columnist, a novelist.
#
Basically, she's someone who sees the world and writes it down.
#
I've read her for decades now.
#
I love the conversational tone of her writing, which is a model for all would-be columnists.
#
Friendly without being frivolous, always thoughtful, always thought-provoking.
#
She's reported and lived through some super interesting times and was kind enough to spare
#
a few hours to talk to me.
#
I love this conversation and I'm now even more of a fan.
#
I know you'll enjoy it too.
#
But first, let's take a quick commercial break.
#
Do you want to read more?
#
I've put in a lot of work in recent years in building a reading habit.
#
This means that I read more books, but I also read more long-form articles and essays.
#
There's a world of knowledge available through the internet.
#
But the problem we all face is, how do we navigate this knowledge?
#
How do we know what to read?
#
How do we put the right incentives in place?
#
Well, I discovered one way.
#
A couple of friends of mine run this awesome company called CTQ Compounds at CTQCompounds.com,
#
which aims to help people up-level themselves by reading more.
#
A few months ago, I signed up for one of their programs called The Daily Reader.
#
Every day for six months, they sent me a long-form article to read.
#
The subjects covered went from machine learning to mythology to mental models and marmalade.
#
This helped me build a habit of reading.
#
At the end of every day, I understood the world a little better than I did before.
#
So if you want to build your reading habit, head on over to CTQCompounds and check out
#
New batches start every month.
#
They also have a great program called Future Stack, which helps you stay up-to-date with
#
ideas, skills, and mental models that will help you stay relevant in the future.
#
Future Stack batches start every Saturday.
#
What's more, you get a discount of a whopping Rs. 2,500 if you use the discount code Unseen.
#
So head on over to CTQCompounds at CTQCompounds.com and use the code Unseen.
#
Seema, welcome to the scene and the Unseen.
#
Thank you so much for having me.
#
It's such a pleasure having you on the show because I just know from before I'm going
#
to enjoy this because I've been reading you for so many years and I feel like I already
#
kind of know you because you've got this really easygoing conversational style for your columns
#
and one straightaway feels that, hey, you know, one knows this person, like many people
#
We've got so many episodes, you're like, and I'm intrigued by something you said just outside.
#
We were, I was raving about Shanta Gokhale's wonderful autobiography and about how much
#
candor it is written with.
#
And you pointed out that, hey, candor is not something you're really good at, which took
#
me by surprise because I'm like, hey, your columns have such candor in them.
#
And you said that, no, no, there are two kinds of candor and I'm good at one.
#
So can you elaborate on that?
#
You know, writing a memoir, you have to be really honest about uncomfortable moments
#
in your life, things that probably caused you pain or caused you discomfort or are not
#
things you want to, you're happy to look back on.
#
You need to go into those kinds of things.
#
I'm not good at that because I find that it's easier to move on than kind of dwell on things
#
that have upset me or have caused me sorrow.
#
So I find that very hard to do.
#
So when I read memoirs of people who are, say, talking about the death of a parent or
#
maybe the death of a spouse or a partner or maybe, you know, even, you know, not necessarily
#
death, but even like, you know, you've had a professional problem or you've had some sort
#
To write about that, you really have to go back to that space in your consciousness.
#
You have to relive those moments.
#
I find that very hard to do.
#
The kind of candor I do in my column is actually a very superficial candor.
#
It's about my life, but it's not about me.
#
If you see the difference, you know, it would be about the kind of things like the fact
#
that I enjoy reading, how that makes me feel, how it takes me back in time, the fact that
#
I like comfort reading, I reread the same books over and over again.
#
It all seems confessional, but it doesn't really give so much of myself away, if you
#
So I feel that there are two kinds of candor and there are some people who are very good
#
at a very deep candor, you know, talking about their innermost feelings, talking about moments
#
in their life that change them.
#
I haven't been able to do that as yet.
#
Maybe at some point when I'm much older and I'm looking back on life and maybe I'm a little
#
further away from events, maybe I'll be able to do that.
#
But even in my columns, I don't really write about my life in the Shanta Gokhale kind of
#
I write about my life more in a, I'm trying to think of a suitable parallel, like who?
#
Though Nora Ephron also wrote about her marriage breaking up and all of that.
#
She had a certain lightheartedness, like she would talk about, you know, cooking.
#
She would talk about, you know, the process about writing a script or how everything was
#
copy in her life and she would write about the whole female experience.
#
I love that collection she did, which was, I feel bad about my neck because it really
#
kind of resonated with all women who are aging and, you know, are leaving their youth behind.
#
It kind of resonates with you.
#
And there's one bit where she says that, I wish that when I was 26 or 27, I had put
#
on a bikini and never taken it off again, because that was the time that I looked at
#
And, you know, it's that kind of confession.
#
It doesn't take too much out of you because it's not that deep and yet it is confessional
#
because you are talking about yourself and how you felt at a point.
#
I feel I can do that sort of confessional, but I can't do the other sort.
#
And what you just said about, you know, what she said about a bikini at 25 and I was going
#
through your columns and there's this lovely column about this 81-year-old lady who was
#
in a bikini and everybody was like, oh, you know, we have to applaud that and all.
#
And you said something which really made me think where you said that, you know, if it
#
was an 81-year-old man, he would not be, you know, Paul McCartney would not be asked to
#
And why should women be, even if they can be objectified really well when they're old?
#
Yeah, why should they be?
#
I think the expectation, first of all, I mean, that was Martha Stewart.
#
In fact, when I wrote that column, my editor at Brunch, Rachel, asked me, do you think
#
anybody in India will know who Martha Stewart is?
#
So I said, you know, okay, maybe they won't, but it doesn't really matter.
#
But because the point is of an 81-year-old being expected to do that.
#
So the point is, there's all this expectation of how a woman is supposed to look like you
#
can be old and you can be gray, but your gray hair has to be just perfect.
#
So Zeenat Aman is on Instagram rocking gray hair, but it's still blow-dried.
#
It's still well-cut and she has, I don't see very many wrinkles, but okay, she doesn't
#
look like she did earlier, but all her pictures are still beautifully composed.
#
She's still fully made up.
#
It's just that she's an older version of what she used to be in her Dammarodam days.
#
So the expectations around a woman's appearance don't really change, you know.
#
It's not like she suddenly changed into a merry beard or something, you know.
#
She still looks like a glamorous, grown old version of herself.
#
And that's what struck me when I saw the Martha Stewart swimsuit thing, that even at 81, if
#
somebody told me I had to squeeze myself into a swimsuit after dieting and after exercising and
#
then the poor photographer had to Photoshop most of my wrinkles out and I had to pose in a
#
certain way so that, you know, your wrinkly bits don't show too much.
#
I mean, how depressing would that be?
#
I mean, if I was old and wrinkled, I just want to enjoy myself by the pool in a nice
#
kaftan and do my own thing.
#
I don't want to be the object of male or female gaze.
#
I don't want to be even now.
#
But at 81, I certainly don't want to be objectified in a certain way.
#
And like you said, I don't see very many men doing that.
#
I mean, even Mick Jagger, who just turned 80, have you seen a single picture of himself showing
#
his bits or, you know, prancing about in a little white front?
#
No, he's still fully clothed.
#
I mean, everybody says he looks great and, you know, he exercises and he's so healthy,
#
but you don't see him doing that sort of thing.
#
So why is this expectation only on women?
#
I was chatting with my friend Roshan Abbas just before I came to Delhi in Bombay and
#
Roshan told me about, he heard this talk by an author of a book called The Culture Code
#
many years ago and the point that gentleman was making, not Roshan's point, but that gentleman's
#
point was that he was looking at certain instinctive desires that people have, which have become
#
part of the culture and pointing out that they evolved that way.
#
For example, the argument he was making was that back in the hunter gatherer days, you
#
know, women would be out gathering a lot of stuff.
#
Gathering a lot of stuff sounds weird, but they'd be out gathering things.
#
And what they carried that in was really important to them.
#
So bags became important to them.
#
And therefore, for women, there is this sort of cliché that women love handbags and all
#
And equally for men who were out hunting, they had to cover large distances fast.
#
So mobility became important to them, which is why men are kind of irrationally obsessed
#
with fast cars and so on and so forth.
#
And kind of taking this further, when you think about the way that we have evolved,
#
you know, we have evolved in, if you read evolutionary psychology, there's all this
#
about how, you know, the pressure on women to look good and for, you know, those superficial
#
trappings is really intense.
#
And the pressure on men, on the other hand, is to kind of be alpha males and be, you know,
#
to show up, you know, peacocks feathers for a man would be an expensive car or all of
#
So in that sense, there's always pressure on a woman to look good in a bikini.
#
There is never pressure on a man to look good in swimming trunks.
#
And I think, obviously, a crucial component of modernity of this whole project that sets
#
us apart from all other species is that we can fight our programming.
#
We don't have to be that way.
#
We don't have to conform to either those instincts or to those social codes.
#
You know, they're not even, I would go further, it's not just instincts, but for most of human
#
history, the only way that women have been able to protect themselves or to feed themselves
#
even is to marry a man who will look after them for most of female history.
#
They were not allowed to own property.
#
Even if they inherited property, it was given to their husbands to look after for them.
#
So the only kind of, you know, which is why Jane Austen is very important because she
#
makes that point in her books, that marriage was the only opening that was open to women
#
So you had to make a good marriage if you wanted a stable life for yourself, if you
#
wanted somebody to bring up your children in a nice way with enough money to look after
#
them or give them education.
#
And that was really the only way you could go about it.
#
And how does one make a good marriage?
#
People are not really interested in a woman for anything other than her looks at that
#
Of course, dowries came into it, not just in India, but even in Western countries where
#
The father was expected to make a settlement on the woman before he before she got married.
#
So dowry was always part of it.
#
But rich men always wanted beautiful women to improve their genetic makeup of their families.
#
So I think that's also a major reason why women's looks are so very, were so very important.
#
But I think that's like a hangover of an earlier period.
#
When there are no other avenues to you, you can't work, you can't really study, you can't
#
I mean, there are very few women who could actually look after themselves or feed themselves.
#
So then your looks becomes the one weapon you have in this world, which will actually
#
So I'm not surprised that women are still obsessed with it, because it's almost like
#
an atavistic memory in your mind that you have to look a certain way to to be like that.
#
Earlier, you described the candor in your columns as a superficial candor and that itself
#
shows a lot of candor in making a confession like that.
#
But I'll just point out to those of my listeners who may not have read you that the superficial
#
is not in a pejorative way, but it's what you probably mean is more on the surface.
#
But I find that a lot of your candor does go deep, like one recent piece of yours which
#
moved me a lot was about coming across these old photographs.
#
And I've sort of been discussing that on my show with some guests because when my father
#
died during the second wave, after about a year, we cleaned out his house, we sold it,
#
we gave most of the things away.
#
But I came across old photographs, of course, and old prints that were lying there.
#
And it was very interesting for me to be able to see once again my parents, not as my parents
#
or as a father figure, mother figure, who are embedded in your head, but as actual real
#
people with insecurities, fears, unpleasant sides to their nature, all of those things,
#
you know, to see pictures of your parents when they are in their early 20s, when they
#
are the same age as I am now.
#
And it's almost surreal.
#
And there's another thing you pointed out in your column which struck me when I was
#
looking through my old pictures, which is when you spoke about, you know, in your column,
#
there's a lovely picture of you and Veer when you're young.
#
And both of you looking just stunning.
#
And you point out that you used to be harsh on yourself back then.
#
But now you look back on your younger self and you realize that your insecurities of
#
that time were unfounded and unnecessary.
#
And that perhaps you should be kinder on yourself today as well.
#
Because 10 years later, you could look back on yourself and say, hey, I'm just fine.
#
And I was always kind of filled with this kind of anger at the world and a certain
#
And when I look at my old pictures, I'm like, why was I so angry?
#
You know, we are, I don't know why that should be.
#
But especially when you're young, you never feel you're good enough.
#
You always feel like there's something wrong with you, even though you'll never probably
#
be that thin again, never have such good skin again or such good hair again, especially
#
Your hair looks incredible.
#
What are you talking about?
#
It's about one third the quantity is left.
#
Oh my God, come on, give me a break.
#
So, but when you're young, I mean, honestly, for all the money in the world, I wouldn't
#
be 25 again, because the amount of insecurities you have about yourself, or at least I did
#
about myself, because you're constantly comparing yourself to other people and feeling that,
#
you know, you're somehow lacking, you know, you're either not tall enough, not thin enough,
#
not pretty enough, you know, not bright enough.
#
And you're always kind of there's something that you find that you compare yourself unfavorably
#
I think you need to be like maybe mid 30s and 40s before you learn to be comfortable
#
And now if you know, if a friend of mine tells me that, oh my God, you know, I put on so
#
much weight, I'm going on a diet, and I'm like, do it if you want to be healthy, but
#
don't do it because you want to be thin.
#
You need to be comfortable the way you are.
#
I mean, you should be happy, be body positive about yourself.
#
I don't think it's important to fit into this kind of mandated kind of image that we have
#
of all women, all men, that you all have to look a certain way, or even this mandated,
#
you know, social construct that everybody has to be married.
#
You have to have two children.
#
Those children have to be one boy, one girl.
#
They have to go to the best schools.
#
They have to be good in their studies.
#
Your husband has to drive a certain kind of car.
#
You have to belong to the right clubs.
#
I mean, that social mandate that we all go mad trying to fit into.
#
And if we don't fit into it, we beat ourselves up about it.
#
I think we need to kind of move beyond that and just be comfortable to be what you are.
#
If you're single and you're happy, you're fine.
#
If you're divorced and happy, you're fine.
#
As long as you're happy and you're content with yourself, I don't think it's important
#
to have these, you know, kind of structures that you have to kind of blend into.
#
I don't think that's important at all.
#
Yeah, and that journey you pointed out of being comfortable in your own skin, I remember,
#
took a long, long time for me.
#
And for some people, it just never happens.
#
You see them walk around with those anxieties all their lives.
#
And I'm just thinking that in modern times, those anxieties of what other people think
#
of you wanting to match up to certain illusory standards is even harder than it used to be
#
for us, because, you know, growing up, we mostly around us, either we saw larger than
#
life movie stars and cricketers, or we saw people kind of like us.
#
It's not such a big deal.
#
But today you go to Instagram and Facebook and you have to compare your real life with
#
the projected lives of others.
#
And you know, there has been much talk of an epidemic of teenage female depression in
#
And Instagram has been blamed for a significant part of it, because you're always kind of
#
struggling to keep up in that race.
#
And even though those images are not probably real, I mean, most of them are filtered and
#
you know, people identify themselves and put all kinds of, you know, stuff on it or whatever.
#
So they're not real at all.
#
But try telling a 16 year old girl that I mean, she doesn't see it that way.
#
It's actually because and it's not just girls, I find that even boys are now coming under
#
that stress because you have to have that six pack, you know, that you see all the film
#
heroes and all your Instagram influencers doing even like 30 and 40 year old men.
#
I mean, the number of men around me that I see going in for hair transplants, which was
#
Like, you know, when I was growing up, you never I mean, men turned bald all the time,
#
but they kind of made their peace with it and, you know, moved on.
#
But even people who are not in the glamour business, they feel they have to look their
#
So it's not just women who are doing that.
#
I think men have as much pressure to look good.
#
I was reading a story recently about how people are having botox and stuff like that because
#
they don't want to look old within a corporate environment because they feel that if they
#
look too old, then they may be just, you know, shunted out and their jobs may be given to
#
So it's important to look young and virile.
#
So even men are having botox and, you know, getting their hair coloured.
#
So it's a very insidious sort of situation where everybody feels obliged to look a certain
#
way, to kind of dress a certain way too.
#
And you're right, it's social media that's really kind of propelling this whole growth
#
in the in terms of not just teenagers, even middle aged women or middle aged men.
#
Yeah, I mean, in a sense, I'm glad that, like, I would have loved to be young today
#
because the world is so full of possibilities.
#
You can learn anything you want, you can create anything you want.
#
But at the same time, I worry about where my anxieties would have taken me, you know,
#
maybe I would have wanted to build my body in a certain way and have a hipster beard
#
and all of that nonsense.
#
And I think the journey towards finding ourselves, I wonder if you'd agree, is sort of like
#
in my generation and our generation, we kind of stumbled towards finding who we are.
#
Today, I worry that you could be forced into particular shapes and never really.
#
We didn't have these kind of anxieties.
#
I mean, there were people around us.
#
I mean, there were magazines, of course, which had these glamorous images.
#
But somehow in that world, we didn't aspire to be exactly like the models.
#
We saw the models as a different species and a different breed.
#
And we didn't really aspire to be like that.
#
But when you see, say, somebody you go to school or college with, putting up an Instagram
#
portrait and say, niece or, you know, the Caribbean wearing a bikini and, you know,
#
with her highlights and a nice straw hat or whatever.
#
Now, that seems aspirational.
#
You feel like, oh, I was in school with her.
#
She can do this. Why can't I?
#
So, you know, that kind of stuff is actually damaging in an entirely different way.
#
And also, I find, I don't know, maybe I'm just old fashioned.
#
But I find that people don't really want to work at normal jobs any longer.
#
You know, they all want to be like, I want to be a social media influencer or I want
#
to be like, you know, arts photographer.
#
And I often wonder who is going to do the mundane jobs if everybody wants to do this.
#
But when I see my nieces and my nephews who are just kind of in college and starting
#
out in their world, there are very few of them.
#
I have one nephew who's just joined the NHS as a psychotherapist, but I think he's
#
the only one who's happy doing a normal, conventional job, whereas everybody else
#
wants to do something exotic and unusual.
#
No, and while I'm glad that so many avenues have opened up for everyone, the one that
#
really amuses me is that social media influencer one, because it's like being
#
famous for being famous.
#
But you know, they make so much money.
#
It's just crazy because a friend's daughter does this.
#
And it's crazy the kind of money that brands will pay.
#
I mean, it's just because you have followers and the right kind of followers
#
who will buy what you buy.
#
But it's a very stressful job to have because you're constantly thinking of, you
#
know, generating copy for your handle and constantly thinking of what to do.
#
So it's not an easy job by any means.
#
So I wouldn't recommend that to anybody.
#
And it's not even a job.
#
I mean, typically I would imagine that, you know, the way our generation would
#
think of it is that if you become an influencer, you become an influencer by
#
being excellent at add something, and then you get whatever influence you get.
#
They are excellent at influencing.
#
Excellent at influencing.
#
Like a friend told me recently that if the 100,000 Instagram followers is a magic
#
number, if you get there, you're going to get paid and you can just live off that.
#
And it's like a self-applicating machine.
#
But you know, the worrying bit is that a lot of people just buy followers.
#
I mean, they're not even genuine followers.
#
Oh, but you have tools actually by which you can figure out, yeah, you can kind of
#
figure out the depth of engagement of followers.
#
But there are some people whose Instagram handles are followed by like so many
#
And I wonder where do all these people come from and how do they know you?
#
Well, I mean, Raj Kapoor had a following in Russia.
#
Well, I mean, my Instagram is really limited to documenting my travels and
#
And unfortunately, nobody pays me to do that.
#
So, but if you're listening, I'm happy to be paid.
#
So you know what, I think the last time this happened was two years ago, twice I
#
have been approached by people saying that my girlfriend slash boyfriend is a
#
big fan of your show and their birthdays and so on.
#
So can you please record a message saying welcome to the scene and the unseen
#
So, so I just did it out of goodwill.
#
I just have to press a button and it's done.
#
And now apparently there is a flourishing market in the U.S.
#
where you can actually pay celebrities to do custom made little things like that.
#
It's called cameo, I think, right?
#
And people get paid, even Richard Schiff does it.
#
Wow, I don't I have no idea who Richard Schiff is.
#
Oh, the guy who played Toby in West Wing.
#
Are you a West Wing fan?
#
I'm afraid I haven't seen.
#
Oh, my God, you haven't seen it.
#
You have such a treat awaiting you.
#
You have to watch it all eight seasons of it.
#
It's one of the best political shows ever.
#
I think I've seen the whole thing thrice.
#
I think three years ago or four years ago, my good friend Trane Panicker
#
gifted me a full DVD set.
#
And you haven't watched it.
#
And I haven't watched it because nobody has a DVD player these days.
#
I think he gifted me the set, if I remember correctly.
#
No, no, I can just watch it online now.
#
So no, it's actually very sadly, it's gone off the streamers.
#
It was an Amazon Prime, which is where I saw it again recently.
#
And now it's gone off and I don't know where you can watch it.
#
So please get a DVD player, a higher one.
#
Now that you have added your voice to the game, I will certainly do so.
#
He recommended it highly, didn't he?
#
Yeah, it's one of the best shows ever.
#
Oh, my God, I can't believe you've not seen it.
#
I apologize, don't get angry.
#
It's really an amazing show.
#
I'm really jealous of you now.
#
You get to see it afresh.
#
Oh, wow, which is actually a very sweet way of looking at it.
#
Someone who's actually watched everything there is to watch.
#
Exactly. What else is there to do?
#
I'm sure this will help.
#
But, you know, during the lockdown, for instance, I'm pretty sure we finished Netflix.
#
I think we saw everything there was worth seeing and there's nothing left to watch.
#
But do you watch a lot of these streaming services or not?
#
And when like if 10 people recommend something, then I'll watch it like right now.
#
This is the 27th of July.
#
We are recording and I don't know when the episode will be out.
#
But right now, all my friends are saying, watch Kora and watch The Heart.
#
Oh, it was really good. Yeah, Kora was really good.
#
So many people have recommended it that I have to watch it now.
#
But The Heart I have not seen.
#
But, you know, I'm Punjabi, though most people think I'm Bengali
#
because of Goswami and growing up in Calcutta.
#
Yeah, but I'm Punjabi actually.
#
So that kind of resonated with me because it's mostly in Punjabi
#
and you don't really see many Punjabi serials really.
#
And they really captured that ethos of Punjab, you know, the way things work.
#
And there's not that unnecessary sensationalism like most of these OTT things do,
#
you know, where there's constant, you know, abuses and stuff.
#
I mean, there are abuses because it's Punjab after all.
#
But it's not done gratuitously.
#
So I and they bring in a lot of stuff, but I don't want to spoil it for you.
#
You'll see it for yourself.
#
Yeah, I was having dinner last night with this dear friend of mine, Vikram Bajaj.
#
And he told me of a scene from The Heart where apparently this guy
#
is has been stripped to his undies and he's asked to get something
#
which is in his pant pocket.
#
So he reaches behind and then he realizes he's not wearing his pants.
#
So he just says pantage.
#
And I think that is just so beautiful and pithy.
#
And apparently it was translated on the screen as the X,
#
the so and so object is in my trouser pocket.
#
So that was a subtitle.
#
But all he's saying is PANTAGE, which is great, which is so great.
#
Let's actually you mentioned growing up in Calcutta.
#
And let's talk about your let's talk about your childhood.
#
You know, the part I find most fascinating and sometimes I realize that,
#
you know, people like you and me, we take a lot of shared experiences,
#
shared influences for granted.
#
And the truth is that more than 70 percent of India was born after liberalization.
#
Right. So they've just grown up in a different world.
#
Very true. And a lot of what we take for granted is something
#
that will be new or even TIL for them.
#
You know, so and I love and I'm half Bengali.
#
So even though I now find you're a Punjabi, you're not a Bengali at all,
#
but I'm half Punjabi also. You're half and half.
#
Yeah, I'm half and half.
#
So tell me, tell me about your childhood.
#
What were your young years like?
#
What were your parents like?
#
So my family is actually from what what is now Pakistan.
#
So my father's side of the family came from this small village
#
in Jelum district, which is near Lahore.
#
And so they moved to Calcutta after partition.
#
And my dad, by the way, was born in Shekhupura near Lahore
#
and moved to Calcutta to Calcutta as well. Wow.
#
But I think before partition, but no, it's a similar sense.
#
So they moved after that.
#
But the thing in Calcutta was that there was a very big Punjabi community
#
because and especially a big Sikh community.
#
So I grew up actually, my first language is Punjabi.
#
So I grew up speaking Punjabi.
#
In fact, I remember when I first went to school, I didn't really speak much English.
#
I actually had to learn English after going to school.
#
And it was actually quite difficult for me.
#
And because and I remember as a child once,
#
you know, coming to Chandigarh to visit my aunt.
#
And I was so astonished because everybody in the shops was speaking Punjabi.
#
And in my mind, Punjabi was like the secret language.
#
We spoke at home and everybody outside would speak Bengali or Hindi or English.
#
And I was astonished that, you know, everybody speaks Punjabi.
#
How is this even possible?
#
Anyway, to get back to growing up in Cal.
#
You know, it was it was a much simpler time
#
because, as you said, it was before liberalization.
#
There weren't that many things to buy or that many things to do.
#
As a child, we didn't even have television.
#
I mean, television came when I think I was in class nine or ten
#
around around that time.
#
And you basically had to make your own entertainment.
#
And I was the third child of the family.
#
So my brother and sister were much older than me.
#
My sister's about 15, 16 years older than me,
#
and my brother's 11 years older than me.
#
So, of course, they made my life miserable
#
by saying that I was never meant to be born and I was an accident.
#
And you know how cruel children are.
#
So I was always told that, you know, you're not really meant to be here.
#
But the good thing about it is that my parents were like so fed up
#
bringing up kids about them.
#
I came along, there was like minimal supervision, like
#
they had no idea what I was doing, like, you know, my Bengali friends,
#
you know, their mothers would come home,
#
come to the school with a little tiffin and feed them with their hands and stuff.
#
And my mom would just pack something and send me off with it.
#
And she had no idea if I had exams or anything,
#
I would be studying on my own, maybe not or maybe yes.
#
But there was like minimal supervision.
#
And my mother had this ritual that, you know, from
#
we lived in a joint family with my grandparents and everyone.
#
And she was incredibly busy
#
because she had to do breakfast and lunch and dinner.
#
I mean, even though there was help, but she still had to do all of it.
#
So she was very particular that from two to four,
#
she was going to retire to her room to sleep or read or do whatever.
#
And nobody was allowed to knock on the door or disturb her.
#
And if you did, I mean, you better be bleeding
#
or on the verge of death before you before you did that.
#
So I used to wait until she kind of went to her room at two.
#
And then I would slip out of the house and I would roam the neighborhood
#
and go into gardens and I would eat all kinds of vegetation
#
that I saw growing on the roadside with a I had another friend of mine
#
who was a year older than me in the neighborhood.
#
And we'd go around and we'd find these little leaves that tasted tart
#
And now looking back, I think that no child in today's age
#
would ever be allowed to do those kinds of things that we got up to.
#
And I remember once we were roaming around barefoot in the garden
#
and a snail got attached to my foot.
#
And then I didn't know what to do because I couldn't tell my mother
#
that I had had this accident because I would have to confess
#
that I had left the house while she was asleep.
#
And I can't remember what I did, but I basically took care of it myself.
#
So I had I had a great childhood, actually, because I was allowed to explore.
#
I was allowed to do my own thing.
#
There was no real pressure on me to study,
#
though I was a studious child.
#
It's not like I didn't, but it wasn't like my parents were asking me to do it.
#
It was just my own innate competitive nature
#
that I had to be good at whatever I did that made me do it.
#
And even growing up, like, you know, when I was going into college,
#
like a lot of my friends had this pressure that you have to study engineering
#
and you have to study medicine and all of that.
#
And to their credit, my parents never ever made any preference known.
#
And I wanted to study literature, which I did.
#
And they never ever said, what are you going to do with it?
#
What is your plan in life?
#
And, you know, what's your job going to be after that?
#
They were happy to let me do what I wanted to do,
#
which, looking back, is an incredible privilege because the kind of pressure
#
that's put on children to do things that they don't really want to do.
#
They're not maybe, you know, suited to do.
#
And I mean, the one subject I always really did badly at was physics.
#
So if my parents had tried to force me to become an engineer,
#
I don't know what would have become of me.
#
So looking back, I think I had an incredibly privileged childhood.
#
It's not like there was a lot of money and I could go out and buy what I wanted.
#
Like, even when it came to buying books, I had a certain budget.
#
I could not exceed that.
#
But like my mother would take me to these lending libraries on Free School Street
#
and we would become members of three or four of them.
#
And every Saturday we would go.
#
And I would I think we were allowed to take two books from each.
#
So I'd get six books which I could read through the week.
#
And that used to be like the high point of my life.
#
You know, I used to come back.
#
The more I came back, I would put out a chair in the veranda
#
and settle down to to read immediately.
#
So you had these little pleasures and you had these, you know,
#
little things that kept you excited.
#
You had your friends in the neighborhood would come in and chat with you.
#
So it it was a kind of an idyllic childhood.
#
There was no social media.
#
So it was very, very different.
#
And when I see my nieces and nephews growing up now,
#
I mean, their parents are frightened to even let them into the neighborhood
#
It just seems like a completely different world.
#
I think what you were lucky to have,
#
which they possibly will never know is two to four.
#
Yes, you know, and that's such a lovely thought of, you know,
#
that the Calcutta of your childhood, in a sense,
#
was a Calcutta between two to four.
#
Yes, quite a lot. Yeah, absolutely.
#
Yeah. Calcutta would go to sleep, no.
#
And did you do you remember?
#
No, I've been there, but I used to be.
#
I don't know why it never happens now, but there used to be this ritual
#
that every evening they would clean the streets with water.
#
They would take pump hoses and they would kind of hose the streets down.
#
I don't know at what point it stopped.
#
But as a child, I have such a strong memory of that.
#
And every time you went out in the evening, the air would be cooler
#
because the streets had been cooled down and everything would be nice and clean.
#
And then I suppose because of water shortages, they must have stopped.
#
But it doesn't happen any longer.
#
But Calcutta was a great place to grow up.
#
I really have great memories of it.
#
And even going to college, I went to a girls college.
#
I went to Loretto College and which was more like a school, actually,
#
because we had assembly in the morning and we had a nun
#
as our principal who would take assembly and we'd have prayers and all of that.
#
And you were not I mean, nobody was allowed to kind of leave
#
the college except for the lunch break.
#
So the only way you could bunk was if you didn't come back after lunch break
#
and you missed your afternoon classes.
#
But we were such good girls that we never actually bunked.
#
We all came back and did our lessons.
#
But it was actually a lot of my friends went to presidency and loved it
#
and enjoyed that whole kind of atmosphere over there.
#
But I actually like being an all girls environment because I think the bonds
#
you form with female friends are terribly important at that age.
#
And to be in an environment which is not distracted is the wrong word,
#
but that there are no men around to to muddy the waters.
#
Free of the male gaze, free of the male gaze.
#
That's a good way to put it was actually a great way to grow up.
#
It was it was an amazing experience.
#
Tell me about your parents, because when I think of the men and women of that time,
#
you know, and all the stories that previous guests of mine have told me
#
and just looking back at my own parents.
#
And I find this really interesting because it's almost as if the roles
#
that they are thrust into are just hardened.
#
The man is supposed to be a certain way, supposed to be a provider.
#
He's supposed to be stern with the kids.
#
He's, you know, supposed to not cry in public.
#
Women are supposed to look after the house and be a completely different way
#
And you will find couples who gradually out of shared love and perhaps,
#
you know, being more influenced to Western literature and all that are
#
kind of don't exactly conform to those roles and become very close.
#
And you also find couples that remain close and full of love
#
with each other, but they're also almost in separate worlds.
#
They are together, but they are alone, where the woman could have an interior life,
#
but it's her interior life.
#
Her husband has no idea that is the world.
#
And her husband could also be constricted along his own groove
#
and into which he never allows her.
#
So, you know, what what were your parents like?
#
What was the relationship with themselves, with each other and with you?
#
It's so hard to say, because, you know, when you're a child,
#
you don't really see your parents as individuals.
#
You just see them as your mom and your dad.
#
You don't really you don't even think about their relationship with each other.
#
You as far as you're concerned, they're only like your parents.
#
And, you know, that's about it.
#
I can only really think about it in retrospect, because to be honest,
#
when I was growing up with the two of them, I never really thought about it
#
or even like, you know, ask them about it, their relationship or whatever.
#
Like, for instance, as I wrote in my column,
#
they got married without ever seeing each other.
#
Like the first time my mother saw my father was when she got married to him.
#
And her photograph was sent to my grandparents,
#
and they shared a photograph of my father.
#
And in all my life, I often wonder that,
#
why didn't I ever ask her how that felt like to marry a man you do not know,
#
to then move into an entirely different, you know, family where you don't know anybody,
#
where you're expected to, you know, instantly become the bahu of the house and, you know, take over.
#
And she was just 18 when she got married, which is like really, really young in retrospect.
#
But I don't think I ever, ever asked her that question, how that felt.
#
I mean, you know, and maybe I should have, but and she also had a very difficult life
#
because she was six when her mother passed away.
#
Her father used to, this isn't British India, he used to work for the railways.
#
And so her mother passed away leaving like, how many, six children or something?
#
Yeah, six, six children.
#
And so he got remarried and had one of my marces was born through the second wife, who also died.
#
I mean, obviously there was a huge mortality rate when it came to women giving birth.
#
And then he got married for a third time from whom I have my youngest mama.
#
And that should be all very close as a family.
#
So we don't really regard ourselves as a step family.
#
But basically, my mother from the age of six did not have a mother.
#
And in fact, she had no memory of what her mother looked like and didn't remember her at all.
#
And of course, there were no pictures in those days that she could have seen.
#
So I think she didn't have any role model of a mother to to base herself on.
#
So I often think that she probably struggled because she had my sister when she was 19.
#
And my sister was practically brought up by my grandmother, because I think my mother was still a child in some ways.
#
But by the time I came around, she was about 35.
#
So I think I was probably the child that she probably was a mother to in the real sense, because she was like a mature person.
#
And I know my father was far more involved in my bringing up than he was in the bringing up of my brother and sister,
#
because he was also so much younger when they were born.
#
So it was almost like a couple of children having children and you know how it is and the entire extended family looking after the kids.
#
But I wonder, I mean, I really don't know, it's just speculation that what does that do to your relationship?
#
Like, how do you relate to each other?
#
Do you relate to each other only as parents or do you relate to each other as, you know, a husband and wife?
#
Do you have like this romantic bond or whatever?
#
But I really don't know how it worked out.
#
And how did your relationship with them then change over the years?
#
Because what you're saying, I think, is true of everyone that we first see our parents as parents.
#
You know, one charming anecdote I keep coming back to is one that Natasha Bhadwa told me in her episode with me,
#
when she and her then boyfriend, now husband, they introduced their parents to each other.
#
And each of them found that the other's parents to be completely different from how they had been portrayed.
#
Because, you know, in your own mind, your parents are a particular way.
#
But actually, they contain multitudes, they're much more than that, they've evolved fast, all of that, and that's...
#
You know, my dad died when I was 24.
#
So I think maybe if he had lived, he was like 68 when he died, he died quite young.
#
And, you know, when you're 24, I don't think you have the maturity really to look beyond the appearances
#
and try and see the person, you know, as what he is.
#
So my memories of my father are still very, you know, childhood oriented.
#
And, you know, like, I had just about started working on my first job when he passed away.
#
My mother lived on for about 30 years after that.
#
She passed away only in 2015 when she was 87 when she died.
#
So with her, I had, you know, a longer period of time, you know, for the relationship to evolve or whatever.
#
And with my mother and me, we are very similar personalities.
#
You know, we're both very strong-willed people who have to have our own way.
#
We're both quick tempered.
#
I won't call it bad tempered, but quick tempered, like, you know, we lose our patience very easily.
#
So we were not really a natural fit that way because we were constantly rubbing against each other,
#
especially when I was a teenager and going to college, we had these constant clashes with each other or whatever.
#
Whereas my father was far more laid back and, you know, he didn't have very strong opinions about anything.
#
So I probably got along better with my father in those days.
#
But as my mother grew older, I think, you know, as she mellowed, too, she became, you know, it happens with all parents.
#
They become more dependent on you.
#
So you become more like the parental figure and they become like more childlike.
#
So that transition took place with my mother.
#
But I never really had a chance with my father because he died when I was so young.
#
So that didn't really happen.
#
But with my mother, our relationship changed as she grew older because she started off as being this very strong and, you know, almost obstreperous person.
#
And by the end, she was like a very different person.
#
She was like, you know, she would depend on you for the smallest little thing.
#
And you could tell that, you know, it was not something she was comfortable with because she had grown up being this very independent person who did her own thing.
#
And it takes and in her last years, she had to move in with my sister and live with her because she couldn't really live on her own.
#
And I think it was very tough on her, you know, giving up your house, giving up your environment, moving in.
#
It changes your life in a very fundamental way.
#
And I think it's very hard to make your peace with.
#
So I think that's tough.
#
And I often wonder, like, you know, with as you grow older, what your old age will hold for you.
#
There's a beautiful poem by A.K. Ramanujan called Self-Portrait.
#
I'll just read it out as I get to my next question.
#
Self-Portrait by A.K. Ramanujan.
#
I resemble everyone but myself.
#
And sometimes see in shop windows, despite the well-known laws of optics, the portrait of a stranger, date unknown, often signed in a corner by my father.
#
And it's a beautiful poem.
#
And how much did knowing your mother better help you also understand yourself?
#
Help me understand myself.
#
To help you know yourself.
#
That's a tough one. I don't know if I understand myself.
#
I think it helped me understand my mother better.
#
Because I think, you know, anybody who loses their mother at such a small age is always damaged as a consequence because you grow up without a maternal influence.
#
And I think that changes you in a very, very fundamental way.
#
So when she became a mother herself, her mothering had no real context because she had no idea, you know, what to do.
#
And that, I think, affected her like she was a huge disciplinarian because her father used to be a huge disciplinarian.
#
So she took her cue from him.
#
So there wasn't that softening influence of a mother that, you know, in the stereotypical way what we say.
#
So she was like, in our family, my mother was always the disciplinarian.
#
My father was always like, you know, it's OK, let it be or whatever.
#
But she was the one who was like the tough one or whatever.
#
And in a sense, I think it was her childhood that made her.
#
And in turn, it made us, you know, because the way she brought us up was influenced by the way that she was not brought up.
#
So it was a tough thing.
#
But I don't know if I could understand myself better as a consequence, but I certainly understood where she was coming from.
#
Like when I was growing up, I would kind of constantly rebel against the disciplinarian aspects of her personality.
#
Like, for instance, when we were kids, we were never allowed sleepovers.
#
We were not allowed to sleep over at anybody's house ever.
#
And it used to be a huge issue for me that, you know, all my friends can do it.
#
Why can't I do it or whatever?
#
But I think because she was brought up by this very strict father who had to protect his daughters in a household where there were no ladies or whatever,
#
she kind of carried that over to her own parenting.
#
So looking back, I can now understand where she was coming from.
#
But at that point, there used to be a lot of anger and resentment that why can't I do the things that, you know, my friends are doing or whatever.
#
But certainly looking back, I feel I understand her better now.
#
But I don't think I understand myself any better as a consequence.
#
That will take some time.
#
It's a kind of lifelong process.
#
You mentioned you were crazy about literature.
#
You like to read, you would read six books a week and you would just go through them.
#
Tell me about the kind of things you read and what stayed with you?
#
What made an impression?
#
Oh, my gosh, you know, like I told you, like within the house, I was completely unsupervised.
#
I wasn't allowed to go out anywhere and I had to be back at a certain time and all that nonsense.
#
But within the house, there was no supervision.
#
And my grandfather, my father, my brother, my sister, they were all big readers.
#
So we had a lot of books at home, which was unusual in that period.
#
And my grandfather used to be a huge history buff.
#
So he used to have books on world wars and, you know, the British royal family and, you know, European royalty and stuff like that.
#
And somehow nobody ever said that I should not read anything like I could read whatever I wanted to read.
#
And I still remember this with this huge bound volume of George Bernard Shaw's collected plays.
#
And I remember I must have been about 10 or 11 when I started reading them.
#
And I'm not even sure that I understood what they were or whatever, but I read all of them, you know,
#
because nobody ever told me that, you know, these are adult books and you can't do this and you can't do that.
#
As a consequence, I developed a pretty eclectic reading habit.
#
Like I would read his history books.
#
I would read these plays.
#
Then my sister was a big fan of George It Is, so I would pick up her George It Is and read them.
#
So I don't have memories of any one particular thing that I liked.
#
Like all children, I loved Enid Blyton because that was the one thing that we all read, the Mallory Tarr series.
#
I used to fantasize about being allowed to go and live in a hostel and where I would have midnight feasts.
#
And of course, my mother would not send me, which was a big bone of contention that I couldn't go and live in a hostel.
#
And so those were there and there were the Nancy Drew books.
#
Then there used to be a lot of books.
#
The school library was one resource that I used.
#
And then I said I used to go out and pick up books from these lending libraries.
#
I don't know if they still exist in Calcutta or whether they've gone.
#
And then there used to be this Oxford library on Park Street where you could borrow books as well.
#
So I had a very eclectic reading habits, which continue to this day.
#
Though now I don't read that much nonfiction, I read much more fiction than nonfiction than I used to.
#
But I'm very happy reading a trashy potboiler kind of thing.
#
I used to read Harold Robbins that my brother had and James Hadley Chase.
#
And Alistair McLean that used to be a big name in those days.
#
The Guns of Navarone and all of that are just made into a movie as well.
#
Those books seem to have disappeared, haven't they?
#
Yeah, I kind of, you know, one lament I have is that today everything is so easily available to us that people can actually curate their reading.
#
And unfortunately, people often do it according to ideas of how they want to project themselves or what they think is cool to read.
#
And I'm like, we were indiscriminate readers because we didn't have a choice.
#
We read whatever we could get our hands on.
#
In fact, I remember once I was, I'm a big fan of Georgette.
#
I think she's an amazing writer and her plots are like really great.
#
And I remember once I was working for Sunday magazine and I was at the airport.
#
And I was reading a Georgette that I had picked up from one of these airport stalls, probably re-reading it because I'd read them all when I was a child.
#
And a week later, a car wandered into the airport.
#
He looked at me and said, what are you reading?
#
And I said, it's a Georgette.
#
I said, what nonsense are you reading?
#
This is all trash and all that.
#
I'm Mills and Boons type and all.
#
So I was really annoyed.
#
I said, you know, have you ever read a Georgette?
#
Have you any idea what she's like and stuff like that?
#
So, of course, he scoffed at me and wandered off and I was really annoyed.
#
Then after a month, he called me up and he said, you know, I think you were right about Georgette because Amitabh Ghosh told me she's one of the best writers.
#
So I said, Amitabh Ghosh's opinion counts, but not mine.
#
But, you know, because of that, I'm a pretty eclectic reader.
#
I read about just about anything, though my big craze is still spy novels.
#
I grew up reading them, so they're still like one of my favorite genres to read.
#
Yeah. And, you know, one of my good friends, Ajay Shah, keeps talking about the importance of biodiversity in our diet.
#
So every time he makes tea, he'll put different herbs into it.
#
And I think that there's the same value in biodiversity in your reading, as it were.
#
Like, you know, I teach a writing course and sometimes students will ask me that, you know, what should I read?
#
Recommend some writers and all of that.
#
And I'm like, anything you enjoy reading is great.
#
There should be no hierarchy of books that something has won the book prize or something is in the canon and something is airport bestseller.
#
You know, anything that gives you joy that you enjoy reading is good writing.
#
It is doing something right. You know, you will internalize it and you should read it.
#
In fact, I have this thing which I'm now trying to get over that once I started a book, I had to finish it.
#
You know, I couldn't give it up.
#
No matter how bad it was or how bored I was, I would still read three, four pages at night trying to finish it.
#
But now I've decided that life is too short.
#
I mean, there's so many other books to be read.
#
So if something doesn't appeal to me, I kind of give it up now.
#
But there was a time when I never used to do that and I used to kind of religiously read through.
#
Because there are a lot of these very popular and well-known writers that I just don't get.
#
You know, like they just don't appeal to me.
#
So I don't see any reason why I have to read them just to prove that, you know, I've read this particular book or whatever.
#
Like God of Small Things.
#
I tried three times and I gave it up.
#
And then people would ask me, how can you not like it?
#
You know, it's Arundhati.
#
My taste also go much more towards minimal, elegant prose like Vikram Seth and so on.
#
Rather than someone more maximalist, which is not a value, objective value judgement.
#
It's just our taste. This is how we are.
#
I get a bit tired of all these lyrical, the purple sky and the boob.
#
The other thing that I kind of keep telling my writing students is that,
#
and contrary to what you do in this case, is that if you don't like something, stop reading it immediately.
#
You know, it's a sunk cost fallacy.
#
You know, you should only read something if it brings you value in two ways.
#
One is you're enjoying it.
#
And the other is that you want to learn something and even if it's a little difficult, you want to learn it.
#
But otherwise, never force yourself through anything because life is so short.
#
In fact, at the moment I'm reading this really, really interesting series.
#
It's quite a quirky series actually, is by this writer called S.J. Bennett.
#
In which she writes these books which is set in the palace.
#
Queen Elizabeth is actually the secret detective who's solving all these crimes.
#
And it's so quirky and it's so fun because, you know, she puts in a little bit about palace life
#
and how, you know, the Queen's world works and whatever.
#
And like, you know, some hand washes up on the beach at Sandringham
#
and who's the man to whom the hand belongs to.
#
And the Queen is trying to find out from behind the scenes.
#
And one of her ADCs is like her front who does all her work for her
#
because obviously the Queen can't go and investigate.
#
But I just found this such fun because the concept is so quirky that I was just intrigued by it.
#
It's not a very high-faluting book or whatever.
#
It's good, easy reading.
#
But I'm really enjoying it at the moment.
#
And our producer for this session, Abhishek, who plays guitar, and Advaita,
#
he was lamenting yesterday that there aren't enough chronicles set in the princely states of India.
#
I mean, of course, Manu Pillai has written about Travancore and all of that,
#
but there aren't enough.
#
And I was just thinking, what about a detective series set in one of those princely courts?
#
You know, funny you should say that because I remember Chikki Sarkar many years ago said,
#
would you like to do this kind of book and all?
#
And unfortunately, I don't have that historical background.
#
You need somebody who understands that period to do it.
#
But it will be a great thing for somebody to do.
#
I think Madhulika Liddle has also said...
#
Has she done? I've not read her.
#
I think in the Mughal courts, there's a series like that.
#
Oh, I haven't read that.
#
You mentioned Mallory Towers earlier and sort of Daydreams of boarding school.
#
And obviously, you know, anyone who read Enid Blyton and all that would kind of feel that attraction.
#
And I love Mallory Towers as well.
#
And I remember when I was in bishop school in Pune in the 1980s,
#
at one point when my father was transferred to Pune,
#
I insisted that I wanted to be, you know, not a day scholar, but a hostelite.
#
And he was like, what are you talking about?
#
God I'm there, why are you kidding me?
#
Etc, etc. So that never happened.
#
But for a very brief while, I had that little fantasy purely because of the books you read.
#
But I want to sort of ask you, what did you daydream about?
#
As a child, I used to create such elaborate fantasies in my head.
#
I was like, you know, when you're there's such a big gap between your siblings and yourself,
#
you're effectively brought up as an only child because they are like grown up by the time or whatever.
#
And so I had this very rich interior life and I used to have all these fantasies.
#
And one, I used to be this the captain of the Indian female cricket team.
#
And we used to go off on all these little tours.
#
And in my mind, I would be replaying every ball in my head and what stroke I would be playing and all of that.
#
So I had a lot of these, you know, the fantastical things in my head because we had so much free time
#
and nothing to do with it apart from read.
#
And when you read, it kind of unlocks your imagination to some extent.
#
And so, yeah, I had a huge daydream.
#
But I never really daydreamed of being a real thing.
#
Like, it's not like in real life, I was actually a cricketer.
#
It was like a complete fantasy.
#
It wasn't like I was fantasizing about something that could actually come to fruition.
#
It wasn't like that at all.
#
And were there romantic daydreams?
#
Like, I'm wondering what were the notions of romance in that time?
#
Because, you know, at one level, if you're not a reader, you just get Bollywood
#
and you get either really straight list conventional notions of romance
#
or they could even be a little toxic because Bollywood could sometimes be that way.
#
But if you read, you know, there could be more and more nuance out there.
#
So what was it like growing up as a young girl?
#
I think our idea of romance came from Mills and Boon's novels, you know.
#
At that age, when you're like 15, 16, they used to be, they were like contraband almost,
#
you know, because they used to have these very lurid covers of these very pretty looking women
#
fainting in the arms of this dark, handsome man.
#
And I think either we were not allowed to read them or there was something.
#
But we used to secretly exchange whatever books we had with each other.
#
So I think we had this very stereotypical idea of romance, that this very strong,
#
tall, dark man would come into our lives, who would always be a little older than you,
#
not, you know, somebody of your same age group and sweep you off your feet and go off.
#
But in real life, we didn't know very many men because I went to a convent school
#
and then I went to Loretto College, so there weren't that many men around.
#
And even when we went to these, you know, college festivals or whatever,
#
we were always, we always steered a little clear of this whole Sensevier's lot,
#
because their idea of trying to make friends with you was trying to tease you,
#
was trying to, you know, I mean, it was a very strange dynamic, you know,
#
nobody would come up and say, hi, hello, but they would catcall you from a distance,
#
you know, how it is when you're like 17 or 18.
#
So it's not like we had very many romances when we were in college.
#
In fact, of all my friends in college, only one had a boyfriend.
#
And even that was a secret boyfriend, like her parents didn't know about it or anything.
#
And it was not until, until what, we were 24 or 25 that people started getting married.
#
And astonishingly, a lot of them arranged marriages.
#
Even in, you know, in the 90s or 80s or whatever,
#
only one friend of mine actually had a love marriage, the one who had a boyfriend in college.
#
And the other one, you know, we didn't call them arranged marriages,
#
because, you know, the boy would be introduced to you by your parents or whatever,
#
and then you would go out with him a couple of times.
#
So you felt that, you know, you were like dating and then you would get married.
#
But effectively, they were arranged marriages, you know, whether you call them or not.
#
So I think it was a very different period.
#
They weren't, or maybe it was different in presidency.
#
Maybe people had lots of boyfriends and girlfriends.
#
But growing up in the ghetto, there were very few people who,
#
there was one girl in our class who actually got married while he was still in college.
#
And that was also an arranged marriage.
#
So it was a, it was a very kind of a conservative, traditionalist kind of an environment that I grew up in.
#
And earlier, you mentioned that your dad was perfectly cool with, you know, your doing literature.
#
And I'm just thinking that had you been a boy, it may not have been that way,
#
because expectations are often kind of different.
#
Well, I don't think we had very many expectations of my brother either.
#
But I think, you know, to be honest, I don't really know,
#
because I was very young when he made that decision, because he's much older than me.
#
But I don't really think there was much pressure on him, him either.
#
I don't think, you know, my parents were not really that motivated by money.
#
And, you know, the whole commercial aspect so much, so I think they were okay with it.
#
And what was your sort of sense of self, as it were, like, what did you want to be?
#
How did you see yourself at that time?
#
You know, it's very strange you ask that, because I really had no clue when I was studying in college what I wanted to do.
#
For me, it was just enough to be in college and studying literature, which I really loved.
#
And I used to, you know, spend all my time in the library.
#
I was one of those really nerdy kids who would probably annoy me now if I actually met her.
#
But I used to be really nerdy.
#
And I remember in my library, there used to be this one particular row of tables which had these big picture windows.
#
And my biggest memory of college is sitting in a picture window and doing my research and looking up literary criticism and all of that.
#
And I never ever thought of what I was going to do next.
#
And then suddenly I was in my third year of college and I had no idea what I wanted to do.
#
The only thing I knew is I didn't want to be a teacher, because that was one thing that did not appeal to me at all.
#
And I knew that I didn't want to do my MA, that I was happy because once I started studying literature,
#
I realized that in a way it was a mistake, because once you start studying a subject,
#
it loses a little bit of its charm because it becomes work.
#
And I often felt that maybe I should have studied history and kept literature as something that I enjoyed.
#
And I didn't want to do my MA in literature or anything, so that I had to decide what I wanted to do.
#
And the only thing I could think of was sitting for the civil services exam.
#
So without any thought or whatever, after I finished my third year of college, I came to Delhi, live with my uncle who lives in Delhi.
#
And so I sat for my prelims and I never thought very much about it and I did them and went back to Calcutta.
#
And while after my prelims are done and I had a little bit of time and I just saw this ad in the newspaper,
#
we used to get the statesman or was it The Telegraph in those days, may have been The Telegraph, about Sunday magazine looking for interns.
#
And I wasn't doing anything.
#
And so I sent off an application saying that, you know, OK, until my results come out, let me just do this.
#
So I sent off an application and they asked me to come and then I had to give a written test.
#
And then I was invited back for an interview by Sunday.
#
And so the two people interviewing me was Avik Sarkar and there was another gentleman who was the editor of Sunday.
#
And so I did the interview and much to my surprise, I got the job.
#
So there were two of us who were hired from this huge intake.
#
And so I was in two minds, I should take it up or should I not take it up.
#
And I said, anyway, it doesn't matter.
#
Like I have till the mains, I can study on the alongside.
#
And I took up this job and I joined Sunday and I used to be like the lowest of the low, you know,
#
the kind of person who would be sent to the library to find pictures and, you know,
#
PTS pull layout, you know, that kind of little things.
#
Then slowly, slowly after about a week or so, they started giving me a little copy to edit and things like that.
#
And then after some time, there was some deluxe that had come and it said something,
#
you know, this story has to be done this.
#
And it was signed Veer.
#
And I turned to Aditi, who was like the person who was mentoring me.
#
And I said, who is this Veer?
#
She said, you don't know who Veer is, that's the editor.
#
It's Veer Sanghvi, didn't he interview you?
#
So I said, oh shit, I thought that was Shubhavrata Bhattacharya.
#
So all through my interview, I was interviewed by Veer in a week,
#
but I thought he was Shubhavrata Bhattacharya.
#
So I'm very lucky I didn't call him Mr. Bhattacharya.
#
And it took me like two weeks into Sunday to figure out who he was,
#
which shows you how unprepared I was for the world of journalism or whatever.
#
Had you called him Mr. Bhattacharya, would you have gotten the job?
#
Then the whole future is different, right?
#
So anyway, and I started working.
#
And then once you start editing, then it was a small kind of office
#
and there were very few of us.
#
So you ended up getting assignments that go and do this little story,
#
like some quiz is happening somewhere or, you know,
#
And after I started doing that, I suddenly got into the whole thing
#
about journalism and I started enjoying myself.
#
I started enjoying writing and started enjoying rewriting also,
#
which is quite something because it was not something that most people like.
#
And then anyway, I got through my prelims and then I came back and I did my mains
#
and I got through my mains and then I had to make a decision
#
as to what I want to do because so I said, OK, now let me see.
#
Now that I've got through, let me see.
#
I'll go back for the interview.
#
So I went back for the interview and I got through that as well.
#
So then I had to decide now, what do I do?
#
I got through the civil service.
#
Gosh, I don't remember, but I don't remember, really.
#
It was like a lifetime ago.
#
So then I had to decide what I wanted to do.
#
So then I had a lot of, you know,
#
heart to hearts with my friends and my parents and everybody.
#
And there were all these pros and cons, you know,
#
you know how people are government job here.
#
You should take it to your life is made.
#
How can you give it up for being like one lowly reporter
#
or a lowly sub editor on Sunday?
#
But I don't know what prompted me, but I decided not to take it up
#
and I decided to stay on in Sunday.
#
Then after a while, when I was working in Sunday,
#
I got I got a letter from the cabinet secretariat saying
#
that you've seen that you passed the civil services
#
and we'd like to offer you a job.
#
And will you come for an interview to Delhi?
#
And I was so naive, I didn't even know what the cabinet secretariat was
#
or that it stood for raw or whatever.
#
So I showed it to various people in the office and they said,
#
So you should definitely go for the interview,
#
at least see what it's about.
#
You know, it's an experience.
#
So I came back to Delhi for that and I gave the raw interview
#
and it was the most surreal experience of my life.
#
It was like this whole phalanx of men sitting like, you know,
#
silhouetted against a window like you see in all the John
#
McCarran novels, asking all kinds of strange questions.
#
And most of them had to do with politics.
#
You know, what do you think of the anti-defamation law
#
and the Punjab agitation and the Sri Lanka thing?
#
You know, all the hot topics of that day.
#
And then I got through that.
#
And then they called me for a medical exam, at which point
#
I finally pulled the plug and I said, I'm not joining raw.
#
And I decided to stay on with Sunday.
#
But I often wonder that if I had joined raw and become a spy,
#
how wonderful it would be.
#
You could write a book about it.
#
I am writing a spy novel.
#
I'm writing a spy novel.
#
But, you know, like my theory is that I was actually hired by raw
#
and I was sent as an undercover agent to Sunday.
#
And that is a good theory, deeply embedded to spy on me.
#
And well, and on and on the country, you know.
#
Yeah, because I managed.
#
I mean, I used to do political journalism in those days.
#
So interviewing all prime ministers and, you know,
#
leaders of the opposition and stuff like that.
#
It's a good way to report back to your handler.
#
But unfortunately, that's not true.
#
I would have liked to have two salaries, but it never happened.
#
And I'm just thinking that, you know, every time you kept saying
#
that I went for this means or I went for interview or I went to the raw interview
#
and I'm waiting for the point where you say that I didn't get through,
#
but you got through all of them.
#
I got through all of them.
#
And I'm just thinking that that must have done such wonders for your confidence,
#
because one thing that I notice in not just young women today,
#
but frankly, women of all ages, is this lack of self-belief,
#
the imposter syndrome as it were.
#
And I'm thinking that in the 80s, it must have been even worse
#
finding that self-confidence where you just have many more men around.
#
You know, I don't know what it was.
#
But I've never ever felt that lack of confidence.
#
In fact, according to Veer, I was obnoxious at the interview
#
and treated him and Avik Sarkar like they were like misguided old people.
#
But, you know, I think it's the arrogance of youth that you feel you can do anything.
#
I probably now I would have more self-doubt because I know all the various things
#
But when you're that young and you haven't really seen the world or whatever,
#
you feel you can do anything.
#
So that's it's a kind of a superpower almost.
#
You know, the arrogance of youth.
#
And that's what carried me through.
#
And also, I think it mattered that I didn't really care
#
deeply about these things, you know, like when you care a lot,
#
then you probably mess up a little bit because you're so nervous and,
#
But I went into it like a lark, especially the raw interview.
#
I definitely went into it for a lark because I didn't really,
#
you know, want to join or whatever.
#
In fact, it's the funniest thing, because some people from IB
#
who came to do my due diligence and, you know, security check on Sunday,
#
they came and told me, you know, you should advise her not to join.
#
It's not a good place to be.
#
So one government agency was running down the other.
#
But I think it's also because I didn't really care that much.
#
If I had really been invested in it, then maybe I would have been
#
a little more nervous that I wasn't.
#
And did you think of yourself as someone who likes to write,
#
who wants to be a writer before all of this, because you were
#
such a voracious reader, you did study literature.
#
I did want to be a writer.
#
But I never really thought of journalism.
#
Somehow journalism was not something I grew up wanting to do.
#
It was a complete accident.
#
But I realized very soon after I joined that I enjoyed doing that.
#
And when I had to make a decision between doing something I enjoyed doing
#
and doing something that would probably pay me better at that point
#
and would probably give me more prestige and, you know, all of that,
#
I think I went with the writing part because that's what I enjoyed doing.
#
And I thought I would end up doing better at it as I went along.
#
And I was very lucky because, you know,
#
because we were a very young organization and we were a very small organization.
#
We got opportunities that people probably wouldn't get
#
for another 10 years of their career.
#
Like I joined in 87 and by 89, I was covering the general election.
#
I was traveling with politicians to their constituencies.
#
I was covering rallies.
#
Then I covered the first day of V.P.
#
Singh's joining his when he became prime minister.
#
I covered that with Chandrasekhar.
#
I remember going on Chandrasekhar's plane once, you know, accompanying him somewhere.
#
And for somebody who's just out of college, that's such a huge opportunity.
#
Like I was basically 24, 25 by then.
#
And I was getting these enormous opportunities, you know, to do this kind of thing.
#
So when you have that kind of, you know, a future opening up in front of you,
#
then, you know, the IFS or the IAS or IPS or whatever doesn't sound very exciting
#
because you're still very much a lowly bot once you're starting out.
#
Whereas this was giving you an opportunity to meet people.
#
I remember when I was still like maybe 25 or whatever.
#
I went and met Vajpayee. He wasn't prime minister then.
#
We were doing a story on poet politicians.
#
And I went and interviewed him.
#
And like you were saying about the pauses, remember, before we started.
#
And I would ask him a question and then he would say a couple of sentences
#
and then he would pause and then it was long silence.
#
And I would think, now should I ask the next question?
#
And just as I started, he would then start off again answering the previous one.
#
And I was like really freaked out as to how this was playing out.
#
But if I remember, when I went to interview him,
#
I had gone from my office in PTI building to his Rai Sinha.
#
I think it was on Rai Sinha Road in those days.
#
And it started pouring.
#
And by the time I got out of the three wheeler and went into his car,
#
I was drenched completely.
#
So the moment I went inside, Mrs.
#
Kaul was there and she saw me and she said, Oh my God, I'm completely drenched.
#
And she got me towels and then she got me tea and then she sat me down.
#
And she was like so motherly and kind of made sure that I was OK
#
before I started the interview.
#
So I had these really lovely experiences with people, you know, in those days.
#
And when you're young and you have this sort of, you know,
#
world opening up before you, you can't think of giving that up, you know,
#
to do something so boring as to sit in an office and just, you know, push pens.
#
You don't want to do that.
#
And I had a similar stroke of good luck in the early 2000s
#
when I was also in my 20s.
#
And online cricket, online sports journalism had just started.
#
So I worked first for Wisden.com and then for Crick-N-Four.
#
And there were a bunch of us young people, Rahul Bhattacharya, me,
#
later on Siddharth Vaidyanathan, all big names now except me.
#
And what we would and I realized that wherever we went to cover test matches
#
and we would cover straight away, we were covering test matches.
#
And all these older fogies would look at us with so much resentment.
#
Exactly. And later one of them took me aside
#
and he said, you know, Amit, I think he was from one of the news agencies.
#
And he said, let me tell you how it is.
#
I started in Times of India today.
#
I'm here in Times of India.
#
It got me four years to get to cricket.
#
And I was allowed then to go to college cricket and, you know,
#
I got my first Ranji Trophy game after eight years in the thing.
#
You know, I got my first test match after 20 years in the profession.
#
You are kids, you have come, you are directly playing with us in the test match.
#
You can also, you know, he was very honest about it, but the others weren't.
#
And what I and I, of course, also had the arrogance of youth.
#
And and sometimes it helps when you're really bad,
#
but you think you're really good because, you know,
#
because then you fake it till you make it in a sense.
#
And I think that's what I did.
#
And what I want to ask you about is then also that process
#
of learning about two important things in journalism.
#
One is just the writing itself, like who were you writing and reporting?
#
Like, were there any writing or reporting or so to say?
#
How did you kind of figure that stuff out?
#
Because as a young person looking at myself, I would try too hard.
#
I would want to show off my facility with the language, do fancy things and all of that.
#
And gradually, over time, that gets beaten out of you and you learn what not to do.
#
So, you know, I want to understand that process of learning about writing and reporting
#
and also the process of learning basic
#
journalistic values, because it strikes me that, you know,
#
abroad people will go to Columbia Journalism School or they'll go to some journalism school.
#
And even within institutions, there are, you know, there are sets of values which are embedded.
#
But from what I remember of the little that I've seen of Indian journalism back in the day,
#
it was very haphazard. If you were lucky, you got a good editor who would teach you a lot.
#
But otherwise, you know, you would be thrown into the thick of things.
#
You just had to produce a lot of copy.
#
And you weren't really learning much either in terms of writing or in terms of values.
#
So what was that learning process for you?
#
You know, for me, it was different because I actually joined a desk.
#
So I wasn't really a reporter reporter.
#
I was a I started off as a trainee sub editor.
#
So I was under training.
#
I was on probation for like six months or whatever.
#
And I spent so we used to do reporting on the side.
#
Like that was a treat for us.
#
Like, you know, you would get assigned a story to do.
#
And it was something that you did because you were so excited about it.
#
Your basic job was to sit and rewrite copy that came from the Delhi Bureau,
#
the Bombay Bureau or whatever.
#
And of course, you didn't get to rewrite right away because you had to had to learn how to do it.
#
But I actually enjoyed the rewriting because I felt that
#
again, arrogance of youth that I was improving copy.
#
And honestly speaking, some of the copy was pretty bad.
#
And the good thing about, you know, studying literature at Loretto
#
is that they taught you how to write.
#
So at least you knew basic grammar and you knew basic things of how you wanted to do it.
#
But the training of how to put a new story together and how to do this,
#
that came on the job because I didn't do any journalistic training whatsoever.
#
I learned everything on the job, even learning how to sub, how to put in, you know,
#
those stets symbols and all of that.
#
I learned on the job. I had no idea what I was getting into.
#
But I had the person I used to report to immediately was Chitreta Banerjee,
#
who's now a food writer who writes these food books and stuff.
#
And she used to kind of help us and teach us various things.
#
And then Veer, of course, was the editor, but he was too busy to do like proper training.
#
But once you had edited a story and especially the bigger stories, then they would go to him
#
and then he would tell you what was wrong and what was right and what it should be.
#
And like you said, you know, all your adjectives are thrown out and, you know,
#
you have to pare down your writing and be like whatever.
#
And also in those days, there used to be these very itty bitty
#
gossipy pieces that used to go on, I forget what was called Delhi Diary or something.
#
And that that actually was a good training ground to learn how to write
#
because it had to be pithy.
#
It had to have information and had to be like 250 words.
#
So that was good training for us, you know, because you would just get this information
#
from the Delhi Bureau, you know, that this it was basically a gossip column,
#
you know, yeah, who are and then you put it together somehow into a little thing.
#
And there were no bylines.
#
There was no pressure that people were going to judge you by what you had written.
#
So that was good training.
#
And then in the back of the book, we had book reviews
#
and we had stuff like that.
#
So we actually got to do a lot of different things.
#
Like, you know, we got there was a business section.
#
So we'd edit business copy as well.
#
So it actually trained us a lot.
#
Like, for instance, I remember I was working on this cover story
#
on this whole Harsha Mehta, you know, whatever thingy.
#
And in just working on that story, I learned so much about the stock exchange,
#
which I promptly forgot two months later, but that's a different story.
#
But every story just taught you so much, you know.
#
So it was a really good training ground.
#
And you learned your you learned essential skills like, you know,
#
what should the first part of a story be?
#
It should be something that draws you in.
#
It has to have at least three bits of information which power it through.
#
You can't end in the middle.
#
You have to have a rounded, you know, thing at the end of your story.
#
So the beginning and the end of your story have to be really strong.
#
And then you work on the middle.
#
So we learn these essential skills.
#
And then I think it's just a question of whether you're good at it or bad at it.
#
You can't really train somebody who is not a good writer to be a good writer.
#
You can train them to be a competent writer.
#
But I think writing is something that's either innate or, you know, you
#
you have to have a gift.
#
I don't think a competent writer can be trained.
#
But, you know, to be a really good writer, I don't think you can train that.
#
Prem Panikkar, who I mentioned a while back,
#
once lamented about journalism that as budgets are falling,
#
what is happening is that you have less and less journalists in the newsrooms,
#
having to churn out more and more stories in terms of, you know, per
#
capita output, as it were.
#
And the result is that a lot of news is like a mile wide and an inch deep.
#
And one of the dangers of that is that journalists have become genderless.
#
Right. And and I'm reminded of I mean, I mean, there are
#
two places I'm going with this.
#
One is this phenomenon known as Gelman amnesia.
#
Have you heard of it? No.
#
So Gelman amnesia is Murray Gelman, our famous physicist
#
that once pointed something out to Michael Crickton, who later called it
#
Gelman amnesia and wrote about it.
#
And it basically is that you read something in a newspaper
#
on a subject, you know, about deeply and you'll realize it's rubbish.
#
But you will trust it on every other subject.
#
That's so true. Even though they got your subject wrong.
#
And one reason for that, obviously, is that a newspaper, especially in India,
#
you know, where a journalist is expected to do one or two stories a day,
#
often in some newsrooms and the specialist beats are disappearing.
#
You could be doing like, you know, going from one subject to the other
#
that a journalist covering of any subject will be so incredibly shallow
#
that any specialist in the field will obviously know what the hell is this.
#
And I'm thinking that for you in a magazine,
#
it must have therefore been an advantage
#
that you don't have that kind of quantity pressure, right?
#
That you have to produce one, two stories a day.
#
So if you're doing a Harshad Mehta story, you can spend three weeks on it.
#
You can you can really crock the subject and understand the stock market.
#
And also, you know, in a newspaper, there is a lot of pressure
#
because you still have to fill that front page every single day.
#
Whereas in a magazine, you have it was a weekly magazine.
#
So it wasn't like a monthly.
#
So there was still some pressure.
#
I mean, we still pulled all nighters and stuff like that, putting it to bed.
#
But it wasn't like a newspaper newspaper in that sense.
#
And also, we were lucky because we had bureaus, you know,
#
who could report back to us and stuff now.
#
But I don't know, newspapers don't really have staff any longer.
#
There's hardly anybody on the desk.
#
There's hardly anybody in the bureaus.
#
Half of them are relying on PTI copy or, you know, that kind of thing.
#
So we were lucky because people put resources into reporting.
#
Like, I remember we used to have this lady who worked with us, Shiraz Siddva,
#
who used to cover Kashmir and stuff.
#
And I lost count of the number of times that we actually sent her to Kashmir to do stories.
#
It wasn't like we were relying on some stringer to just, you know,
#
file and copy and just do it.
#
And all of that took money.
#
And we were willing to spend that money, you know, to to do that.
#
Now, journalism just doesn't have that either they don't have the resources
#
or they don't have the will or they don't have the inclination.
#
I don't know what it is.
#
And also, I'm thinking that because of the way in which we consume information
#
and the way we consume news has changed,
#
something else has also changed in the way that it is presented to us.
#
For example, I remember in the 80s and 90s, I love reading Sunday.
#
I don't specifically remember reading your byline in those days,
#
but I would love to read those.
#
I thought they were so sharp and crisp and well written and insightful.
#
And what great editors tend to do, you know, whether it's
#
we're in Sunday or my friend Sambit Bal in Gentleman at one point in time
#
or perhaps Vinod Mehta and any of the places he was at at certain stints.
#
What great editors tend to be is also they tend to be great curators.
#
It is as if they are telling you this is what is important about the world.
#
I am presenting it to you in one package.
#
And that package is this magazine called Sunday
#
or this magazine called Gentleman or whatever it is.
#
And it's an invaluable function.
#
And and we would go out there and we would buy that package.
#
And we would know that, yeah, there is a sensibility and a perspective
#
that has shaped this package and we can trust it.
#
And I and I just realized I haven't probably bought a magazine in 10 to 15 years.
#
Yeah, you know, I consume everything online.
#
So I might read a piece in whatever Sunday's equivalent today would be.
#
But I would read a piece, you know, and the curators of today
#
are perhaps cultural curators, maybe in some way even me,
#
because people say that, you know, they'll follow all my guests
#
and they look at the show notes and all of that.
#
But the world is more complex than ever.
#
We are dazzled by the amount of data that's available out there.
#
And perhaps we look at influencers as a certain kind of curator.
#
Or we look at whatever we have made out of our Twitter feed as a kind of curation.
#
But I'm feeling that that role, in a sense, which a great editor would play.
#
And you've been an editor yourself as well.
#
You know, it's perhaps lost.
#
Yeah, I mean, it's probably probably overstating the case.
#
But there aren't that many great editors left, are there?
#
I mean, I can't think offhand of anybody.
#
You know, an editor also is in a sense a talent spotter.
#
You know, like you want to do something on the film industry.
#
You think of the best person who can do that piece and you hire that person,
#
you brief that person and you get the best piece out of that person.
#
Editor is not necessarily somebody who understands every single subject,
#
but knows what he wants out of out of it.
#
And I think that skill is lost, you know, that that skill
#
of just kind of spreading your net far and wide,
#
like if you're doing business reporting, going to the best possible person to get it.
#
If you're saying reviewing a book on politics,
#
finding the best possible person who has like, you know, domain knowledge
#
to actually write about that book, I think that is disappearing
#
because I don't see that anymore, really.
#
And I guess it's natural for that to disappear because that particular package
#
called A magazine or A whatever is disappearing itself.
#
So you might have individual talents striking out.
#
Like I remember the editor I was fortunate to work with in my early days, Sambit Bal.
#
One thing that amazed me about him, and he was, of course, in the world of features.
#
So kind of different world from you for a gentleman and then wisdom
#
and then trick and for where he still is.
#
And he was like a magnet for young talent.
#
And he would nurture them so beautifully.
#
You know, you see, that's the other thing.
#
An editor needs to have so much self-confidence.
#
But so many people these days feel threatened by younger people who are talented.
#
You know, but an editor needs to have that confidence
#
to be able to give the other person space.
#
Like, I find it so strange, you know, when when senior people want to hog bylines.
#
I mean, you should give bylines to younger people.
#
You know, they're the ones who are starting out.
#
They're the ones to whom it means so much.
#
I mean, I remember starting out and when I went and interviewed
#
Chandrasekhar, for instance, on his first day at SPM and Anand Bazar Patrika,
#
they translate, they asked me to file and they translated into Bengali
#
because I don't really write Bengali.
#
And I got a front page byline on Anand Bazar Patrika.
#
I still remember the thrill I felt, you know, as a young person,
#
even though I didn't I wasn't really a Bengali speaker or whatever.
#
And I couldn't really understand.
#
But it was a big deal for me.
#
Whereas when you're in your 50s or whatever, I mean, it's old hat, you know,
#
you don't really need a byline to prove anything to yourself.
#
You should give it to young people and let them enjoy that moment.
#
But very few people have the generosity of spirit to do it.
#
And the second part of my question about your learning process, one was, of course,
#
about writing and reporting, and you've spoken about how so much of that
#
was on the job being thrown into the thick of things, working with good people.
#
But the second part was really in a sense about the values that
#
how do I approach a story, you know, what are the areas to get into?
#
What are my ethics while I'm doing this?
#
Is there sort of a higher purpose?
#
Because I am constantly conflicted into different directions
#
when I think about journalism, that on the one hand,
#
I like to think of there being a set of values that are dear to me, that one,
#
of course, a pursuit of truth is above all else.
#
But whether you are sort of afflicting the comfort,
#
comfortable and comforting the afflicted or you're speaking truth to power,
#
any of those cliches that there is a sense that there is a higher calling,
#
that there is a sacredness that I cannot compromise.
#
Right. But at the same time, there is the understanding
#
that this is also a business venture.
#
And I consider business ventures to be entirely honorable.
#
The pursuit of profit is deeply honorable to me because the only way
#
you can make profit is by making someone else better off in a free market.
#
So I'm not sort of going on an anti-profit or anti-capitalist rant.
#
I am a committed capitalist.
#
And there, the imperative is that, look, you know, people have invested money.
#
At the end of the day, every publication or whatever has a responsibility
#
to its shareholders as well.
#
And that also becomes important.
#
And then that incentive or imperative can also shape
#
the kind of stories that you do.
#
And the waters get muddied where in India, for example,
#
pretty much every mainstream publication has other business interests.
#
No one is just a newspaper.
#
There could be a big newspaper,
#
but the owner of the newspaper could also own chemical factories
#
and the government could set the ED on them the next day.
#
So there are all those pressures to contend with.
#
So then as a journalist, what was your sense of values?
#
Like, what was the evolution of your sense of values?
#
Like, if you were to define, say, your duty as a journalist,
#
how do you define it? Is it a duty to a story or as an editor?
#
It's a much broader thing.
#
You're not only doing a story, you're choosing what to cover
#
and who to cover it with.
#
You know, like you said about newspapers having different interests,
#
I was very lucky that I worked for Anand Bazar Patrika
#
because they don't have any other businesses.
#
So they weren't the those the pressures that you talk about.
#
Oh, you know, I'm sure there were pressures.
#
I'm sure that people did put pressure on them,
#
but they were not so compromised in that sense.
#
And in all my years of working for Sunday and then for Telegraph,
#
I cannot remember a single instance when Avik Sarkar would call me up
#
and ask me, A, what story I was doing or two, not to do the story.
#
And there was never any story I filed that never got used
#
because he was scared of, you know, what the repercussions would be or whatever.
#
So I think I was very privileged in that sense.
#
Most people don't have that privilege.
#
They have all kinds of pressures operating on them,
#
which both you and I know what the pressures are.
#
So I was lucky in that sense that I didn't have that.
#
But I think when you're talking about principles of journalism,
#
I think your principal responsibility has to be to your reader.
#
I think it's not to the story.
#
It's not to the publication.
#
It has to be to your reader because you owe your reader the truth.
#
No matter what the story is, it could be the story about a design
#
collection or a fashion show, could be a story about a restaurant opening.
#
It could be a story about parliamentary proceedings.
#
It could be a story about the launch of a new car.
#
It doesn't matter what the story is.
#
I think what you owe your reader is the truth.
#
And if you can't give him the truth, then it's better
#
you not do the story at all, because it's no point doing a story
#
if you have to obfuscate about it.
#
I think that is the guiding principle, as far as I am concerned,
#
that if you can't tell the truth and don't do it, it's no point.
#
And as an editor, it's not just about telling the truth.
#
Let's say you can tell the truth about any story that you choose to tell,
#
but you have limited space and you choose a limited set of stories.
#
And the danger is that if you are constantly guided
#
by what the reader already wants or what you think he already wants
#
or what your market research indicates he already wants, then everybody's
#
in a race to the bottom in a sense.
#
Then you give Bollywood and cricket and all of that.
#
No, I don't think you give the reader what he wants.
#
You give the reader the truth, but it's not necessarily what he's asking for
#
because the reader will read what you give him.
#
Either you have to decide to shape your readership.
#
You can't just blindly give whatever, like if there are three magazines
#
in the market and two of them are doing the same kind of stories,
#
you don't necessarily have to be the third one doing the same kind of story.
#
You can do something different.
#
Maybe, maybe it will work.
#
But you have to have some confidence in your own judgment
#
that this is what is important.
#
You can't really, I mean, just rely on, like you said,
#
the lowest common denominator and do it.
#
Like if you were to do a Bollywood story, it would sell.
#
But you can't keep doing Bollywood stories every single time you do a cover story.
#
You have to kind of, you know, go beyond that.
#
I mean, that's, I think, one of the problems with the way
#
the fashion magazines function, for instance, no matter what happens,
#
there's a film star on the cover.
#
So, you know, I find it a bit strange.
#
So tell me about, you know, it's almost as if in your journalistic career,
#
you were before you could think you're thrown into the middle of things.
#
Then you get a story once in a while.
#
And then suddenly you're out doing political reporters.
#
You're meeting Vajpayee and taking in his long pauses.
#
You're meeting all of these.
#
So what was that journey like?
#
And as that journey happened,
#
what did you learn about the kind of work you wanted to do?
#
You know, the one thing I was always sure was I didn't want to just write about politics.
#
I wanted to write about more than politics, because beyond the point,
#
all political stories are a little bit the same.
#
I mean, there's not much to do about it.
#
And daily political reportage never excited me in the same way,
#
like, you know, going and attending a BJP press conference at the end,
#
up to in the days when there were BJP press conferences.
#
In the days when there were BJP press conferences every day,
#
up to there are no press conferences only.
#
But in the old days, there used to be this tradition of political parties
#
holding conferences for beat reporters.
#
And then they're coming back and writing it over.
#
I mean, that kind of writing was fine as a starting out point.
#
But it didn't excite me that much.
#
Like, I always wanted to do profiles on people.
#
I wanted to spend time with them, try and understand where they're coming from.
#
It could be politicians, it could be a film star,
#
it could be a business executive.
#
But I was interested by people journalism because I found that really interesting.
#
Like, I remember spending time with Uma Bharti
#
in the days when, you know, she was a very different person.
#
You know, she had just come into the limelight.
#
And I remember spending a couple of days with her in Delhi.
#
And she was such a bubbly and sweet person.
#
I remember one instance, particularly, I went and saw her in her flat,
#
somewhere around 3 Murti Road or somewhere.
#
And she saw me and she took me, she dragged me in front of the mirror and said,
#
see, we look like sisters.
#
As a journalist, you said, yeah, yeah, do everything to make sure that people think.
#
But did you look like sisters?
#
And then she showed me her doll collection.
#
I mean, would you think that Uma Bharti had a doll collection?
#
That's so endearing. That's such a lovely detail, actually.
#
Yeah. And then I went and travelled with her to Madhya Pradesh.
#
And I like doing stories like that when you could actually spend time with people.
#
And in Sunday, we still had long form journalism.
#
So you could do, like, you know, lengthy profiles, just, you know,
#
examining what people were like.
#
It's not that you have to put it in, like, 550 words and, you know, do it,
#
which is what it is now.
#
So I enjoyed doing things like that.
#
I did a lot of film journalism as well in those days.
#
That was the time that Anil Kapoor was emerging as the big hero.
#
And we did a whole cover story on whether he would take over from Amitabh Bachchan.
#
Of course, we all know how that turned out, but it was good fun.
#
I went and spent time on the sets of Tridev and I met all the producers and the distributors.
#
And so we did all these deep dives into subjects like that.
#
And I really and then during the general election, I remember the first general in 89,
#
the first one that I covered, we did a whole story on Maharajas on the campaign trail.
#
So we covered Bhavani Singh in Jaipur and we covered Pataudi in Bhopal and we covered Vasundhara Raje.
#
And so we did all these, you know, the royals on the on the campaign trail kind of story.
#
And Nitin Rai was a photographer in those days, Pragu Rai's son.
#
And Nitin and I were in this Khatara ambassador going from place to place and driving around, following these people around.
#
We spent like two weeks on the road researching the story.
#
So those were the stories that I really enjoyed doing and which I still think back to, you know, with some nostalgia.
#
But the normal bread and butter stories don't really live with you.
#
They are like something you do and then you forget about it and move on.
#
I mean, traveling in Khatara jeeps.
#
What was the best days of your life when you look back?
#
Yeah, maybe. I don't know.
#
I like to think the best days are yet to come.
#
Did you write about Mahavati songs?
#
I think I did. You know, the worst part of it is, you know, the Anand Bazaar library burned down, didn't you?
#
So there was this huge, while I was still working with Telegraph, one day I went to the office and the whole street was blocked off and the entire building was on fire.
#
And by fire, I mean, like proper, you know, flames bursting out.
#
So the entire library was destroyed and they had to somehow, you know, restore it digitally.
#
So I don't even know if those stories exist anymore because I never kept any clippings.
#
So I'll have to find out if they still exist.
#
But I remember doing the stories, so definitely.
#
That's a great tragedy. I wonder how much old Sundays would sell for.
#
I mean, I used to love your political coverage of this magazine.
#
I don't know how they would have restored it.
#
Maybe they went to other people and tried to get or whatever.
#
But it used to be a really good library, which had every clipping you wanted and really well done.
#
We used to have this really good librarian called Shakti Roy, who was to run it like a little dictator.
#
And it all went up in smoke, literally.
#
It's really distressing.
#
Something else I want to know about when you said that when you started right at the very start, you were the person that sent to the library to get a clip or whatever.
#
And I'm just thinking of like how I research for an episode today is I can really do it sitting on my computer.
#
I can read every book the person has written.
#
I can read every article they have written.
#
I can see all the YouTube interviews.
#
I can just do it all here, sitting here, one person, no assistant required.
#
And I can type everything myself.
#
And like everything is computer.
#
But I remember even back in the day, like when I was in advertising in the 90s, for example, or in television,
#
our technology was so outdated.
#
A laptop would seem such a glamorous thing to me from a distance.
#
Like I really wanted to own my own laptop.
#
It was such a dream in the 90s.
#
If you want to write and tell me a little bit about those sort of processes, like what would a typical day be like?
#
Because if you are being sent to interview someone, you do not have the Internet.
#
How do you even know what they look like?
#
How do you get hold of a book they have written?
#
So what was that process like?
#
In fact, when I started off in Sunday, we used to work on typewriters.
#
It was not even, we didn't even have those old fashioned,
#
it's only like two years into working into Sunday that we started getting into those little computers,
#
which used to work with that floppy disk.
#
That big black floppy disk.
#
And I actually learned typing on the job.
#
I didn't really know how to type or anything.
#
It was literally two fingers.
#
But, you know, the process was so different.
#
Like I remember in those days, like when I just joined Sunday, being sent off to interview PC Sarkar.
#
And as you said, there was no way to research it except for the library.
#
So you had to go to the library, look at old clips, maybe talk to a few people on the staff,
#
the older members who maybe had some memories of him or somebody who had seen a show or whatever.
#
And I remember going to interview him and I was made to sit in this waiting room while he was inside.
#
And he had this rope that was like literally horizontal.
#
And I don't know how it kept upright.
#
And I tried to figure it out.
#
I went close by and it was nothing was holding it up, but it stayed upright.
#
It was probably one magic trick of his or something.
#
And he was like the most amazing man.
#
But like you said, I had no context for him.
#
I hadn't even seen one of his shows.
#
So it's not like I went and saw a show after I interviewed him.
#
But we're very lucky now.
#
I don't know how we functioned in those days.
#
Like even when it came to political reporting, like if I interviewed Uma Bharti or whatever,
#
I had no context for her.
#
I had to talk to other people in the BJP to get some inputs on her.
#
Then we used to have a sister publication called Ravi Var, which was a Hindi publication.
#
So they had a lot of reporters from Madhya Pradesh or Uttar Pradesh or whatever.
#
So if you were interviewing somebody from that milieu, you went and chatted with them.
#
Rajiv Shukla used to be a big resource for us in those days.
#
He used to work for Ravi Var and then started writing for Sunday.
#
And he was very clued in this whole Hindi-built universe.
#
So anytime we wanted information, you would call him up and there were no mobile phones.
#
So you had to call up the office and then you had to find out when Rajiv would be there.
#
Then he would wander into the office and if he felt like it, he would call you back.
#
And if he didn't, he wouldn't.
#
So it was tough actually, the kind of stuff that we had to do, the kind of running around.
#
And for every story you did, you had to interview at least five or six ancillary people to just
#
And we never did those interviews on the phone either, we always went and met people.
#
And I can imagine the pros and the cons.
#
And the cons of course are that it's much easier to get much more dope today.
#
So today if I interview someone, I have much more knowledge about them than I could possibly have.
#
But the pros of doing it in that old school way is that you are much more engaged in the
#
research work that you are putting in.
#
You're having conversations with people about those people, you're kind of doing all of
#
And I wonder if an analogue to that is a process of writing itself.
#
Something my students will often tell me is, how should I write?
#
Should I do it on the computer?
#
Or should I do it by hand?
#
And I just think that like number one, the obvious answer that comes to me is that words
#
are words, whatever you're comfortable with.
#
But if you think a little deeper, there is a difference that when I'm writing into a
#
physical notepad with a pen, because it is slower, I am forced to be a little more deliberate
#
and deliberative and to think harder about what I am doing.
#
And if I look at the transitional phase where you're doing it into a physical typewriter,
#
which I have used for a very brief while, there is no backspace in whatever.
#
You have to do a full page all over again.
#
So you really need to have that certainty about your words and your thinking, whereas
#
on the computer, I can do whatever I know there's a backspace and all of that.
#
And how have your habits evolved?
#
And do you feel it's kind of changed in the way that you work and perhaps the way that
#
You know, it's strange you should say that because when I started out writing, I could
#
Even if I had to write a story, I would write it longhand and then I would type it on my
#
But over the years, I find that I find it more easy writing on a laptop.
#
I just somehow that discipline of writing by hand, I seem to have lost.
#
Now when I try to write by hand, either my handwriting goes awry or I miss out on words
#
or you know, something like that.
#
Because if I write on the computer, thoughts come more easily to me.
#
I think I made that transition in my head.
#
Like for instance, now, even when it comes to reading news stories, like I would much
#
rather read the New York Times on my phone than read the HD in a print edition.
#
I just find it much easier.
#
I recorded yesterday with a philosopher, writer, triathlete called Akash Singh Rathore.
#
He told me about this Norwegian writer who's a friend of his called Torkel Brekker.
#
He came across I think Brekker's sixth book or seventh book called Foundations.
#
He thought, hey, I've read everything by this guy, but the prose is so different.
#
What the hell happened?
#
The sentences are shorter, it's just full of life, there's momentum, everything is charging
#
So he sent an email to Torkel saying, you know, what's the deal?
#
His friend sends him back a photograph, which is of a treadmill desk.
#
So he has a treadmill and he's attached to a desk at the end of it.
#
And he's literally typing while walking.
#
And that's changed his entire...
#
And that's changed his style.
#
And I'm presuming that that change between his walking and the language must also have
#
changed in his brain and the way he's thinking.
#
I don't think I could do that.
#
I can't walk and write at the same time, no.
#
I have to concentrate on the writing.
#
So I have a sit-stand desk at home, but I don't use it to stand.
#
It's one of those automatic things.
#
You press a button, it goes all the way, but I don't use it to actually stand and write.
#
What I use it for in my lazy Bengali way is that I will sit in different angles of slouch
#
and I will adjust it to the angle of slouch.
#
On that note of slouching, let's take a quick commercial break and let's continue at the
#
Hey, the music started and this sounds like a commercial, but it isn't.
#
It's a plea from me to check out my latest Labour of Love, a YouTube show I am co-hosting
#
with my good friend, the brilliant Ajay Shah.
#
We've called it Everything is Everything.
#
Every week, we'll speak for about an hour on things we care about, from the profound
#
to the profane, from the exalted to the everyday.
#
We range widely across subjects and we bring multiple frames with which we try to understand
#
Please join us on our journey and please support us by subscribing to our YouTube channel at
#
youtube.com slash amitvarma, A-M-I-T-V-A-R-M-A.
#
The show is called Everything is Everything.
#
Please do check it out.
#
Welcome back to The Scene and the Unseen.
#
I'm chatting with Seema Goswami, who's just delighting me with her extreme candour.
#
And, you know, in the break, we were talking about how long we want to live and I was telling
#
you that, you know, there are friends of mine who, inspired by the likes of David Sinclair
#
and Peter Attia, keep telling me that, hey, we will have, we will live till 120.
#
And my initial reaction would be, I do not want that.
#
I don't want that at all.
#
Then, you know, one concept they keep coming up with is, like, there's a term lifespan.
#
Now, I heard this recent interview of Peter Attia, I think it's either on the Shane Parrish
#
show or one of these podcasts, I'll link it from the show notes, where he introduced
#
me to the term healthspan.
#
Yeah, I heard of that, yeah.
#
Healthspan is how long you're healthy.
#
And my scene is, I don't really care about the lifespan bit, because I don't want like
#
But the healthspan thing I can live with, though, having said that every once in a while
#
in my morose way, I'll wonder, why not live, why, what is it, you know, finish this drama.
#
But as, you know, I'm almost 50 and you're in your 50s and, you know, reaching here,
#
how has the way you look at time sort of changed?
#
Because I remember when I was 20, 40 seemed almost old to me.
#
I wanted immediate gratification.
#
I wanted to be world famous by 25, Booker Prize by 28, all of that rubbish.
#
And of course, part of sort of maturing and adulting, you kind of realize that A, a lot
#
of your dreams are not going to come true, but B, a lot of them were the wrong dreams
#
And you kind of adjust the way you think about the world, but also the way you think about
#
Like, right now, I am further away from my birth than my birth was from, say, the Second
#
And, you know, earlier, we would read about something that happened a hundred years ago
#
and it would seem like incredibly distant.
#
But suddenly you're at 50.
#
It feels like decades have just passed.
#
A friend of mine likes to say that the days are long, but the years are short.
#
And how has the way that you look at yourself through this prism of time kind of changed?
#
Like, you know, the youthful you would have visualized one kind of life for yourself.
#
Like, what was that like?
#
You know, it's funny you say that because I was just watching a TV show the other day,
#
which was set in the 1970s.
#
And I was thinking how strange it is to have a period show of a period I actually lived
#
You know, because in my mind, period shows are about the 1920s and 1930s or whatever.
#
But this was a period show of the 1970s.
#
And sometimes even the 80s, in which I was already like in class 10 or whatever.
#
But, you know, when growing up, how I visualized my life, to be honest, I had very little clue
#
of what my life was going to be like when I was 50 or whatever.
#
I never really thought about it.
#
I really, I actually lived for the moment, you know, I never even thought about, like,
#
I should save money and I should keep this aside, you know, in case I grow old or whatever.
#
I never thought of that.
#
It was really a sort of a hedonistic existence where you just wanted to enjoy yourself.
#
You wanted to go out with friends, go on holiday, have fun or whatever.
#
But as I've grown older, I think time has kind of both slowed down and sped up in some ways.
#
Like, for instance, during the lockdown, it was like almost two years of complete solitary,
#
a solitary experience, just sitting at home and doing nothing.
#
And time kind of expanded in that period.
#
Every day seemed so long.
#
You didn't know what to do with it.
#
But in a sense, it was also great for me because I could concentrate on stuff.
#
You know, I could concentrate on my writing.
#
I could, there weren't too many distractions or whatever.
#
And ever since we've come out of lockdown, I feel like I'm trying very hard to make up a lost time.
#
Like, you know, I didn't travel during that period.
#
So now I'm traveling almost every month.
#
I try and make a trip to kind of make up for it.
#
And as you grow older, like I'm in my 50s and I keep thinking,
#
oh my God, there's so much of the world I haven't seen.
#
I better do it in the next 10 years because after that, God knows, I'm going to be in a wheelchair or something.
#
But, you know, it's true because, you know, the older you grow, your energy levels go down.
#
And you, for instance, when you're young, you can do like two day trips and you can just do everything
#
in those two days and come back and rejoin work and you're fine.
#
But when you're older, you want one day to relax and one day to do stuff.
#
And then you come back from holiday, you want one day to recover.
#
So things change, you know, so like I said, time both speeds up and slows down for you as you grow older.
#
So it is different. And you also have the sense of time running out on you.
#
You feel, OK, like at the moment, I'm working on a spy novel, which I should finish by the end of the year, hopefully.
#
And I keep feeling, OK, like it'll come out next year.
#
And then I have these two years to do another book.
#
And how many books can I realistically do after that before my mind gives up on me?
#
So you have those fears, you know, that you fear that your mind will slow down, words don't come as easily.
#
And, you know, your imagination probably won't be as vivid as it was when you were young.
#
So you have all these fears as you grow older.
#
You wrote this beautiful column on Covid, you know, the ways in which they were good for you.
#
And, you know, the potted version of that is that one, you liked how your world shrank down to your core groups,
#
so casual acquaintances, distant family members out of the window.
#
It's, you know, the people you really care about.
#
And then when you're locked up in your homes, you have unlimited time to yourself,
#
where a lot of outside distractions aren't there and you can just spend time with yourself.
#
You spoke about how you love going for walks in parks.
#
And that was great during the lockdown.
#
There was nobody around.
#
There was nobody around.
#
And, you know, the charm of the road trip and, of course, the air you got to breathe in Delhi,
#
which is not something you can do anything about.
#
But all the other stuff was interesting to me because it was almost like this really weird circumstance,
#
which no one could have predicted the circumstance of Covid and lockdowns,
#
suddenly got you and I think a lot of people, including perhaps me to some extent,
#
closer to, you know, discovering what was important for them,
#
what was working for them, what was not working for them.
#
And so I'll ask you a hypothetical question, which sometimes can do that.
#
It's like my favorite party question.
#
So people who heard it before kindly excuse.
#
But it's a two part question, starting with one scenario.
#
A comet is heading towards planet Earth.
#
It is going to hit the Earth.
#
We are all going to die.
#
This is a given. There is scientific consensus.
#
Everybody will cease to exist.
#
So now there are two parts to the question.
#
Part one is if you have 24 hours to live, what would you do in those 24 hours?
#
OK, what would I do in those 24 hours?
#
So I know I'm going to die, right?
#
Everybody's going to die.
#
And everybody knows it. And there's nothing that can be done.
#
Gosh, I think I may just go to bed.
#
I don't think I'll be able to do anything.
#
I'll be paralyzed by the thought of impending doom.
#
No, I'll ask you first. I'll tell you my answers later.
#
OK, I really don't know what I would do.
#
Assume you can click out of this paralysis and you have 24 hours.
#
Assume I can click out of the paralysis.
#
I'll probably take my husband and go for a walk in Sundar nursery
#
and look at all the nice plants,
#
Then have a nice meal, maybe.
#
I mean, basically speak to my family.
#
24 months. My gosh, that's a long time.
#
That's the second question. If you're 24 months, what will you do?
#
If I knew a comment is coming in 24 months.
#
But sharp, the date is decided.
#
There's nothing. I would spend all my money.
#
I would travel around the world.
#
I'll go to all the places I've not been to.
#
And what if the comment doesn't come and I'm broke at the end of it and alive?
#
No, the comment is coming.
#
OK, so that's what I'll do.
#
I'll travel across the world.
#
Me and my husband go to all the places we've not been to.
#
Have the best of meals, drink champagne.
#
At what point does your 24 month plan become your 24 hour plan?
#
And the final question, what's what's in your case?
#
You're probably living this life now.
#
But what stops you from doing it now is the way I end the series of questions.
#
What stops you from doing it now?
#
So does my husband. So we can't really take off.
#
And I'm guessing you go for walks in Sundar nursery.
#
Anyway, yeah, though not with him so often, mostly on my own.
#
He comes very, very rarely.
#
But yeah, you're right.
#
Nothing is stopping me from doing it.
#
Except I can't do it all the time.
#
But if I had one year, then that's all I would do.
#
Because, yeah, I was thinking about, you know, what you mentioned
#
about how Covid sort of concentrated your mind to, you know, what was important.
#
And there's another beautiful column where you've written about the flowers
#
of Tokyo and you have this para where you write,
#
I remember coming back to India and writing a column bemoaning the fact
#
that while we have plenty of flowering trees in India,
#
Amal Taz, Sapthaparani, Tehsu, Palash to name just a few, which are just as pretty.
#
We don't seem to make much of them.
#
We didn't take time off to sit in parks or simply by the side of the road
#
to admire their beauty, stop quote.
#
And you mentioned also that in the 24 hour scenario,
#
when you went for a walk with your husband in the nursery,
#
you would look at the plants and you would look at the flowers.
#
Yeah. And I'm just thinking that what happens through life,
#
what has certainly happened to me is that we grow much less mindful
#
that we could be eating a meal that we really wanted to eat.
#
But after the first couple of bites, we are lost in our own head.
#
We're not really tasting it.
#
You know, I'm tasting it. You're tasting it.
#
Oh, yeah. So I see food is very important to me.
#
Also, I come to food, but my larger question before food,
#
That is that something that you have had to be intentional about?
#
Because typically what happens is that everything is normalized.
#
We are surrounded by beauty.
#
We are surrounded by wonder.
#
And we don't really, you know, it just becomes part of the background.
#
And at least in my case, I have to keep reminding myself that Amit, you fool,
#
just snap out of that, you know, your internal monologue
#
and notice all these things around you.
#
What is your journey been towards sort of?
#
You know, it's interesting you say that because I remember going to Venice
#
and being blown away by the beauty.
#
And I often I thought to myself that people who live here all the time,
#
do they actually appreciate it that much or does it just become part
#
of the normal scenery, you know, when you're surrounded by it all the time?
#
Does it still seem special to you?
#
But I find with me, it does still seem special.
#
Like sometimes you're just driving around like I drove down to your studio.
#
And I passed Masjid more.
#
And then suddenly this old mosque came up out of nowhere.
#
And it's just by the side of the road.
#
No fanfare, no tourists, no nothing or whatever.
#
So just driving through Delhi, if you just look up from your phone or whatever,
#
you'll see Safdarjung storm on one side, you'll see these beautiful trees,
#
tree lined avenues on the other.
#
If you're walking towards Nehru Park, you'll see this beautiful,
#
you know, greenery or whatever.
#
I find I still appreciate that because
#
for me, I count myself very lucky to live in this city
#
because there are so many wonderful things that you can do for no money at all.
#
You know, there's you don't have to spend a truckload of money to go to Lodi Garden.
#
It's not even like Sunda nursery where you have to pay an entrance fee or whatever,
#
which is like 40 rupees or something.
#
But you can just go there, sit there, maybe listen to music, maybe read a book.
#
I do that often, you know, in the winter, I just take a book along
#
and I can sit there and just, you know, look around at the trees
#
and listen to the birds and look at the things.
#
And I find that if you open yourself up,
#
there is beauty almost everywhere you look in the city.
#
It's just that people complain so much about Delhi, you know,
#
that traffic is like this and the people are bad and go ahead and all that.
#
But if you really want to appreciate where you live,
#
you just have to appreciate what is around you.
#
Let's talk about food now, because as you said, you always sort of mindful about food
#
and about food, my thing again is that I certainly find myself
#
like every minute of a meal, I'm not focused on it.
#
It might have been something I crave, something that I wanted.
#
I might think about it in between, but 90 percent of the time
#
I'm eating something, I'm not really thinking about it.
#
And that is as someone who is eating food.
#
And in your case, you've also written about food.
#
And of course, you're with Weir, so he's writing about food all the time.
#
That's a whole game. And does that so incredibly well.
#
And I guess his writing about food would increase his sort of conscious
#
appreciation of nuances, which would be missing for someone like me.
#
Right. And equally for you, therefore, you know, there is
#
there would be an intentionality in the kind of food that you eat, that you taste.
#
So it's not just an exotic dish.
#
And you're thinking about the taste, you're thinking about other stuff
#
associated with it, you know, whether it's cultural or social
#
or these ingredients are so great and et cetera, et cetera.
#
Tell me a little bit about your relationship with food.
#
Like, is this is your love for food one of the things that kind of
#
you and Weir happen to have in common?
#
You know, when we met, he wasn't really into food writing.
#
I mean, he used to do the occasional food writing,
#
but he didn't do like a weekly column or whatever when when he was in Sunday.
#
In fact, he used to do food writing before he joined Sunday
#
when he was with Imprint and he used to write for independent.
#
Was it independent or what was that Bombay newspaper?
#
I've forgotten the name now.
#
There was one called independent. I don't know.
#
Which one was the one that Vinod Mehta used to do?
#
Independent as far as I remember.
#
There was Indian Post also.
#
Maybe it was Indian Post. I can't remember.
#
So I don't think we bonded over food or anything like that
#
because food was not that important.
#
But when I say food is important to me, I don't mean in terms of going
#
to expensive restaurants or eating exotic food or whatever.
#
But it's very important to me that every meal should be a good meal.
#
It doesn't have to be something exotic or whatever.
#
Like I can make a very simple dal,
#
but it has to be a right dal.
#
Like it has to taste right.
#
I can just make a simple khichdi or whatever at home.
#
But every meal has to be good.
#
Like if a meal that I eat is not good,
#
it puts me in a bad mood for the rest of the day.
#
I'm like that was a wasted opportunity.
#
I could have had a good meal.
#
So food is important to me in that sense.
#
It's not like, you know, I want to eat, you know, something very like
#
I have sushi or, you know, whatever, something very exotic every day.
#
I'm very happy eating dal chawal.
#
But that dal chawal has to be made to a certain standard
#
and it has to be something that appeals to me, which is what I mean by food.
#
And I can appreciate just having dal chawal with a little achar and a little papad.
#
I'm very happy with that.
#
I'm more happy with that than if you give me a substandard fish and chips,
#
you know, which is soggy and, you know, whatever.
#
So to that extent, food is important to me and I enjoy cooking.
#
I like making food like, you know, meals.
#
I like experimenting with food.
#
I love watching food shows to get inspiration.
#
Like I like watching Nigella and Jamie Oliver
#
because they do simple, easy to make recipes.
#
I hate watching things like MasterChef where they made food so complicated
#
and it becomes very toxic, the kind of, you know, pressure and the tension
#
and the stress, I think that kind of destroys your joy in food.
#
I hate watching shows like that.
#
It should never be competitive.
#
Cooking is one of those beautiful things, one of the joys of life.
#
So to that extent, I'm very conscious of food.
#
I'm not into food in the sense that my husband is.
#
Like Veer is into food in a far more cerebral sense.
#
Like, you know, he wants to get into things like, you know,
#
where ingredients come from, how they interact.
#
And he's also interested in chefs and the various ways that cooking has evolved.
#
Yeah, he's a he's fully on.
#
I'm not interested in that.
#
I'm only interested in what I'm eating and what I'm eating should be good.
#
That's like the extent of my interest in food.
#
But that said, he doesn't get upset by bad meals as much as I do.
#
So I was for a few years, I was a professional poker player
#
and I used to spend a lot of time in Macau.
#
I didn't know this. Yeah, yeah.
#
It's the only game where you're not playing against a house.
#
So for about five years, that's how I make any money.
#
Yeah, I mean, that's why I played it.
#
But I thought I'll make a few money.
#
I didn't make a few money.
#
I made more than I would make through writing.
#
And then at one point, the lifestyle was just corrosive.
#
I used to write a column on poker for the Economic Times.
#
And in the 42nd and last edition, the headline was why I loved and left poker.
#
So I'll link that from the show notes.
#
And I used to spend some time in Macau where I'd go to play some time.
#
So once I was there with a contingent of fellow Indian players,
#
this would have been 2014 types.
#
And I loved the food in Macau because it's very interesting that one,
#
of course, there is a Chinese, but it was also a Portuguese colony.
#
So there are certain aspects of the food which are similar
#
in some interesting ways to Goa.
#
So there's just a lot to explore in the local food out there.
#
And all my Indian buddies would be like Indian food chaiye, Indian food chaiye.
#
So there was one day where we had an evening flight
#
from Hong Kong back to Bombay and we had to go to the Macau Ferry Terminus.
#
And there was a ferry to the airport.
#
So we had to go to the ferry terminus in the morning at about,
#
I think, 11, 30, 12 or whatever.
#
And then the flight was in the evening.
#
And this bunch of guys with me said, Indian food chaiye, Indian food chaiye.
#
I said, boys, you know, we will be in India tonight.
#
Kindly wait till we get back.
#
Let us grab the quickest meal we can.
#
And eating Indian would mean going to one particular place.
#
But they insisted they were so homesick.
#
And eventually we missed the flight because a ferry terminal said
#
that to catch the five p.m. flight, you have to take the 12 o'clock ferry.
#
Nothing after that. Some shit like that.
#
You missed the flight. We missed the flight.
#
But the point I'm getting at is a point that you've also pointed out
#
in your columns with great and justified irritation,
#
that why do so many Indians when they go out,
#
they just want to eat Indian food instead of enjoying
#
what is available, which is out there.
#
And I am a little empathetic towards them because, you know, in
#
in many areas of my own life, I don't want to experiment.
#
Like I don't want to spend a lot of time listening to a lot of new music.
#
For example, I have my comfort music, which I like.
#
So I can understand if some people are like that about food.
#
I make it a point to kind of always eat only what is,
#
you know, locally available in a particular place.
#
So I kind of love to geek out on that as well.
#
But I've realized that it is an intentional act
#
and it is an act that takes a certain amount of determination
#
because a lot of food that we might find in some countries
#
just don't go with our taste buds.
#
Initially, they are strange to us.
#
We have to almost through an act of will force ourselves to be open
#
and say that, no, you know, let me not eat something that is familiar.
#
Let me not go to a McDonald's or some Indian place.
#
Let me try all of this.
#
Is it something like that with you?
#
Because your love for travel and food kind of, again, seem to go hand in hand.
#
You know, I think I think you should be open to.
#
It's not necessary that you will like everything you try.
#
It's possible you'll hate it.
#
But how would you know that you don't like it unless you try it?
#
Like what I object to is people not even making the effort to try something.
#
Like if you have the opportunity and you're lucky enough
#
and not everybody is lucky enough to be able to travel abroad.
#
It's a huge privilege that you're able to afford to do that.
#
So you're going to a country like, say, Peru or say, you know, some even Paris.
#
And if you don't want to even try something like a croque monsieur or a ceviche,
#
maybe you will. Maybe you like it.
#
But the point is, you're not probably going to go back to that country ever again.
#
You're probably making one trip.
#
So why not open yourself to every possibility?
#
There are times when I've tried things like we went to Chengdu in China
#
and we tried actual Chinese food in Chengdu,
#
which is very different from the Chinese food you get in the rest of India.
#
I mean, there were some things that I hated.
#
I mean, I would take one bite off and I just don't have the taste for it.
#
I'm not going to eat it.
#
Sometimes you find them a bit gelatinous.
#
Sometimes you just don't like the taste of it.
#
But then there are like out of the 10 things you order,
#
there will be like three things that you really enjoy.
#
And you probably will never ever get a chance to eat it again.
#
So you have to open yourself up to the possibility.
#
But I take your point about Indian food.
#
I mean, after spending about like we went to Japan recently
#
and initially I was very excited and we were eating Japanese food and everything.
#
And then after like about four or five days, I started missing
#
the hint of spice and you don't get Indian food there really.
#
So we went and had a Chinese meal because, you know, you want that spicy hit
#
because you're so used to it.
#
So I take that point that, you know, people are used to a certain level of spice.
#
And even me, like if I spend like a week or 10 days abroad,
#
I call up home and I ask my housekeeper, I said, OK,
#
make some khichdi for me and keep it and come and eat that
#
or make some dal chawal for me.
#
So the food you grow up with is the food that is your comfort food,
#
which is something you will always miss.
#
But if you are going abroad and if you're making the effort,
#
you should at least understand the food culture of a place, what people eat.
#
I'm not saying that you have to enjoy it or it has to become
#
your favorite meal from then on.
#
The point is, you you have to at least try it.
#
And it's not just abroad.
#
I think you can travel within the country and the diversity is so incredible.
#
Huge. Like I did a food trip a few years back with, you know, about 10 friends of mine.
#
We took a bus and we did a Mysore, Mangalore kind of thing.
#
And like even within Mysore, within a two square kilometer radius,
#
you can get like four different kinds of biryani.
#
And there are so many different cuisines there, which are authentic to that place,
#
which have their history from that place and have evolved simultaneously.
#
And it's absolute madness to say that you only want a particular kind of food,
#
that you only want to have, you know, your chicken masala or mutter paneer.
#
If you're, you know, but that's the problem in India,
#
that wherever you go, you basically get chana bhaturas and dal makhani wherever you go.
#
It's very hard to find regional food that's, you know, available anywhere.
#
What are the most delightful dishes you've eaten while traveling,
#
which have just really taken you by surprise and been like, wow, there's so many.
#
I can't even see when you ask me questions like that, I go blank.
#
Well, OK, recently you wrote about how much you love Bangkok in some column I wrote of yours.
#
And that's my favorite food city in the world.
#
I love just eating like at very ordinary, I don't know what a fancy restaurants,
#
like very small places.
#
I love the krapao they do.
#
There's one particular place which does pork lab balls,
#
which are like deep fried and served with cucumber slices.
#
Bangkok, you can't eat badly.
#
No matter where you go, the food is so good.
#
And are there any surprising dishes which have blown you like?
#
I remember when I went to Athens last year, just walking through the streets,
#
we were extremely tired.
#
So we didn't really go to some fancy restaurant.
#
We just saw some roadside place and we went in there and I ordered something
#
something called a wheel krithiraki.
#
And a krithiraki is a kind of pasta that looks just like rice.
#
So if you didn't know better, you'd think it was rice.
#
And it was just the most exquisite thing that I have had.
#
And later on, I went to reviews of the place online
#
and there were people saying, oh, it's the best meal I've had in Europe.
#
And it is this and it is that.
#
Yeah, I've never been to Athens.
#
We just found it by accident.
#
No, in general, I would say the food is not so mind blowing there.
#
But this particular place, a sheer luck just chanced upon it and it was great.
#
So those are the best kind of meals, actually.
#
Like, you know, when we went to went to Sicily for my last birthday
#
and we went to we were staying in Tarvina.
#
So we went to a little village nearby.
#
And up on the hilltop, there was this tiny little restaurant
#
and they did the most amazing pastas for us.
#
And they were so unexpectedly good, you know, because it's a tiny little place
#
and you don't expect something great, but it was just so good.
#
And that's the unexpected nature of it is what makes it so so amazing.
#
Because if you go to a Michelin star restaurant
#
and they give you this fancy food, OK, you're expecting it.
#
So you're not really blown away by it as such,
#
because that's something you feel that is part of the experience or whatever.
#
But you go to a small little tiny little place like this time
#
we went to Siam Paragon and one more restaurant.
#
We ordered some Thai food and the quality was just so good that,
#
you know, you were just blown away by it that you can just go to
#
in a little, you know, dhaba type place basically and get good food,
#
which is quite amazing.
#
Yeah, remember in Bangkok in some random mall,
#
you know, outside in a little stall,
#
we had some sushi and I just thought that this is better
#
than any five star sushi I've had in India, it's just mind blowing.
#
Yeah, that's unexpectedness of something is always something that always throws you.
#
Like sometimes you can just go and by the roadside
#
have a really nice hot dog with a relish and it it just is just amazing.
#
Or like a dosa at a roadside place.
#
What's your approach to traveling?
#
Because, you know, there is a classic distinction made between tourists
#
and travelers, you know, tourists are just ticking boxes.
#
Had this experience, had that experience.
#
Travelers typically, you know, more immersive, kind of soaking it up
#
What's been your approach towards traveling?
#
What are the cities you've been most surprised by and why?
#
You know, I'm essentially a creature of habit.
#
I like going back to the same places.
#
That said, I'm changing a bit now, because as I told you,
#
I feel time is running out and I should see parts of the world
#
that I've not seen before, but there was a period in my life
#
that no matter whenever I had time off, I would go to London
#
because it was the one place that I really loved, either London or Bangkok.
#
I mean, that's like one of the two favorite cities of mine in the world.
#
I've discovered a new found love for Italy because
#
I just find the place so amazing.
#
You know, I don't really mean the bigger cities.
#
I mean, the smaller centers, you know, just traveling around
#
in the countryside, just stopping by, going to a little rustic place
#
and having food or whatever.
#
So now I try and do Italy about twice a year
#
because I want to spend the rest of my life just exploring
#
So I'm quite excited about that.
#
But whether I'm a tourist or a traveler, I don't know.
#
I don't think I'm a traveler.
#
But I don't feel like a tourist in London or Bangkok
#
because they are like almost like cities I know so well.
#
Like I have my specific places where I go to.
#
I have friends now who I meet.
#
So it's almost like a home away from home, you know,
#
because you spend so much time there.
#
But yeah, in Italy, I'm definitely a tourist.
#
You know, as as a young person,
#
I was exposed very early on to a lot of world cinema.
#
And one of my favorite filmmakers was Fellini.
#
And I would watch my favorite Fellini film is Ivo Taloni,
#
one of his young younger coming of age films.
#
But I remember while watching Amar Kod,
#
which I think is a film he made in 1975.
#
And and I just thought that, hey, you know, these Italian families.
#
And of course, I hadn't been to Italy then.
#
And it's still one European country I haven't yet visited.
#
But I at that time, I thought that, hey, you know,
#
these Italian families with their exuberance and shows of emotion
#
and all of that are just like all the Bengali families.
#
So do you feel there's something there?
#
100 percent. I think Italians are very like Indians.
#
You know, they have you said they're very into family.
#
They're very affectionate.
#
They're very exuberant. They love food.
#
And like, it's hard to go to a Italian's house
#
and not being fed to bursting point, you know, like it is in India.
#
They want to feed you or whatever.
#
So I think there are a lot of similarities between the two of them.
#
But the Italians are much more elegant than us.
#
They have a certain inborn elegance, like even the poorest person
#
will dress with such flair and, you know, amazing colors
#
and beautiful designs and stuff.
#
And they spend a lot of their time, you know, in Italian, there's this phrase
#
that you have to cut a good figure, like a bella figura.
#
You have to be like you have to present the best version of yourself to the world.
#
So even if you don't have money or whatever, you still have to,
#
you know, present yourself well, which I think is a fabulous concept.
#
Indeed, it is. And it's not just about appearance.
#
Your house has to be, you know, look nice, elegant.
#
The food must be presented in an elegant way, which is a good way to live.
#
Do Indian men have a problem with the way they present themselves
#
or even with the very notion of self-love, which is implicit in this?
#
Indian men, I don't want to say anything about Indian men.
#
You want me to be trolled on Twitter?
#
Twitter, people don't listen to this fourth hour of the podcast
#
where they're going to troll you. So don't worry about it.
#
Indian men don't dress very well, do they?
#
You know, you probably observe this much more closely.
#
So, yeah, but it's changing, I think.
#
I think the younger generation is more more into looking good and,
#
you know, wearing, see, by dressing well, I don't necessarily mean
#
wearing designer clothes or something, but just taking a little bit
#
of pride in the way you look, you know, it's not there.
#
It's not ingrained in Indian men so much.
#
And somehow Indian men also even, they wear too tight clothes, no?
#
Part of that is really majburi.
#
I had the great food writer Pushpesh Pant on my show.
#
And Pushpeshji and I had the same sort of lament,
#
which is that if you have a certain kind of potbelly at a certain age,
#
it's very hard to find clothes that fit you.
#
So I don't understand, OK, you have a potbelly, wear a kurta, no?
#
That's what I said to Pushpeshji, and he agreed with me
#
that even finding a kurta that fits these days is really hard.
#
You have to take that much effort. You should get it in ready-made.
#
Hey, the Fab India does very good.
#
No, no, but now even a lot of the kurta's you find are slim fit and all that.
#
They fit my shoulder, bulge in the middle.
#
And of course, I am on an extreme weight loss program,
#
so I will be very dapper and well-dressed in a while.
#
See, I don't like for instance, I don't think it's important
#
that you have to be thin to be dressed well.
#
There are all the styles that will look good on you.
#
True, but Pushpeshji would disagree very vociferously with that.
#
He's not fat, is he? He's quite thin.
#
Well, I mean, I'm not going to comment on Pushpeshji's bulk or lack thereof.
#
But I met him about a year ago in Calcutta.
#
He was there at some literary festival where I saw him.
#
Ask him about pyjamas sometimes and every tailor he goes to now says,
#
pocket kahan daalu? And he's like,
#
pyjama mein pocket hota hai kya baat kar rahe ho?
#
But it's convenient to have a pocket in a pyjama, yeah?
#
Yes, but Pushpeshji would argue that, you know,
#
we have so many different kinds of pyjamas and, you know,
#
Aligari pyjama, this pyjama, that pyjama, and you're all homogenizing it
#
to in a certain way for function.
#
And I guess this is sort of a lament that anyone who loves food
#
may also feel that Vikram Doctor, the food writer, was on my show a long time ago.
#
And Vikram had this lament about the Cavendish banana,
#
which was a banana that was exported from India to the US and all that.
#
And it's very suited to economies of scale. It lasts a long time.
#
So there it became the dominant banana.
#
And then they exported it back to India.
#
And here it is replacing a lot of indigenous banana forms which are dying out
#
because the Cavendish banana just makes life easier.
#
Yeah, it just makes life so much easier.
#
And the lament then was that, you know, things get homogenized in that way.
#
Pushpeshji's lament was a similar lament about food that wherever
#
you go to a wedding now, anywhere in India, you love the same bloody Punjabi food.
#
That's true. All of that.
#
That is true. I think Punjabi food has kind of taken over the whole,
#
you know, universe. It's quite strange, actually.
#
And Bengali food has been left behind, whereas actually Bengali food
#
I mean, all our local cuisines are quite...
#
But you know, I think it's changing.
#
Like even in London, there's this new restaurant that's opened.
#
I think it's called Chaurangi or something, which is doing Bengali food.
#
Then in New York, there are these there's this guy called Ronnie Mozumdar
#
and Chintan Pandya, who started this restaurant called Thamaka.
#
And they've started another restaurant called Sema,
#
which does South Indian food, Tamil food.
#
And they're not terribly expensive or anything, but really super hard to get into
#
because they're quite small.
#
And the food is amazing.
#
I mean, so regional cuisine is coming up.
#
But I think at the quality level, I think people still go
#
with the dal makhanis and the butter chickens and all of that.
#
And that's going to take time to be phased out because people like it.
#
Yeah. And I'm actually OK if they're there as long as...
#
Other things also come.
#
Yeah, as long as the long tail is healthy,
#
which I actually think it is getting healthier.
#
People are, you know, like now there are home kitchens all over the place.
#
Like in Bombay, I order from this home kitchen, which will give,
#
you know, Naga pork stew.
#
And wow, what's it called?
#
It's I'll link it from the show notes.
#
It's called the slow food something.
#
But and then there are many home kitchens like this,
#
which will specialize in a handful of things and do it really well.
#
Yeah. I mean, to get Naga pork stew in Bombay is amazing.
#
You don't even get it in Delhi.
#
I think. Yeah, Kerala beef chili and all that.
#
Kerala, you get a lot of good Kerala food in Delhi.
#
There's this Baha Belli and yeah, they do good food.
#
Yeah. Savya Rasa does great South Indian food.
#
And there's another the Goa Southern does good Goan food.
#
I don't know if you tried it.
#
There's a small restaurant.
#
I don't know if it still exists.
#
Can't remember what it's called.
#
But there is a lot of then there's this place called Jamun
#
that does in Lodi Colony Market that does good regional food as well.
#
I think regional food is having a bit of a revival.
#
So you mentioned earlier that you did not bond with Veer over food.
#
So can I ask what what did you bond about?
#
Like how what was the trajectory of that?
#
If you don't mind talking about it?
#
Yeah, I think, you know, he was my boss to begin with.
#
So for many years, you know, it was a very we had a very collegial atmosphere
#
in in Sunday, like there was no big hierarchy.
#
Like everybody called Veer, Veer.
#
It wasn't like Sir or Mr. Sanghvi or whatever.
#
And he was pretty young for an editor.
#
Yeah, he was he was like 31, 32 at that point.
#
So he was pretty young, too.
#
We bonded over books, writing, reading,
#
you know, that kind of thing.
#
It wasn't a food, wasn't really a big thing because, hey,
#
there wasn't very much food happening in Calcutta where we were.
#
I mean, the biggest thing happened in Calcutta was the Taj opening
#
and, you know, the restaurants over there.
#
Otherwise, I mean, you know, Calcutta, it was basically Amber
#
where we used to go to for kebabs and naans.
#
And there used to be this little junkie Chinese place
#
next to our AVP office called Chungwa where all the AVP guys used to hang out
#
and have chop suey and hot and sour soup and stuff like that.
#
So food, there wasn't a big food scene anyway.
#
It was a very different Calcutta in those days.
#
The big spot was maybe getting Armenia biryani
#
ordered into office and eating that or something.
#
So food wasn't a big thing.
#
But I think we just had the same interests.
#
I mean, we both like reading, we both like writing.
#
We had the same sort of interests.
#
And, you know, when you work together, you kind of form a bond.
#
So I think that's basically what it was.
#
It wasn't like any particular thing that bonded us together.
#
We're just sort of working together.
#
That becomes friendship, that becomes romance.
#
Yeah, yeah, I think it's a progression.
#
It's not like a coup de foudre that you suddenly turn up and you say, oh, wow,
#
this is it. It wasn't like that.
#
And, you know, there's a beautiful essay I post,
#
I sort of linked to recently on Twitter by a friend of mine, Samarth Bansal,
#
who's been a guest on the show as well.
#
And he's in his late 20s and he talks about the whole dating game for him,
#
you know, using these apps and kind of figuring out what one has to do,
#
how one dances this particular dance.
#
And the modern world is like so much more complicated and all of that.
#
And in a sense, we are the transitional generation,
#
you know, that we grew up on that side of the line.
#
And now, you know, we are sort of onlookers on this side of the line.
#
And what are your thoughts about the way this kind of world?
#
Gosh, I wouldn't want to be young now.
#
You don't want to be. Oh, my God, no way.
#
These dating apps are horrific, man.
#
I mean, would you want to be part of this?
#
It sounds horrendous because it sounds horrendous to me, frankly.
#
I mean, first of all, it's extremely transactional, isn't it?
#
Like, I mean, there is no gradual progression at all.
#
Like in the old days, you met somebody through a friend
#
or you met somebody in college.
#
And it was like a gradual process of discovering each other,
#
getting to know each other.
#
But it's a lot of pressure meeting somebody on a date date, like,
#
you know, for the first time, what conversation do you have?
#
Which which part of yourself do you project?
#
I mean, it's too much pressure. I don't want to do it.
#
Yeah, Samarth has these lovely lines where he talks about how for men,
#
dating today is like dying of thirst in the desert, not a drop of water in sight.
#
And for women, it's like dying of thirst in the oceans.
#
Water is everywhere, but it's mostly toxic and full of salt.
#
Yeah. So maybe someday I should have him back on the show to discuss that.
#
Have you been on dating app ever?
#
I mean, my time is gone.
#
So let's talk about journalism, because even there,
#
you sort of began in one era and ended up in another era entirely today.
#
So tell me about how the world started changing,
#
you know, from your vantage point, did it require a mental adjustment
#
that suddenly you're in one kind of world where there's a certain way
#
that the world works as a form that journalism takes,
#
that there are editors and those editors have to also be mentors at the same time.
#
There's a certain there's certain kind of journalistic values in place,
#
And then the whole game changes where today, I would argue,
#
the mainstream is completely irrelevant.
#
And, you know, the incentives of newsrooms have changed the way
#
the way we consume information, the way we discover information.
#
Everything has changed.
#
Yeah, you're very right.
#
In fact, when we when we started out, there were only a few legacy
#
you know, newspapers and magazines in the market.
#
So in a sense, today we have far more democratization of the news space
#
because you don't need those huge resources to come into the news space.
#
You can still come in with maybe a YouTube channel or you can come in.
#
So in some ways, I think it's a positive thing because more people have a voice.
#
So you have a multiplicity of viewpoints that are coming into the mainstream.
#
When I started off in journalism, there was what?
#
In Calcutta, there was the Statesman and the Telegraph.
#
In Delhi, it was Times of India and Hindustan Times.
#
In the south, it was Hindu.
#
Bombay was basically Times of India.
#
Hindustan Times didn't exist in Bombay in those days.
#
And magazines, there was Sunday, India Today and maybe The Week.
#
But Week wasn't really that popular or anything.
#
So I think the kind of choices that we have today
#
in terms of what media you want to consume are certainly much larger.
#
I'm not sure that they're much better as a consequence,
#
because you have to be far more discerning about what you want to consume.
#
Like, for instance, I have just stopped watching news TV
#
because I feel that it's a complete waste of time.
#
I don't learn anything from it.
#
There was a time when I used to watch a bit of NDTV
#
just to get a sense of what was happening in the country.
#
But now I find you don't even get news stories any longer.
#
It's just basically debate shows.
#
It's like a talk radio with four people on the screen.
#
It's narrative battles.
#
You can kind of predict what everyone is going to say.
#
So I think you just have to choose what you want to do,
#
because there's enough new digital voices coming up
#
that are actually doing much fresher and much more honest journalism,
#
because they can afford to do it.
#
And two, there are not the pressures that legacy media has
#
You really have to be careful what they say and what you don't say,
#
which is quite sad in a sense.
#
But with digital voices like the wire or print, even, I think they get to do.
#
So in some ways, I think I don't think we should knock the fact
#
that more people are in the marketplace.
#
I think it's good that there are more people in the media, media scrum.
#
And it's healthy in a way that people are getting a choice to do this.
#
And certainly, Hindi journalism has really gone
#
the much, much better than it was before in terms of reach
#
and in terms of, you know, what it used to be.
#
So I find it quite hopeful in a sense than what it used to be.
#
No, I mean, we would not be sitting here and talking
#
if this change hadn't happened, because, you know, if I were to pitch my show
#
to any conventional mainstream outlet 20 years ago, they would have laughed me
#
out of the room that what, you want to talk to someone for many hours?
#
And a lot of creators who are doing well today, if not literally,
#
all of them would never get past a gatekeeper.
#
What has also happened, though, is that in the 80s and the 90s,
#
there was a consensus on truth, a broad consensus, right?
#
You know, Sunday and India Today and Frontline may cover things a little separately.
#
And you know what the tilts were.
#
But you would broadly know that they're all relatively solid.
#
And, you know, there might be a difference in the viewpoint, but facts are facts.
#
And there is some fidelity to the truth.
#
Today, I think that that trust has vanished.
#
The mainstream has kind of dissipated.
#
And I think what that's also done is that the role
#
that curators used to play in that time, the role that perhaps people like
#
we used to play in that time, that no longer exists almost.
#
The search for truth has been replaced by narrative battles.
#
And I often wonder then that old school journalists like you guys,
#
you know, how do you sort of reconcile with that?
#
Because at one level, like you said, it's great that anybody can get into the game
#
and, you know, do things.
#
And that gives you guys an opportunity also to do interesting things and to experiment.
#
But at the same time, the sort of position that you had,
#
you know, on big fish in a small pond, in a sense, to use a very crude metaphor.
#
I can't really find a good one for this.
#
That's not exactly what I mean, but you know what I mean.
#
You know, and that's that's kind of changed.
#
And I'm just wondering that then at a human level, how does one come to terms with that?
#
That earlier there were just a few voices and you were one of those voices.
#
And it was largely collegial and other people might criticize you once in a while.
#
But today, on social media, especially, it's a free for all.
#
Suddenly, you can get 2000 retweets blasting you
#
for a misinterpretation of a word you might have used.
#
Right. And the world changes in that way.
#
And I would imagine that it can move people in different directions.
#
That one, you get angry and ossified and you're like in my times.
#
And, you know, like you pointed out, you have this lovely sort of acronym,
#
RW, remember when, right?
#
And you could get into that kind of mode or you can embrace this new world
#
with a certain kind of humility and say that it's great.
#
I love this young energy.
#
I'm going to use some of it myself.
#
You know, so, you know, I think when you talk about legacy
#
media and new new voices emerging,
#
I find even on the new platforms, the legacy media voices are still the strongest.
#
Like Shekhar Gupta will still have more people following him
#
and Ravish will have more people following him than, say, the younger,
#
younger lot of people, which is a consequence of the following
#
that they've built up over the years.
#
Now, maybe with demographic changes that may change 10 years down the line.
#
But I think the stronger voices on media are still the old voices.
#
You know, I don't see very many very strong voices emerging,
#
unless you have some examples, I can't think of any.
#
No, you're right. And Shekhar Gupta also has gotten there
#
by having the humility to say that I can't achieve what I achieved then in that form.
#
So I will do something different.
#
I will do a YouTube show and I will try this new thing.
#
So he's doing something different.
#
But I think it is possible to shift your following from one set of media to to the other.
#
I think it is possible.
#
But you have to be a little nimble and a little agile to be able to do it.
#
And I think not very many legacy media types have that agility to do it like Shekhar does.
#
He's managed to make that transition.
#
He's built up a huge following in this in this new thing.
#
So I think it's possible to do that.
#
And I think, you know, at the end of the day,
#
it doesn't pay to be snobbish and elitist and say that,
#
you know, because I have one hundred thousand followers, I am bigger than you.
#
It doesn't work like that.
#
I mean, everybody's voice is important.
#
That said, if somebody is rude and obnoxious, then that's not the point.
#
But having a debate with people, I'm all all for it.
#
Like a lot of people like, you know, I would count myself as a liberal.
#
A lot of liberals like me who will not, for instance,
#
follow a single right wing handle because they just don't want to engage with that,
#
which which I find is silly because you have to engage with people.
#
If you're a journalist, especially, you can't be in this little liberal elite
#
echo chamber and just listen and talk to the people who think exactly the way you do.
#
You may have your views and you may have your principles or whatever,
#
but there's no harm in just opening yourself up
#
and listening to what the other person has to say,
#
as long as they're not abusive and they're not trolling you or whatever.
#
So I am actually quite happy with the fact that the media has opened up
#
because I find that legacy media is a little bit stultified now.
#
It's a little bit old school or whatever.
#
It hasn't made that transition to this new era where people's attention spans are shorter.
#
You have to appeal to them in a certain way.
#
Like, I don't know very many young people who read newspapers any longer.
#
The only way they would read newspapers is if, for instance,
#
they see a link on Twitter or on Instagram or something and they'll read it.
#
But newspapers haven't made that transition.
#
So they think that you have to subscribe to the entire newspaper to read it.
#
Not many people want to do that.
#
So why not make it possible for them to pay something and read one piece?
#
Or, you know, they have to make that little bit of a mind shift,
#
you know, to be able to access the younger readership,
#
because I find that newspapers are really dying out
#
because the younger generation is really not interested in reading newspapers.
#
Magazines, I think, are dead anyway.
#
Yeah, I think for a moment I'm going to feel good because you have almost,
#
you know, used the term younger generation for me because I haven't read.
#
I stopped subscribing to newspapers when Covid started,
#
because at that time the people weren't delivering.
#
And then I realized I don't want to continue.
#
But I don't read them. We read them because he's old school.
#
So he reads all of them.
#
He gets like five or six newspapers.
#
But like I find I do most of my reading on my phone now.
#
I read. I like to think that I'm living in a parallel universe
#
because I read the NYT and Washington Post and London Times
#
and Telegraph in the Morning while he's reading Hindustan Times.
#
And I'm kind of thinking aloud at what happens with that form
#
of how you consume news also can change the person that you are.
#
And, you know, and in the case of you and we,
#
you've had that whole rounded experience, you've seen everything.
#
It doesn't matter in the case of a young person.
#
And it can matter in the sense that a 15 year old kid today
#
can begin his consumption of, say, YouTube
#
when somebody sends him this crazy right wing video and he watches that.
#
And then the algorithm takes over.
#
And then he's only fed that.
#
Then he's only fed that.
#
Like I once did this experiment where I wanted to understand the ultra right wing.
#
The guys who think, you know, Modi and Adityanath are letting them down.
#
Those kinds of sort of really hardcore.
#
Yeah. And just try and understand that what's going on there.
#
So I didn't want my regular YouTube algorithm to get messed up.
#
So I opened incognito window, new Gmail account.
#
And so I now have two YouTubes.
#
Oh, wow. And the thing is that there is no overlap between these YouTubes.
#
These are completely different worlds.
#
And the world that I get on that other YouTube that I opened for myself,
#
which a 15 year old kid may get, and that that may be the only world
#
he absolutely knows, right, where you you become a slave to the algorithm
#
without even realizing it.
#
While the the benefit of having a newspaper is that a newspaper
#
and most of our newspapers still will have a diversity of news
#
and a diversity of views.
#
And you'll be able to see different parts of the world in them.
#
And also, there will be at least a pretence at impartiality.
#
Whereas YouTube is very much one side or the other.
#
But, you know, a lot of young people like my niece's husband
#
the other day sent me a link that of a video of Dhruv Rati,
#
who is apparently very, very popular, you know,
#
doing something on Manipur or, you know, whatever, whatever.
#
So a lot of people are getting their political information really
#
from these videos rather than from television even.
#
You know, I think television viewership has also gone down
#
because people are tired of this format of constant shouting
#
and screaming at each other.
#
People have kind of moved away to digital media,
#
which is actually a huge opportunity, you know, for somebody to do something
#
It's a huge opportunity.
#
And like I haven't watched news television in some 10, 12 years.
#
Yeah, and my sense of YouTube is that I am glad that,
#
you know, the means of production are available to anyone.
#
Like I started a YouTube podcast recently with a friend of mine.
#
Episode five releases tomorrow after we kind of record this.
#
Though I find that there at the present moment, the way the ecosystem is,
#
is that you'll either go down a particular
#
direction and be part of the right wing algorithm or this whatever,
#
or you are functioning at a really shallow level.
#
And, you know, and Shekhar Gupta is, of course, an exception there.
#
And I'm glad that he kind of does.
#
But even Barkha's Mojo does well.
#
Barkha's Mojo does an amazing job.
#
More power to her for saying that I don't need television.
#
I can do YouTube. Yeah, that's that's huge.
#
You know, I mean, Suza does a great job as well.
#
I haven't seen. I must watch her.
#
I must. I haven't seen her.
#
She's she's got her own channel, is it?
#
Last I checked and certainly on Instagram, she's active and stuff like that.
#
I must invite her to the show.
#
Yeah, she's she's I saw the stand up she did.
#
I thought she was very good.
#
Yeah. Did you see the stand up?
#
She did a stand up because she wanted to challenge herself.
#
Are you ever going to do a stand up? No way.
#
What is some secret daydream you still have?
#
Secret daydream. Gosh, nothing really.
#
No. What's your daydream?
#
I have actually tried to make myself consciously stop daydreaming.
#
But I just like for the longest time, I wanted to write books
#
and not had the discipline to be able to do that.
#
And it's not even a daydream.
#
It's it's a legit sort of aspiration that I want to.
#
I'm trying to, but it's you know, the thing is that people look at me
#
from a distance and they say,
#
huh, every Monday, his scene unseen comes out.
#
And now every Friday, YouTube show comes out.
#
He must be so disciplined.
#
He teaches a writing course.
#
But actually, those are weekly deadlines. I do them.
#
But the things I really, really want to do deep inside,
#
there are no deadlines, there's nothing push external like that.
#
And I find it incredibly hard to sort of internally be able
#
to push myself to do that, which is where.
#
So write a contract, sign a contract with someone.
#
No, no, I have publisher and all that.
#
The brilliant Kartika Ji from West London, she has said will publish.
#
She said yes to every book idea I have given her.
#
But now you have to write it.
#
Now I have to write it.
#
So you set a time for it.
#
I've done all those tricks.
#
You know, in my writing course,
#
actually, my fourth webinar is entirely about process, discipline, habits.
#
But you can't do it yourself.
#
Yeah. And I'm mentally thinking when I teach that class,
#
that, you know, do as I say, don't do as I do.
#
But, you know, there are periods when when your creativity is just fallow.
#
Like there are times when you feel like the words are not coming
#
or the ideas are not clicking.
#
You just have to give yourself a break and then go back to it.
#
Tell me about yourself.
#
Tell me about, you know, you've written you had written a book in 2007.
#
Yeah, that was nonfiction.
#
But now you've written these two fiction exciting novels.
#
So I quite enjoyed doing that, actually.
#
The first one I did, Racecourse wrote that, to be honest, was not my idea.
#
That was David Davida's idea.
#
He called me and asked to meet me.
#
We met at the Hyatt and we had this discussion and he said he wanted me.
#
He had two ideas, which is that he wanted me to do
#
a kind of novel set in Delhi, you know, high society and, you know, that kind of thing,
#
which frankly didn't appeal to me that much because it seems very cliched, you know,
#
that same old high society nonsense.
#
And then he said the other thing is you do something set in the world of politics,
#
which was exciting for me because, you know, there are so many things
#
that you have information that you've gathered over the years,
#
which you've not really used.
#
And it's just floating around in your mind somewhere.
#
And you feel that you can put it in a novel.
#
And so I said I'd do that.
#
And then I signed this with him.
#
And then I thought, if I'm going to do a political novel,
#
I can't just do it as a normal, you know, politics and politicking and all.
#
I want to make it more like a suspense thriller kind of thing.
#
So I decided to start it with the prime minister being assassinated.
#
So then the assassination becomes a plot point that you're trying to solve.
#
So it becomes almost like a murder mystery.
#
So the politics is almost incidental.
#
It's not like the main.
#
It's just the milieu in which this thing happens.
#
And I really enjoyed writing that book because I could draw on my memories
#
and my experiences of political reporting and put it in.
#
And I put in things like a general election.
#
So I could put in things of rallies and, you know, all the stuff that I had done.
#
And I really enjoyed that book.
#
Then after I had done that, I decided to do a sequel
#
because I'd left it hanging in the middle.
#
And for this one, I went with Penguin rather than Aleph.
#
So I changed publishers and I wanted to do a very different style of book.
#
I mean, that was like a more character driven and more cerebral novelist.
#
And I wanted to do a proper page turner this time.
#
So that was fun to do because you're doing something a little different.
#
The genre is a little different.
#
Otherwise, you get stuck in that, you know,
#
rut of writing the same novel over and over again.
#
So I enjoyed doing that.
#
And now I'm writing a spy novel, which I'm really excited about
#
because I'm bringing back all the memories of when I was interviewed by Raw.
#
And all the stuff that could have been I'm writing about in my book now.
#
I'm actually now that, you know, you planted that thought in my head.
#
I'm wondering if you did join Raw at that point and you're still playing that game.
#
Your latest assignment, infiltrate the scene in the unseen.
#
Tell me about the discipline, because this is not really a trivial task
#
to write a couple of books like this and, you know, to slightly change the tone
#
and the voice and all of that, as you did.
#
And you mentioned that Covid helped you write, Madam Prime Minister.
#
Yeah. But, you know, it's it's actually the hardest thing I've ever done.
#
Because journalism is easy in a sense.
#
And columns are easy because there's a certain subject.
#
You have the information, you just put it together and, you know, you you can do it.
#
But fiction means you actually generating the ideas in your imagination.
#
It's not something you're picking up from real life and just putting in a book or whatever.
#
And plus, you have to have character development.
#
You have to find a voice for every different character.
#
They can't sound alike.
#
They should speak differently.
#
The voice patterns have to change.
#
So it is tough, but I just find it easy.
#
The way I do it is that I have the basic outline in mind what what story is going to be.
#
I have a basic breakup of chapters.
#
This is what happens in chapter one, two, three.
#
I mean, obviously, things change in the middle.
#
It's not like set in stone or anything.
#
And I find that once I have that essential scaffolding in place,
#
then I can say, OK, like first chapter, I'm going to spend like two weeks just working on it.
#
And I find that helps me because then I'm not thinking of the whole book.
#
I'm just thinking I have to do these five thousand words in two weeks, which is a doable task.
#
So if I were to start thinking that I have to write a hundred thousand words for the book,
#
I would be overwhelmed.
#
But as long as I'm just thinking about doing that one chapter, I can cope.
#
And then when I'm done with that, then I can move on and do the next five thousand words.
#
And I can work like that.
#
But if I were to try and do it at one go and not break it up, I would find it very tough.
#
So my friend Ajay Shah sometimes repeatedly, in fact, talks about how Tolstoy would write his books.
#
And he says that, you know, when Tolstoy wrote War and Peace,
#
his family reported that he was there, but he was not present.
#
He was walking around the house all day, lost in the world of the book.
#
And sometimes he would be weeping and sometimes he would be laughing.
#
But he's lost in the world of the book.
#
I don't spend more than three hours or four hours writing in a day,
#
because beyond that, I can't really concentrate.
#
My target is to do about 750 to a thousand words.
#
But sometimes even if I do 500, that's fine.
#
But I write during the afternoon when like there's nobody around.
#
There's like, so I would write from, say, maybe two to six or three to seven or whatever.
#
And beyond that, my brain doesn't function.
#
I can't do more than that.
#
But I think if you do that much every day, you're fine.
#
I don't think you need to do more.
#
A lot of writers say they like to write first thing in the morning when they are fresh.
#
I'm not a morning person.
#
I'm really not a morning person.
#
You've written a great column also about owls versus larks.
#
And I'm an owl like you.
#
And the world just treats us so badly.
#
It's like they pass moral judgment for waking up late.
#
That's our psychodian rhythm.
#
Yeah, the other day I was staying over at a friend's house and I asked him,
#
hey, what time do you wake up?
#
And he said, I wake up late.
#
And I was like damn relieved.
#
And then he said, I'll wake up by 730.
#
And I'm like, boss, boss.
#
June Didion once said, I don't know what I think until I write it down.
#
And I did a great episode with Amitav Kumar where he was raving about the habit of journaling.
#
And since then, I have come to recommend it to all my writing students.
#
Many of them have done it to great benefit.
#
And the idea simply being that every time that you sit down and write,
#
it deepens your engagement with the world because you're thinking about the world and so on.
#
But in a sense, you're also shaping yourself
#
every time you kind of sit down and write.
#
And you've done really different kinds of writing in the sense that you have your columns.
#
And for your columns, I'm guessing you have a weekly deadline.
#
And I'm guessing if Thursday is the deadline, by Tuesday, your mind is ticking over.
#
You kind of shortlist what you're going to write about and you write it.
#
You've had a rich life as a reporter, as an editor.
#
Now these two books, you know, to what extent do you feel that,
#
you know, writing has helped shape you or understand yourself better?
#
Did these two books play a part in that? What was it like?
#
I don't know if it's shaped me. I wouldn't say that, no.
#
I think they were books that I really needed to write because I wanted to
#
use all that information that I had inside me, which I hadn't.
#
You know, there's so many things you pick up in politics,
#
which you can't really write about because it's at the level of gossip.
#
You can't really do it because of libel laws or whatever,
#
but you can always put it in a book and write it up as fiction.
#
So I think they were like books that I really wanted to write to get that out of it.
#
But I don't think that they've shaped me in any sense.
#
I think my column has probably shaped me more than the fiction,
#
because the column I've been doing for like 20 years now.
#
So it's been a long time and it's kind of evolved.
#
It's had, you know, the voice has evolved as I've grown older.
#
So I think the column is far more something that's shaped me than the book.
#
It's often deliciously introspective, but also with such a casual tone
#
that is very easy to relate to it. It's not ponderous.
#
Parumita Vohra uses this great term, men with beards, ponderous people giving gyan on the world.
#
And she doesn't mean it literally, so if Veer is listening to this,
#
I don't think you're meant by this.
#
Your writing is like really friendly and accessible.
#
But at the same time, I sort of disagree about the superficial candor.
#
It's more than superficial.
#
I find a lot of depth in it.
#
I've cited the columns that I really liked about photographs and about various other,
#
you know, even an Instagram post.
#
I think there was one Instagram post where you posted a picture of your mom
#
and your grandmom or something.
#
And, you know, even little touches like that can really be evocative.
#
I was struck by the fact that you said when you were thinking about your first book,
#
you know, David said that, hey, you know, one option is South Delhi and,
#
you know, whatever the milu that you're in and all of that.
#
And you said, na, na, ghisapita, like, why should I write about that?
#
And in this lovely column you wrote recently, you spoke about this
#
surprisingly restrained wedding you attended, you know,
#
where there wasn't so much shosha, there weren't celebrities for the sake of it.
#
The bride's mom was greeting everyone while they came and while they went.
#
And just in that contrast itself, by talking about the contrast,
#
you were also implicitly painting a picture of a certain kind of wedding
#
and a certain kind of world.
#
And, you know, Shriyana Bhattacharya in her book Desperately Seeking,
#
Shah Rukh wrote really eloquently about it.
#
And in her episode with me, she spoke about it.
#
She has this memorable phrase about how so much of the dating game,
#
and I think this is very much in a South Delhi context,
#
involves men with unwarranted self-confidence and women with unwarranted self-doubt.
#
And, you know, that also strikes me as just being, I can't speak for South Delhi,
#
but certainly in South Bombay, you know, one can see those kind of vibes
#
and so on and so forth.
#
And while you are very much a part of this world of the English-speaking elites,
#
Lutyens Delhi, as it were, you know, the Khan Market liberals.
#
Yeah, the Khan Market gang, yeah.
#
But at the same time, in your work, especially in your early political reporting with Sunday,
#
where you've gone around the country with different politicians
#
and gone to their constituencies with them, travelled with them, etc., etc.
#
And at the same time, you've also then come to Bombay and covered the film world,
#
not just, you know, the glamour, etc., etc.,
#
but also behind the scenes and the frustrations and all of that.
#
So you've seen all those different Indias,
#
which typically would be unseen for a lot of people from, you know,
#
who belong to the Lutyens elite, as it were.
#
So what part do you think has that played in the way that you think about the world?
#
And when you look at people around you who may not have had
#
perhaps a good fortune of that kind of exposure,
#
do you feel that there are layers that you see that they don't see
#
and that they would be better off seeing it, perhaps?
#
You know, I think what happens when...
#
I think it's also a consequence of being a journalist
#
that you're exposed to so many different people.
#
Like when you're young, you meet famous people or whatever.
#
In a sense, you lose that sense of awe, you know,
#
that sense of awe that people have about celebrities,
#
that they are very famous, they do this and that.
#
A lot of people have that sense of awe.
#
But when you see them up close and you interview them or whatever,
#
you realize that they're just people like you and me, you know,
#
that sense of looking up to people or idolizing people
#
or being in awe of people that just goes away.
#
I think that's one of the biggest advantages that you have as a journalist,
#
that, you know, you've seen people up close
#
and you've seen them maybe at their worst and, you know, whatever.
#
So you kind of are... or whatever.
#
And that kind of gives you a certain degree of...
#
I don't know whether I should call it confidence or security
#
or whatever you want to call it,
#
but I really don't understand how people get so insecure
#
about wanting to drive the right car, for instance,
#
or wanting, you know, like you drive into a Taj,
#
you have to be seen getting out of a Mercedes.
#
I don't understand that.
#
How does it matter what car you drive?
#
But there are people who are obsessed with it
#
in this Lachhan's Delhi world, maybe even in South Bombay.
#
I mean, I'm not that familiar with South Bombay.
#
I'm sure it's the same.
#
There are people who get obsessed with what your address is, you know,
#
that they will want to stay in like the right part of town
#
and not be seen as coming from the wrong side of the tracks or whatever.
#
I really don't get that, you know, because...
#
And to be honest with you, though people say this about Delhi,
#
that people are very status conscious and people are very...
#
I moved to Delhi when I was about 29 or so,
#
when I joined The Telegraph, I moved to Delhi to live here.
#
I used to live in a Basati.
#
I used to drive a Mercedes.
#
Sorry, not a Mercedes, a Maruti.
#
I used to drive a Maruti.
#
And I never felt that anybody was looking down on me.
#
I met the richest people in the world.
#
I would interview them.
#
Some of them became friends.
#
Some of them are still my friends.
#
And I never felt the sense that they were looking down on me
#
because I earn much less than them
#
or because I lived in a small, you know, but I never felt that.
#
So I think half of it is also self kind of, you know, propelled
#
that you feel the sense of inferiority.
#
It's not that other people are making
#
because nobody can make you feel inferior without your permission.
#
It has to be something that comes from within you.
#
And I think as long as you have that sense of self
#
and you're secure in that sense of self,
#
it doesn't really matter whether you live in Lachhan's Delhi
#
or whether you live in Noida or whether you live in Gurgaon.
#
I don't think these things matter.
#
But people do kind of talk like that.
#
So I don't know what to say.
#
You mentioned, you know, driving.
#
Everybody wants to drive a particular kind of car and blah, blah, blah.
#
And you've also written a great column about how there was a celebrity chef
#
and he was wearing a particular kind of sneaker and you looked at his staff
#
and they're all wearing that particular kind of sneaker,
#
perhaps without realizing it, just different colors.
#
And I was reminded of this concept.
#
I've been really taken by as a frame to understand people over the last year.
#
Luke Burgess, who's been on my show recently,
#
he'd written this great book called Wanting,
#
where he spoke about Rene Girard's concept of mimetic desire.
#
Rene Girard was a philosopher of the last century
#
who was asked to teach a course on literature,
#
which was not his core subject, but he needed the money.
#
So he goes through this reading list of great books
#
and he comes to the conclusion that in all of them,
#
the main character wants something because somebody else wants it.
#
So it is what he calls a mimetic desire from which, you know,
#
Burgess introduced me to the frame of thick and thin desires,
#
where a thin desire is a mimetic desire.
#
You want it because somebody else wants it.
#
So it could be, hey, I want to drive a Mercedes.
#
Or, you know, if you're a young woman in India,
#
it might be I want to get married and have kids.
#
Not because you intrinsically do, but that's what is expected of you.
#
And those are thin desires.
#
And they can be intense.
#
That they're thin doesn't mean that they're not intense.
#
You might think that's the only thing you want.
#
Your life depends on that.
#
And then there are thick desires, which are intrinsic to you,
#
which have nothing to do with mimesis or copying others.
#
In your case, I imagine that walking in Sundar nursery,
#
walking among nature, looking at flowers,
#
is a manifestation of a thick desire, if not a thick desire in itself,
#
a desire for a particular vibe or a particular way of being.
#
And thin desires are all of these people wanting fancy cars,
#
wanting a particular kind of life and all of that.
#
And when I look back on my life and I realized that many of the things I wanted,
#
I wanted them for the wrong reasons.
#
And for example, even the desire to write.
#
I was chatting about this with Nilanjana Roy,
#
who did an episode here exactly a year ago.
#
And even the desire to write can have both thin and thick aspects to it,
#
where the thin aspect can be that I want validation.
#
I want to write a bestseller.
#
I want to win the Booker Prize.
#
Whereas the thicker desire could just be that I like writing.
#
I like telling stories.
#
I like getting into the head of a character or creating a universe.
#
And I'm wondering if you could reflect back on your life, for example.
#
Were there thin desires that when you look back, you're like,
#
hey, why did I ever want that?
#
And over time, has your becoming better acquainted with yourself?
#
And as you correctly said at the start of the show,
#
we can never truly know ourselves.
#
But has that process of being better acquainted with yourself
#
also helped you understand what are your thick desires
#
that maybe during COVID, you said you realized some of that
#
because all the extrinsic stuff went away?
#
I think writing would be a thick desire, definitely.
#
You know, it's a strange conundrum, actually, because
#
when I think about it, I love the concept of writing a book.
#
But when I actually get down to doing it,
#
But the thought of giving it up would make me unhappier.
#
But it's not like the act of writing is a great joy for me
#
It doesn't come that easily.
#
Writing a column comes easily.
#
I can finish it in an hour and a half or whatever.
#
But writing a book is really tough for me.
#
I really have to work at it.
#
I have to kind of motivate myself to keep doing it or whatever.
#
But it's something that I really, really want to do,
#
even though it's not terribly enjoyable in the moment.
#
then the sense of satisfaction I get from that
#
is far greater than I get from writing a column.
#
So it's a little bit more complicated
#
than just my feeling joy in writing.
#
I don't feel joy in writing.
#
I feel joy having written.
#
It only comes afterwards.
#
It's the same for all writers, which is bloody difficult.
#
There are a lot of people who just…
#
Someone like Shashi Tharoor, I don't know how he does it.
#
He writes these humongous books
#
while doing so much other stuff.
#
I mean, he really enjoys writing.
#
I don't think I could do that.
#
I don't have that prolific thing that he does.
#
Maybe he's cloned himself.
#
Or maybe he's from the future.
#
It's somewhere in a shed in his house.
#
There are like four Shashi Tharoors, two are writing books.
#
One is just learning new words from Aditya Zora.
#
I don't want to make fun of the guy.
#
He's been on your show.
#
One of my favorite quotes is by Annie Dillard.
#
How we spend our days is how we spend our lives.
#
And that to me is a profound truth.
#
Because often what happens is
#
we will spend our day doing one thing.
#
And in the grand narrative in our heads,
#
our lives are something else.
#
But the truth is that ultimately
#
how we spend our days is how we spend our lives.
#
It really boils down to our everyday habits and all of that.
#
So I want to ask you about
#
how you spend your days these days.
#
Apart from today where you've been really kind enough
#
to do what you say is your first podcast.
#
It's an outlier event in your life.
#
Thank you so much for that.
#
how do you spend your days
#
and is there something you would like to change about that?
#
You know, my days are not...
#
I mean, one varies a lot from the other.
#
I spend a lot of time reading
#
because I find that, you know, like at the moment
#
I'm not writing my book
#
because I'm going through this fallow phase.
#
So I'm trying to inspire myself by reading.
#
Because I find if I read good books
#
then I feel inspired to go back to my own.
#
So I spend a lot of time reading.
#
So as I said, I'm a late riser.
#
And my mornings are basically for
#
what I call my media mornings.
#
I do all my newspaper reading
#
all on the phone, not physical newspapers or whatever.
#
My evenings are like the time
#
that I spend time in the kitchen.
#
I don't really do much cooking in the afternoon.
#
I like spending time cooking in the evening.
#
Maybe something very simple or, you know,
#
nothing very complicated,
#
maybe a pasta or a dal or whatever.
#
I like making dinner for ourselves.
#
Because we travel so much when we are in Delhi,
#
we like to eat at home.
#
So I don't mind going out for lunch,
#
but dinner I like to have at home
#
because I like that sense of
#
sitting down at the end of the day
#
and having a meal together.
#
And I watch a lot of streaming services as well
#
And my writing, as I told you,
#
happens in the afternoon,
#
which is when I do most of my work
#
because, you know, then everybody's gone off
#
to do their own things.
#
And so I'm alone at home.
#
There's no distraction.
#
Almost like your mother's two to four.
#
Yes, actually, yeah, quite it is.
#
So I have that little bit of dead time
#
so which is when I can concentrate
#
I can't do this thing that people do like,
#
you know, I'm going to take two months off
#
and write a book and just write the book.
#
It has to be part of my everyday experience.
#
Tell me about friendships.
#
Like you've pointed out that
#
in one of the advantages of Loretto
#
and therefore the male gaze being absent,
#
you don't have to project yourselves
#
in a particular way for boys.
#
That particular anxiety is missing.
#
And that also was, you know,
#
fertile ground for the development
#
And what I've also noticed is that
#
female friendships tend to inhabit
#
a deeper, more intimate space
#
than male friendships do.
#
Male friendships are more at a surface level
#
and typically you'll talk Bollywood,
#
you'll talk cricket, you'll do whatever.
#
But it can sometimes be superficial,
#
you know, unless you intentionally,
#
like I do, try to make it
#
a little more than that.
#
But female friendships,
#
a sisterhood as it were,
#
can be deep, can sustain you
#
You've also got a great column on friendships
#
where you talk about casual friends,
#
lunch friends, dinner friends,
#
and you've got all these categories.
#
Presume all your friends
#
after reading that column
#
Seema, you didn't invite me for dinner.
#
I am not in that esteemed category.
#
But tell me a bit about
#
the friendships in your life.
#
Do you make an effort to keep them going?
#
You know, I have a lot of female friends.
#
I'm basically a girl's girl.
#
I don't have that many male friends.
#
I bond more with women than I do with men.
#
And so from my school days,
#
actually, I was telling you about
#
who we used to go when we were children
#
going out exploring the neighborhood.
#
So she lives in Cal still
#
and we're still close friends.
#
And I just went down to Cal
#
So she's somebody who's known me
#
from the time I was born
#
because she's like a year older than me.
#
She's Kavita Walia now.
#
But in my mind, she's Kavita Bagga.
#
But her pet name is Sweety.
#
And so I still call her Sweety.
#
In my mind, she's still that.
#
Everybody else calls her Kavita.
#
And so, you know, the kind of memories
#
we have together of growing up
#
and childhood memories and going to school.
#
In fact, even though she's a year older than me,
#
we both went to school on the same day.
#
Like we entered school.
#
I still remember the two of us holding hands
#
and walking into the school
#
and feeling very trepidatious
#
about what was going to happen.
#
But we still had each other.
#
So we were like a little bit kind of confident about it.
#
So I'm still friends with her.
#
My college friends, most of them have moved out
#
and they live abroad and things.
#
So, I mean, I'm in touch with them,
#
but I don't really meet them that often or anything.
#
Though the other day in Khan Market,
#
I was having lunch with another friend
#
and suddenly two girls who I went to college with
#
were at the next table.
#
And like we were so hyper excited to see each other.
#
I think we brought the restaurant down
#
with us squealing and shouting.
#
But most of my friends are actually
#
from the time I started working,
#
from the time I started working in Sunday
#
and then with Telegraph.
#
I mean, those are people who I'm still friends with,
#
who started off as work friends,
#
but they are still my friends.
#
And then I made another set of friends
#
So I have like, you know, different sets of friends.
#
Some are journalistic friends,
#
some are like wives of husbands
#
who Veer is friendly with.
#
So we have these different little groups,
#
not all of them intermingle,
#
but I have my little friendships.
#
And we always make it a point to, you know,
#
meet up at least once in a month or whatever
#
to have lunch or just to have a coffee
#
if they don't have time for lunch.
#
And then of course there's WhatsApp.
#
So there's a lot of WhatsApping going around.
#
So actually I'm good with friendships.
#
One of the sort of dilemmas
#
I face more and more in these times
#
is how engaged to be with the world,
#
especially with what is happening in our country.
#
And that's my question for you also,
#
that at one level as a journalist,
#
as someone who's in fact started off covering politics,
#
seeing the political space so intimately,
#
seeing how that's happened.
#
At one level, you've been a really engaged citizen
#
just through your journalism to begin with, right?
#
And at another level, I also feel really strongly sometimes
#
the temptation to just step back from it,
#
partly because it is so depressing,
#
partly because it just seems pointless.
#
You know, there is sort of this famous phrase
#
from Kashi Nath Singh in Kashi Kasi.
#
I'll give a family-friendly version of it.
#
And sometimes I think I'm happy with my harmonia
#
and just trying to sort of focus on the work that I do.
#
And of course, even the work that I do is engaged
#
and I'm playing the long game.
#
But the temptation also is that it almost,
#
one has a certain amount of emotional energy
#
and it almost becomes a choice
#
between caring about the country
#
and just working on self-actualization,
#
whatever that might mean.
#
Like, do I want to read five angry columns
#
about something I myself am angry about?
#
Or do I just want to sit quietly amid nature
#
and read a few nice poems and all of that?
#
Over the years, how have you dealt with that?
#
To be honest, I think I have retreated a bit
#
from the political space because it's depressing.
#
you feel like there's not much you can do about it.
#
But, you know, there are some things
#
that still touch you and anger you,
#
like this whole Manipur thing,
#
which kind of bring you back into the space,
#
even though you don't really want to be in it.
#
But it's a very depressing situation
#
because you feel that your views or your opinions
#
account for nothing in this country,
#
which is a depressing place to be in.
#
Like, you feel that people who think like you,
#
it's a shrinking space, we don't really matter.
#
The country has moved in a different direction,
#
And it's hard to come to terms with,
#
not just as a journalist,
#
it's hard to come to terms with.
#
So, you know, I've taken up a lot of your time.
#
and hopefully we can do it again sometime.
#
I'll end with a standard question I ask all my guests.
#
For my benefit and for the benefit of all my listeners,
#
recommend some books, films, music,
#
any kind of art at all that means a lot to you,
#
and you love it so much that you want to share it with everyone.
#
I'm not a big one for music,
#
so I'll tell you about films.
#
And which films would I recommend,
#
which have meant a lot to me?
#
What was the last film that made you cry?
#
No, I haven't seen any movies like that.
#
You know, my problem is that all the movies I go and see in film halls
#
are the ones that are all about superheroes and,
#
you know, that kind of thing,
#
which are not terribly moving, unfortunately.
#
The spectacle films are not the intimate dramas.
#
Yeah, it's quite sad, actually.
#
No, I can't think of any.
#
But I think I would recommend that people watch Gohra,
#
which was a really amazing show.
#
I was telling you that it really resonated with me
#
because it's set in Punjab and that whole milieu was really...
#
The other streaming show I really like is a very sweet thing called Kathal,
#
which is about the theft of kathals from this politician's house in UP or whatever,
#
and how the police tries to retrieve them.
#
It's actually almost like a dark satire, but it's a great fun thing.
#
What else have I been watching?
#
I was recommending to you that you should watch West Wing,
#
because if you're into politics or you're interested in politics,
#
it's probably one of the better streaming things to watch.
#
Books, my God, I love reading a lot of spy novels,
#
and I don't know if you read him, there's this author called Daniel Silva.
#
So he's done this whole series of books.
#
He's probably done 20 by now,
#
and the hero is a man called Gabriel Alon,
#
who is an Israeli art restorer who doubles as an assassin for Mossad,
#
and it's basically his journey through life.
#
He starts off as one of the people in Munich where those Israelis were kidnapped,
#
and then Israel started this whole thing of tracking them down and killing them one by one.
#
So in the books, he's one of the people who is tasked with killing them one by one,
#
and then with every book, he's given a different task to do by his masters,
#
and eventually ends up becoming the head of Mossad himself.
#
At the moment, he's now retired and back in Venice working as an art restorer.
#
So it's really fun watching the arc of his life as it goes.
#
And what I like about it is that they don't portray Israel as the all-knowing and all-seeing thing.
#
There are all these gray things with Palestinians,
#
and there are gray areas as well in terms of politics.
#
It's a very well-written and very kind of balanced narrative of the region, which is good fun.
#
So those are the things I like.
#
And apart from that, I love reading Claire McIntosh.
#
I'm afraid I haven't read her either, but you're giving me a lot to discover.
#
I like doing these little book recommendations in my column.
#
I do it twice a year for summer reading and winter reading.
#
And so S.J. Bennett, which I told you about, where the Queen Elizabeth plays a detective,
#
those are good fun reads.
#
Serious books, my gosh, I don't know.
#
These are all serious books, are you object to that?
#
I mean, all books are serious.
#
And you know, one of the best books I've read is actually by Elizabeth Jane Howard.
#
They're called the Cazalot Chronicles.
#
And there are four books in the series,
#
and it tells the story of this kind of upper middle class British family
#
from the kind of start, before the war and then the war happens and then the post-war years
#
and how their fortunes fluctuate during that period.
#
So the best pieces of writing.
#
It's one of her best books, certainly.
#
I can't wait to go out and read all of these.
#
Seema, this was such a pleasure.
#
Thank you for having me.
#
If you enjoyed listening to this conversation, check out the show notes.
#
Enter Abit Holes at will.
#
Do go to your nearest bookstore online or offline and buy all of Seema's books.
#
All of them, all three of them.
#
You can follow her on Twitter at Seema Goswami.
#
You can follow me on Twitter at Amit Verma, A-M-I-T-V-A-R-M-A.
#
You can browse past episodes of The Scene and the Unseen at sceneunseen.in.
#
Thank you for listening.
#
Did you enjoy this episode of The Scene and the Unseen?
#
If so, would you like to support the production of the show?
#
You can go over to sceneunseen.in slash support
#
and contribute any amount you like to keep this podcast alive and kicking.